Search

Automated insulin delivery aims to lower treatment burden and improve quality of life as well as glycemic outcomes. We present sub-study data from a dual-center, randomized, open-label, two-sequence crossover study in automated insulin delivery naive users, comparing Medtronic MiniMed® Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop (AHCL) to Sensor Augmented Pump therapy with Predictive Low Glucose Management (SAP + PLGM). At the end of each 4-week intervention, impacts on quality of life, sleep and treatment satisfaction were compared using seven age-appropriate validated questionnaires given to patients or caregivers. 59/60 people completed the study (mean age 23.3 ± 14.4yrs). Statistically significant differences favoring AHCL were demonstrated in several scales (data shown as mean ± SE). In adults (≥ 18yrs), technology satisfaction favored AHCL over PLGM as shown by a higher score in the DTSQs during AHCL (n = 28) vs SAP + PLGM (n = 29) (30.9 ± 0.7 vs 27.9 ± 0.7, p = 0.004) and DTSQc AHCL (n = 29) vs SAP + PLGM (n = 30) (11.7 ± 0.9 vs 9.2 ± 0.8, p = 0.032). Adolescents (aged 13–17yrs) also showed a higher DTSQc score during AHCL (n = 16) versus SAP + PLGM (n = 15) (14.8 ± 0.7 vs 12.1 ± 0.8, p = 0.024). The DTQ “change” score (n = 59) favored AHCL over SAP + PLGM (3.5 ± 0.0 vs 3.3 ± 0.0, p 16 years (n = 36) and demonstrated improved sleep quality during AHCL vs SAP + PLGM (4.8 ± 0.3 vs 5.7 ± 0.3, p = 0.048) with a total score > 5 indicating poor quality sleep. These data suggest that AHCL compared to SAP + PLGM mode has the potential to increase treatment satisfaction and improve subjective sleep quality in adolescents and adults with T1D.

Automated insulin delivery aims to lower treatment burden and improve quality of life as well as glycemic outcomes.We present sub-study data from a dual-center, randomized, open-label, two-sequence crossover study in automated insulin delivery naïve users, comparing Medtronic MiniMed® Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop (AHCL) to Sensor Augmented Pump therapy with Predictive Low Glucose Management (SAP + PLGM). At the end of each 4-week intervention, impacts on quality of life, sleep and treatment satisfaction were compared using seven age-appropriate validated questionnaires given to patients or caregivers.59/60 people completed the study (mean age 23.3 ± 14.4yrs). Statistically significant differences favoring AHCL were demonstrated in several scales (data shown as mean ± SE). In adults (≥ 18yrs), technology satisfaction favored AHCL over PLGM as shown by a higher score in the DTSQs during AHCL (n = 28) vs SAP + PLGM (n = 29) (30.9 ± 0.7 vs 27.9 ± 0.7, p = 0.004) and DTSQc AHCL (n = 29) vs SAP + PLGM (n = 30) (11.7 ± 0.9 vs 9.2 ± 0.8, p = 0.032). Adolescents (aged 13-17yrs) also showed a higher DTSQc score during AHCL (n = 16) versus SAP + PLGM (n = 15) (14.8 ± 0.7 vs 12.1 ± 0.8, p = 0.024). The DTQ "change" score (n = 59) favored AHCL over SAP + PLGM (3.5 ± 0.0 vs 3.3 ± 0.0, p 0.001). PSQI was completed in those 16 years (n = 36) and demonstrated improved sleep quality during AHCL vs SAP + PLGM (4.8 ± 0.3 vs 5.7 ± 0.3, p = 0.048) with a total score 5 indicating poor quality sleep.These data suggest that AHCL compared to SAP + PLGM mode has the potential to increase treatment satisfaction and improve subjective sleep quality in adolescents and adults with T1D.

Background: Automated insulin delivery aims to lower treatment burden and improve quality of life as well as glycemic outcomes. Methods: This dual-centre, randomized, open-label, two-sequence cross-over study in automated insulin delivery naïve users, compared Medtronic Minimed® Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop (AHCL) to Sensor Augmented Pump therapy with Predictive Low Glucose Management (SAP+PLGM). At the end of each 4 week intervention impacts on quality of life were compared using age-appropriate scales: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status and change (DTSQs and DTSQc), Diabetes Technology Questionnaire (DTQ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), World Health Organisation-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), Hypoglycemic Fear Survey (HFS-II) and Hypoglycemia Confidence Scale (HCS). Results: 59/60 people completed the study (mean age 23.3±14.4yrs). Statistically significant differences favouring AHCL were demonstrated in several scales (data shown as mean±SE). Technology satisfaction favoured AHCL over PLGM as shown by a higher score in the DTSQs during AHCL (n=28) vs. SAP+PLGM (n=29) (30.9±0.7 vs. 27.9±0.7, p=0.004) and DTSQc AHCL (n=29) vs. SAP+PLGM (n=30) (11.7±0.9 vs. 9.2±0.8, p=0.032) in adults. Adolescents also showed a higher DTSQc score during AHCL (n=16) vs. SAP+PLGM (n=15) (14.8±0.7 vs. 12.1±0.8, p=0.024). The DTQ “change” score (n=59) favoured AHCL over SAP+ PLGM (3.5±0.0 vs. 3.3±0.0, p 5 indicating poor quality sleep. No differences were found in the other scales. Conclusion: The findings from this RCT suggest AHCL compared to SAP + PLGM mode has the potential to increase treatment satisfaction and improve subjective sleep quality in adolescents and adults with T1D. Disclosure O. Collyns: None. R. Meier: None. Z. Betts: None. D. Chan: None. C. Frampton: None. C.M. Frewen: None. B. Galland: None. N. Hewapathirana: Other Relationship; Self; Sanofi. S. Jones: None. N. Kurtz: Employee; Self; Medtronic. J. Shin: Employee; Self; Medtronic. R. Vigersky: Employee; Self; Medtronic. B.J. Wheeler: Research Support; Self; Medtronic. M. de Bock: None.

Background: The Medtronic Minimed® Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop system (AHCL) includes an individualised algorithm with optional set points, automated correction bolus, and improved SmartGuard™ Auto Mode stability. Methods: This dual-centre, randomized, open-label, two-sequence cross-over study in automated insulin delivery naïve participants (aged 7-80yrs), compared AHCL to Sensor Augmented Pump therapy with Predictive Low Glucose Management (SAP+PLGM). Each study phase was 4 weeks, preceded by a 2-4 week run-in, and separated by 2-week washout. Results: 59/60 people completed the study (mean age 23.3±14.4yrs). Overall time in target range (TIR) (70-180mg/dL) favoured AHCL over SAP+PLGM by 12.5±8.5% (p180mg/dL). Mean SG improved in AHCL by 10.0±7.4mg/dL (p Conclusion: AHCL with automated correction bolus showed significant improvement in glucose control compared to PLGM, in a population with a younger mean age reflecting a challenging demographic. Disclosure O. Collyns: None. R. Meier: None. Z. Betts: None. D. Chan: None. C. Frampton: None. C.M. Frewen: None. B. Grosman: Employee; Self; Medtronic. N. Hewapathirana: Other Relationship; Self; Sanofi. S. Jones: None. N. Kurtz: Employee; Self; Medtronic. A. Roy: Employee; Self; Medtronic. J. Shin: Employee; Self; Medtronic. R. Vigersky: Employee; Self; Medtronic. B.J. Wheeler: Research Support; Self; Medtronic. M. de Bock: None.