Search

Background: Improvements in diagnostics and clinical care have allowed more women of childbearing age, suffering from neurological diseases, to safely have pregnancy, reducing peripartum complications. However, these patients remain at risk and are a constant challenge for anesthesiologists in the delivery room. Methods: To assess the type of anesthesiologic management performed for delivery in obstetric patients with preexisting neurological disease and who reported significant neurological symptoms during pregnancy, a retrospective observational study was carried out between 1 October 2008 and 30 September 2021. Results: Data from 49,202 pregnant women were assessed over 13 years; 239 pregnant women with a diagnosis of preexisting neurological disease and who reported significant neurological symptoms during pregnancy were identified (prevalence 0.49%). The main neurological disorders that affected pregnant women included vascular abnormalities and intracranial bleeding (N = 42, 17.6%), central nervous system tumors (N = 35, 14.6%), epilepsy and episodic and paroxysmal disorders of the central nervous system (N = 34, 14.2%), diseases of the neuromuscular junction and muscles (N = 26, 10.9%), demyelinating central nervous system diseases (N = 24, 10%). A total of 234 (97.9%) pregnant women with neurological disorders and significant neurological symptoms underwent cesarean section: 192 (80.3% of the total cesarean sections) were elective, 39 (16.3%) were urgent type 2 and 3; 3 (1.2%) were emergency cesarean sections. General anesthesia was administered to 73 patients (30.5%), while 166 patients (69.5%) were managed with neuraxial techniques. 2 patients who had had neuraxial block reported worsening neurological symptoms that required a change in medical therapy. Postoperative multiparameter monitoring was performed for less than 24 h in the recovery room for 226 patients (94.6%). 3 patients (1.2%) were observed with multiparameter monitoring in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) for more than 24 hours; 10 patients (4.2%) were moved to the postoperative intensive care unit (ICU). The median hospitalization duration was 4 days (with an interquartile difference of 3–6 days). Conclusions: In our experience, when neuraxial anesthesia was feasible, it proved to be a safe option for pregnant patients with symptomatic neurological disease, resulting in uncommon maternal complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Purpose: Nusinersen, the first treatment approved for all spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) types, is administered intrathecally through lumbar puncture. We used ultrasound assistance or a landmark‐based technique to access the lumbar intrathecal space in adult SMA patients. This study aimed to evaluate the technical success and adverse events (AEs) in such patients using either technique over a long observation period. Methods: Fifty‐one adult patients received 507 consecutive interlaminar nusinersen administrations. Patients presented with both 'uncomplicated spines' or 'complicated spines'; two patients had previous back surgery. Technical success and AEs were recorded using either technique. A generalised linear mixed model was applied to evaluate predictors of technical success and complications. Results: An overall success rate of 99.6%, with only two procedures failing to reach the intrathecal space, and an overall optimal procedure rate of 90.3% have been reported. A total of 455 procedures (89.7%) were uneventfully performed. One (0.2%) case of severe AE (puncture of a bulky abdominal annexal cyst) was recorded. Twenty‐seven episodes (5.3%) of post‐dural puncture headache (PDPH) and 24 episodes (4.7%) of radicular or back pain, both successfully treated with medical therapy, have also been reported. Technical success was significantly associated with 'complicated spines' (P = 0.022) and the use of ultrasound assistance (P = 0.01), and the use of ultrasound was the only independent predictor of uncomplicated procedures (P = 0.007). Discussion: In adult patients with SMA both landmark‐based and ultrasound‐assisted techniques are safe and effective even in the long term. The use of assistance is associated with technical success and can predict uncomplicated procedures. Conclusion: Our results support the use of ultrasonography in order to improve the success and reduce the burden of nusinersen intrathecal administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Aims: Nusinersen intrathecal administration can be challenging in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) adults. We aimed to determine if the ultrasound (US)‐assistance reduces the number of needle attempts and needle redirections needed for intrathecal drug administration and its impact on the procedure time, the incidence of adverse events (AEs), and patient satisfaction in these patients. Methods: Fifty‐eight patients aged 18 years and older scheduled for intrathecal nusinersen injection were enrolled and randomized (1:1 ratio) into Group 1 (nusinersen infusion with US‐assisted technique) or Group 2 (nusinersen infusion with landmark‐based technique). The number of attempts, number of redirections, periprocedural time, AEs and patient satisfaction were reported. Continuous variables were compared with the Student t‐test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Categorical variables were evaluated with the Chi‐square test or Fisher's exact test in case of expected frequencies <5. The p‐values <.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: There were no statistical differences in the number of attempts, AEs, or patient satisfaction between the two groups. The number of needle redirections was significantly lower in the ultrasound group versus landmark‐based group (p <.05) in both the overall group of patients and in the subgroup with difficult spines. The periprocedural time was about 40 seconds longer in US‐group versus landmark‐based group (p <.05). Discussion: In SMA adults, US assistance reduces the number of needle redirections needed for intrathecal drug administration. These results suggest that the US assistance may be advantageous for nusinersen therapy to reduce the therapeutic burden of intrathecal infusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Variability in obstetric outcomes in terms of the number and type of deliveries related to the day–night cycle has been described in previous studies. This 11-year retrospective analysis explores the effects of nighttime versus daytime delivery with labor epidural on obstetric outcomes. Methods: Data on deliveries performed between 1 October 2008 and 1 October 2019 were collected and differentiated into daytime, occurring from 8:00 a.m. to 7:59 p.m., and nighttime deliveries, occurring from 8:00 p.m. to 7:59 a.m. of the following day. The data collected included the patient history and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results: A total of 29831 patients were included in the analysis. A positive and statistically significant correlation between the number of cesarean sections (Odds Ratio 1.35; 95% confidence interval = 1.26–1.44; p < 0.001) and the number of vaginal operative deliveries (Odds Ratio 1.21; 95% confidence interval = 1.01–1.44; p < 0.05) in patients who did not receive an epidural at nighttime was reported. Regarding the labor epidurals, a significantly greater incidence of accidental dural punctures with needles (0,4%; p < 0.05) in the nighttime versus daytime was reported. Conclusions: The absence of labor epidurals was associated with a significant increase in the number of cesarean sections and vaginal operative deliveries occurring at nighttime, without significant differences in labor duration. The incidence of anesthesiologic complications was greater in deliveries performed at nighttime. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intraoperative hypotension is associated with increased perioperative complications, hospital length of stay (LOS) and healthcare expenditure in gynecologic surgery. We tested the hypothesis that the adoption of a machine learning-based warning algorithm (hypotension prediction index—HPI) might yield an economic advantage, with a reduction in adverse outcomes that outweighs the costs for its implementation as a medical device. Methods: A retrospective-matched cohort cost–benefit Italian study in gynecologic surgery was conducted. Sixty-six female patients treated with standard goal-directed therapy (GDT) were matched in a 2:1 ratio with thirty-three patients treated with HPI based on ASA status, diagnosis, procedure, surgical duration and age. Results: The most relevant contributor to medical costs was operating room occupation (46%), followed by hospital stay (30%) and medical devices (15%). Patients in the HPI group had EURO 300 greater outlay for medical devices without major differences in total costs (GDT 5425 (3505, 8127), HPI 5227 (4201, 7023) p = 0.697). A pre-specified subgroup analysis of 50% of patients undergoing laparotomic surgery showed similar medical device costs and total costs, with a non-significant saving of EUR 1000 in the HPI group (GDT 8005 (5961, 9679), HPI 7023 (5227, 11,438), p = 0.945). The hospital LOS and intensive care unit stay were similar in the cohorts and subgroups. Conclusions: Implementation of HPI is associated with a scenario of cost neutrality, with possible economic advantage in high-risk settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Malignant hyperthermia is a rare but life-threatening pharmacogenetic disorder triggered by exposure to specific anesthetic agents. Although this occurrence could affect virtually any patient during the perioperative time, the pediatric population is particularly vulnerable, and it has a five-fold higher incidence in children compared to adults. In the last few decades, synergistic efforts among leading anesthesiology, pediatrics, and neurology associations have produced new evidence concerning the diagnostic pathway, avoiding unnecessary testing and limiting false diagnoses. However, a personalized approach and an effective prevention policy focused on clearly recognizing the high-risk population, defining perioperative trigger-free hospitalization, and rapid activation of supportive therapy should be improved. Based on epidemiological data, many national scientific societies have produced consistent guidelines, but many misconceptions are common among physicians and healthcare workers. This review shall consider all these aspects and summarize the most recent updates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]