Search

Background: A new combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal approach for rectovaginal endometriosis allows intraoperative digital bowel palpation to assess bowel infiltration and prevents unnecessary bowel resections. This technique was compared to various established approaches where bowel resection was indicated by clinical symptoms and imaging results only. Methods: Patients operated for rectovaginal endometriosis with endometriotic bowel involvement between March 2002 and April 2006 at the gynecological department Charité, Berlin, Germany were included. Bowel involvement was suspected by clinical symptoms, clinical examination, and/or results of imaging techniques. The study group (SG) was operated by the combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal approach (n=30) and the control group (CG) (n=18) by laparoscopy (n=4), laparotomy (n=3), laparoscopy followed by laparotomy for bowel resection (n=8) or laparoscopy followed by vaginal bowel resection (n=3). In all cases histopathology was performed. Results: The study group and the control group were comparable regarding age, body mass index, symptoms, American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) classification, colorectal operative procedures, operating times, length of the resected bowel specimen, and concomitant surgical procedures. However, only in the CG were protective stomas required (p=0.047). There were significantly less complications in the SG (p=0.027). No patient experienced leakage of anastomosis. Bowel involvement by endometriosis was confirmed by histopathology in the SG in all cases whereas in the CG only in 16/18 (88.9%) cases. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the SG. Rehospitalizations were necessary only in the CG to repair one rectovaginal fistula and to reverse three stomas. Conclusions: With the presented technique of a combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal surgical procedure for rectovaginal endometriosis, we showed that the complication rate, rehospitalization rate, and hos

Objective: Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is associated with an increase in breast cancer risk, which correlates to the duration of HRT use. We wanted to investigate a possible association between HRT use and the risk of a histologic subtype of breast cancer. Patients and methods: From 1995 until 2004, 497 cases of primary ductal, lobular or ductulolobular breast cancer in postmenopausal women were diagnosed at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. The data was derived from patient's records. HRT ever use was defined as HRT use for ≥6 months. Results: Of the 99 cases of lobular cancer 72.7% were invasive lobular cancers, 21.2% were invasive ductulolobular cancers and 6.1% were lobular cancers in situ. Of the 398 cases of ductal cancer, 90.5% were invasive ductal cancers and 9.5% were ductal cancers in situ. Totally 144 women were HRT ever users, and 341 women were HRT never users. HRT status could not be defined in 12 women. HRT ever use was associated with an increased risk for lobular cancer (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.02-2.73). Also, menopause due to bilateral oophorectomy was associated with an increased risk for lobular cancer (OR 2.42; 95% CI 1.06-5.54). Conclusions: There is evidence that HRT as well as menopause due to bilateral oophorectomy may be associated with an increased risk for lobular cancer. This association is of major clinical relevance, since lobular breast cancer is more difficult to diagnose clinically and radiologically than ductal breast cancer

Objective: To prospectively assess the effect of water birth on maternal and fetal outcomes in a selected low-risk collective of a tertiary obstetrical unit. Method: In this prospective observational study, 513 patients of a low-risk collective, who requested a water birth, were studied during the years 1998-2002. Primary outcome measurements included the maternal and fetal parameters. Secondary outcome measurements comprised data on the incidence of water births in an interested, low-risk population in an academic hospital. Result: All groups were similar in terms of demographic and obstetric data. Significant differences were observed in maternal outcome parameters, which included the use of analgesia/anesthesia during labor, the duration of first and second stages of labor, perineal tears and episiotomy rate. No differences were seen in all observed fetal outcome parameters including APGAR scores, arterial and venous pH, admission rate to neonatal intensive care unit and infection rate. Conclusion: Water birth is a valuable and promising alternative to traditional delivery methods. The maternal and fetal outcomes were similar to traditional land births. However, currently there still exist some deficits in the scientific evaluation of its safety. Therefore, the selection of a low-risk collective is essential to minimize the risks with the addition of strictly maintained guidelines and continuous intrapartum observation and fetal monitoring. Based on our results and the literature, water births are justifiable when certain criteria are met and risk factors are excluded

Objective: To compare the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone for induction of labor (IOL) in patients with preeclampsia according to the WHO criteria. Study design: Ninety-eight patients were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 47 patients received 3mg dinoprostone suppositories every 6h (max. 6mg/24h) whereas 51 patients in the misoprostol group received either 50μg misoprostol vaginally every 12h, or 25μg every 6h (max. 100μg/24h). Primary outcomes were vaginal delivery within 24 and 48h, respectively. Results: The probability of delivering within 48h was more than three-fold higher in the misoprostol than in the dinoprostone group: odds ratio (OR)=3.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24, 10.30, whereas no significant difference was observed within 24h (P=0.34). No correlation was seen between a ripe cervix prior to IOL and delivery within 24/48h (P=0.33 and P=1.0, respectively). More cesarean sections were performed in the dinoprostone group due to failed IOL (P=0.0009). No significant differences in adverse maternal outcome were observed between both study groups, whereas more neonates (12 vs. 6) of the dinoprostone group were admitted to the NICU (P=0.068). Conclusion: This study suggests that misoprostol may have some advantages compared to dinoprostone, including improved efficacy and lower cost of the drug, even in cases of preeclampsia

Objective: Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is associated with an increase in breast cancer risk, which correlates to the duration of HRT use. We wanted to investigate a possible association between HRT use and the risk of a histologic subtype of breast cancer. Patients and methods: From 1995 until 2004, 497 cases of primary ductal, lobular or ductulolobular breast cancer in postmenopausal women were diagnosed at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. The data was derived from patient's records. HRT ever use was defined as HRT use for ≥6 months. Results: Of the 99 cases of lobular cancer 72.7% were invasive lobular cancers, 21.2% were invasive ductulolobular cancers and 6.1% were lobular cancers in situ. Of the 398 cases of ductal cancer, 90.5% were invasive ductal cancers and 9.5% were ductal cancers in situ. Totally 144 women were HRT ever users, and 341 women were HRT never users. HRT status could not be defined in 12 women. HRT ever use was associated with an increased risk for lobular cancer (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.02-2.73). Also, menopause due to bilateral oophorectomy was associated with an increased risk for lobular cancer (OR 2.42; 95% CI 1.06-5.54). Conclusions: There is evidence that HRT as well as menopause due to bilateral oophorectomy may be associated with an increased risk for lobular cancer. This association is of major clinical relevance, since lobular breast cancer is more difficult to diagnose clinically and radiologically than ductal breast cancer

Background: A new combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal approach for rectovaginal endometriosis allows intraoperative digital bowel palpation to assess bowel infiltration and prevents unnecessary bowel resections. This technique was compared to various established approaches where bowel resection was indicated by clinical symptoms and imaging results only. Methods: Patients operated for rectovaginal endometriosis with endometriotic bowel involvement between March 2002 and April 2006 at the gynecological department Charité, Berlin, Germany were included. Bowel involvement was suspected by clinical symptoms, clinical examination, and/or results of imaging techniques. The study group (SG) was operated by the combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal approach (n=30) and the control group (CG) (n=18) by laparoscopy (n=4), laparotomy (n=3), laparoscopy followed by laparotomy for bowel resection (n=8) or laparoscopy followed by vaginal bowel resection (n=3). In all cases histopathology was performed. Results: The study group and the control group were comparable regarding age, body mass index, symptoms, American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) classification, colorectal operative procedures, operating times, length of the resected bowel specimen, and concomitant surgical procedures. However, only in the CG were protective stomas required (p=0.047). There were significantly less complications in the SG (p=0.027). No patient experienced leakage of anastomosis. Bowel involvement by endometriosis was confirmed by histopathology in the SG in all cases whereas in the CG only in 16/18 (88.9%) cases. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the SG. Rehospitalizations were necessary only in the CG to repair one rectovaginal fistula and to reverse three stomas. Conclusions: With the presented technique of a combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal surgical procedure for rectovaginal endometriosis, we showed that the complication rate, rehospitalization rate, and hos

Objective: To prospectively assess the effect of water birth on maternal and fetal outcomes in a selected low-risk collective of a tertiary obstetrical unit. Method: In this prospective observational study, 513 patients of a low-risk collective, who requested a water birth, were studied during the years 1998-2002. Primary outcome measurements included the maternal and fetal parameters. Secondary outcome measurements comprised data on the incidence of water births in an interested, low-risk population in an academic hospital. Result: All groups were similar in terms of demographic and obstetric data. Significant differences were observed in maternal outcome parameters, which included the use of analgesia/anesthesia during labor, the duration of first and second stages of labor, perineal tears and episiotomy rate. No differences were seen in all observed fetal outcome parameters including APGAR scores, arterial and venous pH, admission rate to neonatal intensive care unit and infection rate. Conclusion: Water birth is a valuable and promising alternative to traditional delivery methods. The maternal and fetal outcomes were similar to traditional land births. However, currently there still exist some deficits in the scientific evaluation of its safety. Therefore, the selection of a low-risk collective is essential to minimize the risks with the addition of strictly maintained guidelines and continuous intrapartum observation and fetal monitoring. Based on our results and the literature, water births are justifiable when certain criteria are met and risk factors are excluded