Search

Background: Blunt aortic injury (BAI) is relatively uncommon in the pediatric population. The goal of this study was to examine the management of BAI in both children and adolescents, using a large national dataset., Methods: Patients (1-19 years of age) with BAI were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database over 14-years. Patients were stratified by age group (children [ages 1-9] and adolescents [ages 10-19]) and compared. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of mortality in adolescents with BAI., Results: Adolescents undergoing TEVAR had similar morbidity (16.8 vs 12.6 ​%, p ​= ​0.057) and significantly reduced mortality (2.1 vs 14.4 ​%, p ​< ​0.0001) compared to those adolescents managed non-operatively. MLR identified use of TEVAR as the only modifiable risk factor significantly associated with reduced mortality (OR 0.138; 95%CI 0.059-0.324, p ​< ​0.0001)., Conclusions: BAI leads to significant morbidity and mortality for both children and adolescents. For pediatric patients with BAI, children may be safely managed non-operatively, while an endovascular repair may improve outcomes for adolescents., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None of the authors have received funding or have a conflict of interest associated with this work., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Multiple treatment modalities exist for the management of aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) including endovascular (endo), extra-anatomic bypass (EAB), and anatomic bypass (AB). The goal of this study was to examine the impact of revascularization strategy and patient frailty on outcomes for AIOD in patients with critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI)., Methods: Patients undergoing revascularization for CLTI and AIOD were identified from the NSQIP database over 5 years. Demographics, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were recorded. Modified frailty index (mFI-5) was calculated for each patient. Patients were compared based on the type of procedure and frailty (mFi > 0.6)., Results: From 2017 to 2021, 1777 patients underwent revascularization for CLTI from AIOD. Patients were majority male (56%) with a mean age of 68. A total of 1346 patients (76%) underwent an open operation of which 669 were EAB. When endo (431 patients) was compared with open repair, endo was associated with a higher incidence of tissue loss at presentation (42% vs 33%, p < 0.001), lower rates of bleeding (6.5% vs 15.5%, p < 0.001), fewer MI/stroke (1.6% vs 4.6%, p = 0.004), and fewer wound complications (2.6% vs 11.2%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in re-intervention, amputation, or death based on frailty. For frail patients (184 patients), type of repair did not impact re-intervention, major amputation, or mortality, though there was increased MI/stroke with EAB and increased wound complications with AB/EAB., Conclusions: AIOD revascularization strategies for patients with CLTI have similar 30-day re-intervention, major amputation, and mortality rates. Endovascular repair has less surgical wound complications and is better suited for frail patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Patients with no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia are not candidates for conventional revascularization options and will inevitably require major amputation. Deep venous arterialization (DVA) is a potential option for these patients. A complete endovascular system to perform DVA has recently received great acclaim and US Foor and Drug Administration approval. However, patients with severe tibial medial calcinosis such as those with diabetes or renal failure may not be candidates for this because most endovascular needles cannot penetrate severe calcium. Here we describe a novel hybrid approach to DVA that provided technical success in three patients with end-stage renal disease and severe medial calcinosis., Competing Interests: None., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Mesenteric bypass (MB) for patients with acute (AMI) and chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is associated with cardiovascular (CV) and pulmonary morbidity., Methods: Patients with AMI and CMI from 2008 to 2019 were identified to determine independent predictors of CV (cardiac arrest, MI, DVT, and stroke) and pulmonary (pneumonia and ventilator time>48 h) morbidities in patients undergoing MB., Results: 377 patients were identified. Patients with AMI had higher rates of preoperative SIRS/sepsis (28 vs 12%, P < .0001), were more likely to be ASA class 4/5 (55 vs 42%, P = .005), were more likely to require bowel resection (19 vs 3%, P < .0001), and were more likely to have vein utilized as their bypass conduit (30 vs 14%, P < .0001). There were no differences in use of aortic or iliac inflow ( P = .707) nor in return to the OR (24 vs 19%, P = .282). Both postoperative sepsis (12 vs 2.6%, P = .003) and mortality (31.4% vs 9.8%, P < .0001) were significantly increased in patients with AMI. After adjusting for both patient and procedural factors, multivariable logistic regression (MLR) identified international normalized ratio (INR) (OR 3.16; 95% CI 1.56-6.40, P = .001) and chronic heart failure (CHF) (OR 5.88; 95% CI 1.15-29.97, P = .033) to be independent predictors of pulmonary morbidity, while preoperative sepsis (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.45-2.66, P < .0001) alone was predictive of CV morbidity in all patients undergoing MB., Discussion: Mesenteric bypass for mesenteric ischemia leads to high rates of morbidity and mortality, whether done in an acute or chronic setting. Preoperative sepsis, independent of AMI or CMI, predicts CV morbidity, regardless of bypass configuration or conduit, while elevated INR or underlying CHF carries a higher risk of pulmonary morbidity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Flail chest (FC) after blunt trauma is associated with significant morbidity and prolonged hospitalizations. The goal of this study was to examine the relationship between timing of rib fixation (ORIF) and pulmonary morbidity and mortality in patients with FC., Methods: FC patients were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database over 3-year, ending 2019. Demographics, severity of injury and shock, time to ORIF, pulmonary morbidity, and mortality were recorded. Youden's index identified optimal time to ORIF. Patients were compared based on undergoing ORIF versus nonoperative management, then for patients undergoing ORIF based on time from admission to operation, utilizing Youden's index to determine the preferred time for fixation. Multivariable logistic regression determined predictors of pulmonary morbidity and mortality., Results: 20,457 patients were identified: 3347 (16.4%) underwent ORIF. The majority were male (73%) with median age and injury severity score of 58 and 22, respectively. Patients undergoing ORIF were clinically similar to those managed nonoperatively but had increased pulmonary morbidity (27.6 versus 15.2%, P < 0.0001) and reduced mortality (2.9 versus 11.7%, P < 0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression identified ORIF as the only modifiable risk factor significantly associated with reduced mortality (odds ratio: 0.26; 95% CI:0.21-0.32, P < 0.0001). Youden's index identified the inflection point for time to ORIF as 4 d postinjury: EARLY (≤4 d) and LATE (>4 d). EARLY fixation was associated with a significant decrease in ventilator days, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and pulmonary morbidity., Conclusions: Patients undergoing ORIF for FC experienced increased pulmonary morbidity; however, had an associated reduced mortality benefit compared to the nonoperative cohort. EARLY ORIF was associated with a reduction in pulmonary morbidity, without impacting the mortality benefit found with ORIF. Thus, for patients with FC, ORIF performed within 4 d postinjury may help reduce pulmonary morbidity, length of stay, and mortality., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are uncommon neuroendocrine tumors at the carotid bifurcation treated with resection. The goal of this study was to examine patient outcomes after CBT resection and establish predictors of morbidity., Methods: Patients undergoing CBT resection were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database over 11 years. Demographics, past medical history, preoperative labs, procedural details, morbidity and mortality were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of morbidity., Results: From 2010 to 2020, 668 CBT resections were identified. The majority of patients were female (65%) and White (72%) with a mean age of 56 (standard deviation [SD] ± 16). Average body mass index (BMI) was 29.9 (SD ± 7.1). Arterial resection occurred in 81 patients (12%). 6% of patients experienced morbidity, most commonly re-operation (2.4%). Morbidity was more common in patients with higher BMI (33.1 vs. 29.7, P = 0.005), chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (10% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.012), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (P = 0.005), and lower albumin (3.7 vs. 4, P = 0.016). Morbidity was not increased with arterial resection (P = 1) or based on length of operation (P = 0.169). Morbidity did not impact mortality (P = 0.06) though led to longer length of stay [LOS] (8 days vs. 2.4, P < 0.001). On MLR, preoperative BMI was the only risk factor for morbidity (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.1, P = 0.005)., Conclusions: CBT resection is very well tolerated with low stroke rates, morbidity, and mortality. Arterial resection leads to increased transfusion requirements and LOS but did not increase stroke rates, mortality, or overall morbidity. Within the NSQIP database, preoperative BMI was the only predictor of postoperative morbidity, which leads to significantly longer LOS., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is uncommon though carries significant morbidity. Procedural risk factors are not well established for acute renal failure (ARF) that requires initiation of dialysis. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of ARF on patients undergoing EVAR and identify risk factors for ARF using a large, national dataset., Methods: Patients undergoing EVAR were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database over 9 years, ending in 2019. Demographics, indication for repair, comorbidities, procedural details, complications, hospital and ICU LOS, and mortality were recorded. Patients were stratified by presence of ARF and compared. Patients were further stratified by indication for EVAR and presence of ARF. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analysis was performed to determine the independent predictors of ARF., Results: 18 347 patients were identified. Of these 234 (1.3%) developed ARF requiring dialysis. Mortality (40 vs 1.8%, P < .0001), ICU LOS (5 vs 0 days, P < .0001), and hospital LOS (11 vs 2 days, P < .0001) were all significantly increased in patients with ARF. Multivariable logistic regression identified increasing diameter, creatinine, operative time, preoperative transfusions, ASA class, emergent repair, female gender, and juxtarenal/suprarenal proximal landing zone as predictors of ARF., Conclusions: ARF after EVAR causes significant morbidity, prolongs hospitalizations, and increases mortality rates. Those patients at risk of ARF after EVAR should be closely monitored to reduce both morbidity and mortality., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: The anatomy of the femoral artery and vein plays an integral role in vascular access. Both technical feasibility and complication rates are associated with femoral vessel diameter and depth. The goal of this study is to establish normative values for common femoral artery (CFA) and vein (CFV) depth and diameter using a large, diverse patient population., Methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing lower extremity venous duplex imaging over a 1 year period were reviewed. Patients with inadequate imaging or with evidence of deep vein thrombosis were excluded. The index image of all studies was a non-compressed view of the common femoral vein at the saphenous-femoral junction. All measurements were taken from this still. Vessel diameters were measured from intima to intima. Depth was measured from skin to intima. BMI and BSA were calculated using standard formulas. Chi square was used for univariate analysis. Linear regression was used to establish correlation., Results: Over the 1 year period, 983 patients met criteria for inclusion. The majority were male (53%) with a mean age of 55. The patients were 47% white and 44% black. The majority had hypertension (53%). The mean BMI and BSA were 29 and 2, respectively. Mean CFA depth was 1.7 cm, while mean CFV depth was 1.8 cm. The mean CFA and CFV diameters were 0.9 and 1.1 cm, respectively. Amongst height, weight, BMI, and BSA, weight correlated best with CFA ( R  = 0.548) and CFV ( R  = 0.552) depth, while BSA correlated best for diameter for both CFA ( R  = 0.390) and CFV ( R  = 0.440)., Conclusions: This study establishes mean diameters and depths for the common femoral artery and vein using a large, diverse patient group. BSA was most closely associated with vessel diameter, while weight was correlated with depth. This study provides normative diameter and depth values for the common femoral vasculature, which may assist in vascular access planning for providers., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Primary tracheal cancer is uncommon, with poor survival. While surgical resection is the mainstay of therapy, the role of chemotherapy and radiation is poorly defined. We aimed to study the impact of treatment modalities on survival., Methods: Patients with primary tracheal cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database over 12 years, 2004-2015. Patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival were recorded. Factors associated with survival were assessed using Cox Regression., Results: Of the 1726 patients identified, 59% were male, 83% White race, 62% had a comorbidity index of zero, median age 64 years, median tumor size 2.7 cm, and median survival was 28.5 months (89 months for patients undergoing surgical resection). Cox Regression for all patients found adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) (p < 0.001), radiation (p < 0.001), and surgical resection (p < 0.001) to be associated with improved survival, while increasing age (p < 0.001) decreased survival. For patients receiving resection, ACC (p < 0.001) was associated with improved survival, while increasing age (p < 0.001) and positive margins (p = 0.002) were associated with worse survival. For R0 resections, ACC (p < 0.001) was associated with improved survival, while increasing age (p < 0.001) decreased survival, with chemotherapy and radiation having no impact. For R1/2 resections, ACC (p < 0.001) and radiation (p < 0.001) were associated with improved survival, while increasing age (p < 0.001) decreased survival, with chemotherapy having no impact on survival., Conclusions: Primary tracheal cancer is highly lethal, with surgical resection leading to the best chance of survival. For patients undergoing resection, radiation provided survival benefits for R1/2 but not R0, while chemotherapy did not impact survival regardless of margin status., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and esophageal balloon dilation (BD) are the two mainstays of achalasia treatment-this study examines the outcomes when they are performed simultaneously without fundoplication., Methods: All patients undergoing LHM&BD were reviewed for demographic and procedural data, and to see if additional procedures for achalasia had been performed. Patients were surveyed using the Eckardt score and the GERD quality-of-life score (GERD-HRQL) to assess the durability of repair., Results: From 2013-2020, 66 patients underwent LHM&BD. There were no esophageal perforations and a median LOS of 1 day. Seven patients have required additional operations or procedures at median 4-years follow up. 31 patients (47%) responded to the survey. The average Eckardt score was 2.9 (goal<4) with mean GERD-HRQL of 14.4 (goal<25)., Conclusions: LHM&BD allows for a safe, durable repair of achalasia. Reflux symptoms are manageable with PPI without fundoplication and the re-intervention rate similar to published values.

Background: Common and external iliac artery injuries (IAI) portend significant morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of mechanism of injury and type of repair on outcomes and identify the optimal repair for patients with traumatic IAI using a large, national dataset., Study Design: Patients undergoing operative repair for IAI were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database during a 5-year timespan, ending in 2019. Age, sex, race, severity of injury, severity of shock, type of iliac repair (open or endovascular), mechanism, morbidity and mortality were recorded. Patients with IAI were stratified by both type of repair and mechanism and compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of mortality., Results: Operative IAI was identified in 507 patients. Of these injuries, 309 (61%) were penetrating and 346 (68.2%) involved the external iliac artery. The majority of patients were male (82%) with a median age and ISS of 31 and 20, respectively. Endovascular repair was performed in 31% of cases. For patients with penetrating injuries, the type of repair impacted neither morbidity nor mortality. For blunt-injured patients, endovascular repair was associated with lower morbidity (29.3% vs 41.3%; p = 0.082) and significantly reduced mortality (14.6% vs 26.7%; p = 0.037) compared with the open-repair approach. Multivariable logistic regression identified endovascular repair as the only modifiable risk factor associated with decreased mortality (odds ratio 0.34; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.79; p = 0.0116)., Conclusions: Traumatic IAI causes significant morbidity and mortality. Endovascular repair was identified as the only modifiable predictor of decreased mortality in blunt-injured patients with traumatic IAI. Therefore, for select patients with blunt IAIs, an endovascular repair should be the preferred approach., (Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Retained hemothorax remains a common problem after thoracic trauma with associated morbidity and prolonged hospitalizations. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of time to video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) on pulmonary morbidity using a large, national data set., Methods: Patients undergoing VATS for retained hemothorax within the first 14 days postinjury were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database over 5 years, ending in 2016. Demographics, mechanism, severity of injury, severity of shock, time to VATS, pulmonary morbidity, and mortality were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of pulmonary morbidity. Youden's index was then used to identify the optimal time to VATS., Results: From the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, 3,546 patients were identified. Of these, 2,355 (66%) suffered blunt injury. The majority were male (81%) with a median age and Injury Severity Score of 46 and 16, respectively. The median time to VATS was 134 hours. Both pulmonary morbidity (13 vs 17%, P = .004) and hospital length of stay (9 vs 12 days, P < .0001) were significantly reduced in patients undergoing VATS before 3.9 days. Multivariable logistic regression identified VATS during the first 7 days as the only modifiable risk factor significantly associated with reduced pulmonary morbidity (odds ratio 0.52; 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.63, P < .0001)., Conclusion: Patients undergoing VATS for retained hemothorax have significant morbidity and prolonged length of stay. VATS within the first week of admission results in fewer pulmonary complications and shorter length of stay. In fact, the optimal time to VATS was identified as 3.9 days and was the only modifiable risk factor associated with decreased pulmonary morbidity., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Blunt aortic injury (BAI) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) are the leading causes of death after blunt trauma. The purposes of this study were to identify predictors of mortality for BAI and to examine the impact of procedural heparinization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) on neurologic outcomes in patients with BAI/TBI., Methods: Patients with BAI were identified over an 8 year period. Age, gender, severity of injury and shock, time to TEVAR, morbidity, and mortality were recorded and compared. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was performed to determine independent predictors of mortality. Youden's index determined optimal time to TEVAR., Results: A total of 129 patients were identified. The majority (74%) were male with a median age and injury severity score (ISS) of 40 years and 29, respectively. Of these, 26 (20%) had a concomitant TBI. Patients with BAI/TBI had higher injury burden at presentation (ISS 37 vs. 29, P = 0.002; Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] 6 vs. 15, P < 0.0001), underwent fewer TEVAR procedures (31 vs. 53%, P = 0.039), and suffered increased mortality (39 vs. 16%, P = 0.009). All TEVARs had procedural anticoagulation, including patients with TBI, without change in neurologic function. The optimal time to TEVAR was 14.8 hr. Mortality increased in TEVAR patients before 14.8 hr (8.7 vs. 0%, P = 0.210). MLR identified TEVAR as the only modifiable factor that reduced mortality (odds ratio 0.11; 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.45, P = 0.002)., Conclusions: TEVAR use was identified as the only modifiable predictor of reduced mortality in patients with BAI. Delayed TEVAR with the use of procedural heparin provides a safe option regardless of TBI with improved survival and no difference in discharge neurologic function., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The current literature offers mixed conclusions regarding the effect of increased body mass index (BMI) on outcomes after trauma laparotomy. This study evaluated the impact of obesity on outcomes and cost for patients undergoing trauma laparotomy at a level 1 trauma center., Study Design: Data on patients requiring trauma laparotomy in 2016 were prospectively collected and patients were stratified by BMI. Statistical analyses were used to determine variables significantly associated with patient morbidity and length of stay., Results: 313 patients underwent trauma laparotomy: 225 non-obese, 69 obese, and 19 morbidly obese. Obese and morbidly obese patients had longer ICU and hospital lengths of stay (LOS), more ventilator days, larger hospital costs, and higher morbidity compared to non-obese patients. Obesity was an independent predictor for patient morbidity, ICU, and hospital LOS., Conclusions: Morbidity and length of stay increased with worsening obesity after trauma laparotomy, contributing to rising hospital costs., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Visceral angiosarcoma is rare and aggressive, accounting for 2% of soft tissue sarcomas. Using a national data set, we examine determinants of outcomes for patients presenting with this rare disease., Methods: The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with visceral angiosarcoma. Trends in treatment and outcomes were examined. Factors affecting overall survival (OS) were assessed with log-rank and Cox regression., Results: Eight hundred and ninety-three patients with visceral angiosarcoma were identified (median age 65 years, male [63%], Charlson comorbidity index <1 [86%]). Tumor size was <5 cm in 20.7%, and 34.2% were moderate/high grade. Median OS was 3.8 months (95% CI: 3.4-4.4). By multivariate analysis, increased tumor grade and size, and liver/biliary origin demonstrated worse OS while surgery, radiation, and systemic chemotherapy demonstrated improved OS (all p < 0.001). Survival was similar between patients achieving R0 resection and those with R1/2 resection receiving chemotherapy by Kaplan-Meier analysis., Conclusions: Visceral angiosarcomas are rare tumors with poor outcomes. Liver/biliary origin, higher tumor grade, and larger tumor size demonstrate worse outcomes. While R0 resection remains the mainstay of treatment, patients with R1/R2 resection have improved survival with addition of chemotherapy. Consideration should be made for multimodal therapy in these patients., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Traumatic subclavian artery injury (SAI) remains uncommon but can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Although open and endovascular repair offer excellent limb salvage rates, their role in blunt and penetrating injuries is not well defined. The goal of this study was to examine the effect of mechanism of injury and type of repair on outcomes in patients with traumatic SAI., Study Design: Patients undergoing procedures for traumatic SAI were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database between 2015 and 2018. Demographics, severity of injury and shock, type of subclavian repair (open vs endovascular), morbidity, and mortality were recorded. Patients with SAI were stratified by mechanism and type of repair and compared. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of mortality., Results: Seven hundred thirty-seven patients undergoing procedures for SAI were identified. Of these, 39% were penetrating. The majority were male (80%) with a median age and Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 37 and 21, respectively. 58% of patients were managed endovascularly. For patients with blunt injury, the type of repair affected neither morbidity (25% vs 19%, p = 0.116) nor mortality (11% vs 10%, p = 0.70). For patients with penetrating injuries, endovascular repair had significantly lower morbidity (12% vs 22%, p = 0.028) and mortality (6% vs 21%, p = 0.001). MLR identified endovascular repair as the only modifiable risk factor associated with reduced mortality (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.87, p = 0.02)., Conclusions: SAI results in significant morbidity and mortality regardless of mechanism. Although the type of repair did not affect mortality in patients with blunt injury, endovascular repair was identified as the only modifiable predictor of reduced mortality in patients with penetrating injuries., (Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Data is scarce regarding the need for early re-amputation to a higher anatomic level. This study seeks to define outcomes and risk factors for re-amputation., Methods: Patients undergoing primary major lower extremity amputation were identified within the 2012-2016 ACS-NSQIP database. Demographics, outcomes, and peri-operative characteristics were compared, and multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine association with early re-amputation., Results: Over a 4-year period, 8306 below knee amputations and 6367 above knee amputations were identified. Thirty-day re-amputation occurred in 262 patients (1.8%) and was associated with increased length of stay (12.9 vs. 7.3 days, P < 0.001), higher rates of readmission (64.9% vs. 13.6%, P < 0.001), and overall complications (69.5% vs. 39.3%, P < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, advanced age (OR 1.02, CI 1.01-1.03), smoking (OR 1.75, CI 1.32-2.33), dialysis dependence (OR 1.67, CI 1.23-2.26), preoperative septic shock (OR 2.53, CI 1.29-4.97), and bleeding disorders (OR 1.72, CI 1.34-2.22) were associated with early re-amputation., Conclusions: Thirty-day re-amputation rates are low, but are associated with significant morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and frequent readmissions., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Blunt aortic injury (BAI) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) represent the 2 leading causes of death after blunt trauma. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of TBI and use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) on patients with BAI, using a large, national dataset., Study Design: Patients with BAI were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database over 10 years, ending in 2016. Patients with BAI were stratified by the presence of concomitant TBI and compared. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of mortality in BAI patients with and without TBI. Youden's index was used to identify the optimal time to TEVAR in these patients., Results: 17,040 patients with BAI were identified, with 4,748 (28%) having a TBI. Patients with BAI and TBI were predominantly male, with a higher injury burden and greater severity of shock at presentation, underwent fewer TEVAR procedures, and had increased mortality compared with BAI patients without TBI. The optimal time for TEVAR was 9 hours. Mortality was significantly increased in patients undergoing TEVAR before 9 hours (12.9% vs 6.5%, p = 0.003). For BAI patients with and without TBI, MLR identified use of TEVAR as the only modifiable risk factor significantly associated with reduced mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.41; 95%CI 0.32-0.54, p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: TBI significantly increases mortality in BAI patients. TEVAR and delayed repair both significantly reduced mortality. So, for patients with both BAI and TBI, an endovascular repair performed in a delayed fashion should be the preferred approach., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Forefoot transmetatarsal amputation is performed commonly to achieve limb salvage, but transmetatarsal amputations have a high rate of failure, requiring more proximal amputations. Few contemporary studies have examined the incidence of major amputation (transtibial or transfemoral) after transmetatarsal amputation. The goal of this study is to determine risk factors and outcomes for a more proximal amputation after forefoot amputation., Methods: We queried the 2012 to 2016 database of the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program for patients undergoing a complete transmetatarsal amputation with wound closure by Current Procedural Terminology code. Patients requiring early (within 30 days) more proximal amputation after transmetatarsal amputation were compared with those who did not need further amputation. Characteristics of patients requiring more proximal amputation were examined, and a multivariable logistic regression model was created to identity risk factors for early more proximal amputation., Results: In the study, 1,582 transmetatarsal amputation were identified. Most patients were male (70%), white (59%), and diabetic (74%), with a median age of 63 years. More proximal amputation occurred in 4.2% of patients within the first 30 days postoperatively. This early failure was associated with greater hospital stays postoperatively (10 days vs 7 days), more wound complications (29% vs 11%), pneumonia (8% vs 2%), stroke (3% vs 0.1%), and overall complications (50% vs 28%; P ≤ .025 each). Although there was no difference in 30-day mortality (P = .27), there was a marked increase in unplanned readmission (59% vs 14%; P < .0001) for those undergoing reamputation. On multivariable analysis, preoperative systemic inflammatory response, sepsis, or septic shock (odds ratio 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.6) were independent predictors of more proximal amputation., Conclusion: Early below-knee or above-knee amputation early after transmetatarsal amputation leads to increased morbidity. Because patients with preoperative sepsis may be at increased risk of failure after transmetatarsal amputation, the level of amputation should be considered carefully in these patients., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This Conversations Starter article presents a selected research abstract from the 2017 Association of American Medical Colleges Southern Region Group on Educational Affairs annual spring meeting. The abstract is paired with the integrative commentary of 4 experts who shared their thoughts stimulated by the study. These thoughts explore the value of the Observed Structured Teaching Encounter in providing structured opportunities for medical students to engage with the complexities of providing peer feedback on professionalism.

Background: In ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), acute kidney injury (AKI) may increase subsequent morbidity and mortality. Still, it remains difficult to predict AKI risk in these patients. We sought to 1) determine the frequency and clinical outcomes of AKI and, 2) develop, validate and compare a web-based tool for predicting AKI., Methods & Findings: In a racially diverse series of 1144 consecutive STEMI patients, Stage 1 or greater AKI occurred in 12.9% and was severe (Stage 2-3) in 2.9%. AKI was associated with increased mortality (5.7-fold, unadjusted) and hospital stay (2.5-fold). AKI was associated with systolic dysfunction, increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressures, hypotension and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. A computational algorithm (UT-AKI) was derived and internally validated. It showed higher sensitivity and improved overall prediction for AKI (area under the curve 0.76) vs. other published indices. Higher UT-AKI scores were associated with more severe AKI, longer hospital stay and greater hospital mortality., Conclusions: In a large, racially diverse cohort of STEMI patients, Stage 1 or greater AKI was relatively common and was associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A web-accessible, internally validated tool was developed with improved overall value for predicting AKI. By identifying patients at increased risk, this tool may help physicians tailor post-procedural diagnostic and therapeutic strategies after STEMI to reduce AKI and its associated morbidity and mortality.

Background: Objective-structured teaching encounters (OSTEs) are used across many disciplines to assess teaching ability. The OSTE detailed in this paper assesses 191 fourth-year medical students' (M4) ability to identify and address lapses in professionalism based on Association of American Medical Colleges' professionalism competencies. The research questions addressed are How frequently do M4s address professionalism lapses observed during an OSTE? What factors influence whether M4s provide feedback when they observe professionalism lapses in an OSTE?, Methods: Standardized patients (SPs) and standardized learners (SLs) were recruited and trained to participate in a standardized encounter with specific cognitive, social, and behavioral errors, including professionalism lapses. M4s viewed this encounter and then offered feedback to the SL, while remotely observed by faculty. Post-encounter, the SL and faculty completed identical checklists to assess both teaching readiness and ability to address professionalism concerns., Results: An analysis of frequencies showed that six of the Association of American Medical Colleges' nine professional competencies were addressed in the checklist and/or discussed in the focus group. Analysis of transcribed debriefing sessions confirmed that M4s did not consistently address professionalism lapses by their peers., Conclusions: In focus groups, M4s indicated that, while they noticed professionalism issues, they were uncomfortable discussing them with the SLs. Findings of the current study suggest how medical educators might support learners' ability to address lapses in professionalism as well as topics for future research., Competing Interests: and funding The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors have not received any funding or benefits from industry or elsewhere to conduct this study.

BACKGROUND Inflammation of the aortic wall, known as aortitis, is a rare clinical entity which is frequently asymptomatic, or identified when the patient presents with an aortic aneurysm or dissection. It is most often caused by infection or autoimmune vasculitides such as giant cell or Takayasu's arteritis. CASE REPORT The case presented is that of a 55-year-old man with symptomatic occlusion of the right coronary artery caused by a plasmacytic aortitis suggestive of IgG4 disease, which was successfully treated with coronary artery bypass grafting and an ascending aortic graft. CONCLUSIONS A review of the current literature emphasizes how poorly the etiology and natural history of plasmacytic aortitis is understood.