Search

Gastro-oesophageal reflux is an almost universal daily occurrence, but only a small percentage of the population develops gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and, among them, a small number develop erosive oesophagitis (ERD) or one of its complications. It is well accepted that the pathophysiology of GORD is related to failure of antireflux mechanisms but several phenomena are not fully explained on the basis of this sequence. There is no apparent relation between damage and the amount and quality of refluxate. It is not known why the same amount of refluxate determines GORD in one patient and not in another.2 It is also unclear whether there is a relation between these unexplained questions and the possible influence of proliferative responses of epithelial proliferating cells to damage. Hence we evaluated cell proliferation of the oesophageal epithelium using Ki67 immunostaining in normal subjects and in patients with GORD, with or without erosions. Thirty five subjects were enrolled: nine were healthy voluntary controls with normal pH testing and normal endoscopic, histological, and ultrastructural patterns. Twenty six patients were affected by GORD, defined as frequent heartburn for at least a year, and abnormal 24 hour pH, histological, and ultrastructural parameters. Of these 26 patients, 13 had a normal appearing oesophageal mucosa at endoscopy (NERD) while 13 had ERD. All subjects underwent gastroscopy; six biopsies were obtained within the lower 5 cm of the oesophagus from areas of macroscopically intact oesophageal mucosa. The presence of oesophagitis was graded according to the Los Angeles classification. pH parameters were not statistically different between NERD and ERD. At transmission electron microscopy (TEM), all patients with GORD, with or without erosions, showed ultrastructural signs of damage, defined by the presence of dilation of intercellular spaces (>0.74 µm). No significant differences were observed between the two groups. For assessment of the proliferative activity of epithelial cells, we used the immunohistochemical approach based on the Ki67 marker of cell proliferation which provides an accurate estimate of the cell growth fraction. Ki67-labelling index (LI) ranged from 8.9% to 74.4% among all patients (mean (SD) 33.5 (19.7)%; median 27.8%). Mean Ki67-LI values for the three groups of patients (normal, NERD, and ERD) were 62.2%, 29.8%, and 17.2%, respectively, and the difference among the groups was significant (p

Background: Collagenous colitis (CC) and lymphocytic colitis (LC) are chronic inflammatory diseases of the colon with a benign and sometimes relapsing course. Frequency among patients with chronic diarrhea and normal looking colonoscopy is around 10–15%. To date, treatment of CC and LC is not well defined. Data about these conditions are mostly derived from retrospective studies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the response to treatment and the clinical course of CC and LC in a large group of patients prospectively diagnosed. Methods and Results: A total of 819 patients underwent a colonoscopy because of chronic watery diarrhea and among them we found 41 patients with LC and 23 with CC. These patients were later randomized and assigned to treatment with mesalazine or mesalazine + cholestyramine for 6 months. Fifty-four patients (84.37%) had resolved diarrhea in less than 2 weeks. After 6 months a colonoscopy with biopsies was repeated. Clinical and histological remission was achieved in 85.36% of patients with LC and in 91.3% with CC, with a better result in patients with CC treated with mesalazine + cholestyramine. During a mean period of 44.9 months, 13% of patients relapsed; four with LC and three with CC. They were retreated for another 6 months. At the end of this period one patient with CC was still symptomatic and persistence of CC was confirmed at histology. Conclusions: Treatment with mesalazine seems to be an effective therapeutic option for LC to date, while mesalazine + cholestyramine seems to be more useful in the treatment of CC.

To value whether omeprazole could induce the healing of DIS and regression of symptoms in patients with DGER.We enrolled 15 symptomatic patients with a pathological esophageal 24-h pH-metry and bilimetry. Patients underwent endoscopy and biopsies were taken from the distal esophagus. Specimens were analyzed at histology and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Patients were treated with omeprazole 40 mg/d for 3 mo and then endoscopy with biopsies was repeated. Patients with persistent heartburn and/or with an incomplete recovery of DIS were treated for 3 more months and endoscopy with biopsies was performed.Nine patients had a non-erosive reflux disease at endoscopy (NERD) while 6 had erosive esophagitis (ERD). At histology, of the 6 patients with erosive esophagitis, 5 had mild esophagitis and 1 moderate esophagitis. No patients with NERD showed histological signs of esophagitis. After 3 mo of therapy, 13/15 patients (86.7%, P0.01) showed a complete recovery of DIS and disappearance of heartburn. Of the 2 patients treated for 3 more months, complete recovery of DIS and heartburn were achieved in one.Three or 6 mo of omeprazole therapy led to a complete regression of the ultrastructural esophageal damage in 86.7% and in 93% of patients with DGER, NERD and ERD respectively. The ultrastructural recovery of the epithelium was accompanied by regression of heartburn in all cases.