Search

In the United States, more than 9 million rural women (15-44 years old) experience limited access and delivery of reproductive healthcare services. Rurality coupled with lower socio-economic status are associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this qualitative study was to gain in-depth information from underserved English- and Spanish-speaking pregnant and postpartum rural women on what they would value in a health promotion program. Three focus group sessions were conducted exploring four domains: (1) physical activity, (2) dietary habits, (3) fetal movement/kick counts, and (4) breastfeeding and other support resources. Five overarching themes were observed across domains, with the following health promotion needs: (1) information on safe exercises, (2) advice on healthy food and drink, (3) breastfeeding support, (4) guidance on counting fetal movement, and (5) self- and peer-education. Study findings will inform intervention programming that aims to improve pregnancy and birth outcomes., Author(s): Lisette T. Jacobson [sup.1] , Rosalee Zackula [sup.1] , Michelle L. Redmond [sup.1] , Jennifer Duong [sup.1] , Tracie C. Collins [sup.1] Author Affiliations: (Aff1) 0000 0001 2106 0692, [...]

While the malignant self-regard construct and a corresponding questionnaire, the Malignant Self-Regard Questionnaire (MSRQ; Huprich, 2011) have been empirically evaluated in several non-clinical samples, it has yet to be evaluated in a clinical population. In this study, 139 outpatients in the Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences ( n  = 83) and Internal Medicine ( n  = 57) were administered the MSRQ and a number other measures to assess its construct and incremental validity. The MSRQ was internally consistent in both samples, and was positively correlated with four dimensions of levels of personality functioning, DSM-5 personality trait domains, overdependence, detachment, insecure attachment, and general perceptions of physical and mental well-being. Furthermore, the MSRQ incrementally predicated variance in levels of personality functioning, interpersonal dependency, and general perceptions of physical and mental well-being above and beyond DSM-5 traits and (where appropriate) levels of personality functioning. These findings converge with studies of the MSRQ in nonclinical samples and support the clinical utility and validity of the MSRQ for further use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Internal fixation of hip fractures is associated with high reoperation rates. This study investigated the reoperation rates after internal fixation with the femoral neck system (FNS)., Materials and Methods: A single-institution cohort study was conducted on patients aged 18 years or older who sustained intracapsular femoral neck fractures and underwent internal fixation with a fixed-angle implant. Surgeons, patients, and investigators were not blinded. The primary outcome was any hip reoperation at the final follow-up. Secondary outcomes were to characterize a cohort of patients regarding demographics, fracture classification, intraoperative findings, postoperative fracture complications and union rates, and postoperative pain., Results: This study found that internal fixation with FNS for intracapsular femoral neck fractures was associated with a 23% rate of revision surgery. Of the initial 94 patients who received FNS internal fixation, 44 patients were included for analysis; of those, 10 patients underwent revision surgery. Patients had a 22% rate of in-hospital medical adverse events with a 30-day readmission rate of 9%. Increasing body mass index was associated with increased revision rates ( P = 0.037). Patients who sustained displaced femoral neck fractures had a significant decrease in SF-12 Mental Health Composite, SF-12 Physical Health Composite, and quality-of-life subscale scores., Conclusions: The FNS is a viable alternative for internal fixation of intracapsular femoral neck fractures. The observed rate of revision after internal fixation was comparable with previously published outcomes following fixation with cannulated screws and sliding hip screws., Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association.)

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine if augmentation of the helical blade with polymethylmethacrylate bone cement decreases the rates of varus cut-out and medial perforation in geriatric intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation., Methods: This was a retrospective comparative cohort study at two urban Level I trauma centers. Patients with an intertrochanteric hip fracture (classified as AO 31A1-3) who were treated with the TFN-Advanced Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA) from 2018 to 2021 were eligible for the study. Medical records and post-operative radiographs were reviewed to determine procedure complications and reoperations., Results: Of the 179 patients studied, cement augmentation (CA) was used in 93 patients (52%) and no cement augmentation (NCA) was used in 86 (48%). There were no significant differences between group demographics and fracture reduction grades. Varus cut-out occurred three times in the CA group and five times in the NCA group (p = 0.48). Medial perforation occurred three times, all in the NCA group (p = 0.11). The most frequent complication was symptomatic blade lateralization from fracture collapse, with eight occurrences in the CA group compared with two in the NCA group (p = 0.10). There were 10 reoperations in the CA group and 9 in the NCA group (p = 0.99). The most common reason for reoperation was varus cut-out and the most common revision procedure was hip arthroplasty., Conclusions: Intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with the TFNA fixation system with and without cement augmentation have similar complication profiles and reoperation rates., (Copyright © 2024 Bianco, et al.)

Introduction: In 2018, our Midwestern university medical center began offering unconscious bias training. Each session concluded with a standard evaluation. We analyzed two years of data that focused on three areas: 1) whether demographic differences or amount of prior knowledge on the topic influenced the training experience; 2) what participants liked best about the training; and 3) whether participants' stated intentions to apply their learning at the end of the training aligned with institutional goals of the training., Methods: Participants attended sessions open to the campus community pre-scheduled by the Office for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and posted on its website. Chi-square tests were utilized to test associations between outcomes and questionnaire responses. Outcome measures included race/ethnicity, prior knowledge level, and overall rating of the training. Thematic analysis was used to code comments and establish themes from two open-ended survey questions., Results: Significant differences were found by race and ethnicity for all questionnaire responses; each were p < 0.001. Those who reported they had advanced/expert knowledge on the topic were less likely to report the training increased their knowledge, and those who reported their race as White/Caucasian tended to give the training the highest overall rating, as did heterosexuals. Through thematic analysis, participants valued the interactive nature of the training sessions, the use of storytelling, and the safety of the learning environment. Participants' intention to apply their learning indicated they had gained general awareness of bias and settings where it might influence their work., Conclusions: In an effort to foster a better working and learning environment for those who are underrepresented in the health professions, training was provide that may not have met the expectations of all participants. At the same time, participants who identified as White clearly increased their awareness of bias. Therefore, it is recommended to move away from one-size-fits-all unconscious bias training and develop a robust training continuum to provide ongoing advancement for diverse audiences., (© 2022 The University of Kansas Medical Center.)

Introduction: Although the use of antifibrinolytics to reduce perioperative blood loss during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has shown unequivocal benefit in regard to blood conservation, the best route of administration remains in question. This study tested the hypothesis that topical delivery of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) was superior to intravenous (IV) administration in the setting of primary TKA., Methods: This cross-sectional study included a six-year retrospective chart review of TKA patients done by a single surgeon. Post-operative hemoglobin levels and the incidence of blood transfusions were compared among three patient subgroups: no EACA, topical EACA, or IV EACA. Key outcome measures included post-operative hemoglobin, need for post-operative transfusion, and length of hospital stay., Results: Of the 668 patients included in this study, 351 (52.5%) received IV EACA, 298 (44.6%) received topical EACA, and 19 (2.8%) received no EACA. For the three-way comparisons, significant differences were observed for post-operative mean hemoglobin on day one (p < 0.001), day two (p < 0.001), and day three (p = 0.004), with consistently higher means for participants in the topical group. Eight patients required transfusions in the IV EACA group, but none were needed in the topical EACA group (p = 0.027). Length of stay was shortest for patients in the topical group, with 66% hospitalized for two days, while 84% of the IV group remained hospitalized for three days (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The topical delivery of EACA is superior to IV administration with respect to blood conservation for patients undergoing primary TKA., (© 2022 The University of Kansas Medical Center.)

Introduction: Miscommunication during shift change and other handoff events is a common source of malpractice claims and patient-care errors. An efficient patient handoff system is imperative to prevent miscommunication. Owning to limitations with our current handoff system and to an ever-increasing reliance on electronic health information, our residency program sought to modernize our handoff method., Methods: To improve handoff communication, the HIPAA-compliant application Listrunner © was adopted. Members of the orthopaedic trauma team were oriented to the new application. Change-of-shift patient handoff was transitioned from the current email system to List-runner © . After three months of using the new application, a web-based questionnaire was administered to all members of the care team to assess their experiences, including perceived benefits and limitations of the Listrunner © application., Results: Seventeen orthopaedic resident physicians and three orthopaedic trauma attending physicians completed the survey. While almost half of the respondents were satisfied using email as a checkout tool, more than half of study participants indicated that it lacked security and several users believed there was a need for improvement. Most indicated that Listrunner © was easy to use, improved clinical efficiency, and improved patient care and safety. Seventeen of 20 respondents reported that they would like to continue using Listrunner © as a check-out tool., Conclusions: The Listrunner © application was adopted quickly by our orthopaedic trauma team, whose members opined that the application increased the efficiency and accuracy of handoff when compared to the previous secure email system., (© 2022 The University of Kansas Medical Center.)

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2) causing COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) continues to be widespread in Kansas. County health departments are trying to contain this pandemic., Methods: This second survey of Kansas county health department directors occurred from August 7 to September 7, 2020. Since the first survey in April, there have been significant increases in the number of positive cases of COVID-19 and related deaths. Thus, the aim of the study was to re-evaluate county-level containment efforts and assess shortfalls that were identified in the April 2020 survey., Results: In total, 41 out of 105 directors responded to the survey. Generally, respondents said there were increased supplies for testing, increased testing centers, shorter time to get test results, and in some cases, increased funding. However, the number of people involved in contact tracing had not increased substantially, which was one of the recommended changes for improving containment. Moreover, of those persons who were tested, only a few (18%) counties inquired if they wear masks in public. From comments reported, there was a sense of employees being overwhelmed, especially among the smaller county health departments., Conclusion: As the cases of and deaths from COVID-19 are increasing in the state, especially in high density areas, the respondents to our survey indicated there was continued need for additional funding with easy access, increased staffing, especially for contact tracing, and significant help for effective messaging to improve adherence to public health directives., (© 2020 The University of Kansas Medical Center.)

Multiparametric MRI and the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) have emerged as tools to reveal suspicious prostate lesions and MRI-targeted biopsy has shown potential to avoid repeat prostate biopsies and miss fewer significant cancers. This retrospective study sought to assess the differences in diagnostic yield and sampling efficiency between MRI-targeted and standard biopsies in a community urology practice. We concluded that MRI-targeted biopsy was more efficient than a standard biopsy, although neither technique achieved a superior diagnostic yield of clinically significant cancer in our community setting. We recommend that a standard biopsy be performed alongside targeted biopsy., (© 2020 MedReviews®, LLC.)

Background and Objectives: In completing post-encounter notes (PENs), students are believed to under-report about 30% of the important information obtained in the medical history. The resulting incomplete clinical notes can contribute to adverse patient care and medicolegal outcomes. We hypothesized that pertinent negative items would be more likely to be under-reported than positive items. We compared reporting rates for pertinent positive and negative items on two cases in a clinical skills assessment (CSA) taken by all 55 third-year students. Based on standardized patient (SP) checklists, students obtained 87% of both positive and negative items. Scoring of PENs found significant differences in the reporting rates for positive (75%) and negative (52%) items. These results were consistent for each case. Students appear to be able to elicit pertinent negative information from patients but, although these items may be crucial in the medical history, they are significantly more likely than positive items to be omitted from the clinical note.

Background: If students report information in a post-encounter note that was allegedly not obtained from the patient, they may be suspected of serious professional misconduct, ie, deliberate falsification of patient data. Over-reporting during a clinical assessment may result in accusations of cheating and even lead to failure of a high-stakes examination. Despite these serious implications, the prevalence and reasons for over-reporting are not clear. We investigated every detected incident of false reporting during our high-stakes clinical skills assessment (CSA) at the end of the third year. Of 73 alleged incidents, 69 were attributed to errors in standardized patient (SP) performance, note scoring, data management, or the design of cases or scoring instruments. The four instances of over-reporting by students were more compatible with mistakes and lack of specificity than deliberate falsification. We conclude that all potential sources of error must be excluded before over-reporting incidents are attributed to deliberate falsification of data by students.