Search

Summary: Background: The long‐term risk of relapse after switching from intravenous (IV) to subcutaneous (SC) infliximab remains unknown in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Aims: To assess the long‐term effectiveness and acceptability of switching from IV to SC infliximab in patients with IBD treated with or without an intensified IV regimen. Methods: We extended the follow‐up of the REMSWITCH study including patients with IBD in clinical remission who were switched from IV to SC infliximab (120 mg/2 weeks). Relapse was defined as clinical relapse or faecal calprotectin increase ≥150 μg/g compared to baseline. Results: After median follow‐up of 18 [15–20] months, among 128 patients, rates of relapse were 13.8% (8/58), 18.4% (7/38), 35.3% (6/17) and 86.7% (13/15) at last follow‐up (p < 0.001), in those receiving 5 mg/kg/8 weeks, 10 mg/kg/8 weeks, 10 mg/kg/6 weeks and 10 mg/kg/4 weeks at baseline, respectively. Among relapsing patients, dose escalation led to clinical remission in 82.1% (23/28). In multivariable analyses, factors associated with higher risk of relapse were IV infliximab 10 mg/kg/4 weeks (OR = 61.0 [6.1–607.0], p < 0.001) or 10 mg/kg/6 weeks (OR = 4.7 [1.1–20.2], p = 0.017), and decreased (OR = 5.6 [1.5–20.3], p = 0.004) or stable (OR = 5.0 [1.6–15.0], p = 0.009) serum levels of infliximab between baseline and first post‐switch visit. Acceptability was improved at 6 months and did not decrease over time (6.9 ± 1.6 before the switch vs. 8.8 ± 1.3 at 6 months and 8.8 ± 1.3 at last follow‐up; p < 0.001). No severe adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Switching from IV to SC infliximab 120 mg every other week is safe and well accepted leading to low long‐term risk of relapse. Tight monitoring and dose escalation should be recommended for patients receiving 10 mg/kg/6 weeks and 4 weeks, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the impact of annual case volume on the outcomes and safety of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures. The study included 3770 colorectal ESDs performed in 13 participating centers. The results showed that high-volume centers had higher rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, and curative resection compared to middle-volume and low-volume centers. The duration of the procedure was also shorter in high-volume centers. However, the study found that the volume of the center was not a significant risk factor for complications such as perforation. Overall, the study suggests that colorectal ESD can be successfully implemented in non-expert settings, but challenging cases should still be referred to experts. [Extracted from the article]

Background: The ileocecal valve (ICV) is considered to be one of the most difficult locations for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of traction-assisted ESD in this situation., Methods: All patients who underwent traction-assisted ESD for an ICV lesion at three centers were identified from a prospective ESD database. En bloc and R0 rates were evaluated. Factors associated with non-R0 resection were explored., Results: 106 patients with an ICV lesion were included. The median lesion size was 50 mm (interquartile range 38-60) and 58.5% (62/106) invaded the terminal ileum. The en bloc and R0 resection rates were 94.3% and 76.4%, respectively. Factors associated with non-R0 resection were lesions covering ≥75% of the ICV (odds ratio [OR] 0.21. 95%CI 0.06-0.76; P=0.02), and involving the anal lip (OR 0.36, 95%CI 0.13-0.99; P=0.04) or more than two sites on the ICV (OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.07-0.99; P=0.03)., Conclusion: Traction-assisted ESD for treatment of ICV lesions was a safe and feasible option. Large lesions and anal lip involvement appeared to be factors predictive of difficulty., Competing Interests: C. Yzet is a consultant and lecturer for Abbvie, Takeda, Jansen, Amgen, and Galapagos. T. Wallenhorst has received honoraria for ESD training sessions from Olympus and Fujifilm, and lectures for Mayoli. J. Jacques has provided ESD training sessions for Olympus, Fuji, Erbe, Pentax Medical, and Lumendi, and lectures for Abbvie, Janssen, and Norgine. J. Rivory has received honoraria for training sessions in endoscopy and endoscopic resection from Olympus and Cook Medical. M. Schaefer has received honoraria for training session from Boston Scientific, and has received invitations to congresses from Olympus, Cook, Cousin Medical, Boston, Pentax, Abbvie, MSD, Amgen, and Norgine. M. Pioche has received honoraria for training sessions in endoscopy and endoscopic resection from Olympus, Cook Medical, Boston Scientific, and Pentax Medical; honoraria for training sessions in endoscopic characterization from Norgine and Provepharm; invitation to UEGW from AlfaSigma; and owns a patent for the Hospices Civils de Lyon IPEFIX device. M. Figueiredo, F. Rostain, L.J. Masgnaux, J. Grimaldi, R. Legros, P. Lafeuille, J. Albouys, and F. Subtil declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction:  The environmental impact of endoscopy, including small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE), is a topic of growing attention and concern. This study aimed to evaluate the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (kgCO 2 ) generated by an SBCE procedure., Methods:  Life cycle assessment methodology (ISO 14040) was used to evaluate three brands of SBCE device and included emissions generated by patient travel, bowel preparation, capsule examination, and video recording. A survey of 87 physicians and 120 patients was conducted to obtain data on travel, activities undertaken during the procedure, and awareness of environmental impacts., Results:  The capsule itself (4 g) accounted for < 6 % of the total product weight. Packaging (43-119 g) accounted for 9 %-97 % of total weight, and included deactivation magnets (5 g [4 %-6 %]) and paper instructions (11-50 g [up to 40 %]). A full SBCE procedure generated approximately 20 kgCO 2 , with 0.04 kgCO 2 (0.2 %) attributable to the capsule itself and 18 kgCO 2 (94.7 %) generated by patient travel. Capsule retrieval using a dedicated device would add 0.98 kgCO 2 to the carbon footprint. Capsule deconstruction revealed materials (e. g. neodymium) that are prohibited from environmental disposal; 76 % of patients were not aware of the illegal nature of capsule disposal via wastewater, and 63 % would have been willing to retrieve it. The carbon impact of data storage and capsule reading was negligible., Conclusion:  The carbon footprint of SBCE is mainly determined by patient travel. The capsule device itself has a relatively low carbon footprint. Given that disposal of capsule components via wastewater is illegal, retrieval of the capsule is necessary but would likely be associated with an increase in device-related emissions., Competing Interests: M. Pioche is a consultant for Olympus and a trainer for Olympus, Pentax, Norgine, Boston, and Cook. X. Dray is co-founder and a shareholder of Augmented Endoscopy; he provides consultancy for Norgine and Provepharma, and lectures and demonstrations for Alfasigma, Bouchara Recordati, Fujifilm, Medtronic, Norgine, and Sandoz. E. Rodriguez de Santiago has had educational and advisory roles for Olympus, educational roles at Apollo Endosurgery and Norgine, and has received conference fees from Norgine and Casen.J.A. Cunha Neves, H. Pohl, M.-Q. Lê, R.Grau, C. Yzet, M. Mochet, J. Jacques, T. Wallenhorst, J. Rivory, N. Siret, A.-L. Peillet, J.-B. Chevaux, F. Mion, U. Chaput, P. Jacob, D. Grinberg, J.-C. Saurin, R. Baddeley, and P.-J. Cottinet declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: It is still unclear whether Crohn's disease (CD) might be associated with diminished ovarian reserve (OvR) and factors influencing anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels in CD are poorly known., Material and Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search of multiple electronic databases from inception to June 2022 to identify all studies reporting AMH levels or factors associated with diminished OvR in patients with CD., Results: Of the 48 studies identified in our search, eight (including 418 patients with CD) were finally included. The mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) in the AMH level between pooled CD patients and controls was -0.56 (-1.14 to 0.03) (p = 0.06). A history of CD-related surgery was not associated with a lower OvR (odds ratio, OR [95% CI] 1.34, [0.66-2.7]; p = 0.4). While disease activity and perianal disease seems associated with a low OvR, disease location (L2 vs. L1, OR [95% CI] = 95% CI [0.47-7.4]; p = 0.4) and L3 vs. L1 (OR [95% CI] = 1.44 [0.67-3.12]; p = 0.3), CD medication, and disease behavior were not., Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis did not identify a significantly low OvR in patients with CD. Contrary to CD-related surgery risk factor, active disease was associated lower AMH levels., (© 2024 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).)

Background and Aims: Traction has become the reference strategy for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). One of its major limitations is that the force of traction decreases as dissection progresses. The ATRACT traction device (ATRACT Device and Co, Lyon, France) uses a pulley system to increase traction during the procedure, making it easier and faster. A retrospective study of 54 cases showed interesting results in terms of efficacy and safety throughout the digestive tract. We sought to confirm these initial results with a prospective study of resections of colorectal lesions., Methods: In this prospective multicenter study, 5 experienced operators from 3 different centers each performed 10 procedures using the ATRACT device consecutively for all conventional colorectal ESDs measuring between 4 and 10 cm in conventional locations (no recurrent lesions, appendicular, of the ileocecal valve, in contact with the pectinate line, or measuring more than two-thirds of the circumference)., Results: Between November 2022 and April 2023, 50 ESDs were performed in 49 patients. On average, the main diameter of the lesions was 66.6 mm, with a surface area of 3066 mm 2 . The mean operating time was 55.2 minutes, resulting in a mean resection speed of 61.4 mm 2 /min. En bloc and R0 resection rates were 100% and 98%, respectively. Resections were curative in 94% of cases. Four (8%) perforations occurred, all of which were closed endoscopically without the need for surgery. One (2%) case of delayed hemorrhage was noted. To date, this is the series with the highest resection speeds in the literature for colorectal ESD. For comparison, previous studies reported a speed of 23.5 mm 2 /min using the "pocket" strategy and a speed of 39.1 mm 2 /min using the double-clip traction technique. These results need to be confirmed in larger studies and in nonexpert centers., Conclusions: This prospective evaluation confirms the efficacy and safety of the adaptive traction strategy with the ATRACT device for colorectal ESD with high resection speed., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: J. Grimaldi: Cofounder of ATRACT Device and Co. L.-J. Masgnaux: Cofounder of ATRACT Device and Co. J. Rivory: Cofounder of ATRACT Device and Co; training sessions in endoscopy for Olympus, Cook Medical, and Boston scientific. R. Legros: Cofounder of ATRACT Device and Co; training sessions in endoscopy for Olympus, Fuji, and Erbe. T. Wallenhorst: Training sessions in endoscopy for Olympus and Fujifilm. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Competing Interests: Jérôme Rivory, Jean Grimaldi, Louis Jean Masgnaux, Mathieu Pioche are co-founders of the ATRACT devices and co. Nothing to declare for the other authors.

Background & Aims: We assessed Modified Multiplier Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (MM-SES-CD) and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) thresholds that are best associated with low likelihood of long-term disease progression., Methods: Data from 61 patients with early Crohn's disease (CD) who participated in the CALM long-term extension study were used as the derivation cohort and validated using the McMaster inflammatory bowel disease database (n = 99). The primary outcome was disease progression (new internal fistula/abscess, stricture, perianal fistula or abscess, CD-related hospitalization or surgery) since the end of the CALM trial. Optimal MM-SES-CD and SES-CD thresholds were determined using the maximum Youden index. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses compared threshold scores of remission definitions on disease progression., Results: In the derivation cohort, based on the maximum Youden index, the optimal thresholds associated with a low likelihood of disease progression were MM-SES-CD <22.5 and SES-CD <4. A significantly greater proportion of patients with a MM-SES-CD ≥22.5 had disease progression as compared with patients in the derivation cohort with MM-SES-CD <22.5 (10/17 [58.8%] vs 3/44 [6.8%]; P < .001). Similarly, a significantly greater number of patients with SES-CD ≥ 4 had disease progression compared with those with a SES-CD <4 (11/25 [44.0%] vs 2/36 [5.6%]; P < .001). Compared with other clinical or endoscopic remission definitions, which demonstrated poor to fair accuracy, MM-SES-CD <22.5 performed the best for predicting disease progression (area under the curve = 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.94; P < .001). These thresholds were confirmed in the validation cohort., Conclusion: Achievement of MM-SES-CD <22.5 or SES-CD <4 in patients with ileocolonic or colonic CD is associated with low risk of disease progression and may be suitable targets in clinical trials and practice for endoscopic healing., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Endoscopy is still the gold, standard for assessing disease activity in Crohn's disease (CD). Its invasiveness, poor acceptability, and cost limit its use in the era of tight control and treat-to-target management. Fecal calprotectin (FC) and intestinal ultrasound (IUS) are non-invasive alternatives to colonoscopy to assess disease activity. We aimed to evaluate the performance of IUS and FC to assess mucosal healing in CD., Methods: All consecutive CD patients who underwent colonoscopy for mucosal healing assessment and IUS and/or FC within four weeks between September 2019 and April 2022 were included in a prospective cohort. The bowel-wall thickness (BWT) and color Doppler signal (CDS) were assessed for each segment. Endoscopic remission was defined by a CDEIS score < 3., Results: In total, 153 patients were included, of whom 122 showed endoscopic mucosal healing. Eighty-two (53.6 %) were female, the median was age 36 years (IQR, 28-46), and the median disease duration was 10 years (IQR, 4-19). The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of a BWT < 3 mm to predict endoscopic mucosal healing were 56 %, 88 %, 95 %, and 36 %, respectively (patients misclassified as mucosal healing, 2.5 %). The best FC threshold (< 92.9 µg/g) provided similar results: 77 %, 89 %, 96 %, and 67 %, respectively (patients misclassified, 2.2 %). The association of an FC < 250 µg/g with a BWT < 3 mm and the absence of CDS increased the Sp and PPV: Se 58 %, Sp 95 %, PPV 97 %, VPN 43 %; patients misclassified, 1.3 %., Conclusion: Noninvasive evaluation of mucosal healing by IUS or calprotectin efficiently identifies patients with CD who have achieved endoscopic mucosal healing., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest CY: consultant and lecture fees from Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, Amgen, and Galapagos MF: consultant and lecture fees from Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, Amgen, Galapagos, Gilead, Biogen, Fresenius, Pfizer, Lilly, Celltrion, Ferring, Tillots, and Nordic Pharma VH: AAA, Merck KGaA, Amgen, Servier, Deciphera, Ipsen, and Pierre Fabre The other authors have nothing to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The development of noninvasive markers to assess mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis (UC) is essential in the treat-to-target era. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of intestinal ultrasound (IUS), fecal calprotectin (FC), and their combination to assess mucosal healing in UC patients., Methods: All consecutive patients between January 2021 and September 2022 with UC who underwent a complete colonoscopy and IUS and/or an FC test within 4 weeks were included in a prospective cohort. Bowel wall thickness (BWT) and the color Doppler signal (CDS) were assessed for each segment. Endoscopic mucosal healing was defined by a Mayo score of 0 to 1., Results: A total of 61 patients were included, of whom 79% showed endoscopic healing (26 Mayo 0 and 11 Mayo 1). Among the patients, 16 (27.6%) of 58 had a BWT <3 mm, and 41 (70.7%) of 58 had no CDS. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of a BWT <3 mm to predict endoscopic mucosal healing were 37%, 77%, 72%, and 44%, respectively. The association of FC <150 µg/g, a BWT <3 mm, and a CDS = 0 increased the specificity and positive predictive value (sensitivity 33%, specificity 94%, positive predictive value 89%, negative predictive value 48%). The combination of a normal IUS, no rectal bleeding, and an FC <172 µg/g identified all patients with mucosal healing., Conclusion: The combination of IUS and FC is effective in identifying mucosal healing in UC. Noninvasive evaluation of mucosal healing is possible for most UC patients., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: The adoption of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is still limited in the West. A recent randomized trial showed that ESD is more effective and only slightly riskier than piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection; reproducibility outside expert centers was questioned. We evaluated the results according to the annual case volume in a multicentric prospective cohort., Methods: Between September 2019 and September 2022, colorectal ESD was consecutively performed at 13 participating centers classified as low volume (LV), middle volume (MV), and high volume (HV). The main procedural outcomes were assessed. Multivariate and propensity score matching analyses were performed., Results: Three thousand seven hundred seventy ESDs were included. HV centers treated larger and more often colonic lesions than MV and LV centers. En bloc , R0, and curative resection rates were 95.2%, 87.4%, and 83.2%, respectively, and were higher at HV than at MV and LV centers. HV centers also achieved a faster dissection speed. Delayed bleeding and surgery for complications rates were 5.4% and 0.8%, respectively, without significant differences. The perforation rate (overall: 9%) was higher at MV than at LV and HV centers. Lesion characteristics, but not volume center, were independently associated with both R1 resection and perforation. However, after propensity score matching, R0 rates were significantly higher at HV than at LV centers, and perforation rates were significantly higher at MV than at HV centers., Discussion: Colorectal ESD can be successfully implemented in the West, even in nonexpert centers. However, difficult lesions must still be referred to experts., (Copyright © 2024 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

BACKGROUND : Good submucosal exposure is key to successful endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and can be achieved with various traction devices. Nevertheless, these devices have a fixed traction force that tends to decrease as the dissection progresses. In contrast, the ATRACT adaptive traction device increases traction during the procedure. METHODS : In this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data (from a French database), we analyzed ESD procedures performed with the ATRACT device between April 2022 and October 2022. The device was used consecutively whenever possible. We collected details of lesion characteristics, procedural data, histologic outcomes, and clinical consequences for the patient. RESULTS : 54 resections performed in 52 patients by two experienced operators (46 procedures) and six novices (eight procedures) were analyzed. The ATRACT devices used were the ATRACT-2 (n = 21), the ATRACT 2 + 2 (n = 30), and the ATRACT-4 (n = 3). Four adverse events were observed: one perforation (1.9 %), which was closed endoscopically, and three delayed bleeding events (5.5 %). The R0 rate was 93 %, resulting in curative resection in 91 % of cases. CONCLUSION:  ESD using the ATRACT device is safe and effective in the colon and rectum, but can also be used to assist with procedures in the upper gastrointestinal tract. It may be particularly useful in difficult locations., Competing Interests: L.-J. Masgnaux, J. Grimaldi, J. Rivory, T. Wallenhorst, R. Legros, J. Jacques, and M. Pioche are cofounders of A-TRACT Device & Co. T. Ponchon, C. Yzet, A. Lupu, and F. Rostain declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: When initial resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (r-NETs) is not R0, persistence of local residue could lead to disease recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate the interest of systematic resection of non-R0 r-NET scars., Methods: Retrospective analysis of all the consecutive endoscopic revisions and resections of the scar after non-R0 resections of r-NETs., Results: A total of 100 patients were included. Salvage endoscopic procedure using endoscopic submucosal dissection or endoscopic full-thickness resection showed an R0 rate of near 100%. Residual r-NET was found in 43% of cases., Discussion: In case of non-R0 resected r-NET, systematic scar resection by endoscopic full-thickness resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection seems necessary., (Copyright © 2023 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.