Search

Cardiotocography (CTG) measurements are critical for assessing fetal wellbeing during monitoring, and accurate assessment requires well-traceable CTG signals. The current FHR calculation algorithm, based on autocorrelation to Doppler ultrasound (DUS) signals, often results in periods of loss owing to its inability to differentiate signals. We hypothesized that classifying DUS signals by type could be a solution and proposed that an artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach could be used for classification. However, limited studies have incorporated the use of AI for DUS signals because of the limited data availability. Therefore, this study focused on evaluating the effectiveness of semi-supervised learning in enhancing classification accuracy, even in limited datasets, for DUS signals. Data comprising fetal heartbeat, artifacts, and two other categories were created from non-stress tests and labor DUS signals. With labeled and unlabeled data totaling 9,600 and 48,000 data points, respectively, the semi-supervised learning model consistently outperformed the supervised learning model, achieving an average classification accuracy of 80.9%. The preliminary findings indicate that applying semi-supervised learning to the development of AI models using DUS signals can achieve high generalization accuracy and reduce the effort. This approach may enhance the quality of fetal monitoring.

Cardiotocography (CTG) is widely used to assess fetal well-being. CTG is typically obtained using ultrasound and autocorrelation methods, which extract periodicity from the signal to calculate the heart rate. However, during labor, maternal vessel pulsations can be measured, resulting in the output of the maternal heart rate (MHR). Since the autocorrelation output is displayed as fetal heart rate (FHR), there is a risk that obstetricians may mistakenly evaluate the fetal condition based on MHR, potentially overlooking the necessity for medical intervention. This study proposes a method that utilizes Doppler ultrasound (DUS) signals and artificial intelligence (AI) to determine whether the heart rate obtained by autocorrelation is of fetal origin. We developed a system to simultaneously record DUS signals and CTG and obtained data from 425 cases. The midwife annotated the DUS signals by auditory differentiation, providing data for AI, which included 30,160 data points from the fetal heart and 2160 data points from the maternal vessel. Comparing the classification accuracy of the AI model and a simple mathematical method, the AI model achieved the best performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98. Integrating this system into fetal monitoring could provide a new indicator for evaluating CTG quality.