Search

Aggressiveness and age of manifestation of medullary thyroid cancer depend on the risk level of germline RET mutations. For high-risk mutations, preventive thyroidectomy is recommended at young age. In recent years, endoscopic operations for thyroid cancer were introduced in clinical practice. But such experience in pediatrics is very limited. We present a case report of a male patient, 6-year-old with the high-risk germline mutation С634R in RET gene. Close relatives (mother, cousin, and native sister) of the proband, were treated for medullary thyroid cancer. Also, his grandmother on the maternal line and her native brother died at the age of 38 and 37 years because of medullary thyroid cancer progression. Since 3 years old, our patient was under regular exams. At the age of six, calcitonin level was 8 ng/mL, and no evidence of pathology on ultrasound. According to recommendations of American Thyroid Association from 2015 (ATA 2015), preventive thyroidectomy was planned. This operation was performed by transoral vestibular approach. Oral nutrition started on the first day after the operation and the patient was discharged from the hospital. No major complications were observed. Transitory paresthesia and slight edema of the submental compartment were noticed. Consider this, endoscopic operation on the thyroid gland can be performed, as a preventive procedure, for RET gene germline mutation carriers in young age. This method helps avoid scars on the skin of the anterior neck.

Abstract Background In the phase 2 double‐blind Study 211, a starting dose of lenvatinib 18 mg/day was compared with the approved starting dose of 24 mg/day in patients with radioiodine‐refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR‐DTC). Predefined criteria for noninferiority for efficacy in the 18 mg arm were not met; safety was similar in both arms. Impact of lenvatinib treatment on health‐related quality‐of‐life (HRQoL) was a secondary endpoint of Study 211. Methods Patients with RR‐DTC were randomly assigned to a blinded starting dose of lenvatinib 18 mg/day or 24 mg/day. HRQoL was assessed at baseline, every 8 weeks until Week 24, then every 16 weeks, and at the off‐treatment visit, using the EQ‐5D‐3L and FACT‐G instruments. Completion and compliance rates, mean change from baseline, and times to first and definitive deterioration were evaluated. Results Baseline EQ‐5D and FACT‐G scores, and overall changes from baseline, were comparable between patients in the lenvatinib 18 mg/day (n = 77) and 24 mg/day arms (n = 75). For the 18 mg versus 24 mg arms, least squares mean differences were −0.42 (95% CI −4.88, 4.03) for EQ‐5D‐VAS and 0.47 (95% CI −3.45, 4.39) for FACT‐G total. Time to first deterioration did not significantly favor either arm; EQ‐5D‐VAS HR [18 mg/24 mg] 0.93 (95% CI 0.61–1.40), EQ‐5D‐HUI HR [18 mg/24 mg] 0.68 (95% CI 0.44–1.05), FACT‐G total HR [18 mg/24 mg] 0.73 (95% CI 0.48–1.12). Time to definitive deterioration did not significantly favor either arm, though EQ‐5D‐VAS showed a trend in favor of the 24 mg arm (HR [18 mg/24 mg] 1.72; 95% CI 0.99–3.01); EQ‐5D‐HUI HR [18 mg/24 mg] was 0.96 (95% CI 0.57–1.63), FACT‐G total HR [18 mg/24 mg] was 0.72 (95% CI 0.43–1.21). Conclusions In Study 211, HRQoL for patients in the lenvatinib 18 mg/day arm was not statistically different from that of patients in the 24 mg/day arm. These data further support the use of the approved lenvatinib starting dose of 24 mg/day in patients with RR‐DTC. ClinicalTrials.gov Number NCT02702388.