1. Outcome of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: Comparison of using and not using the floor standing pneumatic powered endoscope-holder system
- Author
-
Masahiko Tosaka, Rei Yamaguchi, Kazuhiko Horiguchi, Atsushi Ozawa, Shunichi Matsumoto, Fumiaki Honda, Yohei Hokama, Takaaki Yoshida, Mitsuko Okano, Akihiro Tsukada, Shogo Ishiuchi, Masanobu Yamada, and Yuhei Yoshimoto
- Subjects
Acromegaly ,Growth hormone ,Pituitary neuroendocrine tumor ,Endoscopy ,Endoscope holder ,Science (General) ,Q1-390 ,Social sciences (General) ,H1-99 - Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery can be performed by two surgeons, including an endoscopist (PE/2S), and by a single surgeon with an endoscope-holder system (PE/1S + H). We analyzed the surgical outcome, and outcome predictors in acromegaly patients in endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery using floor standing pneumatic endoscope-holder system. Methods: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery was performed with PE/1S+H (n = 51) and PE/2S (n = 20). Postoperative remission was evaluated by the 2010 consensus criteria for acromegaly. We compared the surgical results of PE/2S style and PE/1S+H style, and investigated the factors associated with favorable surgical outcomes. Results: There was no difference in clinical background between the PE/2S and the PE/1S + H groups. The remission rates for PE/2S and PE/1S+H were 65.0% and 82.4%, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.128). In consecutive 71 cases, statistically useful predictors of remission were low preoperative growth hormone (GH) level (
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF