Search

Introduction: We aimed to provide a practical and evidence-based guide on the indications, performance and reporting of high-resolution oesophageal manometry (HRM) and ambulatory pH monitoring (PHM) in adult patients in Singapore. Methods: The guideline committee comprised local gastroenterologists from public and private sectors with particular expertise in aspects of HRM and PHM, and it was tasked to produce evidence-based statements on the indications, performance and reporting of these tests. Each committee member performed literature searches to retrieve relevant articles within the context of domains to which they were assigned. Results: Twelve recommendation statements were created and summarised. Conclusion: Standardising key aspects of HRM and PHM is imperative to ensure the delivery of high-quality care. We reported the development of recommendations for the performance and interpretation of HRM and ambulatory reflux monitoring in Singapore. Keywords: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, GERD, high-resolution oesophageal manometry, oesophagus, pH testing

Background and aim Patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) often have concomitant anxiety and depression. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) combines the principles of cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness. It is a group-based therapy and has been shown to be efficacious in functional gastrointestinal disorders. There are no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating MBCT in FD. We aimed to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of MBCT in FD management. Methods We performed a mixed-method single-center pilot randomized trial of 28 patients fulfilling ROME-III criteria for FD. Fifteen patients were randomized to an 8-week MBCT program while 13 underwent treatment-as-usual (TAU). Patients completed questionnaires at baseline and at week 8. Two focus-groups were conducted. Feasibility of recruitment, acceptability of randomization, procedures and intervention, handout compliance and feasibility of quantitative measures were assessed. The primary outcome was subjective-clinical-assessment of FD symptoms (SCA-FD). Secondary outcome measures included Short-form Nepean Dyspepsia Index (SF-NDI), subjective-clinical-assessment of general health (SCA-GH), EuroQoL-Visual Analog Scale (EuroQoL-VAS), and Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 Items (DASS-21). Results Twelve of 15 patients in the MBCT group completed the program. There was a trend towards symptom improvement, with 90% in the MBCT group reporting improvement in SCA-FD compared with 45% in TAU(P = 0.063). Patients who underwent MBCT reported greater improvement in SF-NDI (mean change: -8.8 (SD: 7.5) vs -0.7 (7.2), P = 0.018) and DASS-21 (-19.8 (29.5) vs -5.5 (6.6) P = 0.13) compared with TAU. There was no difference in SCA-GH and EuroQoL-VAS. Based on SCA-FD improvement, the eventual RCT will require 50 patients (25 in each group). Conclusions Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy is likely efficacious for FD, and it would be feasible to conduct a RCT.

There is great interest in crosstalk between the gastrointestinal and immune systems. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is a bowel disorder prevalent among patients with Parkinson's disease; SIBO treatment has been shown to modulate neurological inflammation, motor and cognitive outcomes there. However, to date, no link between Alzheimer's dementia and SIBO has been established. This pilot study sought to estimate the prevalence of SIBO in Alzheimer's dementia in the outpatient setting in Singapore General Hospital. It entailed performing a hydrogen breath test and objectively scoring gastrointestinal symptoms and their severity in 48 patients, comparing symptom scores and mean breath test values in those with mild to moderate Alzheimer's against age- and sex-matched controls that did not fulfill DSM-V criteria for probable Alzheimer's. Here, the prevalence of positive breath tests and symptoms of SIBO were no greater among Alzheimer's patients than in controls. This suggests that the gut microbiome changes and increased bowel inflammation seen in previous studies on Alzheimer's patients are likely effected through pathways other than SIBO, and are likely more complex than a mere increase in small bowel bacterial volume. Rather, future research could be directed along the lines of qualitative changes in small bowel microbiota, or pathologies in other parts of the gastrointestinal tract such as the colon or stomach, aspects which are not adequately captured by the hydrogen breath test. Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; dementia; gut-brain axis; small intestinal bacterial overgrowth; microbiome.

Objective Assess whether treatment with probiotics improve gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled parallel-group phase II trial, SSc subjects with total score ≥ 0.1 on a validated SSc-specific gastrointestinal tract (GIT) questionnaire were randomized (1:1) to receive 60 days of high dose multi-strain probiotics (Vivomixx® 1800 billion units/day) or identical placebo, followed by an additional 60 days of probiotics in both groups. Between group differences in GIT score change were assessed after 60 days (primary outcome, time-point T1) and 120 days (secondary outcome, time-point, T2) by an intention-to-treat approach. Stool samples at three time-points were subjected to 16S next generation sequencing. Results Forty subjects were randomized to placebo-probiotics (n = 21) or probiotics-probiotics (n = 19). At T1, no significant improvement was observed between the two groups, reported as mean ± SE for total GIT score (placebo 0.14 ± 0.06 versus probiotics 0.13 ± 0.07; p = 0.85) or its subdomains. At T2, whilst there was no significant improvement in total GIT score (placebo-probiotics –0.05±0.06; probiotics-probiotics –0.18 ± 0.07; p = 0.14), there was significant improvement of GIT-reflux in the probiotic group (–0.22 ± 0.05 versus placebo-probiotics 0.05 ± 0.07; p = 0.004). Subjects on probiotics exhibited increasing stool microbiota alpha diversity compared to the placebo-probiotics group. Adverse events (AEs) were mild, with similar proportion of subjects with AEs and serious AEs in both groups. Conclusion Whilst there was no clear improvement in overall GI symptoms after 60 days, we observed significantly improved GI reflux after 120 days of probiotics. The trial confirmed safety of multi-strain probiotics in SSc patients. Trial registration. Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01804959

Background Systemic sclerosis-associated gastrointestinal tract involvement (SSc-GIT) is an independent predictor of 2-year mortality in early SSc. Availability of non-invasive investigations will facilitate early diagnosis and monitoring. Hypothesis We investigate the role of 18 F-FDG-PET-MRI in SSc-GIT, hypothesizing that i) higher bowel FDG-PET uptake, a surrogate biomarker for inflammation, distinguishes healthy bowel from inflamed SSc-GIT; ii) MRI T1-MOLLI mapping, a surrogate biomarker for cardiac fibrosis, distinguishes healthy bowel from fibrotic SSc-GIT. Methods In this prospective study, 16 SSc patients and 15 healthy controls were recruited. All SSc patients and 5 controls underwent PET-MRI (with T1-MOLLI mapping) on a Siemens 3T mMR; 10 controls underwent MRI without PET. Manual segmentation of the large and small bowels was performed jointly by two trained analysts in order to report T1 and PET values. Control dataset was used to assess normal healthy range. Mean T1 values, mean Tissue-to-Background (TBR) PET values, as well as amount of supposedly abnormal bowel (measured using the healthy ranges) was compared using Student’s t-test and Cohen’s d effect size. Results Mean T1 values in large (1113 ± 182 ms vs 856 ± 176 ms; p-value Conclusion Our novel study of FDG-PET-MRI in SSc-GIT demonstrated promising results in non-invasively evaluating concurrently bowel inflammation and fibrosis.

Background A low–fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyol (FODMAP) diet (LFD) appeared to improve gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). However, evidence of its efficacy in Asia remains scarce. Objectives This study aims to investigate the clinical effectiveness of LFD intervention among Asian IBS patients and barriers to its adherence. Methods Patients with IBS who were instructed to follow LFD by dietitians at a tertiary hospital in Singapore between July 2013 and December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Severity scores of 19 gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded using an 11-point rating scale (0 = “no symptoms,” 10 = “extremely severe”) pre- and post-LFD intervention. Adherence to LFD was assessed based on patients’ diet history and a high-FODMAP food checklist. Results Eighty-two patients with a median follow-up of 5.8 weeks were investigated. The LFD adherence rate was 61.0% ( n = 50). Overall, statistically significant improvement was observed in 14 of 19 gastrointestinal symptoms (median difference = −2.0 to −0.5, p < .05). The proportion of patients who had improvement in 10 individual symptoms (defined as ≥1 point reduction in symptom severity rating) was significantly higher in LFD-adherent patients (67.5%–82.4%) than that of the non-adherent group (27.8%–55.0%). Reasons reported for non-adherence included “limited availability of low-FODMAP alternatives” ( n = 9), “limited understanding of LFD” ( n = 7), and “perceived lack of benefit” ( n = 4). Conclusions LFD intervention improved gastrointestinal symptoms in a cohort of Asian IBS patients. Limited access to low-FODMAP alternatives was the main barrier to adherence.

Metastasis to the esophagus from a distant primary cancer is a rare manifestation in a patient with a history of oncological disease presenting with obstructive upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Computed tomography of the thorax or esophagogastroduodenoscopy can be non-diagnostic as the disease tends to be submucosal. In such a situation, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) can be directed to characterize and sample the submucosal esophageal lesion. We present a case series of metastatic esophageal strictures diagnosed with EUS and FNA.

Summary Introduction Most studies on alternative intravenous lipid emulsion (IVLE) versus conventional IVLE have been conducted in the critically ill patients. The benefits of alternative IVLE in non-critically ill patients is uncertain. We aim to determine clinical outcome difference between alternative IVLE versus conventional IVLE in non-critically ill patients. Method All patients on parenteral nutrition (PN) from July 2007 to September 2010 were identified. Patients were stratified into two groups: conventional IVLE (soybean oil-based) and alternative IVLEs, namely MCT oil-based, olive oil-based and fish oil-containing IVLE. Result Three hundred and eighty-eight patients were included in the study. Ninety-one patients received soybean-based IVLE, 59 patients received MCT oil-based IVLE, 141 patients received olive oil-based IVLE and 97 patients received fish oil-containing IVLE. Adjusting the effect of baseline covariates in separate multiple linear/logistic regression models, there were no differences in mortality, readmission, length of stay and infection between conventional IVLE group and alternative IVLEs group, the adjusted p-value was 0.64, 0.06, 0.36 and 0.18 respectively. However, there was a significant change in day 5 CRP between these two groups (8.43 g/L (SD 112.2) vs −41.2 (SD 106.4); adjusted p-value = 0.01). There was no difference in day 5 albumin between these two group (−1.03 (SD 5.1) vs −0.1 (SD 5.3); adjusted p-value = 0.08). Conclusion Our study showed that pertinent clinical outcomes in non-critically ill patients who received either conventional IVLE or alternative IVLEs were the same. However, there was significant reduction in day-5 CRP in alternative IVLE compared to conventional IVLE.

Patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) have a decreased quality of life (QoL). Psychological illnesses are strongly associated with FGIDs. This study examined the effect of a comprehensive psychological intervention programme designed for refractory FGID patients.Refractory FGID patients at a tertiary gastroenterology unit were encouraged to participate in a psychological intervention programme, which included screening for anxiety and depression in patients, educating patients and physicians on FGIDs, and providing early access to psychiatric consultation for patients with significant psychological illnesses. The duration of follow-up was six months. Outcomes were measured using the Irritable Bowel Syndrome-QoL (IBS-QoL) instrument and the EuroQol five dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire.A total of 1,189 patients (68% female, 80% Chinese, mean age 48.6 years) participated in the programme. Among these participants, 51% had a significant psychological disorder (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS] anxiety or depression score7). These participants had a significantly poorer QoL (IBS-QoL and EQ-5D, both p0.0001), and were more likely to be single or English-speaking, as compared to the participants without psychological disorders. Participants who completed ≥ 3 months of follow-up (n = 906) showed significant and durable improvement. High baseline HADS anxiety score predicted improvement (p0.001), with participant IBS-QoL and EQ-5D scores decreasing over time.The intervention programme was associated with a clinically meaningful improvement in the QoL of patients with refractory FGIDs. High baseline anxiety was predictive of improvement.

In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and excessive belching, most belches are supragastric, and can induce reflux episodes and worsen GERD. Supragastric belching (SGB) might be reduced with diaphragmatic breathing exercises. We investigated whether diaphragmatic breathing therapy is effective in reducing belching and proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.We performed a prospective study of 36 consecutive patients with GERD refractory to PPI therapy and a belching visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 6 or more, seen at a gastroenterology clinic at a tertiary hospital in Singapore from April 2015 through October 2016. Patients underwent high-resolution manometry and 24-hour pH-impedance studies while they were off PPIs. Fifteen patients were placed on a standardized diaphragmatic breathing exercise protocol (treatment group) and completed questionnaires at baseline, after diaphragmatic breathing therapy, and 4 months after the therapy ended. Twenty-one patients were placed on a waitlist (control subjects), completed the same questionnaires with an additional questionnaire after their waitlist period, and eventually received diaphragmatic breathing therapy. The primary outcome was reduction in belching VAS by 50% or more after treatment. Secondary outcomes included GERD symptoms (evaluated using the reflux disease questionnaire) and quality of life (QoL) scores, determined from the Reflux-Qual Short Form and EuroQoL-VAS.Nine of the 15 patients in the treatment group (60%) and none of the 21 control subjects achieved the primary outcome (P.001). In the treatment group, the mean belching VAS score decreased from 7.1 ± 1.5 at baseline to 3.5 ± 2.0 after diaphragmatic breathing therapy; in the control group, the mean VAS score was 7.6 ± 1.1 at baseline and 7.4 ± 1.3 after the waitlist period. Eighty percent of patients in the treatment group significantly reduced belching frequency compared with 19% in control subjects (P = .001). Treatment significantly reduced symptoms of GERD (the mean reflux disease questionnaire score decreased by 12.2 in the treatment group and 3.1 in the control group; P = .01). The treatment significantly increased QoL scores (the mean Reflux-Qual Short Form score increased by 15.4 in the treatment group and 5.2 in the control group; P = .04) and mean EuroQoL-VAS scores (15.7 increase in treatment group and 2.4 decrease in the control group). These changes were sustained at 4 months after treatment. In the end, 20 of the 36 patients who received diaphragmatic breathing therapy (55.6%), all with excessive SGB, achieved the primary outcome.In a prospective study, we found a standardized protocol for diaphragmatic breathing to reduce belching and PPI-refractory gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, and increase QoL in patients with PPI-refractory GERD with belching-especially those with excessive SGB.

Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) may be due to anatomical abnormalities, but it is unclear how to evaluate them after high-resolution manometry. We aimed to determine (i) clinical and high-resolution manometry parameters differentiating anatomical EGJOO from functional EGJOO, (ii) investigations chosen and yield for anatomical EGJOO, and (iii) clinical outcomes of functional EGJOO.Medical records of consecutive patients with symptomatic EGJOO from February 2012 to December 2015 were reviewed. EGJOO was defined as anatomical if investigations identified a macroscopic or microscopic pathology accounting for EGJOO.Forty of 292 (13.7%) had EGJOO, of which 6/40 (15%) had anatomical EGJOO (two PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia, two infiltrating cancers, and two external compressions). Anatomical EGJOO was more likely to present with dysphagia (100% vs 29.4%, P = 0.001) and less likely with regurgitation (0% vs 41.2%, P = 0.05). Anatomical EGJOO had higher frequencies of premature contraction (50% vs 5.9%, P = 0.003) and lower mean values of distal latency (5.6 +/- 1.3 vs 6.7 +/- 1.2, P = 0.004). Computed tomography scans revealed 50% (3/6) of etiologies of anatomical EGJOO. Approximately, 73.5% (25/34) of patients with functional EGJOO had spontaneous resolution of their symptoms. One underwent pneumatic dilatation with symptom resolution while remaining eight with persistent symptoms were attributed to gastroesophageal reflux disease.Anatomical causes are present in 15% of EGJOO. Evaluation is warranted especially in patients presenting with dysphagia. Esophageal biopsies, barium swallows, computed tomography scans, and endoscopic ultrasound are complementary in EGJOO evaluation. In patients with non-obstructive symptoms and no anatomical etiologies, monitoring for spontaneous resolution is an option.

The development of the high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) and the Chicago classification have improved the diagnosis and management of esophageal motility disorders. However, some conditions have yet to be addressed by this classification. This review describes findings in HRM which are not included in the current Chicago classification based on the experience in our center. This includes the analysis of the upper esophageal sphincter, proximal esophagus, longitudinal muscle contraction, disorders related to gastroesophageal reflux disease and respiratory symptoms. The utility of provocative tests and the use of HRM in the evaluation of rumination syndrome and post-surgical patients will also be discussed. We believe that characterization of the manometric findings in these areas will eventually lead to incorporation of new criteria into the existing classification.

Introduction Belching is common in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Diaphragmatic breathing can reduce belching and GORD symptoms, but only patients with excessive supra-gastric belching (SGB) responded to this treatment. 24 hour pH-impedance study is the gold standard to diagnose SGB but is expensive and invasive. Our study aimed to identify clinical factors that can predict excessive SGB (>13/day) in GORD patients. Methods We prospectively analysed patients with a belching visual analogue scale (VAS) score ≥6 and a clinical or endoscopic diagnosis of GORD. All patients underwent 24 hour pH-impedance studies off medications. Patients were given questionnaire on belching symptoms, including belching VAS, belching frequency, repetitive nature of belching and ability to control belching. GORD symptoms were evaluated via Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ), somatization scores via PHQ15 and mood disorders via Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS). Statistical analysis via independent t-test and Chi2 test were done for univariate analysis, while logistic regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis of clinical factors most predictive of excessive SGB. Results We recruited 36 patients between April 2015 and October 2016 (25 women; mean age 45.5±12.7). 32 patients had excessive SGB, while 4 had predominantly gastric belching on pH-impedance studies. Repetitive belching and RDQ regurgitation score ≥2 were significantly more likely in patients with excessive SGB, but only repetitive belching was significant on multivariate analysis. Repetitive belching on questioning has a sensitivity of 93.4% and specificity of 75% for SGB diagnosis, positive predictive value 96.8% and negative predictive value 60.0%. Conclusions We identified that a simple questioning on the repetitive nature of belching can be used as a screening tool to predict SGB in belching patients, and hence predict response to diaphragmatic breathing exercises.

Management of patients with dysphagia, regurgitation, and related symptoms after antireflux surgery is challenging. This prospective, case-control study tested the hypothesis that compared with standard high-resolution manometry (HRM) with single water swallows (SWS), adding multiple water swallows (MWS) and a solid test meal increases diagnostic yield and clinical impact of physiological investigations.Fifty-seven symptomatic and 12 asymptomatic patients underwent HRM with SWS, MWS, and a solid test meal. Dysphagia and reflux were assessed by validated questionnaires. Diagnostic yield of standard and full HRM studies with 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring was compared. Pneumatic dilatation was performed for outlet obstruction on HRM studies. Clinical outcome was assessed by questionnaires and an analogue scale with "satisfactory" defined as at least 40% symptom improvement requiring no further treatment.Postoperative esophagogastric junction pressure was similar in all groups. Abnormal esophagogastric junction morphology (double high pressure band) was more common in symptomatic than in control patients (13 of 57 vs 0 of 12, P = .004). Diagnostic yield of HRM was 11 (19%), 11 (19%), and 33 of 57 (58%), with SWS, MWS, and solids, respectively (P.001); it was greatest for solids in patients with dysphagia (19 of 27, 70%). Outlet obstruction was present in 4 (7%), 11 (19%), and 15 of 57 patients (26%) with SWS, MWS, and solids, respectively (P.009). No asymptomatic control had clinically relevant dysfunction on solid swallows. Dilatation was performed in 12 of 15 patients with outlet obstruction during the test meal. Symptom response was satisfactory, good, or excellent in 7 of 12 (58%) with no serious complications.The addition of MWS and a solid test meal increases the diagnostic yield of HRM studies in patients with symptoms after fundoplication and identifies additional patients with outlet obstruction who benefit from endoscopic dilatation.

G A A b st ra ct s significant for individual polyols: mannitol (p=0.002), sorbitol (p

We read with great interest the data presented by Zhang et al1 regarding changes in high-resolution manometry (HRM) values when the procedure was performed in the upright position using solid swallows. Dysphagia and other esophageal symptoms due to abnormal esophageal motility have been shown to be poorly diagnosed by clinical history or endoscopy.2,3 Assessment of esophageal manometry is advocated as the subsequent investigation. While HRM based on standard supine water swallows as described by the Chicago classification4 has been effective in guiding the management of achalasia, it has had limited impact on clinical management of other motility disorders.5 In addition, it is increasingly recognized that performing HRM in a supine position is non-physiological and poorly tolerated by some patients. Performing the investigation in an upright position results in changes in the normative values which may alter the diagnosis in some patients.6 In addition, the use of solid swallows as a provocative physiological test has been shown to increase the sensitivity of detecting motility disorders7 and has been advocated as a complementary test to the standard water swallows.8,9

G A A b st ra ct s Forty-six subjects had biopsy to "rule out EoE"; 29 (63%) of these had normal WEPM. The maximum eos/hpf ranged between 1 and 75 with 19 patients having between 1-15 eos/hpf (mean ± sd: 4.5 ± 4.5) and 6 having .15 eos/hpf (mean ± sd: 41.3 ± 21.3). Of these, 2 patients, 4.3% (95% CI: 0.5, 14.8%) proved to have EoE and one had eosinophilic gastroenteritis with eosinophilic esophagitis. These 46 patients were significantly younger, more commonly female, more likely to have dysphagia, less likely to have abnormal EGD, BE, subepithelial tissue and lamina propia fibrosis than patients who had EB done for other reasons. Patients with abnormal WEPM were significantly more likely to have basal cell hyperplasia (57% vs. 23%; p=0.004). Abnormal histology was significantly more common in patients with abnormal WEPM than in those with normal WEPM (73% vs. 44%; p=0.011). Patients with abnormal histology were more likely to have heartburn and/or regurgitation than those with normal histology (p=0.019). CONCLUSION: Nearly 45% of patients with normal pH study have histologic findings that may affect patient management. EoE is an uncommon finding in patients undergoing WEPM for evaluation of atypical or refractory gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

Background: A TLESR is a major mechanism of acid reflux in healthy subjects and patients with reflux esophagitis and we have noticed that the amplitude of primary peristalsis and EGJ pressure, following a TLESR, is accompanied by a forceful contraction, when compared with before a TLESR. The aim of this study is to investigate whether or not primary peristalsis and EGJ pressure, when accompanied by a forceful contraction and following a TLESR, is a characteristic finding of a TLESR. Methods: 10 healthy subjects underwent esophageal high-resolution manometry with a 21-lumen perfused assembly, which monitored pressure in the pharynx, the upper esophageal sphincter, the esophageal body, LES and the proximal stomach. The EGJ was evaluated using ten side holes, spaced at 1-cm intervals. Recordings were then taken, in the sitting position, for 1 hour after a meal (692 kcal, 33 % fat). A TLESR is defined as previously described. Data were analyzed, using Trace! Software (Dr. G.S Hebbard, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia). The contractile integral (CI) of the distal esophageal segment (D-CI: volume of the domain above 20 mmHg), excluding the EGJ segment, was measured both before and after a TLESR, and the CI of the EGJ (EGJCI) (volume of the domain above 0 mmHg), was measured for 8 seconds after primary peristalsis reached the EGJ, both before and after a TLESR. Results: 56 TLESRs were measured during the study. The D-CI (1603 mmHg s cm (1177-2120), median (interquartile range)) following a TLESR was significantly greater than before a TLESR (484 (323-1079)) and more than a 50% increase of D-CI in 35 (62.5%) of the 56 TLESRs was observed. The EGJCI (790 (465-1009)) following a TLESR was significantly greater than before a TLESR (238 (186-308)) and more than a 50% increase in the EGJ-CI in 48 (85.7%) of the 56 TLESRs was observed. Conclusions: The D-CI and the EGJ-CI following a TLESR, were significantly greater than before a TLESR and this tendency was evident in the EGJ-CI, although it can, at times, be difficult to evaluate a TLESR. If the focus is on a forceful contraction of primary peristalsis or on the EGJ, it may be easier to detect and evaluate a TLESR.

Background Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disorder. The prevalence of IBS in Asian countries varies from 2.9% to 15.6%. IBS does not result in increased mortality, but is associated with psychological distress and disruption of work and sleep. Consequently, the evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important outcome measure for patients with IBS since it provides a holistic assessment of the patient's emotional, social and physical function. However, some HRQoL tools can be time-consuming to apply. EQ-5D is a brief HRQoL tool which has been validated in the Western IBS population but has thus far not been used in Asia. This study was conducted to determine whether persons with self-reported symptoms that met the Rome III criteria for IBS had a poorer quality of life than those without these symptoms. We also aimed to determine which specific aspects of quality of life were most affected and whether any risk factors distinguished those with and without IBS. Methods Self-administered questionnaires which included the Rome III diagnostic questionnaire modules for IBS and the EQ-5D questionnaire were obtained from participants of a health symposium in Singapore on 31th October 2010. IBS was diagnosed based on the Rome III Criteria. The main outcome measure was the EQ-5D index score. The relationship between the presence of IBS and the EQ-5D index score, individual dimensions of EQ-5D and demographic risk factors were examined. Results 449 completed questionnaires were analyzed. The mean EQ-5D index score for IBS was 0.739 which was a significant reduction compared to non-IBS participants [−0.11 (95% CI: -0.15 to −0.07), p Conclusion IBS sufferers have significantly poorer quality of life. Assessment of HRQoL in IBS using the EQ-5D should be considered in further studies and routine clinical practice.

results: There were a total of 104 respondents; 82.5% of respondents felt that GC is common in Singapore. While most risk factors (RF) were identified correctly, knowledge of dietary RF was deficient, with only 34.3% and 36.5% realising that a high salt diet and low vegetable/fruit intake were RF, respectively. 95.1% knew that GC can be asymptomatic, but if detected early, is potentially curable (97.1%). Majority of respondents felt that GC was best diagnosed by endoscopy and the best time to diagnose it was when asymptomatic. However, only 52% of the respondents felt that screening gastroscopy was worthwhile. For those willing to pay for screening gastroscopy, the mean cost they were willing to pay was S$243. conclusion: Our results show that while most RF of GC are well recognised, knowledge of dietary factors is deficient. There is ambivalence towards screening gastroscopy despite knowing that GC is common in Singapore and can be asymptomatic. This may be a barrier to tackling the problem of GC in Singapore. Before we recommend any GC screening programmes in the future, it may be important to optimise knowledge and change the mindsets of doctors in Singapore towards GC.