Search

Background: Inserting noise into existing patient projection data to simulate lower‐radiation‐dose exams has been frequently used in traditional energy‐integrating‐detector (EID)‐CT to optimize radiation dose in clinical protocols and to generate paired images for training deep‐learning‐based reconstruction and noise reduction methods. Recent introduction of photon counting detector CT (PCD‐CT) also requires such a method to accomplish these tasks. However, clinical PCD‐CT scanners often restrict the users access to the raw count data, exporting only the preprocessed, log‐normalized sinogram. Therefore, it remains a challenge to employ projection domain noise insertion algorithms on PCD‐CT. Purpose: To develop and validate a projection domain noise insertion algorithm for PCD‐CT that does not require access to the raw count data. Materials and Methods: A projection‐domain noise model developed originally for EID‐CT was adapted for PCD‐CT. This model requires, as input, a map of the incident number of photons at each detector pixel when no object is in the beam. To obtain the map of incident number of photons, air scans were acquired on a PCD‐CT scanner, then the noise equivalent photon number (NEPN) was calculated from the variance in the log normalized projection data of each scan. Additional air scans were acquired at various mA settings to investigate the impact of pulse pileup on the linearity of NEPN measurement. To validate the noise insertion algorithm, Noise Power Spectra (NPS) were generated from a 30 cm water tank scan and used to compare the noise texture and noise level of measured and simulated half dose and quarter dose images. An anthropomorphic thorax phantom was scanned with automatic exposure control, and noise levels at different slice locations were compared between simulated and measured half dose and quarter dose images. Spectral correlation between energy thresholds T1 and T2, and energy bins, B1 and B2, was compared between simulated and measured data across a wide range of tube current. Additionally, noise insertion was performed on a clinical patient case for qualitative assessment. Results: The NPS generated from simulated low dose water tank images showed similar shape and amplitude to that generated from the measured low dose images, differing by a maximum of 5.0% for half dose (HD) T1 images, 6.3% for HD T2 images, 4.1% for quarter dose (QD) T1 images, and 6.1% for QD T2 images. Noise versus slice measurements of the lung phantom showed comparable results between measured and simulated low dose images, with root mean square percent errors of 5.9%, 5.4%, 5.0%, and 4.6% for QD T1, HD T1, QD T2, and HD T2, respectively. NEPN measurements in air were linear up until 112 mA, after which pulse pileup effects significantly distort the air scan NEPN profile. Spectral correlation between T1 and T2 in simulation agreed well with that in the measured data in typical dose ranges. Conclusions: A projection‐domain noise insertion algorithm was developed and validated for PCD‐CT to synthesize low‐dose images from existing scans. It can be used for optimizing scanning protocols and generating paired images for training deep‐learning‐based methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The vast majority of body CT exams are performed with automatic exposure control (AEC), which adapts the mean tube current to the patient size and modulates the tube current either angularly, longitudinally or both. However, most radiation dose estimation tools are based on fixed tube current scans. Accurate estimates of patient dose from AEC scans require knowledge of the tube current values, which is usually unavailable. The purpose of this work was to develop and validate methods to accurately estimate the tube current values prescribed by one manufacturers AEC system to enable accurate estimates of patient dose. METHODS: Methods were developed that took into account available patient attenuation information, user selected image quality reference parameters and x-ray system limits to estimate tube current values for patient scans. Methods consistent with AAPM Report 220 were developed that used patient attenuation data that were: (a) supplied by the manufacturer in the CT localizer radiograph and (b) based on a simulated CT localizer radiograph derived from image data. For comparison, actual tube current values were extracted from the projection data of each patient. Validation of each approach was based on data collected from 40 pediatric and adult patients who received clinically indicated chest (n = 20) and abdomen/pelvis (n = 20) scans on a 64 slice multidetector row CT (Sensation 64, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany). For each patient dataset, the following were collected with Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval: (a) projection data containing actual tube current values at each projection view, (b) CT localizer radiograph (topogram) and (c) reconstructed image data. Tube current values were estimated based on the actual topogram (actual-topo) as well as the simulated topogram based on image data (sim-topo). Each of these was compared to the actual tube current values from the patient scan. In addition, to assess the accuracy of each method in estimating patient organ doses, Monte Carlo simulations were performed by creating voxelized models of each patient, identifying key organs and incorporating tube current values into the simulations to estimate dose to the lungs and breasts (females only) for chest scans and the liver, kidney, and spleen for abdomen/pelvis scans. Organ doses from simulations using the actual tube current values were compared to those using each of the estimated tube current values (actual-topo and sim-topo). RESULTS: When compared to the actual tube current values, the average error for tube current values estimated from the actual topogram (actual-topo) and simulated topogram (sim-topo) was 3.9% and 5.8% respectively. For Monte Carlo simulations of chest CT exams using the actual tube current values and estimated tube current values (based on the actual-topo and sim-topo methods), the average differences for lung and breast doses ranged from 3.4% to 6.6%. For abdomen/pelvis exams, the average differences for liver, kidney, and spleen doses ranged from 4.2% to 5.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Strong agreement between organ doses estimated using actual and estimated tube current values provides validation of both methods for estimating tube current values based on data provided in the topogram or simulated from image data.

Simultaneous dual-contrast imaging of iodine and bismuth has shown promise in prior phantom and animal studies utilizing spectral CT. However, it is noted that in previous studies, Pepto-Bismol has frequently been employed as the source of bismuth, exceeding the recommended levels for human subjects. This investigation sought to assess the feasibility of visually differentiating and precisely quantifying low-concentration bismuth using clinical dual-source photon-counting CT (PCCT) in a scenario involving both iodinated and bismuth-based contrast materials. Four bismuth samples (0.6, 1.3, 2.5, and 5.1 mg/mL) were prepared using Pepto-Bismol, alongside three iodine rods (1, 2, and 5 mg/mL), inserted into multi-energy CT phantoms with three different sizes, and scanned on a PCCT system at three tube potentials (120, 140, and Sn140 kV). A generic image-based three-material decomposition method generated iodine and bismuth maps, with mean mass concentrations and noise levels measured. The root-mean-square errors for iodine and bismuth determined the optimal tube potential. The tube potential of 140 kV demonstrated optimal quantification performance when both iodine and bismuth were considered. Distinct differentiation of iodine rods with all three concentrations and bismuth samples with mass concentrations ≥ 1.3 mg/mL was observed across all phantom sizes at the optimal kV setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The detectability performance of a CT scanner is difficult to precisely quantify when nonlinearities are present in reconstruction. An efficient detectability assessment method that is sensitive to small effects of dose and scanner settings is desirable. We previously proposed a method using a search challenge instrument: a phantom is embedded with hundreds of lesions at random locations, and a model observer is used to detect lesions. Preliminary tests in simulation and a prototype showed promising results. Purpose: In this work, we fabricated a full‐size search challenge phantom with design updates, including changes to lesion size, contrast, and number, and studied our implementation by comparing the lesion detectability from a nonprewhitening (NPW) model observer between different reconstructions at different exposure levels, and by estimating the instrument sensitivity to detect changes in dose. Methods: Designed to fit into QRM anthropomorphic phantoms, our search challenge phantom is a cylindrical insert 10 cm wide and 4 cm thick, embedded with 12 000 lesions (nominal width of 0.6 mm, height of 0.8 mm, and contrast of −350 HU), and was fabricated using PixelPrint, a 3D printing technique. The insert was scanned alone at a high dose to assess printing accuracy. To evaluate lesion detectability, the insert was placed in a QRM thorax phantom and scanned from 50 to 625 mAs with increments of 25 mAs, once per exposure level, and the average of all exposure levels was used as high‐dose reference. Scans were reconstructed with three different settings: filtered‐backprojection (FBP) with Br40 and Br59, and Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) with strength level 5 and Br59 kernel. An NPW model observer was used to search for lesions, and detection performance of different settings were compared using area under the exponential transform of free response ROC curve (AUC). Using propagation of uncertainty, the sensitivity to changes in dose was estimated by the percent change in exposure due to one standard deviation of AUC, measured from 5 repeat scans at 100, 200, 300, and 400 mAs. Results: The printed insert lesions had an average position error of 0.20 mm compared to printing reference. As the exposure level increases from 50 mAs to 625 mAs, the lesion detectability AUCs increase from 0.38 to 0.92, 0.42 to 0.98, and 0.41 to 0.97 for FBP Br40, FBP Br59, and SAFIRE Br59, respectively, with a lower rate of increase at higher exposure level. FBP Br59 performed best with AUC 0.01 higher than SAFIRE Br59 on average and 0.07 higher than FBP Br40 (all P < 0.001). The standard deviation of AUC was less than 0.006, and the sensitivity to detect changes in mAs was within 2% for FBP Br59. Conclusions: Our 3D‐printed search challenge phantom with 12 000 submillimeter lesions, together with an NPW model observer, provide an efficient CT detectability assessment method that is sensitive to subtle effects in reconstruction and is sensitive to small changes in dose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]