Search

Introduction: Advance directives (ADs) promote patient autonomy in end-of-life (EOL) care, including an individual's EOL medical treatment preferences. This study aims to better understand preferences regarding EOL medical treatment among community-dwelling adults (18 and older) residing in the United States and examine the association between sociodemographic characteristics and EOL medical treatment preferences. Methods: Utilizing a cross-sectional study and snowball sampling methodology, community-dwelling adults completed a survey containing two different ADs and a questionnaire with sociodemographic information. Univariate analyses were used to summarize EOL medical treatment preferences among the sample, and bivariate analyses (Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests) were performed to examine the association between sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, and race/ethnicity) and EOL medical treatment preferences. Results: The mean age of the 166 participants was 50 (SD: 21.65, range: 18-93), with 58.4% being White and 61.4% being female. Generally, when EOL scenarios involved brain damage or a coma, more participants indicated that they did not want life-support treatment. Age and race were both associated with EOL medical treatment preferences, but no significant differences were observed in the bivariate results by gender. Largely, young and middle-aged adults, along with Black participants, were more likely to prefer more aggressive EOL medical treatments than older adults and White participants. Conclusion: Overall, EOL medical treatment preferences varied among participants. The study findings indicate that adults develop different preferences for EOL medical treatment, with some of the variation attributable to sociodemographic characteristics such as age and race. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Advance directives (AdvDirs) align end-of-life care with personal values, averting unnecessary treatments. This study explores factors influencing AdvDir completion. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study with community-dwelling adults (n = 166) age range 18-93, using a survey to gather sociodemographics, beliefs, and AdvDir experiences. Multivariate logistic regression quantifies associations between selected covariates and AdvDir completion. Results: We found that 36% of respondents had completed AdvDirs. The majority were comfortable discussing death (77%) and end-of-life care (84%) and recognized the importance of AdvDirs (79%). Age, education level, self-perceived health status, exposure to end-of-life planning, and the preference to limit treatment in potential future Alzheimer's scenarios significantly influenced AdvDir completion. Conclusion: In conclusion, the study highlights: (1) The need for age-specific, personalized AdvDir education initiatives, and (2) The necessity of intensified AdvDir awareness efforts, particularly for individuals favoring unlimited treatment in Alzheimer's or dementia scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Our study aims to (1) examine the perspectives of young adults toward Five Wishes, and (2) measure their preferences related to personal, emotional, spiritual, and medical choices in end-of-life care planning. Methods: Data were collected using a structured survey questionnaire and Five Wishes. Participants include graduate students (n = 30) attending a university in New York State. Bivariate summary statistics were performed to address the study aims. Results: The average age of the participants was 24 years old; 60% were female, 60% White, and 27% Black. In the case of permanent and severe brain damage without the expectation to wake up or recover, 63% of the participants do not want life-support treatment. In the event of a coma without expectation to wake up or recover, 53% do not want life-support treatment. When close to death, 80% want to have religious or spiritual readings and well-loved - poems read aloud. Conclusion: Young adults are capable of making their own decisions about appointing a health care proxy and making choices for their personal, emotional, spiritual, and medical care for the future. The present findings intend to make contributions to the research pertaining to end-of-life care that promotes population-based healthcare decision-making, education, and awareness among young adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. It has been demonstrated that the majority of hip fracture patients do not regain their prefracture level of functioning and usually decline in function following fracture. Little is known about the effectiveness of surgical procedure performed (hemiarthroplasty vs internal fixation) on functional recovery of subcapital fracture patients. This study examines the factors related to the type of the surgical procedure chosen and the effect of this selection on physical activities of daily living (PADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Methods. The sample consists of 312 patents with subcapital fractures age 65 and older admitted from the community to one of seven Baltimore area hospitals between 1984 and 1986. Baseline information was obtained during hospitalization through structured interviews with both patients and their significant others (proxy). The follow-up interviews were administered to proxies at two months, six months, and one year after discharge from hospital. Information on disease diagnoses, fracture severity, and surgical procedures performed was obtained from medical charts. Results. Patients with a displaced fracture were seven times more likely to receive a hemiarthroplasty (OR = 7.0, 95% CI 3.7-13.1). During the short-term recovery (2 months after surgery), patients who received hemiarthroplasty were doing better in transferring, meal preparation, and shopping than those who received internal fixation. For the long-term functional recovery (one year), the overall PADL and IADL functions were not statistically significantly different between the two surgical procedures performed. Conclusions. The severity of fracture was found to be the most important determinant of surgical procedure. Patients with a subcapital fracture who received hemiarthroplasty tended to have a better functional recovery in the short term. Further study of other benefits of using a hemiarthroplasty is needed.