Search

Background/Aims: We investigated quantitative/qualitative changes of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in people with a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0.5. Methods: IADLs were evaluated in older residents: CDR of 0 (healthy) and CDR 0.5 (questionable/very mild dementia). The subjects with CDR 0.5 were divided into 2 types: the very mild Alzheimer's disease (vmAD) type and the other type including very mild subcortical vascular dementia. IADLs were evaluated quantitatively using the Lawton and the original qualitative IADL scales. Results: CDR 0.5/vmAD type subjects had impairment of only one Lawton item (Shopping) compared to CDR 0 subjects. However, the CDR 0.5/vmAD type group and the CDR 0.5/other type group showed impairment of 3 items in the qualitative assessment (Shopping, Food preparation, and Mode of transportation). Conclusion: We suggest using both quantitative/qualitative IADL scales for assessing older adults with very mild dementia.

Aim: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of apathy, and to compare vascular mild cognitive impairment (vMCI), amnestic MCI (amMCI), and other type using Clinical Assessment for Spontaneity (CAS). Methods: Agreement to take part in the study was obtained from 590 community dwellers, aged ≥75 years living in Kurihara, Japan. Of the 590 subjects, 221 had a clinical dementia rating (CDR) of 0 (normal); 295 had CDR 0.5 (mild cognitive impairment; MCI); and 74 had CDR 1+ (dementia). The CDR 0.5 subjects were divided into three groups: 55 with vMCI (Erkinjuntti et al. criteria), 91 with amMCI and 149 with other type. To evaluate the various aspects of apathy, we used the three CAS subscales: clinical interview (CAS1), self-evaluation (CAS2), and caregiver assessment (CAS3). Three analyses were then performed to determine: (i) the validity of CAS; (ii) the prevalence rate of apathy in CDR 0 versus CDR 0.5 versus CDR 1+; and (iii) the prevalence rate of apathy in normal versus vMCI versus amMCI versus other type. Results: CAS was validated with the Apathy Evaluation Scale. There were significant differences among the three CDR groups in CAS1, CAS2 and CAS3 (P

Vascular dementia (VaD) is a condition whereby decreased cerebral perfusion causes cognitive deterioration. We hypothesized that lesions of the anterior nucleus (AN) including the mammillo-thalamic tract cause a decline in the recollection of past episodes/events, and that the left thalamic infarction can cause frontal dysfunction through the “diaschisis.” We investigated 18 VaD cases with only left thalamic infarction. 99m Tc-ECD single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was used to assess regional cerebral blood flow (CBF). To test the first hypothesis, the scores on the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) domain Recent memory or the rating on the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) domain Memory were analyzed. To test the second hypothesis, we selected the six regions of interest that correlated with the two measures, i.e., word fluency and/or depressive state, as assessed with the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). We found that all patients had amnesia, especially in the AN group, six of the eight patients had scores of 1+ on the CDR Memory scale, and all but one disclosed the CASI domain Recent memory impairment. There were significant correlations between the left anterior cingulate CBF and word fluency scores, and between the right rectal gyrus CBF and GDS scores. We suggest that these observations are due to a remote effect of the thalamic lesion.

Aims: To examine the effectiveness of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to screen people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), to associate the MoCA score with the presence of infarction, and to detect the characteristics of people with very mild subcortical vascular dementia (vmSVD). Methods: 392 out of 886 community dwellers aged 75 years and above living in Kurihara, Northern Japan, agreed to participate in our study; 164 scored a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0 (healthy), 184 scored a CDR of 0.5 (MCI) and 44 scored a CDR of 1+ (dementia). The participants scoring a CDR of 0.5 were divided into 2 subtypes: 37 had vmSVD and 147 had other types of dementia. The objective variables were the total MoCA, the MoCA subscale and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Results: There was a difference in the MoCA and MMSE scores between the 3 CDR groups. The MoCA score overlapped in participants with CDR 0 and 0.5. There were significant CDR effects, while there were no significant infarction effects for the MoCA and MMSE. vmSVD participants had lower scores on the total MoCA, the MoCA attention subscale and MMSE than healthy elderly people and participants with other types of dementia. Conclusion: Our results suggested that MMSE performed rather well and that the MoCA is not superior to MMSE in MCI and vmSVD participants aged 75 and above in a community.

Aim: To determine whether impaired instrumental activities of daily living affect conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia for subjects in a community. Methods: This is a 7-year retrospective study that followed 226 randomly selected participants from the Prevalence Study 1998 in Tajiri in northern Japan who had Clinical Dementia Rating 0.5. Instrumental activities of daily living levels were assessed with a 21-item questionnaire. We analyzed the scores at baseline between the converters to dementia and non-converters. Results: The converters had lower baseline scores on the ‘bed making’ and ‘mode of transportation’ items compared with the non-converters; the former item was significant after a stepwise logistic regression analysis that excluded age and Mini-Mental State Examination effects. In gender analysis, female converters had lower baseline scores on the ‘bed making’ and ‘cleaning’ items. For male participants, no items were found to have such an effect. Conclusions: We suggest that when individuals with mild cognitive impairment are limited in their performance of instrumental activities of daily living, this is predictive of dementia onset.

Background Cholinesterase inhibitors can delay the progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Several clinical trials of the drug in moderate to severe AD have consistently reported clinically positive effects. A combining effect with psychosocial intervention was reported in mild to moderate AD patients. Since a therapeutic approach or rehabilitation combined with cholinesterase inhibitors for severe AD patients remains controversial, we performed a prospective intervention for patients in Long-Term Care Health Facilities (LTCHF). Methods Two LTCHFs (N1, N2) were enrolled. N1 is a 126-bed facility that does not treat with donepezil but rather with psychosocial intervention (reality orientation and reminiscence). N2 is a 150-bed facility with a 50-bed special dementia unit, in which the physician can prescribe donepezil. On top of the similar psychosocial intervention, rehabilitation is performed in N2. Thirty-two severe AD patients (MMSE

There have been no reports on the prevalence of dementia among the old-old people in Japan.We studied the old-old population in Kurihara, northern Japan. Analysis 1 of Participants 1 (n=590) was performed to evaluate the prevalence of dementia and dementing diseases by intensive evaluation including MRI. Analysis 2 aimed to determine a good indicator for detecting 'suspected dementia condition' based on the Long-Term Care Insurance index. Analysis 3 of Participants 2 (n=3915) aimed to estimate the prevalence of 'suspected dementia condition'.In Analysis 1, 73 people (12.4%) were diagnosed with dementia. The most common cause was Alzheimer's disease with cerebrovascular disease. In Analysis 2, level I of the Impairment Level of Dementia was found to be a good indicator of 'suspected dementia condition'. In Analysis 3, the overall estimated prevalence of 'suspected dementia condition' was 23.6%. In men, the ratio increased gradually from 75 to 87 years old to about 20%, increased to 40% at the age of 88 and became stable thereafter. In contrast, in women, the ratio increased from 75 to 95+ years old, reaching about 70%.The prevalence was higher than that reported previously. There was a difference between the sexes: an 'age-related' increase occurred in men and an 'ageing-related' increase in women. Alzheimer's disease with cerebrovascular disease was the most common cause, which coincided with the previous findings of individuals aged 65 years and older; however, the ratio of mixed dementia was greater.

The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of apathy, and to compare vascular mild cognitive impairment (vMCI), amnestic MCI (amMCI), and other type using Clinical Assessment for Spontaneity (CAS). Agreement to take part in the study was obtained from 590 community dwellers, aged ≥75 years living in Kurihara, Japan. Of the 590 subjects, 221 had a clinical dementia rating (CDR) of 0 (normal); 295 had CDR 0.5 (mild cognitive impairment; MCI); and 74 had CDR 1+ (dementia). The CDR 0.5 subjects were divided into three groups: 55 with vMCI (Erkinjuntti et al. criteria), 91 with amMCI and 149 with other type. To evaluate the various aspects of apathy, we used the three CAS subscales: clinical interview (CAS1), self-evaluation (CAS2), and caregiver assessment (CAS3). Three analyses were then performed to determine: (i) the validity of CAS; (ii) the prevalence rate of apathy in CDR 0 versus CDR 0.5 versus CDR 1+; and (iii) the prevalence rate of apathy in normal versus vMCI versus amMCI versus other type. CAS was validated with the Apathy Evaluation Scale. There were significant differences among the three CDR groups in CAS1, CAS2 and CAS3 (P 0.001). The prevalence rate of apathy in each CAS in the CDR 1+ group was higher than the CDR 0.5 group, which was higher than the CDR 0 group. There was a significant difference in CAS3 score between the four groups (the normal and the three subgroups; P 0.001). Apathy in vMCI was more severe than in the other three groups (P 0.05) on CAS3 score. vMCI subjects have more severe apathy compared with amMCI subjects on caregiver assessment.