Search

Background: Thymic carcinoma is a very rare neoplasm for which no optimal chemotherapeutic regimen has been established to date. Hence, we performed this study to investigate the efficacy and safety of carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel as a first-line regimen for patients with advanced thymic carcinoma.Patients and methods: We conducted this multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced thymic carcinoma who had received carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel as a first-line chemotherapy between August 2013 and December 2021. Results: Twelve patients were included in this study and were subjected to efficacy and safety analysis. Their median age was 62 years (range, 47–74 years), and all had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. After a median follow-up time of 19.7 months, the overall response rate was 50%; the median progression-free and overall survival times were 8.8 months and 23.3 months, respectively. Chemotherapy-related peripheral neuropathy was observed in 2 patients (16%; each with grade 1). Other toxicities were manageable, and there were no treatment-related deaths.Conclusion: Carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel as a first-line chemotherapy regimen showed good efficacy and safety in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma.

Purpose: The addition of cytotoxic chemotherapy to immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) may enhance antitumor effects. We conducted an open-label randomized phase II/III study to evaluate nivolumab + docetaxel combination therapy in comparison with nivolumab monotherapy for previously treated ICI-naïve non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: The primary endpoint of the phase III study was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. As ICI and platinum-doublet combination chemotherapy was approved in the first-line setting during this study, patient accrual was discontinued. Results: One hundred twenty-eight patients (each arm, n = 64) were included in the full analysis set. The median OS in nivolumab (arm A) and nivolumab + docetaxel (arm B) was 14.7 months (95% CI, 11.4–18.7) and 23.1 months (95% CI, 16.7–NR), respectively. The HR for OS was 0.63 (90% CI, 0.42–0.95; P = 0.0310). The median PFS in arms A and arm B was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.0–3.9) and 6.7 months (95% CI, 3.8–9.4), respectively. The HR for progression was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.39–0.88; P = 0.0095). The ORR was 14.0% (95% CI, 6.3–25.8) in arm A and 41.8% (95% CI, 28.7–55.9) in arm B. Hematotoxicity and gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in arm B than in arm A. Two treatment-related deaths were observed, including one patient in arm A who died of pneumonitis and one in arm B who died of myocarditis. Conclusions: Despite a slightly elevated toxicity, the addition of docetaxel to nivolumab has significantly prolonged the OS and PFS of patients with previously treated ICI-naïve NSCLC.

Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have significantly improved the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only a limited proportion of patients can benefit from this therapy, and clinically useful predictive biomarkers remain to be elucidated. Methods Blood was collected from 189 patients with NSCLC before and six weeks after the initiation of the ICI treatment (anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibody). Soluble PD-1 (sPD-1) and PD-L1 (sPD-L1) in plasma before and after treatment were analyzed for evaluation of their clinical significance. Results The Cox regression analysis demonstrated that higher sPD-L1 levels before treatment significantly predicted unfavorable progression-free survival (PFS; HR 15.4, 95%CI 1.10–86.7, P = 0.009) and overall survival (OS; HR 11.4, 95%CI 1.19–52.3, P = 0.007) in NSCLC patients treated with ICI monotherapy (n = 122), but not in those treated with ICI combined with chemotherapy (n = 67: P = 0.729 and P = 0.155, respectively). In addition, higher sPD-1 levels after treatment were significantly associated with better OS (HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.06–0.91, P = 0.037) in patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy, whereas higher sPD-L1 levels after treatment were significantly associated with worse PFS (HR 6.09, 95%CI 1.42–21.0, P = 0.008) and OS (HR 42.6, 95%CI 6.83–226, P

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitive EGFR mutations. The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) is an inflammation-assessing score based on C-reactive protein and albumin concentrations. Information regarding the association between the GPS and EGFR-TKI treatment effectiveness is limited; hence, we investigated whether the GPS can predict the response of NSCLC to EGFR-TKIs. Methods: We evaluated 340 patients with NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations who received EGFR-TKI monotherapy between March 2009 and July 2021. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: After a median follow-up of 26.6 months, patients with a GPS of 0, 1, and 2 had PFS of 15.7, 10.0, and 6.3 months, respectively, and OS of 40.1, 25.8, and 14.4 months, respectively; patients with a GPS of 0 had significantly better PFS and OS than those with a GPS of 1 (P=0.03, P=0.001, respectively) or 2 (P

Supplementary Data from A Randomized Comparison of Nivolumab versus Nivolumab + Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced or Recurrent ICI-Naïve Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: TORG1630

Purpose:The addition of cytotoxic chemotherapy to immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) may enhance antitumor effects. We conducted an open-label randomized phase II/III study to evaluate nivolumab + docetaxel combination therapy in comparison with nivolumab monotherapy for previously treated ICI-naïve non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and Methods:The primary endpoint of the phase III study was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. As ICI and platinum-doublet combination chemotherapy was approved in the first-line setting during this study, patient accrual was discontinued.Results:One hundred twenty-eight patients (each arm, n = 64) were included in the full analysis set. The median OS in nivolumab (arm A) and nivolumab + docetaxel (arm B) was 14.7 months (95% CI, 11.4–18.7) and 23.1 months (95% CI, 16.7–NR), respectively. The HR for OS was 0.63 (90% CI, 0.42–0.95; P = 0.0310). The median PFS in arms A and arm B was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.0–3.9) and 6.7 months (95% CI, 3.8–9.4), respectively. The HR for progression was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.39–0.88; P = 0.0095). The ORR was 14.0% (95% CI, 6.3–25.8) in arm A and 41.8% (95% CI, 28.7–55.9) in arm B. Hematotoxicity and gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in arm B than in arm A. Two treatment-related deaths were observed, including one patient in arm A who died of pneumonitis and one in arm B who died of myocarditis.Conclusions:Despite a slightly elevated toxicity, the addition of docetaxel to nivolumab has significantly prolonged the OS and PFS of patients with previously treated ICI-naïve NSCLC.

Supplementary Figure from A Randomized Comparison of Nivolumab versus Nivolumab + Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced or Recurrent ICI-Naïve Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: TORG1630

Purpose An increasing number of advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases are being reported in the ageing population. However, studies on the use of afatinib in elderly patients are scarce. We conducted a prospective multicentre, single-arm, and open-label phase II trial for low-dose afatinib (30 mg/day) use in elderly patients with NSCLC with EGFR mutation to assess quality-of-life (QOL) and pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacogenomic (PGx) parameters. Patients and methods The primary end-point was the objective response rate (ORR), and the planned number of registered cases was 35, with a threshold ORR of 50%, an expected ORR of 75%, α of 0.05, and β of 0.1. Secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the incidence rate of adverse events (AEs), QOL survey (FACT-L), and trough plasma concentration of afatinib at steady state (Css) and at the occurrence of clinically significant AEs. Results The median age of the patients was 79 years. The ORR was 80.0% and the disease control rate was 91.4%. The median PFS and OS were 15.6 and 29.5 months, respectively. Four patients discontinued because of AEs. Treatment-related death was not observed. No significant change in QOL was observed at baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Css was comparable with those in previous reports and was significantly higher in patients with grade 3 AEs. Direct correlations between afatinib treatment and PGx profiles were not observed. Conclusions An afatinib starting dose of 30 mg/day could be an effective and safe treatment option for elderly patients.

Satoshi Igawa,1 Masashi Kasajima,1 Taihei Ono,1 Takahiro Ozawa,1 Mikiko Kakegawa,1 Seiichiro Kusuhara,1 Takashi Sato,1 Yoshiro Nakahara,1 Tomoya Fukui,1 Masanori Yokoba,2 Masaru Kubota,2 Hisashi Mitsufuji,3 Jiichiro Sasaki,4 Katsuhiko Naoki1 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara-city, Kanagawa, Japan; 2School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Sagamihara-city, Kanagawa, Japan; 3Kitasato University School of Nursing, Sagamihara-city, Kanagawa, Japan; 4Kitasato University School of Medicine, Research and Development Center for New Medical Frontiers, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara-city, Kanagawa, JapanCorrespondence: Satoshi IgawaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1, Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara-city, Kanagawa, 252-0374, JapanTel +81-42-778-8506Fax +81-42-778-6412Email igawa@kitasato-u.ac.jpBackground: The clinical outcomes of elderly patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are treated with osimertinib have not been sufficiently evaluated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in elderly chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations.Patients and Methods: We assessed the clinical effects of osimertinib as a first-line treatment for elderly NSCLC patients (≥ 75 years of age) with an exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation in EGFR. All patients were administered 80 mg/day osimertinib as initial treatment.Results: Forty-three patients (24 women and 19 men) with adenocarcinoma who were treated between August 2018 and July 2021 were included in this study; their median age was 79 years (range, 75– 90 years). The overall objective response rate was 60.5%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) of the entire patient population were 22.1 months and 14.6 months, respectively. The most common adverse event was rash acneiform (42%), followed by diarrhea (33%) and paronychia (28%); none of these were grades ≥ 3. Interstitial lung disease developed in 8 patients (18.6%); however, no treatment-related deaths occurred. Multivariate analysis identified performance status and disease stage as predictors of PFS and TTF.Conclusion: Considering the findings of this study and despite an observed discordance between PFS and TTF, osimertinib appears to be an effective and safe treatment option in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations. To obtain conclusive results, further studies in a larger elderly population are warranted.Keywords: non-small cell lung carcinoma, chemotherapy-naïve patients, efficacy

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitive EGFR mutations. The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) is an inflammation-assessing score based on C-reactive protein and albumin concentrations. Information regarding the association between the GPS and EGFR-TKI treatment effectiveness is limited; hence, we investigated whether the GPS can predict the response of NSCLC to EGFR-TKIs. Methods: We evaluated 340 patients with NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFRmutations who received EGFR-TKI monotherapy between March 2009 and July 2021. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: After a median follow-up of 26.6 months, patients with a GPS of 0, 1, and 2 had PFS of 15.7, 10.0, and 6.3 months, respectively, and OS of 40.1, 25.8, and 14.4 months, respectively; patients with a GPS of 0 had significantly better PFS and OS than those with a GPS of 1 (P=0.03, P=0.001, respectively) or 2 (PPConclusions: The GPS predicted the survival of NSCLC patients harboring sensitive EGFRmutations who were undergoing EGFR-TKI treatment. The GPS might be ideal for routine use in clinical practice, given that it is an easily calculated parameter.

ROS1 rearrangements are found in 1–2% of patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer. The detection of the rearrangements is crucial since clinically effective molecular targeted drugs are available for them. We present a case of lung adenocarcinoma with a previously unknown ROS1‐CD74 fusion variant, CD74 exon 3 fused to ROS1 exon 34, which was not detected by a conventional RT‐PCR‐based test for ROS1 fusion gene detection but identified by hybrid capture‐based next‐generation sequencing. This tumor responded to crizotinib initially and to entrectinib after relapse with brain metastasis, indicating the oncogenic activity of this novel fusion variant., We present a case of lung adenocarcinoma with a novel ROS1‐CD74 fusion variant, CD74 exon 3 fused to ROS1 exon 34, which was not detected by a conventional RT‐PCR‐based testing but identified by hybrid capture‐based next‐generation sequencing. This tumor responded to crizotinib initially and to entrectinib after relapse with brain metastasis, indicating the oncogenic activity of this novel fusion variant.

Introduction: Predictors of the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain ill-defined. We investigated whether the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) could serve as such predictors. Methods: Eighty patients treated with pembrolizumab or atezolizumab monotherapy as second- or subsequent-line therapy for NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed, and the associations between GPS, body mass index (BMI), and each of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Results: The median follow-up period was 11.1 months. Patients with a BMI ≥20.4 kg/m2 had significantly longer PFS and OS (3.7 and 22.2 month, respectively) than did those with a BMI 2 (2.2 and 11.5 months, respectively). Patients with a GPS of 0 had a significantly longer PFS (6.6 months) than did those with a GPS of 1 (2.2 months, p = 0.002) and 2 (1.8 months, p = 0.029). Patients with a GPS of 0 also had a significantly longer OS (22.2 month) than did those with a GPS of 1 (9.2 months, p = 0.002) and 2 (4.7 months, p = 0.002). Notably, the GPS, BMI, and clinical stage were independent predictors of PFS, while the GPS and performance status were independent predictors of OS. The response rate of patients with a GPS of 0 was significantly higher than that of patients with a GPS of 1–2 (26.2% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.03). Conclusion: The GPS is an independent predictor of PFS and OS in patients with NSCLC who received second- or subsequent-line pembrolizumab or atezolizumab monotherapy.

Increasing the T-cell immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis with an anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) antibody may ultimately have detrimental effects. We present the case of a patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who developed active tuberculosis (TB) after initial treatment with pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody. Pembrolizumab was resumed after completing anti-TB treatment, and no relapse of TB was observed clinically or radiologically. Checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) is first suspected when a pulmonary shadow presents during treatment with an anti-PD-1 antibody. It is sometimes difficult to diagnose CIP using computed tomographic images alone. Careful testing, including bacterial examinations and bronchoscopic biopsy, should be performed.

Background: Pembrolizumab (Pemb) is a key drug for the treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are limited data on Pemb use in older adults aged >75 years with NSCLC, especially in terms of pharmacokinetics (PK). Methods: This open-label multicenter observational study aimed to evaluate real-world data on the safety, efficacy, and blood concentrations of Pemb (both monotherapy and combination therapies) in older adults with NSCLC. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected immediately before Pemb administration. Quantitative Pemb concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Results: We enrolled 100 patients from July 2019 to September 2020; one patient was excluded due to stage migration. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age, 78 (75-87) years; male/female ratio, 70/29; performance status (PS) 0-1/2-3, 85/14; adenocarcinoma/squamous cell carcinoma/others, 62/25/12; stage I-III/IV/postoperative recurrence (TNM 7th edition), 9/60/30; PD-L1 TPS Conclusion: In older adults aged >75 years with NSCLC and low albumin levels and PS and a high number of metastatic organs, C1 trough of Pemb is reduced and not expected to prolong PFS and OS. Citation Format: Yoshiro Nakahara, Kageaki Watanabe, Yukio Hosomi, Yuta Yamanaka, Takayasu Kurata, Hidehito Horinouchi, Yuichiro Ohe, Tetsuhiko Asao, Sho Saeki, Yukari Tsubata, Yu Fujita, Jun Sakakibara Konishi, Hidenori Mizugaki, Mayu Ohuchi, Shigehiro Yagishita, Akinobu Hamada. Multicenter pharmacokinetic study of pembrolizumab for non-small cell lung cancer in older adults aged over 75 years [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2797.

TCR and BCR repertoire diversity plays a critical role in tumor immunity. Thus, analysis of TCR and BCR repertoires might help predict the clinical efficacy of anti-PD-1 treatment. Blood samples from 30 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with anti-PD-1 antibody were collected before and six weeks after treatment initiation. The clinical significance of TCR and BCR repertoire diversity in peripheral blood was evaluated in all the enrolled patients (n = 30) or in the subset with (n = 10) or without (n = 20) EGFR/ALK mutation. TCR and BCR diversity was significantly correlated at baseline (R = 0.65; P = 1.6 × 10–4) and on treatment (R = 0.72; P = 1.2 × 10–5). Compared to non-responders (SD or PD), responders (PR) showed significantly decreased TCR and BCR diversity after treatment in the EGFR/ALK wild-type subset (P = 0.0014 and P = 0.034, respectively), but not in all the enrolled patients. The post-treatment reduction in TCR and BCR repertoire diversity was also significantly associated with the occurrence of adverse events in the EGFR/ALK wild-type subset (P = 0.022 and P = 0.014, respectively). Patients with more reduced TCR diversity showed better progression-free survival (PFS) in the EGFR/ALK wild-type subset (P = 0.011) but not in the mutant subset. These findings suggest the clinical significance of changes in peripheral TCR and BCR repertoire diversity after anti-PD-1 treatment in patients with NSCLC without EGFR/ALK mutation. Monitoring of the peripheral TCR and BCR repertoires may serve as a surrogate marker for the early detection of EGFR/ALK wild-type NSCLC patients who would benefit from anti-PD-1 treatment.

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death globally. In addition, its incidence increases with age, with approximately half of all cases diagnosed in patients aged ≥70. Molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer have markedly improved outcomes over the past two decades. Despite the high incidence of lung cancer in older people, most trials excluded such patients from enrollment. Therefore, the optimal treatment strategies for older patients remain unclear. The present review summarizes the published literature and provides guidance on the treatment of older patients with lung cancer within three broad stages: (i) early-stage lung cancer, (ii) locally advanced lung cancer and (iii) metastatic lung cancer. We also discuss the use of the latest evidence for older patients.

SummaryIntroduction In preclinical data, the combination therapy with S-1 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) had a synergistic antitumor effect on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of the EGFR mutation status. Patients and Methods Patients with previously treated NSCLC and adequate organ function regardless of EGFR mutation status were eligible for the phase I study, with wild-type EGFR were eligible for the phase II study. Treatment consisted of erlotinib 150 mg/body orally once every day and S-1 60 mg/m2, 70 mg/m2, or 80 mg/m2 (level 0, level 1, or level 2) orally on days 1–14 every three weeks. The primary endpoint for the phase I study was the determination of the recommended dose (RD), the phase II study was the overall response rate (ORR). Results A total of 7 patients with performance-status (PS) 0 or 1 were enrolled as subjects in phase I. Five of these subjects were EGFR-mutation positive. Four subjects were enrolled at S-1 dose level 1 and 3 were enrolled at S-1 dose level 2. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in these subjects. The RD was decided as erlotinib 150 mg/body and S-1 80 mg/m2. In phase I, 5 subjects achieved partial response, and the ORR was 71.4%. A total of 10 patients with PS 0, 1, or 2 EGFR-wild type NSCLC were enrolled in phase II. In phase II, the ORR was 10.0%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 40.0%. After the enrollment of 10 subjects, enrollment was stopped based on two treatment-related deaths. Conclusion The combination therapy of erlotinib plus S-1 was not feasible in the EGFR wild-type NSCLC at least and early stopped. Trial registration: UMIN-CTR Identifier: 000003421 (2010/03/31, phase I), 000003422 (2010/03/31, Phase II).

Objective: The clinical outcomes of poor performance status (PS) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are treated with osimertinib as a first-line treatment have not been sufficiently evaluated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in chemotherapy-naive and poor PS (2 or more) patients with NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations.Materials and Methods: We assessed the clinical effects of osimertinib as a first-line treatment for patients with poor PS NSCLC with an exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation in EGFR. All patients were administered osimertinib (80 mg/day) as the initial treatment.Results: Sixteen patients (nine women and seven men) who were treated between August 2018 and July 2021 were included in this study; their median age was 78 years. The overall objective response rate was 56.3%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the entire patient population was 10.5 months and the PS score improved in 8 of 16 patients (50%). The most common adverse event was acneiform rash (42%), followed by diarrhea (36%) and paronychia (36%); none of these were of grade ≥ 3. Interstitial lung disease occurred in 2 patients (12.5%); however, no treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: Considering the findings of this study, osimertinib appears to be an effective and safe treatment option for patients with poor PS and advanced NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations. To obtain conclusive results, further studies with larger cohorts are warranted.

Background The clinical outcomes of elderly patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are treated with osimertinib have not been sufficiently evaluated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in elderly chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations. Patients and Methods We assessed the clinical effects of osimertinib as a first-line treatment for elderly NSCLC patients (≥75 years of age) with an exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation in EGFR. All patients were administered 80 mg/day osimertinib as initial treatment. Results Forty-three patients (24 women and 19 men) with adenocarcinoma who were treated between August 2018 and July 2021 were included in this study; their median age was 79 years (range, 75–90 years). The overall objective response rate was 60.5%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) of the entire patient population were 22.1 months and 14.6 months, respectively. The most common adverse event was rash acneiform (42%), followed by diarrhea (33%) and paronychia (28%); none of these were grades ≥3. Interstitial lung disease developed in 8 patients (18.6%); however, no treatment-related deaths occurred. Multivariate analysis identified performance status and disease stage as predictors of PFS and TTF. Conclusion Considering the findings of this study and despite an observed discordance between PFS and TTF, osimertinib appears to be an effective and safe treatment option in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations. To obtain conclusive results, further studies in a larger elderly population are warranted.

Background CheckMate 9LA, a phase 3, randomized, open-label study in first-line advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), showed significantly improved overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with 2 cycles of chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (4 cycles). We present results for the Asian subpopulation enrolled in Japan and China. Methods Patients aged ≥ 18 years with treatment-naive, histologically confirmed stage IV or recurrent NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1 and no sensitizing EGFR/ALK mutations were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab [360 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W)] plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg Q6W) combined with chemotherapy (Q3W for 2 cycles), or chemotherapy alone (Q3W for 4 cycles). Primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Results Twenty-eight patients received nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with chemotherapy and 30 received chemotherapy. At a minimum follow-up of 12.7 months, median OS was not reached with nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with chemotherapy versus 13.3 months with chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14–0.80]. Median PFS was 8.4 versus 5.4 months (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.24–0.92) and ORR was 57% versus 23%, respectively. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 57% versus 60% of patients, respectively. Conclusion Consistent with results in the all randomized population, nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with chemotherapy improved efficacy in the Asian subpopulation versus chemotherapy alone and had a manageable safety profile, supporting its use as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC in Asian patients.

Background: The optimal second and subsequent lines of chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have preexisting interstitial lung disease (ILD) are unclear. Hence, we examined the clinical efficacy and safety of second-line chemotherapy in such patients, including any exacerbation of preexisting ILD.Methods: The medical records of patients with NSCLC and preexisting ILD who received both first- and second-line chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed.Results: Twenty-four patients with a median age of 71 years who were treated between April 2013 and March 2021 were included. The response rate after second-line chemotherapy with S-1 (n=13), docetaxel (n=8), pemetrexed (n=2), or docetaxel plus ramucirumab (n=1) was 12.5%, with a median progression-free survival (2nd line PFS) of 3.8 months. The overall survival from a start of first-line chemotherapy (1st line OS) and post-progression survival (PPS) post-first-line chemotherapy were 18.7 and 9.7 months, respectively. Spearman rank correlation and linear regression analyses showed that PPS was strongly correlated with 1st line OS (R = 0.85, P < 0.00001). Importantly, the 2nd line PFS was also significantly correlated with 1st line OS (R = 0.71, P = 0.0001). While second-line chemotherapy-related acute exacerbation of ILD was observed in 7 patients (29.2%), there were no treatment-related fatalities.Conclusions: Second-line chemotherapy has a strong positive impact on the OS of patients with NSCLC who have preexisting ILD. Given the findings of this study, second-line chemotherapy may be valuable in terms of prolonging long-term OS.

Skeletal-related events (SREs) may occur at the time of first diagnosis in 20-30% of lung cancer patients with bone metastases. Several clinical trials have shown that zoledronic acid (ZA) is effective for decreasing SREs. The main objective of the present study was to discuss clinical data of ZA and compare the frequency of SREs with previous reports. All patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with metastatic bone disease who were administered ZA at least twice between January 2008 and December 2009 were eligible for inclusion in the study. In total, 198 consecutive patients were identified. The median duration of ZA administration was 106 days [95% confidence interval (CI), 92-133 days], and the median number of ZA administrations was 4 (range, 2-41). The median time to first SRE in patients who experienced SRE following ZA treatment was 202 days (95% CI, 156-264 days). Among the 78 patients who had already experienced SRE prior to ZA treatment, 35 (45%) experienced SRE subsequently after starting ZA treatment. On the other hand, among the 120 patients without a history of SRE before starting ZA treatment, 42 (35%) experienced SRE after the start of ZA administration (P=0.16). No osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) was reported in any of the patients. The present study revealed that ZA had a certain level of efficacy regardless of the presence or absence of prior SREs. However, the duration of ZA therapy was short in this study; further accumulation of data on the long-term prognosis and incidence rates of ONJ and other late complications of ZA therapy seems to be particularly important.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, among which high-grade neuroendocrine tumors including small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) are especially aggressive with a dismal prognosis. Although molecular subtypes of SCLC based on the expression of lineage transcription factors such as ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3 and YAP1 have been identified and explored recently, LCNEC has not been well characterized so far, and in clinic, patients with LCNEC have been treated with both chemotherapy regimens for SCLC and regimens for non-small cell lung cancer. To make efficient treatment strategies for LCNEC, further advances in molecular characterization of LCNEC are warranted. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to elucidate the heterogeneity of neuroendocrine differentiation in lung cancer with LCNEC components by using epigenomic profiling. We investigated super-enhancer profiles of 24 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues from patients with primary lung cancer containing LCNEC components. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of these specimens using H3K27 acetylation signals over super-enhancer regions near transcriptional regulators identified four distinct clusters. Principal component analysis supported this classification. Immunohistochemical staining for ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3 and YAP1 on these tissues was also performed and the staining results were compatible with our epigenomic profiling. Cluster 1 tissues were positive for ASCL1 and NKX2-1 while the high expression of POU2F3 or YAP1 was found in some samples among Cluster 3 and Cluster 4. None of the four transcription factors were positive in Cluster 2. Additional genomic profiling revealed no clear associations between the clusters and genetic alterations such as RB1 loss and STK11 loss. Neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin, chromogranin A and CD56 were found to be more commonly positive in tissues among Cluster 1. These findings suggest the existence of the distinct differentiation subtypes of lung cancer with LCNEC components, different from the previously reported classifications, which provides new insight into the regulation of neuroendocrine differentiation in lung cancer. Citation Format: Takashi Sato, Junko Hamamoto, Katsura Emoto, Takahiro Fukushima, Kai Sugihara, Masayuki Shirasawa, Yoshiro Nakahara, Satoshi Igawa, Yoshiki Murakumo, Takashi Kohno, Kouya Shiraishi, Hiroyuki Yasuda, Kenzo Soejima, Hideo Watanabe, Katsuhiko Naoki. Epigenomic profiling identifies distinct neuroendocrine subtypes in lung cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5715.

Background Amrubicin (AMR) is a completely synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline and clinically active against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I study of AMR and erlotinib (ERL) combination therapy in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC and have already reported the safety and effectiveness. Methods We conducted a multi-center, single-arm phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of AMR and ERL combination therapy in patients with previously treated, advanced NSCLC harboring wild-type EGFR, PS 0–1 and

Background Anti‐programmed death‐1 (PD‐1) immunotherapy can cause immune‐related pneumonitis, also known as checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP). CIP that develops early after the initiation of anti‐PD‐1 immunotherapy is important because it is more severe than CIP that develops later. However, only a few studies have examined the risk factors for early‐onset CIP. Previous studies have reported several risk factors for CIP, including imaging findings of airway obstruction adjacent to lung tumors. However, the utility of this factor is debatable. Therefore, we investigated potential risk factors for early‐onset CIP, including tumor invasion in the central airway (TICA), in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving anti‐PD‐1 therapy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the medical records and chest computed tomography scans of patients with NSCLC treated with anti‐PD‐1 antibodies at the Kanagawa Cancer Center in Japan between 1 January 2016, and 30 June 2018. The clinical characteristics and imaging findings, including TICA, were compared between patients with and without early‐onset CIP. Results Data from 181 eligible patients (114 receiving nivolumab and 67 receiving pembrolizumab) were analyzed. Early‐onset CIP occurred in 13 of 79 patients (16.5%) with TICA and 2 of 102 patients (2.0%) without TICA. In multivariate analysis, the odds ratio of early‐onset CIP for patients with TICA was 8.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.98–34.0, P = 0.0037). Conclusions TICA was strongly associated with early‐onset CIP in patients with NSCLC. Clinicians should carefully observe patients with TICA, especially within three months of anti‐PD‐1 antibody administration because of high CIP risk. Key points Significant study findings Tumor invasion in the central airway (TICA) was a predictor of early‐onset checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP)TICA had good interobserver variability, indicating its utility in clinical practicePatients with TICA might have a higher immune status than patients without What this study adds This is the first study focusing on risk factors for CIP limited to early‐onset CIP., TICA was strongly associated with early‐onset CIP in patients with NSCLC. Clinicians should carefully observe patients with TICA, especially within three months of anti‐PD‐1 antibody administration because of high CIP risk.

Background Currently used biomarkers for immunotherapy are inadequate because they are only based on tumor properties. In view of microenvironment changes by tumors, host immunity should be considered, which may result in identifying more accurate and easily detectable biomarkers for daily clinical practice. Here, we assessed serum immune‐modulating factor levels for the response to anti‐PD‐1 antibodies during the first cycle in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods Serum was collected from patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab at several time points during the first cycle. We applied the enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and multiplex assays to measure the levels of immune modulators. Results A total of 40 patients treated with nivolumab and 26 patients treated with pembrolizumab were studied. By ELISA, serum perforin, but not granzyme B, was measured in all samples. By multiplex assay, 10 immune modulators, including granzyme B, were measured in some, but not all, samples. Serum baseline perforin levels were strongly associated with increased progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times. Sequential changes in perforin levels during the first cycle were weakly associated with the clinical outcome. Conclusions Serum baseline perforin levels may be used to predict the prognosis of NSCLC patients treated with anti‐PD‐1 antibody therapy. Key points To identify a useful predictive marker for anti‐PD‐1 antibody therapy, using blood samples might be helpful.Serum baseline perforin levels were closely associated with prognosis with anti‐PD‐1 antibody therapy in non‐small cell lung cancer., This study demonstrates immune‐modulator changes in serum during the first cycle of anti‐PD‐1 antibody therapy in non‐small cell lung cancer. Serum baseline perforin levels were found to be closely associated with clinical outcome with anti‐PD‐1 antibody therapies.

Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare cancer with minimal evidence of survival following palliative‐intent chemotherapy. Sunitinib, everolimus, and pembrolizumab have been proposed as active agents based on previous phase II trials. In this phase II study, TC patients previously treated with platinum‐based chemotherapy were enrolled. The patients received S‐1 orally twice daily at a dose of 40‐60 mg/m2 for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off until the progression of the disease or the presence of unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The sample size of 26 patients was planned to reject the ORR of 10% under the expectation of 30% with a power of 0.80 and a type I error of 0.05 (one‐sided). Twenty‐six patients were recruited between 2013 and 2016; 23 patients had squamous cell carcinoma and 10 had an ECOG performance status of 0. One patient showed complete response and seven patients showed partial responses, resulting in a 30.8% response rate (90% confidence interval [CI], 18.3‐46.9) and an 80.8% disease control rate (90% CI, 65.4‐90.3). The median PFS was 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.3‐10.3 months) and median OS was 27.4 months (95% CI, 16.6‐34.3). Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 included neutropenia (12%), skin rash (8%), elevated alanine aminotransferase, and fatigue (4%). No treatment‐related death was observed. S‐1 confirmed clinical activity with tolerability in patients with previously treated TC. (UMIN000010736)., Not a few patients of TC can be treated with S‐1 in a longer period. The toxicity of S‐1 was also acceptable. S‐1 is a promising drug for TC with easy accessibility and low cost.

IMPORTANCE: Although the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for EGFR gene mutation–positive non–small cell lung cancer is well established, optimal dosing remains to be established, especially in elderly or frail patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose erlotinib in elderly or frail patients with EGFR mutation–positive non–small cell lung cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Single-arm phase 2 trial with the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 2-stage design that enrolled frail patients from 21 Japanese institutions after meeting the inclusion criteria. Chemotherapy-naive patients with EGFR-activating mutation–positive non–small cell lung cancer who were considered frail based on age, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were eligible for the study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were initially administered 50 mg/d erlotinib for 4 weeks, which was modified based on response or adverse events. Dose increase was permitted for patients with stable disease after 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the independent review committee–confirmed objective response rate (ORR) at the dose of 50 mg/d. The study also evaluated the pharmacokinetics of low-dose erlotinib and influence of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled, with a median (range) age of 80 (49-90) years; 54 (68%) were men. An independent review committee confirmed a significant ORR of 60.0% (90% CI, 50.2%-69.2%). The disease control rate was 90.0% (90% CI, 82.7%-94.9%), median progression-free survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.2-11.4 months), and median overall survival was 26.2 months (95% CI, 21.9-30.4 months). Mild adverse events were observed in some participants, with few patients exhibiting grade 3 or greater adverse events. Low-dose erlotinib treatment was temporarily suspended for 10 patients owing to adverse events. Five of 80 patients (6%) had their erlotinib dose reduced to 25 mg because of oral mucositis, paronychia, erythema multiforme, diarrhea, and anorexia. Two patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (cutaneous ulcer and bone infection, and oral mucositis, respectively). There were no cases of interstitial lung disease or treatment-related deaths. The median (range) erlotinib plasma concentration was measured at 685 (153-1950) ng/mL. Seventy-three patients discontinued study treatment owing to disease progression (n = 60), death (n = 3), AEs (n = 4), and patient requests (n = 6). No clear association was observed between the pharmacokinetics of low-dose erlotinib and the treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Low-dose erlotinib appears to be safe and effective in elderly or frail patients with EGFR mutation–positive non–small cell lung cancer and can be a valid treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR Identifier: UMIN000015949

We herein report the case of a 52-year-old man with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma. The patient was negative for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) /anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement. He was treated with nivolumab as a third-line chemotherapy. After four cycles of nivolumab treatment, a partial response was observed in the brain and at the primary tumor site. Nivolumab treatment has been continued for 11 months without progression. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was 0% (according to the tumor proportion score). Our case indicates that the efficacy of programmed cell death 1 inhibitors is not solely predicted by the PD-L1 status, and that immune checkpoint inhibitors might be effective for the treatment of central nervous system metastasis.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a particular propensity to metastasize to the brain, affecting ~10% of SCLC patients at diagnosis, but may occur in more than 50% of 2-year survivors. Most cytotoxic drugs have limited ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, and the effectiveness of chemotherapy for brain metastasis is limited. Therefore, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been proposed to treat SCLC. A meta-analysis revealed that PCI significantly decreased the risk of brain metastasis and increased the 3-year survival rate; it has been established as a standard therapy for limited-disease SCLC. However, certain aspects of PCI remain unclarified, including the roles in resected SCLC and extensive-disease SCLC, and its neurotoxicities. In addition, information on PCI has been obtained from old clinical trials without the use of new imaging devices, such as magnetic resonance imaging. Evidence from advanced imaging techniques is needed in this era.

There are few established treatments for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with interstitial lung disease (ILD). The safety and efficacy of albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) in combination with carboplatin is uncertain, although the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is the most common regimen for treating NSCLC patients with ILD. A total of 9 NSCLC patients with ILD, treated between April 2013 and March 2016, were retrospectively investigated. Carboplatin (AUC 5–6) was administered on day 1 and nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8 and 15, every 4–6 weeks. The median age of the patients upon initiating chemotherapy was 67 years. The pathological examination revealed 6 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, and 6 patients exhibited the typical pattern of ILD. The response rate was 55.6%, and the median progression-free and overall survival time was 174 and 344 days, respectively. Acute exacerbation of ILD was not observed in any of the patients, and febrile neutropenia developed in 3 patients (3/9, 33.3%). Thus, treatment with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel was found to be safe and effective for NSCLC patients with ILD, although management of hematological adverse events, such as febrile neutropenia, was required. However, these encouraging results require confirmation by a large-scale clinical trial.

Background Previous study indicated that an optional anti-cancer drug for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is amrubicin. However, no prospective studies have evaluated amrubicin in chemo-naive elderly or poor-risk patients with SCLC. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of amrubicin as first-line chemotherapy for elderly or poor-risk patients with extensive-disease SCLC (ES-SCLC). Methods Patients with chemotherapy-naive ES-SCLC received multiple cycles of 40 mg/m2 amrubicin for 3 consecutive days every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results Between March 2011 and August 2015, 36 patients were enrolled in this study. Each patient received a median of four treatment cycles (range, 1–6 cycles). ORR was 52.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 37–69%]. The median PFS and OS periods were 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.4–6.6 months) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 5.2–13.6 months), respectively. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event (69.4%), with febrile neutropenia developing in 13.9% of patients. No treatment-related death occurred. At the time of starting second-line chemotherapy, 19 of 22 patients (86%) had significantly improved or maintained their performance status (PS) relative to their PS at the time of starting amrubicin monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy (P = 0.027). Conclusions The results of the present study suggest that amrubicin could be considered as a viable treatment option for chemotherapy-naive elderly or poor-risk patients with ES-SCLC (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000011055 www.clinicaltrials.gov ).