Search

Background Infective endocarditis (IE) lesions rarely exist only in the endocardium, except on the valves. Such lesions are usually treated with the same strategy used to treat valvular IE. Depending on the causative organisms and degree of intracardiac structure destruction, it might be cured with conservative treatment consisting of antibiotics alone. Case summary A 38-year-old woman had a continuous high fever. Echocardiography revealed a vegetation located on the endocardial side of the posterior wall of the left atrium, from the valve ring on the side of the posteromedial scallop, which was exposed to a mitral regurgitation jet. Mural endocarditis caused by methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was diagnosed based on blood cultures. Splenic infarction developed despite various types of appropriate antibiotics. The vegetations increased in size over time to >10 mm. The patient underwent surgical resection and had an uneventful post-operative course. There was no evidence of exacerbation or recurrence during the post-operative outpatient follow-up visits. Discussion Even in cases of isolated mural endocarditis, infections caused by MSSA that are resistant to multiple antibiotics can be challenging to manage with antibiotics alone. Specifically, for cases of MSSA IE that show resistance to various antibiotics, early consideration should be given to surgical intervention as part of the treatment process.

Aim We aimed to validate the subjective and qualitative angioscopic findings by the objective and quantitative near-infrared spectroscopic (NIRS) assessment to compensate each other's drawbacks. Methods This is a single-center prospective observational study. Patients undergoing a planned follow-up coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively enrolled from January 2018 to April 2019. The major three vessels were examined by NIRS-intravascular ultrasound, followed by coronary angioscopic evaluation. Yellow color grade on angioscopy was classified into four grades (0, white; 1, slight yellow; 2, yellow; and 3, intensive yellow) at a location of maximal lipid core burden index over 4 mm [LCBI (4)] on NIRS in each vessel. Results A total of 95 lesions in 44 patients (72.6±6.7 years, 75% male) were analyzed. LCBI (4) was significantly different among different yellow color grades by coronary angioscopy (ANOVA, p＜0.001). Positive correlation was found between angioscopic yellow color grade and LCBI (4) (beta coefficient 164.8, 95% confidence interval 122.9-206.7; p＜0.001). The best cutoff value of LCBI (4) to predict the presence of yellow plaque (yellow color grade ≥ 2) was 448 (sensitivity 79.3%, specificity 69.7%, C-statistic 0.800, 95% confidence interval 0.713-0.887, p＜0.001). Conclusion The qualitative angioscopic assessment was objectively validated by the quantitative NIRS evaluation, which would be helpful for the reinterpretation of the existing evidences of both imaging modalities.

Evidence on the efficacy and safety of low-dose direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in older patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is still scarce. We conducted a single-center prospective registry of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with DOACs: the DIRECT registry (n = 2,216; follow-up, 407 ± 388 days, UMIN000033283). The whole population was divided into 2 groups: the older group (age ≥80 years, n = 548) versus the younger group (age80 years, n = 1,668). Primary safety and efficacy end points were major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria, and stroke or systemic embolism (SSE), respectively. Effects of known risk factors and low-dose DOAC on major bleeding and SSE were assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. In the older group, low-dose DOAC was associated with lower bleeding events (hazard ratio 0.279, 95% confidence interval 0.087 to 0.892, p = 0.031) but was not associated with increased SSE (p = 0.894). In the younger group, low-dose DOAC was neither associated with risk of major bleeding nor SSE (both p 0.05). In conclusion, in older patients, low-dose DOAC was associated with reduced risk of major bleeding without compromising its efficacy.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a left ventricular systolic dysfunction associated with heart failure (HF) in late-term pregnancy or peripartum. A 29-year-old pregnant woman with no history of cardiac disease noted lower extremity edema around 34 weeks' gestation with significant weight gain. She delivered twins via caesarean section, and the edema regressed postpartum. On postpartum day 4, however, she experienced difficulty breathing at night and was diagnosed with HF owing to PPCM. HF treatment along with cabergoline was initiated. With low prolactin blood levels, her symptoms and cardiac function improved over time. This case demonstrated the usefulness of anti-prolactin therapy with cabergoline in PPCM.

In the drug-eluting stent era, stent thrombosis is uncommon but still a life-threatening complication after percutaneous coronary intervention. There are several types of risk factors associated with stent thrombosis, which could work synergistically to produce thrombus. We report the case of subacute stent thrombosis. A 66-year-old male was hospitalized due to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and received emergency percutaneous coronary intervention to the obtuse marginal branch and the posterolateral artery. Five days later, he complained of chest pain. Emergency coronary angiography was performed and revealed stent thromboses in both the obtuse marginal branch and the posterolateral artery. Remarkably, in this case, stent thromboses occurred in the obtuse marginal branch and the posterolateral artery simultaneously. Finally, we overcame this situation by stenting to the main branch of left circumflex artery. We speculated the precise mechanism of simultaneously occurring two subacute stent thromboses through multiple intracoronary imaging modalities. In this case, we hypothesized that the combination of the protrusion of obtuse marginal branch stent to the main branch of left circumflex artery, blood flow turbulence due to the ulcer, and relatively high thrombogenicity of acute coronary syndrome lesion synergistically generated the thrombus.

The vessel healing process after implantation of biodegradable polymer (BP) and durable polymer (DP) everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) lesions remains unclear.Methods and Results: We conducted a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial to compare early (2 weeks) and mid-term (12 months) vascular responses after implantation of BP-EES vs. DP-EES in STEMI patients. In this prespecified subanalysis, serial coronary angioscopy (CAS) analysis was performed in 15 stents in the BP-EES arm (n=10 patients) and 14 stents in the DP-EES arm (n=10 patients). At the 2-week follow-up, there was no significant difference in the estimated marginal means of the neointimal coverage grade (primary endpoint) between the 2 arms (mean [±SE] 0.00±0.00 in both arms; P0.999). There were no significant differences between the BP-EES and DP-EES groups in the yellow color grade (1.046±0.106 vs. 0.844±0.114, respectively; P=0.201) or the presence of thrombus (77.8% vs. 88.8%, respectively; P=0.205). At 12 months, competent strut coverage, defined as yellow color grade ≤1, no thrombus, and a neointimal coverage grade ≥1 was achieved more frequently in the BP-EES than DP-EES arm (85.2% vs. 53.1%; adjusted odds ratio 2.11 [95% confidence interval 1.26-3.53]; P=0.023).Neointimal coverage 2 weeks after implantation of BP-EES and DP-EES in STEMI lesions was comparable on CAS evaluation. However, at 1 year, BP-EES was independently associated with competent strut coverage.

BACKGROUND In-stent restenosis (ISR), especially for neoatherosclerosis, is still a major problem of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) even in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era. AIMS The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of neoatherosclerosis on prognosis after PCI for ISR. METHODS Between March 2009 and December 2017, 313 ISR lesions in patients undergoing an OCT-guided PCI in five hospitals were retrospectively enrolled. Neoatherosclerosis was defined as a lipid neointima or calcified neointima. We examined the association between neoatherosclerosis and the clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR) rates. RESULTS In 313 ISR lesions, 64 lesions (20.4%) had bare metal stents and 241 lesions (77.0%) had drug-eluting stents (DES). Among them, 47.0% of lesions (147 lesions) had neoatherosclerosis. A multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that eGFR (odds ratio [OR] 0.986, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.974-0.998; p=0.023), the time from PCI to the ISR (OR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.22; p

Background Modification of arrhythmogenic substrates with extensive ablation comprising linear and/or complex fractional atrial electrogram ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI‐plus) can theoretically reduce the recurrence of atrial fibrillation. The DR‐FLASH score (score based on diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, persistent form of atrial fibrillation, left atrialdiameter >45 mm, age >65 years, female sex, and hypertension) is reportedly useful for identifying patients with arrhythmogenic substrates. We hypothesized that, in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, the DR‐FLASH score can be used to classify patients into those who require PVI‐plus and those for whom a PVI‐only strategy is sufficient. Methods and Results This study is a post hoc subanalysis of the a multicenter, randomized controlled, noninferiority trial investigating efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation alone for recurrence prevention compared with extensive ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (EARNEST‐PVI trial). This analysis focuses on the relationship between DR‐FLASH score and the efficacy of different ablation strategies. We divided the population into 2 groups based on a DR‐FLASH score of 3 points. A total of 469 patients were analyzed. Among those with a DR‐FLASH score >3 (N=279), the event rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence was significantly lower in the PVI‐plus arm than in the PVI‐only arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45 [95% CI, 0.28–0.72]; P P =0.795). There was significant interaction between patients with a DR‐FLASH score >3 and DR‐FLASH score ≤3 ( P value for interaction=0.020). Conclusions The DR‐FLASH score is a useful tool for deciding the catheter ablation strategy for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03514693.

Background The respiratory tract is the most commonly affected organ system in sarcoidosis. Purely extrapulmonary sarcoidosis is rare. There have been no reports of extrapulmonary sarcoidosis with lesions only in the heart and guts. Case summary A 19-year-old male was admitted for chest symptoms accompanied by remarkably elevated troponin T and creatinine kinase levels. Electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm with a right bundle branch block, broad ST segment elevation, and abnormal Q waves. Endoscopic biopsy revealed granuloma formation in the transverse colon. Based on multimodal imaging, we made a clinical diagnosis of extrapulmonary sarcoidosis involving only the heart and guts. One year of immunosuppressive therapy with prednisolone resolved the inflammation in the guts but not in the heart. He experienced runs of sustained ventricular tachycardia with loss of consciousness and was admitted to our hospital again. The addition of methotrexate markedly reduced cardiac accumulation of fluorodeoxyglucose. No life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias have been recorded afterwards. Discussion This unusual case of cardiac sarcoidosis not only involved rare lesions only in the heart and guts but also presented with ST elevation on ECG. This case suggests that the gastrointestinal tract is a site of effective antigen capture outside of the respiratory tract that can affect the heart.

Aims: The feasibility of offline optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance in bifurcation (with either two-dimensional or three-dimensional images) and its potential benefits have been demonstrated in retrospective studies; however, these have not yet been investigated prospectively. The aim of this trial is to determine the superiority of online three-dimensional optical frequency domain imaging (3D-OFDI)- guided stenting to angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in terms of incomplete stent apposition (ISA) at the bifurcation segment. Methods and results: The OPTIMUM trial is a randomised, superiority, multicentre clinical trial. The primary endpoint of this trial is the post-procedural percentage of malapposed struts assessed by OFDI in the main branch bifurcation region after final kissing balloon dilatation (FKBD). A total of 106 patients will be randomly allocated to either 3D-OFDI guidance or angiography guidance PCI. Bifurcation lesions will be treated with a provisional single-stent strategy using the Ultimaster sirolimus-eluting stent. Patients randomised to the 3D-OFDI guidance arm will undergo OFDI assessment in the main branch (MV) after rewiring into the jailed side branch following stent implantation, while in the angiography guidance arm re-crossing of a wire into the side branch will be performed using conventional fluoroscopic/angiographic guidance. In patients in the 3D-OFDI guidance arm, if the position of the wire is not located in the optimal cell, further attempts to redirect the wire to the optimal cell will be performed, with subsequent OFDI acquisitions to confirm the re-crossing position. The proximal optimisation technique and FKBD are mandatory in this trial. The study will provide a 90% power to show superiority of 3D-OFDI guidance PCI compared with angiography-guided PCI. Conclusions: The OPTIMUM trial will be the first prospective, randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of online 3D-OFDI-guided PCI in bifurcation lesions. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02972489.

The present study aimed to assess the associations between dosing of DOACs and outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) require dose adjustment according to patient or clinical factors for patients with NVAF. We conducted a single-center prospective registry of NVAF patients with DOACs: DIRECT registry (UMIN000033283). In the present analysis, we categorized the patients (n = 2,216) into 5 groups: appropriate standard-dose (n = 907, 40.9%), appropriate low-dose (n = 833, 37.6%), overdose (n = 117, 5.3%), underdose (n = 338, 15.3%), and contraindication (n = 21, 0.9%). The efficacy endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE: a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke/systemic embolism) and its individual components. The safety end points were adverse bleeding events including clinically significant bleeding, major bleeding, and gastro-intestinal bleeding. All NVAF patients treated with DOACs in our institution from 2011 to 2017 were enrolled (71.6 ± 10.8 years, 36.4% female, follow-up duration: 407.2 ± 388.3 days). Appropriate low-dose group were older, more likely female, had a higher CHADS2 and ORBIT scores than the other groups. MACE (7.4%) and clinically significant bleeding (26.2%) occurred most frequently in the appropriate low-dose group. However, after adjustment for various confounders, appropriate dose reduction of DOAC showed 35.4% risk reduction of clinically significant bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio 0.646, 95% CI [0.469 to 0.890], p = 0.007) with no impairment of efficacy end points. In the real-world Asian clinical practice, four fifths of the NVAF patients received appropriate dose of DOACs. Appropriate dose reduction was associated with decrease in clinically significant bleeding and no significant impairment in efficacy end points.

A 76-year-old man developed repeated fulminant myocarditis in a short period, and immunosuppressive therapy was remarkably effective. A pathologic evaluation showed that inflammatory cells had infiltrated the myocardium. Not only invasion of inflammatory cells but also the formation of lymphoid follicle was noted. Chronic myocardial inflammation was proven, but cardiac sarcoidosis was negative according to the results of various examinations. This is the first report of recurrent autoimmune myocarditis with a lymphoid follicle in the myocardium. These findings may suggest a novel pathogenesis of myocarditis.

The early and mid-term arterial healing profile of biodegradable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) is unclear, especially in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) culprit lesions. This study aimed to compare early- and mid-term arterial healing between durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) and BP-EES in STEMI patients. In a prospective, multicenter, non-inferiority trial, STEMI patients were randomized to receive BP-EES (n = 60) or DP-EES (n = 60). The primary endpoint of this study was the mean percentage of covered struts (%covered struts) on FD-OCT 2 weeks post-PCI. Key secondary endpoints included the percentage of uncovered struts, frequency of abnormal intra-stent tissue, and percentage of malapposed struts by FD-OCT 2 weeks and 12 months post-PCI. They underwent serial frequency-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) evaluations immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention, and at 2 weeks and at 12 months after the procedure. The primary endpoint of %covered struts at 2 weeks was 71.4% in BP-EES and 72.3% in DP-EES [risk difference - 0.94%, lower limit of one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) - 5.6; P

In patients with multivessel disease (MVD), functional information on lesions improves the prognostic capability of the SYNTAX score. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR®) is an angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) that does not require a pressure wire or pharmacological hyperemia. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of QFR-based patient information in Heart Teams' discussions to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with MVD. We hypothesized that there is an acceptable agreement between treatment recommendations based on the QFR approach and recommendation based on the FFR approach. The DECISION QFR study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that will include patients with MVD who require revascularization. Two Heart Teams comprising cardiologists and cardiac surgeons will be randomized to select a revascularization strategy (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft) according to patient information either based on QFR or on FFR. All 260 patients will be assessed by both teams with reference to the anatomical and functional SYNTAX score/SYNTAX score II 2020 derived from the allocated physiological index (QFR or FFR). The primary endpoint of the trial is the level of agreement between the treatment recommendations of both teams, assessed using Cohen's κ. As of March 2022, the patient enrollment has been completed and 230 patients have been discussed in both Heart Teams. The current trial will indicate the usefulness of QFR, which enables a wireless multivessel physiological interrogation, in the discussions of Heart Teams to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for MVD.

Background: Little is known about factors associated with elevated N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at the convalescent stage and their effects on 1-year outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods and Results: This study included 469 patients with HFpEF. Elevated NT-proBNP was defined as the highest quartile. The first 3 quartiles (Q1-Q3) were combined together for comparison with the fourth quartile (Q4). Median NT-proBNP concentrations in Q1-Q3 and Q4 were 669 and 3,504 pg/mL, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that low albumin (odds ratio [OR] 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-4.39; P=0.003), low estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR 5.83; 95% CI 3.46-9.83; P

Background Non-obstructive general angioscopy is a powerful modality for detecting areas in the aorta with vulnerable plaque, which are difficult to visualize using conventional diagnostic tools such as computed tomography (CT). The aim of the present study was to clarify the efficacy and usefulness of aortic angioscopy in patients with chronic type B aortic dissection scheduled for thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR). Methods Ten patients with chronic type B aortic dissection who underwent elective TEVAR were enrolled. Before starting the stent graft procedure, the aortic intima was observed by use of non-obstructive general angioscopy. Based on those findings, the range of the stent graft position was confirmed. Results In all patients, observations of the aortic intima with non-obstructive general angioscopy from a point just proximal of the descending aorta to the iliac artery were successful. At the proximal site, an entry site or ulcer-like projection was detected in all patients, while a small intimal tear or entry, or an irregular intima surface with a salmon-pink color were seen in some cases. In contrast, preoperative CT did not detect any such findings in the same locations. After confirming the position of the abnormal intima, we determined the position of the distal end of the stent graft. No complications considered to be related to aortic angioscopy were noted. Conclusions Non-obstructive general angioscopy is useful for observing the condition of the aortic intima, revealing abnormal conditions, and confirming a normal aortic intima in patients with chronic type B aortic dissection. This modality may play an important role in determining the precise position of a stent graft for a TEVAR procedure.

We aimed to quantitatively assess a possible difference of the neointimal quality between biodegradable polymer- (BP-) and durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DESs). We conducted a single-center all-comer prospective cohort study: the RESTORE registry (UMIN000033009). All patients who received successful OCT examination at planned 3-month follow-up after DES implantation were analyzed. Study population was divided into 2 groups, BP-DES versus DP-DES groups. We evaluated standard OCT variables, coverage percent, and the quantitative light property values including light intensity, attenuation, and backscatter. We performed OCT analyses of 121 lesions in 98 patients (BP-DES 55 lesions in 51 patients vs. DP-DES 66 lesions in DP-DES 53 patients). Lesion and procedural characteristics were overall well-balanced between both groups. At 3-month follow-up, neointimal thickness (BP-DES 49.3 [38.2, 57.7] µm versus DP-DES 54.7 [45.1, 70.7] µm, p = 0.059) and coverage percent (BP-DES 94.5 [89.8, 97.0]% vs. DP-DES 95.8 [91.1, 98.1]%, p = 0.083) did not significantly differ. Light intensity of superficial neointima in the BP-DES was lower than that in the DP-DES, whereas that of deep neointima did not differ between both groups. Both superficial and deep neointima of the BP-DES presented significantly lower light attenuation and backscatter than those of the DP-DES did. Almost complete coverage at 3 months in both contemporary BP- and DP-DES would support the ultra-short DAPT strategy in the upcoming decade. Nevertheless, there was a significant difference in the neointimal characteristics on OCT light property 3 months after BP- versus DP-DES implantation. Trial Registration UMIN000033009.

IntroductionThe optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is uncertain. For patients with non-AF, many trials are now evaluating short 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy. In patients with AF undergoing PCI, in contrast, short dual therapy (P2Y12 inhibitor +direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)) has not yet been evaluated.Methods and analysisThe OPTIMA-AF trial (OPTIMAl antiplatelet therapy in combination with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting stent) is an investigator-initiated, open-label, nationwide, multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy and safety of short dual therapy (1-month DOAC +P2Y12 inhibitor followed by DOAC monotherapy) against long dual therapy (12-month DOAC +P2Y12 inhibitor followed by DOAC monotherapy) in the treatment of AF subjects undergoing PCI. The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of death or thromboembolic events (myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, stroke or systemic embolism) at 365 days; and the primary safety endpoint is bleeding (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding) at 365 days. This trial is intended to show the non-inferiority of short dual therapy versus long dual therapy in terms of the primary efficacy endpoint and show superiority in terms of the primary safety endpoint. A total of 1090 subjects will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio at approximately 60 sites.Ethics and disseminationThis study received approval from the Certified Review Board of Osaka University (a certified research ethics committee by the Japanese Clinical Research Act). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.Trial registration numberJapan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCTs051190053; Pre-results.

BACKGROUND Although diastolic dysfunction is important pathophysiology in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), its prognostic impact in HFpEF patients, including those with atrial fibrillation (AF), remains to be elucidated.Methods and Results:We included the data for 863 patients (321 patients with AF) registered in a prospective multicenter observational study of patients with HFpEF. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or HF rehospitalization. Median age was 83 years, and 55.5% were female. 196 (22.7%) were classified with normal diastolic function (ND), 253 (29.3%) with indeterminate (ID) and 414 (48.0%) with diastolic dysfunction (DD). The primary endpoint occurred more frequently in patients with DD than in those with ND or ID (log-rank P

The use of the Impella device (ABIOMED, Danvers, Massachusetts) is becoming widespread in patients presenting with cardiogenic shock and those undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The DTU-STEMI (Door To Unloading With IMPELLA CP System in Acute Myocardial Infarction

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the vessel healing status 3 months after stent implantation of bioresorbable-polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DESs) in comparison with durable-polymer DESs (DP-DESs) by angioscopy. Study design was a single-center all-comer prospective cohort study: the RESTORE registry (UMIN000033009). All patients who received successful angioscopic examination at planned 3-month follow-up after the DES implantation in the native coronary artery were enrolled. We evaluated main, maximum, minimum strut coverage grades and coverage heterogeneity score defined as a difference between maximum and minimum coverage grades. All lesions were divided into three segments: proximal, mid, and distal segments. A total of 108 patients (66.6 ± 10 years) with 124 lesions were analyzed (BP-DES 57 patients 61 lesions 226 segments vs. DP-DES 57 patients 63 lesions 203 segments; six patients had both BP-DES and DP-DES). Patient and lesion demographics, procedural characteristics were well balanced. Main coverage grade (mean ± standard error; 1.08 ± 0.02 vs. 1.05 ± 0.03, p = 0.354) and minimum coverage grade (1.00 ± 0.00 vs. 1.00 ± 0.00, p > 0.999) were not significantly different between BP-DES and DP-DES groups. Maximum coverage grade was significantly higher in the BP-DES than in the DP-DES (1.45 ± 0.04 vs. 1.35 ± 0.04, p = 0.049). Coverage heterogeneity score did not differ between BP-DES and DP-DES groups (1.05 ± 0.07 vs. 0.90 ± 0.07, p = 0.162). At 3-month follow-up, the current BP-DES had higher maximum stent coverage than the contemporary DP-DES, while main and minimum coverage grades and heterogeneity of the neointimal coverage were comparable. Further prospective randomized trials should be conducted to evaluate the clinical significance of the present imaging results.

Background Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty is one of the standard treatments for lesions with in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, the efficacy of additional excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) for ISR lesions prior to DCB angioplasty has not been elucidated. The aims of this study were to elucidate the efficacy of ELCA prior to DCB treatment for ISR and the difference in effectiveness by lesion morphology. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective observational study. We enrolled 208 ISR lesions from 204 patients which were treated with DCB angioplasty under optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance. We compared the acute gain evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) between the ELCA (+) (47 lesions) and ELCA (−) (161 lesions) groups. Results The acute gain was significantly larger in the ELCA (+) group (1.51 ± 0.47 mm versus 1.29 ± 0.52 mm, P = 0.012). Even after adjustment for comorbidities, the ELCA had a significant impact on the acute gain (coefficient 0.24 [95% confidence interval 0.067–0.41]). In addition, the ELCA usage was significantly associated with larger acute gain in lesions with a homogeneous pattern, although there was no association between ELCA and either the heterogeneous pattern or neoatherosclerosis. The freedom from CD-TLR was not different between the ELCA (−) and ELCA (+) groups (hazard ratio 0.53 [0.24–1.18]). Conclusions ELCA had a significant impact on the larger acute gain in ISR lesions, especially may did in those with a homogenous pattern, while it did not impact CD-TLR significantly.

Background: The association between direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dose and clinical outcomes when used with antiplatelets still remains to be investigated. Methods and Results: We conducted a prospective registry of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with DOAC: the DIRECT registry (n=2,216; follow-up, 407±388 days). We analyzed patients taking standard dose (n=907) and off-label reduced dose (n=338) DOAC in this sub-analysis. These patients were further stratified by add-on antiplatelets. Because DOAC dose was not randomly selected, potential confounding factors were eliminated through a propensity score-matching technique. The primary endpoint was clinically significant bleeding. The secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of all-cause death, all myocardial infarction, and stroke/systemic embolism). In patients with DOAC only/DOAC+antiplatelets, we successfully matched 212/62 patients who received off-label reduced dose DOAC with 212/62 standard dose patients. Off-label DOAC dose reduction did not have a significant impact on bleeding (HR, 1.123; 95% CI: 0.730–1.728, P=0.596) or MACE (HR, 1.107; 95% CI: 0.463–2.648, P=0.819) in patients with DOAC only, whereas in patients with add-on antiplatelets, off-label dose reduction significantly reduced bleeding (HR, 0.429; 95% CI: 0.212–0.868, P=0.019) without increasing MACE (HR, 2.205; 95% CI: 0.424–11.477, P=0.348). Conclusions: Reduced DOAC dose in combination with antiplatelet agents was associated with fewer bleeding complications than standard-dose therapy with no reduction in efficacy.