1. Meeting medical emergency response criteria for hypertension is not associated with an increased likelihood of in-hospital mortality in a tertiary referral center
- Author
-
Jin Nuo Joan Tsang, Stephen Bacchi, Christopher D. Ovenden, Rudy Goh, Joshua G. Kovoor, Aashray K. Gupta, Yong Min Lee, Antoinette Lam, Brandon Stretton, Minh-Son To, Richard Woodman, Arduino A Mangoni, and James Malycha
- Subjects
Hypertension ,Hospital medicine ,Medical emergency response ,Vital signs ,Specialties of internal medicine ,RC581-951 - Abstract
Backgrounds: Rapid response team or medical emergency team (MET) calls are typically activated by significant alterations of vital signs in inpatients. However, the clinical significance of a specific criterion, blood pressure elevations, is uncertain. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the likelihood ratios associated with MET-activating vital signs, particularly in-patient hypertension, for predicting in-hospital mortality among general medicine inpatients who met MET criteria at any point during admission in a South Australian metropolitan teaching hospital. Results: Among the 15,734 admissions over a two-year period, 4282 (27.2%) met any MET criteria, with a positive likelihood ratio of 3.05 (95% CI 2.93 to 3.18) for in-hospital mortality. Individual MET criteria were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality, with the highest positive likelihood ratio for respiratory rate ≤ 7 breaths per minute (9.83, 95% CI 6.90 to 13.62), barring systolic pressure ≥ 200 mmHg (LR + 1.26, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.69). Conclusions: Our results show that meeting the MET criteria for hypertension, unlike other criteria, was not significant associated with in-hospital mortality. This observation warrants further research in other patient cohorts to determine whether blood pressure elevations should be routinely included in MET criteria.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF