Search

Real‐world data derived from electronic health records often exhibit high levels of missingness in variables, such as laboratory results, presenting a challenge for statistical analyses. We developed a systematic workflow for gathering evidence of different missingness mechanisms and performing subsequent statistical analyses. We quantify evidence for missing completely at random (MCAR) or missing at random (MAR), mechanisms using Hotelling's multivariate t‐test, and random forest classifiers, respectively. We further illustrate how to apply sensitivity analyses using the not at random fully conditional specification procedure to examine changes in parameter estimates under missing not at random (MNAR) mechanisms. In simulation studies, we validated these diagnostics and compared analytic bias under different mechanisms. To demonstrate the application of this workflow, we applied it to two exemplary case studies with an advanced non‐small cell lung cancer and a multiple myeloma cohort derived from a real‐world oncology database. Here, we found strong evidence against MCAR, and some evidence of MAR, implying that imputation approaches that attempt to predict missing values by fitting a model to observed data may be suitable for use. Sensitivity analyses did not suggest meaningful departures of our analytic results under potential MNAR mechanisms; these results were also in line with results reported in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Relapsed/refractory Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (R/R PCNSL) has a poor prognosis with no established preferred treatment. We report the efficacy and toxicity of a combination chemotherapy regimen: methotrexate, carmustine, etoposide, and prednisone with or without rituximab (RMBVP). This retrospective study included thirty patients who received a median of two 28-day cycles (0.5–5). The median age was 66 years (23–81); median KPS was 70 (30–90); 14 (46.7%) were women. Patients received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy and all received prior methotrexate. Of 29 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 73.3% (n = 22). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.6 months. Patients who recurred or progressed <12 months since last chemotherapy had a shorter median PFS (7.6 vs 37.6 months). Toxicity was moderate with 20% rates of severe myelosuppression. RMBVP is a tolerable treatment option for R/R PCNSL, with favorable response rates in those with recurrent disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used for prevention of skeletal related events in patients with bone metastasis from solid tumors and is administered every four weeks. In our practice, denosumab is often given at different frequencies more similar to patient's chemotherapy regimens to decrease frequency of clinic visits. The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of skeletal related events, incidence of hypocalcemia, and cost with denosumab given at every four weeks and denosumab given at other frequencies. Methods This retrospective study at Duke University Health System included solid tumor patients with an age ≥18 years who received denosumab for prevention of skeletal related events. Results A total of 94 patients were included, with 29 in the every four-week group and 65 in the greater than every four-week group. Patients who received denosumab every four weeks had a 41.4% incidence of skeletal related events compared to 26.2% incidence of skeletal related events in patients who received denosumab at intervals greater than every four weeks (OR: 0.50; p = 0.14). There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of hypocalcemia. Based on average wholesale price, when the frequency of denosumab is extended to greater than every four weeks, annual cost savings per patient ranged from $4700 (every 5 weeks) to $18,800 (every 12 weeks). Conclusion While this study raises the possibility of decreasing the frequency of denosumab administration, further data are necessary to confirm that less frequent administration is non-inferior to every four-week administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Denosumab therapy is commonly used for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastasis. However, a common side effect of denosumab is hypocalcemia. Objective The aim of the study is to determine the incidence of hypocalcemia in patients receiving denosumab for prevention of skeletal-related events in bone metastasis and evaluate risk factors for developing hypocalcemia. Methods This was a retrospective medication use evaluation reviewing the incidence of hypocalcemia in patients receiving outpatient denosumab for prevention of skeletal-related events at Yale–New Haven Hospital. Additionally, various risk factors were reviewed to determine their risk of developing hypocalcemia. Results As per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03, of the 106 patients included in the study population, 37 (35%) patients had an incidence of hypocalcemia within 30 days of denosumab administration. Fourteen patients (13.2%) had an incidence of grade 1, 13 patients (12.3%) had an incidence of grade 2 hypocalcemia, and 7 patients (6.6%) had an incidence of grade 3 hypocalcemia. Grade 4 hypocalcemia occurred in three (2.8%) patients. Calcium supplementation did not decrease the risk of developing hypocalcemia. Patients who had one or more episodes of acute kidney insufficiency were at a higher risk of developing hypocalcemia (odds ratio = 7.5 (95% confidence interval = 1.8–36.3), p = 0.001). Conclusion This study found that the overall incidence of hypocalcemia and severe hypocalcemia was higher than reported in clinical trials. Additionally, calcium supplementation did not have an effect on incidence of hypocalcemia, while patients who experienced acute kidney insufficiency while on denosumab had a higher likelihood of developing hypocalcemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To review the emergency-based approach to opioid toxicity reversal in cancer-related pain patients. Data source A MEDLINE and PubMed search was conducted (1966 to May 2014) using the terms opioids, cancer, naloxone, respiratory depression, morphine, morphine derivatives, emergency, and anaphylaxis. Methods of study selection English articles in human subjects identified from the MEDLINE and PubMed search were evaluated. Citations were excluded if they addressed acute overdoses, non-cancer pain, and/or acute, non-chronic pain. Data extraction and synthesis Pain is a common occurrence in the oncology population. Although toxicity from opioids is common, life-threatening toxicities are not. The use of naloxone in this particular patient population occurs frequently for any perceived opioid-related effect and can be detrimental to the oncology patient’s care and quality of life. Difficulties exist when attempting to separate opioid toxicity from disease progression or metastases and, therefore, a thorough history is needed prior to complete opioid reversal in this population. Severity of the opioid intoxication should dictate reversal strategy. Dosing strategies that take into account both the treatment of the opioid-related effects as well as the negative effects reversal will have on the patient are offered. We also review the pre-hospital setting and identified the need for protocols that not only take the patient’s symptoms into account, but also the patient’s cancer history. Conclusion Opioid reversal protocols should be developed by a multi-disciplinary team. Each protocol should differentiate those toxicities which are life-threatening and require complete opioid reversal with toxicities that require small aliquots of naloxone to mitigate the presenting symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]