Search

Purpose: Mixed gonadal dysgenesis is a difference of sex development that is often confused with other conditions. Individuals have a 45,X/46,XY karyotype. Gonads are characterized by a streak gonad and a dysgenetic testis at varying levels of descent. Persistent Müllerian structures are typical (eg, hemi-uterus). There is significant phenotypic heterogeneity of the internal and external genitalia that, together with different interpretations of the definition, have contributed to a poor understanding of the condition among pediatric urologists. Mixed gonadal dysgenesis is one manifestation of the 45,X/46,XY karyotype. 45,X/46,XY mosaicism can also be associated with typical female or male external genitalia. This review aims to clarify the mixed gonadal dysgenesis definition and to provide urologists with diagnostic and management considerations for affected individuals. Materials and Methods: We searched 3 medical databases for articles related to mixed gonadal dysgenesis. Two hundred eighty-seven full-text abstracts and manuscripts were reviewed for content pertinent to: (1) clarifying the definition of mixed gonadal dysgenesis, and (2) describing the following related to the care of affected individuals: prenatal and neonatal evaluation and management, genital surgery, gonadal malignancy risk and management, fertility, gender dysphoria/incongruence, puberty and long-term outcomes, systemic comorbidities, and transitional care. Results: Fifty articles were included. Key points and implications for each of the above topics were summarized. Conclusions: Mixed gonadal dysgenesis exists on a wide phenotypic spectrum and management considerations reflect this heterogeneity. Care for individuals with mixed gonadal dysgenesis is complex, and decisions should be made in a multidisciplinary setting with psychological support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We sought to assess associations between health-related quality of life (QOL), bladder-related QOL, bladder symptoms, and bladder catheterization route among adolescents and young adults with spina bifida. Materials and Methods: Clinical questionnaires administered to individuals ≥ 12 years old requiring catheterization between June 2019 to March 2020 in a spina bifida center were retrospectively analyzed. Questionnaires were completed in English or Spanish independently or with caregiver assistance. Medical records were reviewed for demographic and clinical characteristics. Primary exposure was catheterization route (urethra or channel). Primary outcome was health-related QOL, measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric Global Health 7 (PGH-7). Secondary outcomes were bladder-related QOL and bladder symptoms, measured by Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS). Nested, multivariable linear regression models assessed associations between catheterization route and questionnaire scores. Results: Of 162 patients requiring catheterization, 146 completed both the PGH-7 and NBSS and were included. Seventy-three percent were catheterized via urethra and 27% via channel. Median age was 17.5 years (range 12-31), 58% of patients were female, and 80% had myelomeningocele. Urinary incontinence was more common among those who catheterized via urethra (60%) compared to channel (33%). On adjusted analyses, catheterization route was not significantly associated with PGH-7 or NBSS bladder-related QOL scores. More bladder symptoms were associated with worse bladder-related QOL. Patients who catheterized via channel had fewer bladder symptoms than those who catheterized via urethra. Conclusions: Catheterization route was not significantly associated with QOL. Though catheterization via channel was associated with fewer bladder symptoms, only degree of current bladder symptoms was significantly associated with bladder-related QOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Urodynamic testing (UDS) is an important tool in the management of pediatric lower urinary tract conditions. There have been notable efforts to standardize pediatric UDS nomenclature and technique, but no formal guidelines exist on essential elements to include in a clinical report. We sought to identify ideal structure and elements of a pediatric UDS assessment based on expert consensus. Materials and Methods: Pediatric urologists regularly performing UDS were queried using a Delphi process. Participants were invited representing varied geographic, experience, and societal involvement. Participants underwent 3 rounds of questionnaires between November 2022 and August 2023 focusing on report organization, elements, definitions, and automated electronic health record clinical decision support. Professional billing requirements were also considered. Consensus was defined as 80% agreeing either in favor of or against a topic. Elements without consensus were discussed in subsequent rounds. Results: A diverse sample of 30 providers, representing 27 institutions across 21 US states; Washington, District of Columbia; and Canada completed the study. Participants reported interpreting an average number of 5 UDS reports per week (range 1-22). The finalized consensus report identifies 93 elements that should be included in a pediatric UDS report based on applicable study conditions and findings. Conclusions: This consensus report details the key elements and structure agreed upon by an expert panel of pediatric urologists. Further standardization of documentation should aid collaboration and research for patients undergoing UDS. Based on this information, development of a standardized UDS report template using electronic health record implementation principles is underway, which will be openly available for pediatric urologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess perspectives on clinical communication about sexual health in young adult males with spina bifida. Method: Semi‐structured interviews were conducted between February and May 2021 with males at least 18 years of age with spina bifida to assess their perspectives and experiences of sexual health communication with clinicians. Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained from chart review and a survey of patients. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and conventional content analysis was used for transcript coding. Results: Twenty individuals participated with a median age of 22 years 6 months (range 18–29 years). Sixteen had myelomeningocele. Most identified as heterosexual (n = 17) and not sexually active (n = 13). Barriers and facilitators of successful interactions were identified. Barriers for participants included general discomfort with talking about sex and variability in individual preferences for how conversations occur. Facilitators included participants' comfort with their urologist and discussing sex in relation to disability. Suggestions for improving discussions included (1) notifying individuals that discussion about sex will occur before clinic visits; (2) creating space for discussions; (3) respecting individuals' readiness to discuss; and (4) making discussions disability specific. Interpretation: Young adult males with spina bifida are interested in discussing sexual health with their clinicians. Great variability exists about conversation preferences, emphasizing the need to individualize clinical communication about sex. Current health guidelines for males may not be in line with individuals' wishes. What this paper adds: Great variability exists in individual preference around sexual health communication.Patient‐level barriers hinder successful conversations about sex.Individuals have great insight into how conversations about sex can be improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]