Search

This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence on feasibility of the inaugural use of teleconsultation between acute hospitals and primary care for acute wound management in Singapore. Post-surgical patients with carbuncle wounds, perianal abscess wounds or surgical abdominal dehiscence wounds were recruited from an acute hospital. Instead of receiving their follow up care at the acute care tertiary hospital, patients were given the option to receive their care at primary care facilities instead, supported by teleconsultation wound services provided by wound care nurses from the hospital. The following outcome measures were collected: number of care sessions required (until wound healed), readmissions or referrals back to hospital, cost (patient's and healthcare provider's perspective), patients' and nurses' satisfaction. In total, 18 patients were recruited and completed the study (teleconsult group = 5; tertiary care clinic group = 13). The mean age (SD) of patients were 63.2 (SD 11.5) years old in the teleconsult group and 47.9 years old (SD 11.5) in the tertiary care clinic group. There were 7 female (54%), and 6 male (46%) in the tertiary care clinic group whereas teleconsult group consisted of male only (n = 5). Most had carbuncle wounds (teleconsult group: n = 4; 80%); tertiary care clinic group: (n = 10; 77%). For patients with carbuncle wounds, the average number of care sessions required were 21 and 33 for the tertiary care clinic and teleconsult respectively. None of the patients in the teleconsult group were referred back to the tertiary care hospital. All 16 nurses (n = 6 from acute care hospital, n = 10 from polyclinics) who participated in the feedback survey cited convenience, ease of tracking wound sizes, and closer collaboration between the acute care and primary care nurses as advantages of the service. Wound teleconsultation is feasible and potentially cost savings for patients with acute complex wounds.

Background Consumer engagement is a requirement of high quality clinical guidelines. Developing strategies to engage consumers and incorporate the perspectives of individuals with or at risk of pressure ulcers/injuries and their informal caregivers was one priority in the recent update of the EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA's Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline. Aims The aims were to determine the goals of individuals and caregivers for pressure ulcer/injury care, priorities for pressure ulcer/injury education and biggest problems related to pressure ulcers/injuries. Methods An online, anonymous, international 10-item survey, accessible in nine languages was provided to individuals and their caregivers from April to October 2018. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data and a thematic analysis approach was used to analyse qualitative data. Results There were 1233 individuals from 27 countries who completed the survey. Overall, individuals and caregivers had similar goals of care. Reducing the size of pressure ulcer/injury was selected more often as a care goal than complete healing. Individuals, compared to caregivers, considered managing pain more important. Qualitative data analysis identified five themes including knowledge, attitudes, and skills; risk factors for pressure ulcer/injury; accessing pressure ulcer/injury care; quality of life for patients and caregivers; and the pressure ulcer/injury. Conclusions The consumer survey provided consumer engagement and perspective that was incorporated into guideline development, including consideration during evaluation of the relevance and acceptability of recommendations, and assignment of recommendation strength ratings.

Objective: To evaluate the use of an infrared thermography device in assessing skin temperature among category I pressure ulcer (PU) and/or suspected deep tissue injuries (SDTI) with intact skin. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study design was used. Adult inpatients (cases) who had a category I PU or suspected deep tissue injury (skin intact) on the sacral or heel during the study period (March to April 2018) were recruited. Patients without a PU were also recruited to act as control. Thermal images of the patient's PU site and non-PU site were taken within 24 hours of PU occurrence. Thermal images of the control patients (no PU) were also taken. Each PU case was matched to three control patients in terms of age, gender, race and anatomical sites. All thermal images were taken using a portable CAT S60 Thermal Imaging Rugged Smartphone (Caterpillar Inc., US) that provided readings of the skin temperature in degrees Celsius. Results: A total of 17 cases and 51 controls were recruited. Among the cases, the mean difference in skin temperature between the PU site (mean: 31.14°C; standard deviation [SD]: 1.54) and control site within the cases (mean: 28.93°C; SD: 3.47) was significant (difference: 2.21±3.66°C; p=0·024). When comparing between all cases and controls, the mean temperature difference was non-significant. When comparing between the category I PU and suspected deep pressure injury cases, the mean difference was also non-significant. Conclusion: Using infrared thermography technology at the bedside to measure skin temperature will support the clinical diagnosis of patients with skin types I to III. However, there is a need for a more accurate and objective measurement to identify and diagnose early category I PU or suspected deep tissue injury in adult patients with darker skin types 4 and above, enabling early initiation of preventive measures in the hospital acute care setting.