1. Association between sulfur microbial diet and the risk of esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study in 101,752 American adults
- Author
-
Xiaorui Ren, Li Xin, Linglong Peng, Yi Xiao, Zhihang Zhou, Haoyun Luo, Zhiyong Zhu, Qi Wei, Yahui Jiang, Hongmei He, Ling Xiang, Yaxu Wang, Yunhao Tang, and Haitao Gu
- Subjects
Sulfur microbial diet ,Esophageal cancer ,Sulfur-metabolizing microbes ,PLCO cancer screening trial ,Cox hazards regression analysis ,Nutrition. Foods and food supply ,TX341-641 ,Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases ,RC620-627 - Abstract
Abstract Background Sulfur microbial diet (SMD) is a dietary pattern closely related to the intestinal load of sulfur-metabolizing microbes in humans. Diet and microbes may play an important role in the carcinogenesis of esophagus. However, epidemiological studies on SMD and esophageal cancer (EC) risk are scarce. Here, we evaluated this association based on a large American cohort. Methods In the cohort of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, a SMD score was calculated to evaluate participants’ compliance of SMD pattern, with higher scores presenting greater adherence. Cox hazards regression model was used to explore the association between the SMD score and the incidence of EC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA). Subgroup analyses were conducted to figure out potential modifiers interacting with SMD on EC. Sensitivity analyses were used to testify the robustness of our main result. Results Among 101,752 participants, 154 EC cases, consisted of 41 ESCC cases and 97 EA cases, were identified with mean follow-up of 8.9 years. In the fully adjusted model, the highest versus the lowest quartiles of the SMD score were found to be associated with an increased risk of EC and ESCC (EC: HRQ4 vs. Q1: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.05, 2.56; P = 0.016 for trend; ESCC: HRQ4 vs. Q1: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.02, 5.47; P = 0.031 for trend), while not significantly associated with increases risk of EA (HRQ4 vs. Q1: 1.41; P = 0.144 for trend). The main result remained through a series of sensitivity analyses. Subgroup analyses showed a stronger association between SMD and EC in participants with no regular consumption of aspirin (HRQ4 vs. Q1: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.04, 3.47) than in those using aspirin regularly (HRQ4 vs. Q1: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.71, 2.66) (P = 0.008 for interaction). Conclusion Adherence to the SMD pattern may be associated with increased risks of EC and ESCC, particularly for EC in individuals who do not regularly consume aspirin.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF