Search

Here, we report the development of methodologies that enable genetic modification of a Basidiomycota yeast, Naganishia liquifaciens. The gene targeting method employs electroporation with PCR products flanked by an 80 bp sequence homologous to the target. The method, combined with a newly devised CRISPR-Cas9 system, routinely achieves 80% gene targeting efficiency. We further explored the genetic requirement for this homologous recombination (HR)-mediated gene targeting. The absence of Ku70, a major component of the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway of DNA double-strand break repair, almost completely eliminated inaccurate integration of the marker. Gene targeting with short homology (80 bp) was almost exclusively dependent on Rad52, an essential component of HR in the Ascomycota yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. By contrast, the RecA homolog Rad51, which performs homology search and strand exchange in HR, plays a relatively minor role in gene targeting, regardless of the homology length (80 bp or 1 kb). The absence of both Rad51 and Rad52, however, completely eliminated gene targeting. Unlike Ascomycota yeasts, the absence of Rad52 in N. liquefaciens conferred only mild sensitivity to ionizing radiation. These traits associated with the absence of Rad52 are reminiscent of findings in mice.

During homologous recombination, Rad51 forms a nucleoprotein filament on single-stranded DNA to promote DNA strand exchange. This filament binds to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), searches for homology, and promotes transfer of the complementary strand, producing a new heteroduplex. Strand exchange proceeds via two distinct three-strand intermediates, C1 and C2. C1 contains the intact donor dsDNA whereas C2 contains newly formed heteroduplex DNA. Here, we show that the conserved DNA binding motifs, loop 1 (L1) and loop 2 (L2) in site I of Rad51, play distinct roles in this process. L1 is involved in formation of the C1 complex whereas L2 mediates the C1–C2 transition, producing the heteroduplex. Another DNA binding motif, site II, serves as the DNA entry position for initial Rad51 filament formation, as well as for donor dsDNA incorporation. Our study provides a comprehensive molecular model for the catalytic process of strand exchange mediated by eukaryotic RecA-family recombinases., Rad51 drives DNA strand exchange, the central reaction in recombinational DNA repair. Two sites of Rad51 are responsible for DNA binding, but the function of these sites has proven elusive. Here, the authors employ real-time assays to reveal catalytic roles for the two DNA binding sites of Rad51.

Rad51 is the key protein in homologous recombination that plays important roles during DNA replication and repair. Auxiliary factors regulate Rad51 activity to facilitate productive recombination, and prevent inappropriate, untimely or excessive events, which could lead to genome instability. Previous genetic analyses identified a function for Rrp1 (a member of the Rad5/16-like group of SWI2/SNF2 translocases) in modulating Rad51 function, shared with the Rad51 mediator Swi5-Sfr1 and the Srs2 anti-recombinase. Here, we show that Rrp1 overproduction alleviates the toxicity associated with excessive Rad51 levels in a manner dependent on Rrp1 ATPase domain. Purified Rrp1 binds to DNA and has a DNA-dependent ATPase activity. Importantly, Rrp1 directly interacts with Rad51 and removes it from double-stranded DNA, confirming that Rrp1 is a translocase capable of modulating Rad51 function. Rrp1 affects Rad51 binding at centromeres. Additionally, we demonstrate in vivo and in vitro that Rrp1 possesses E3 ubiquitin ligase activity with Rad51 as a substrate, suggesting that Rrp1 regulates Rad51 in a multi-tiered fashion., Graphical Abstract Graphical AbstractRrp1 translocase removes Rad51 from double stranded DNA and is an E3 ubiquitin ligase with Rad51 as a substrate.

Here, we report the development of methodologies that enable genetic modification of a Basidiomycota yeast, Naganishia liquifaciens. The gene targeting method employs electroporation with PCR products flanked by an 80 bp sequence homologous to the target. The method, combined with a newly devised CRISPR-Cas9 system, routinely achieves 80% gene targeting efficiency. We further explored the genetic requirement for this homologous recombination (HR)-mediated gene targeting. The absence of Ku70, a major component of the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway of DNA double-strand break repair, almost completely eliminated inaccurate integration of the marker. Gene targeting with short homology (80 bp) was almost exclusively dependent on Rad52, an essential component of HR in the Ascomycota yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. By contrast, the RecA homolog Rad51, which performs homology search and strand exchange in HR, plays a relatively minor role in gene targeting, regardless of the homology length (80 bp or 1 kb). The absence of both Rad51 and Rad52, however, completely eliminated gene targeting. Unlike Ascomycota yeasts, the absence of Rad52 in N. liquefaciens conferred only mild sensitivity to ionizing radiation. These traits associated with the absence of Rad52 are reminiscent of findings in mice.

The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex (MRN) is important for repairing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination (HR). The endonuclease activity of MRN is critical for resecting 5′-ended DNA strands at DSB ends, producing 3′-ended single-strand DNA, a prerequisite for HR. This endonuclease activity is stimulated by Ctp1, the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homolog of human CtIP. Here, with purified proteins, we show that Ctp1 phosphorylation stimulates MRN endonuclease activity by inducing the association of Ctp1 with Nbs1. The highly conserved extreme C terminus of Ctp1 is indispensable for MRN activation. Importantly, a polypeptide composed of the conserved 15 amino acids at the C terminus of Ctp1 (CT15) is sufficient to stimulate Mre11 endonuclease activity. Furthermore, the CT15 equivalent from CtIP can stimulate human MRE11 endonuclease activity, arguing for the generality of this stimulatory mechanism. Thus, we propose that Nbs1-mediated recruitment of CT15 plays a pivotal role in the activation of the Mre11 endonuclease by Ctp1/CtIP.

Cohesin, a critical mediator of genome organization including sister chromatid cohesion, is a ring-shaped multi-subunit ATPase that topologically embraces DNA. Its loading and function on chromosomes require the Scc2-Scc4 loader. Using biochemical reconstitution, we show here that the ability of the loader to bind DNA plays a critical role in promoting cohesin loading. Two distinct sites within the Mis4

Although Rad51 is the key protein in homologous recombination (HR), a major DNA double-strand break repair pathway, several auxiliary factors interact with Rad51 to promote productive HR. We present an interdisciplinary characterization of the interaction between Rad51 and Swi5-Sfr1, a conserved auxiliary factor. Two distinct sites within the intrinsically disordered N-terminus of Sfr1 (Sfr1N) were found to cooperatively bind Rad51. Deletion of this domain impaired Rad51 stimulation in vitro and rendered cells sensitive to DNA damage. By contrast, amino acid-substitution mutants, which had comparable biochemical defects, could promote DNA repair, suggesting that Sfr1N has another role in addition to Rad51 binding. Unexpectedly, the DNA repair observed in these mutants was dependent on Rad55-Rad57, another auxiliary factor complex hitherto thought to function independently of Swi5-Sfr1. When combined with the finding that they form a higher-order complex, our results imply that Swi5-Sfr1 and Rad55-Rad57 can collaboratively stimulate Rad51 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe., eLife digest The DNA within cells contains the instructions necessary for life and it must be carefully maintained. DNA is constantly being damaged by radiation and other factors so cells have evolved an arsenal of mechanisms that repair this damage. An enzyme called Rad51 drives one such DNA repair process known as homologous recombination. A pair of regulatory proteins known as the Swi5-Sfr1 complex binds to Rad51 and activates it. The complex can be thought of as containing two modules with distinct roles: one comprising the first half of the Sfr1 protein and that is capable of binding to Rad51, and a second consisting of the rest of Sfr1 bound to Swi5, which is responsible for activating Rad51. Here, Argunhan, Sakakura et al. used genetic and biochemical approaches to study how this first module, known as “Sfr1N”, interacts with Rad51 in a microbe known as fission yeast. The experiments showed that both modules of Swi5-Sfr1 were important for Rad51 to drive homologous recombination. Swi5-Sfr1 complexes carrying mutations in the region of Sfr1N that binds to Rad51 were unable to activate Rad51 in a test tube. However, fission yeast cells containing the same mutations were able to repair their DNA without problems. This was due to the presence of another pair of proteins known as the Rad55-Rad57 complex that also bound to Swi5-Sfr1. The findings of Argunhan, Sakakura et al. suggest that the Swi5-Sfr1 and Rad55-Rad57 complexes work together to activate Rad51. Many genetically inherited diseases and cancers have been linked to mutations in DNA repair proteins. The fundamental mechanisms of DNA repair are very similar from yeast to humans and other animals, therefore, understanding the details of DNA repair in yeast may ultimately benefit human health in the future.

During homologous recombination, Rad51 forms a nucleoprotein filament with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) that undergoes strand exchange with homologous double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Here, we use real-time analysis to show that strand exchange by fission yeast Rad51 proceeds via two distinct three-strand intermediates, C1 and C2. Both intermediates contain Rad51, but whereas the donor duplex remains intact in C1, the ssDNA strand is intertwined with the complementary strand of the donor duplex in C2. Swi5–Sfr1, an evolutionarily conserved recombination activator, facilitates the C1–C2 transition and subsequent ssDNA release from C2 to complete strand exchange in an ATP-hydrolysis-dependent manner. In contrast, Ca2+, which activates the Rad51 filament by curbing ATP hydrolysis, facilitates the C1–C2 transition but does not promote strand exchange. These results reveal that Swi5–Sfr1 and Ca2+ have different activation modes in the late synaptic phase, despite their common function in stabilizing the presynaptic filament. Real-time FRET analyses and biochemical assays reveal that Rad51 recombinase promotes DNA strand exchange via two distinct three-strand intermediate states.

The synaptonemal complex (SC) is a proteinaceous macromolecular assembly that forms during meiotic prophase I and mediates adhesion of paired homologous chromosomes along their entire lengths. Although prompt disassembly of the SC during exit from prophase I is a landmark event of meiosis, the underlying mechanism regulating SC destruction has remained elusive. Here, we show that DDK (Dbf4‐dependent Cdc7 kinase) is central to SC destruction. Upon exit from prophase I, Dbf4, the regulatory subunit of DDK, directly associates with and is phosphorylated by the Polo‐like kinase Cdc5. In parallel, upregulated CDK1 activity also targets Dbf4. An enhanced Dbf4‐Cdc5 interaction pronounced phosphorylation of Dbf4 and accelerated SC destruction, while reduced/abolished Dbf4 phosphorylation hampered destruction of SC proteins. SC destruction relieved meiotic inhibition of the ubiquitous recombinase Rad51, suggesting that the mitotic recombination machinery is reactivated following prophase I exit to repair any persisting meiotic DNA double‐strand breaks. Taken together, we propose that the concerted action of DDK, Polo‐like kinase, and CDK1 promotes efficient SC destruction at the end of prophase I to ensure faithful inheritance of the genome.

Homologous recombination (HR) is the process whereby two DNA molecules that share high sequence similarity are able to recombine to generate hybrid DNA molecules. Throughout evolution, the ability of HR to identify highly similar DNA sequences has been adopted for numerous biological phenomena including DNA repair, meiosis, telomere maintenance, ribosomal DNA amplification and immunological diversity. Although Rad51 and Dmc1 are the key proteins that promote HR in mitotic and meiotic cells, respectively, accessory proteins that allow Rad51 and Dmc1 to effectively fulfil their functions have been identified in all examined model systems. In this Review, we discuss the roles of the highly conserved Swi5‐Sfr1 accessory complex in yeast, mice and humans, and explore similarities and differences between these species.

During homologous recombination, Rad51 forms a nucleoprotein filament on single-stranded DNA to promote DNA strand exchange. This filament binds to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), searches for homology, and promotes transfer of the complementary strand, producing a new heteroduplex. Strand exchange proceeds via two distinct three-strand intermediates, C1 and C2. C1 contains the intact donor dsDNA whereas C2 contains newly formed heteroduplex DNA. Here, we show that conserved DNA binding motifs, loop 1 (L1) and loop 2 (L2) in site I of Rad51, play distinct roles in this process. L1 is involved in formation of the C1 complex whereas L2 mediates the C1-C2 transition, producing the heteroduplex. Another DNA binding motif, site II, serves as the DNA entry position for initial Rad51 filament formation, as well as for second donor dsDNA incorporation. Our study provides a comprehensive molecular model for the catalytic process of strand exchange mediated by eukaryotic RecA family recombinases.

Although Rad51 is the key protein in homologous recombination (HR), a major DNA double-strand break repair pathway, several auxiliary factors interact with Rad51 to promote productive HR. Here, we present an interdisciplinary characterization of the interaction between Rad51 and Swi5-Sfr1, a widely conserved auxiliary factor. NMR and site-specific crosslinking experiments revealed two distinct sites within the intrinsically disordered N-terminus of Sfr1 that cooperatively bind to Rad51. Although disruption of this binding severely impaired Rad51 stimulation in vitro, interaction mutants did not show any defects in DNA repair. Unexpectedly, in the absence of the Rad51 paralogs Rad55-Rad57, which constitute another auxiliary factor complex, these interaction mutants were unable to promote DNA repair. Our findings provide molecular insights into Rad51 stimulation by Swi5-Sfr1 and suggest that, rather than functioning in an independent subpathway of HR as was previously proposed, Rad55-Rad57 facilitates the recruitment of Swi5-Sfr1 to Rad51.

Summary Structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) complexes are proteinaceous rings that embrace DNA to enable vital chromosomal functions. The ring is formed by two SMC subunits, closed at a pair of ATPase heads, whose interaction is reinforced by a kleisin subunit. Using biochemical analysis of fission-yeast cohesin, we find that a similar series of events facilitates both topological entrapment and release of DNA. DNA-sensing lysines trigger ATP hydrolysis to open the SMC head interface, whereas the Wapl subunit disengages kleisin, but only after ATP rebinds. This suggests an interlocking gate mechanism for DNA transport both into and out of the cohesin ring. The entry direction is facilitated by a cohesin loader that appears to fold cohesin to expose the DNA sensor. Our results provide a model for dynamic DNA binding by all members of the SMC family and explain how lysine acetylation of cohesin establishes enduring sister chromatid cohesion., Graphical Abstract, Highlights • Biochemical reconstitution of DNA entry into and exit out of the cohesin ring • DNA-sensing lysines on the Psm3/Smc3 subunit’s ATPase trigger main ring opening • The Wapl subunit disengages an interlocking kleisin subunit “outer gate” • A unified model for DNA entry and exit with implications for all SMC complexes, The biochemical reconstitution of the topological entrapment and release of DNA by the fission-yeast cohesin complex indicates that DNA sensing by lysine residues triggers entry into and exit from nested gates comprised of the cohesin complex proteins in a manner that can be regulated by acetylation.

Summary The ring-shaped structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) complexes are multi-subunit ATPases that topologically encircle DNA. SMC rings make vital contributions to numerous chromosomal functions, including mitotic chromosome condensation, sister chromatid cohesion, DNA repair, and transcriptional regulation. They are thought to do so by establishing interactions between more than one DNA. Here, we demonstrate DNA-DNA tethering by the purified fission yeast cohesin complex. DNA-bound cohesin efficiently and topologically captures a second DNA, but only if that is single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Like initial double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) embrace, second ssDNA capture is ATP-dependent, and it strictly requires the cohesin loader complex. Second-ssDNA capture is relatively labile but is converted into stable dsDNA-dsDNA cohesion through DNA synthesis. Our study illustrates second-DNA capture by an SMC complex and provides a molecular model for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion., Graphical Abstract, Highlights • The recombinant cohesin complex mediates DNA-DNA interactions • Second-DNA capture by cohesin requires ssDNA • DNA replication stabilizes second-strand capture • Second-DNA capture at a replication fork could establish sister chromatid cohesion, Cohesin sets up the initial steps of chromosome cohesion by anchoring single-stranded DNA along to a region of duplex DNA.

The cohesin complex is involved in a broad range of chromosomal biology, including DNA repair, gene transcription as well as sister chromatid cohesion. Cohesin is a large, ring-shaped protein complex and is thought to entrap DNA molecules inside of its ring. The unique DNA association is central to cohesin function and requires its ATPase and another heterodimer complex called the cohesin loader. Here we describe the biochemical reconstitution of topological cohesin loading onto DNA using the purified fission yeast cohesin proteins.

Both ubiquitously expressed Rad51 and meiosis-specific Dmc1 are required for crossover production during meiotic recombination. The budding yeast Rad52 and its fission yeast ortholog, Rad22, are “mediators;” i.e., they help load Rad51 onto ssDNA coated with replication protein A (RPA). Here we show that the Swi5–Sfr1 complex from fission yeast is both a mediator that loads Dmc1 onto ssDNA and a direct “activator” of DNA strand exchange by Dmc1. In stark contrast, Rad22 inhibits Dmc1 action by competing for its binding to RPA-coated ssDNA. Thus, Rad22 plays dual roles in regulating meiotic recombination: activating Rad51 and inhibiting Dmc1.

The functions of cohesin are central to genome integrity, chromosome organization and transcription regulation through its prevention of premature sister-chromatid separation and the formation of DNA loops. The loading of cohesin onto chromatin depends on the Scc2–Scc4 complex; however, little is known about how it stimulates the cohesion-loading activity. Here we determine the large ‘hook' structure of Scc2 responsible for catalysing cohesin loading. We identify key Scc2 surfaces that are crucial for cohesin loading in vivo. With the aid of previously determined structures and homology modelling, we derive a pseudo-atomic structure of the full-length Scc2–Scc4 complex. Finally, using recombinantly purified Scc2–Scc4 and cohesin, we performed crosslinking mass spectrometry and interaction assays that suggest Scc2–Scc4 uses its modular structure to make multiple contacts with cohesin., The cohesin complex maintains genome integrity by ensuring correct sister-chromatid segregation during mitosis and meiosis. Here, Chao et al. present a pseudo-atomic model of the full-length Scc2–Scc4 cohesin loader complex and reveal key Scc2 surfaces crucial for cohesin loading.

SummaryRad51 forms a helical filament on single-stranded DNA and promotes strand exchange between two homologous DNA molecules during homologous recombination. The Swi5-Sfr1 complex interacts directly with Rad51 and stimulates strand exchange. Here we describe structural and functional aspects of the complex. Swi5 and the C-terminal core domain of Sfr1 form an essential activator complex with a parallel coiled-coil heterodimer joined firmly together via two previously uncharacterized leucine-zipper motifs and a bundle. The resultant coiled coil is sharply kinked, generating an elongated crescent-shaped structure suitable for transient binding within the helical groove of the Rad51 filament. The N-terminal region of Sfr1, meanwhile, has an interface for binding of Rad51. Our data suggest that the snug fit resulting from the complementary geometry of the heterodimer activates the Rad51 filament and that the N-terminal domain of Sfr1 plays a role in the efficient recruitment of the Swi5-Sfr1 complex to the Rad51 filaments.

Background: The Swi5-Sfr1 protein complex is an activator of Rad51 recombinase, which mediates DNA strand exchange in homologous recombination. Results: Swi5 and Sfr1 form a 1:1 complex, which exhibits an extremely elongated dogleg-shaped structure in solution. Conclusion: The Swi5-Sfr1 structure is suitable for binding within the helical groove of the Rad51 filament. Significance: A structural model will advance our understanding of the molecular mechanism of homologous recombination., In eukaryotes, DNA strand exchange is the central reaction of homologous recombination, which is promoted by Rad51 recombinases forming a right-handed nucleoprotein filament on single-stranded DNA, also known as a presynaptic filament. Accessory proteins known as recombination mediators are required for the formation of the active presynaptic filament. One such mediator in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is the Swi5-Sfr1 complex, which has been identified as an activator of Rad51 that assists in presynaptic filament formation and stimulates its strand exchange reaction. Here, we determined the 1:1 binding stoichiometry between the two subunits of the Swi5-Sfr1 complex using analytical ultracentrifugation and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Small-angle x-ray scattering experiments revealed that the Swi5-Sfr1 complex displays an extremely elongated dogleg-shaped structure in solution, which is consistent with its exceptionally high frictional ratio (f/f0) of 2.0 ± 0.2 obtained by analytical ultracentrifugation. Furthermore, we determined a rough topology of the complex by comparing the small-angle x-ray scattering-based structures of the Swi5-Sfr1 complex and four Swi5-Sfr1-Fab complexes, in which the Fab fragments of monoclonal antibodies were specifically bound to experimentally determined sites of Sfr1. We propose a model for how the Swi5-Sfr1 complex binds to the Rad51 filament, in which the Swi5-Sfr1 complex fits into the groove of the Rad51 filament, leading to an active and stable presynaptic filament.

Homologous recombination proceeds via the formation of several intermediates including Holliday junctions (HJs), which are important for creating crossover products. DNA strand exchange is a core reaction that produces these intermediates that is directly catalyzed by RecA family recombinases, of which there are two types in eukaryotes: universal Rad51 and meiosis-specific Dmc1. We demonstrated previously that Rad51 promotes four-strand exchange, mimicking the formation and branch migration of HJs. Here we show that Dmc1 from fission yeast has a similar activity, which requires ATP hydrolysis and is independent of an absolute requirement for the Swi5–Sfr1 complex. These features are critically different from three-strand exchange mediated by Dmc1, but similar to those of four-strand exchange mediated by Rad51, suggesting that strand exchange reactions between duplex–duplex and single-duplex DNAs are mechanistically different. Interestingly, despite similarities in protein structure and in reaction features, the preferential polarities of Dmc1 and Rad51 strand exchange are different (Dmc1 promotes exchange in the 5′-to-3′ direction and Rad51 promotes exchange in the 3′-to-5′ direction relative to the ssDNA region of the DNA substrate). The significance of the Dmc1 polarity is discussed within the context of the necessity for crossover production.

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe nip1(+)/ctp1(+) gene was previously identified as an slr (synthetically lethal with rad2) mutant. Epistasis analysis indicated that Nip1/Ctp1 functions in Rhp51-dependent recombinational repair, together with the Rad32 (spMre11)-Rad50-Nbs1 complex, which plays important roles in the early steps of DNA double-strand break repair. Nip1/Ctp1 was phosphorylated in asynchronous, exponentially growing cells and further phosphorylated in response to bleomycin treatment. Overproduction of Nip1/Ctp1 suppressed the DNA repair defect of an nbs1-s10 mutant, which carries a mutation in the FHA phosphopeptide-binding domain of Nbs1, but not of an nbs1 null mutant. Meiotic DNA double-strand breaks accumulated in the nip1/ctp1 mutant. The DNA repair phenotypes and epistasis relationships of nip1/ctp1 are very similar to those of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae sae2/com1 mutant, suggesting that Nip1/Ctp1 is a functional homologue of Sae2/Com1, although the sequence similarity between the proteins is limited to the C-terminal region containing the RHR motif. We found that the RxxL and CxxC motifs are conserved in Schizosaccharomyces species and in vertebrate CtIP, originally identified as a cofactor of the transcriptional corepressor CtBP. However, these two motifs are not found in other fungi, including Saccharomyces and Aspergillus species. We propose that Nip1/Ctp1 is a functional counterpart of Sae2/Com1 and CtIP.

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe Swi5 protein forms two distinct protein complexes, Swi5–Sfr1 and Swi5–Swi2, each of which plays an important role in the related but functionally distinct processes of homologous recombination and mating-type switching, respectively. The Swi5–Sfr1 mediator complex has been shown to associate with the two RecA-like recombinases, Rhp51 (spRad51) and Dmc1, and to stimulate in vitro DNA strand exchange reactions mediated by these proteins. Genetic analysis indicates that Swi5–Sfr1 works independently of another mediator complex, Rhp55–Rhp57, during Rhp51-dependent recombinational repair. In addition, mutations affecting the two mediators generate distinct repair spectra of HO endonuclease-induced DNA double strand breaks, suggesting that these recombination mediators differently regulate recombination outcomes in an independent manner.

SummaryThe remarkable accuracy of eukaryotic cell division is partly maintained by the cohesin complex acting as a molecular glue to prevent premature sister chromatid separation. The loading of cohesin onto chromosomes is catalyzed by the Scc2-Scc4 loader complex. Here, we report the crystal structure of Scc4 bound to the N terminus of Scc2 and show that Scc4 is a tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) superhelix. The Scc2 N terminus adopts an extended conformation and is entrapped by the core of the Scc4 superhelix. Electron microscopy (EM) analysis reveals that the Scc2-Scc4 loader complex comprises three domains: a head, body, and hook. Deletion studies unambiguously assign the Scc2N-Scc4 as the globular head domain, whereas in vitro cohesin loading assays show that the central body and the hook domains are sufficient to catalyze cohesin loading onto circular DNA, but not chromatinized DNA in vivo, suggesting a possible role for Scc4 as a chromatin adaptor.

Nucleoprotein filaments made up of Rad51 or Dmc1 recombinases, the core structures of recombination, engage in ATP-dependent DNA-strand exchange. The ability of recombinases to form filaments is enhanced by recombination factors termed 'mediators'. Here, we show that the Schizosaccharomyces pombe Swi5-Sfr1 complex, a conserved eukaryotic protein complex, at substoichiometric concentrations stimulates strand exchange mediated by Rhp51 (the S. pombe Rad51 homolog) and Dmc1 on long DNA substrates. Reactions mediated by both recombinases are completely dependent on Swi5-Sfr1, replication protein A (RPA) and ATP, although RPA inhibits the reaction when it is incubated with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) before the recombinase. The Swi5-Sfr1 complex overcomes, at least partly, the inhibitory effect of RPA, representing a novel class of mediator. Notably, the Swi5-Sfr1 complex preferentially stimulates the ssDNA-dependent ATPase activity of Rhp51, and it increases the amounts of Dmc1 bound to ssDNA.

EMBO J (2013) 32: 666–676 doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.7; published online January292013 EMBO J (2013) 32: 677–687 doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.16; published online February082013 EMBO J (2013) 32: 656–665 doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.346; published online January222013 Chromosome segregation is triggered when the ring-shaped chromosomal cohesin complex is opened by proteolytic cleavage to release pairs of sister chromatids. Even before this dramatic event in anaphase, many cohesin rings lead a dynamic life on chromosomes, and in metazoan cells a good part of them dissociate from chromosome arms during mitotic prophase. Two new papers in The EMBO Journal address how chromatin can get into and out of the cohesin ring without requiring its cleavage.

Cohesion between sister chromatids, mediated by the chromosomal cohesin complex, is a prerequisite for faithful chromosome segregation in mitosis. Cohesin also has vital roles in DNA repair and transcriptional regulation. The ring-shaped cohesin complex is thought to encircle sister DNA strands, but its molecular mechanism of action is poorly understood and the biochemical reconstitution of cohesin activity in vitro has remained an unattained goal. Here we reconstitute cohesin loading onto DNA using purified fission yeast cohesin and its loader complex, Mis4(Scc2)-Ssl3(Scc4) (Schizosaccharomyces pombe gene names appear throughout with their more commonly known Saccharomyces cerevisiae counterparts added in superscript). Incubation of cohesin with DNA leads to spontaneous topological loading, but this remains inefficient. The loader contacts cohesin at multiple sites around the ring circumference, including the hitherto enigmatic Psc3(Scc3) subunit, and stimulates cohesin's ATPase, resulting in efficient topological loading. The in vitro reconstitution of cohesin loading onto DNA provides mechanistic insight into the initial steps of the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion and other chromosomal processes mediated by cohesin.

DNA strand exchange is a core reaction of homologous recombination directly catalyzed by Rad51/Dmc1 RecA family recombinases in eukaryotes. This reaction proceeds through the formation of several DNA intermediates. The X-shaped four-way DNA structure known as a Holliday junction (HJ) is a central intermediate in homologous recombination. Genetic and biochemical studies indicate that the HJ is important for the production of crossover-type recombinants, which are reciprocal exchange products. According to a recombination model for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks, the formation of HJs requires a reciprocal duplex-duplex DNA exchange known as the DNA four-strand exchange reaction. In vitro analyses using purified recombination proteins and model DNA substrates provide a mechanistic insight into the DNA strand exchange reaction, including the steps leading to the formation and branch migration of Holliday junctions.

DNA strand exchange is a core reaction of homologous recombination directly catalyzed by Rad51/Dmc1 RecA family recombinases in eukaryotes. This reaction proceeds through the formation of several DNA intermediates. The X-shaped four-way DNA structure known as a Holliday junction (HJ) is a central intermediate in homologous recombination. Genetic and biochemical studies indicate that the HJ is important for the production of crossover-type recombinants, which are reciprocal exchange products. According to a recombination model for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks, the formation of HJs requires a reciprocal duplex-duplex DNA exchange known as the DNA four-strand exchange reaction. In vitro analyses using purified recombination proteins and model DNA substrates provide a mechanistic insight into the DNA strand exchange reaction, including the steps leading to the formation and branch migration of Holliday junctions.

The assembly of the presynaptic filament of recombinases represents the most important step in homologous recombination. The formation of the filament requires assistance from mediator proteins. Swi5 and Sfr1 have been identified as mediators in fission yeast and these proteins form a complex that stimulates strand exchange. Here, the expression, purification and crystallization of Swi5 and its complex with an N-terminally truncated form of Sfr1 (ΔN180Sfr1) are presented. Analytical ultracentrifugation of the purified samples showed that Swi5 and the protein complex exist as tetramers and heterodimers in solution, respectively. Swi5 was crystallized in two forms belonging to space groupsC2 andR3 and the crystals diffracted to 2.7 Å resolution. Swi5–ΔN180Sfr1 was crystallized in space groupP21212 and the crystals diffracted to 2.3 Å resolution. The crystals of Swi5 and Swi5–ΔN180Sfr1 are likely to contain one tetramer and two heterodimers in the asymmetric unit, respectively.

In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, genetic evidence suggests that two mediators, Rad22 (the S. pombe Rad52 homolog) and the Swi5-Sfr1 complex, participate in a common pathway of Rhp51 (the S. pombe Rad51 homolog)–mediated homologous recombination (HR) and HR repair. Here, we have demonstrated an in vitro reconstitution of the central step of DNA strand exchange during HR. Our system consists entirely of homogeneously purified proteins, including Rhp51, the two mediators, and replication protein A (RPA), which reflects genetic requirements in vivo. Using this system, we present the first robust biochemical evidence that concerted action of the two mediators directs the loading of Rhp51 onto single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) precoated with RPA. Dissection of the reaction reveals that Rad22 overcomes the inhibitory effect of RPA on Rhp51-Swi5-Sfr1–mediated strand exchange. In addition, Rad22 negates the requirement for a strict order of protein addition to the in vitro system. However, despite the presence of Rad22, Swi5-Sfr1 is still essential for strand exchange. Importantly, Rhp51, but neither Rad22 nor the Swi5-Sfr1 mediator, is the factor that displaces RPA from ssDNA. Swi5-Sfr1 stabilizes Rhp51-ssDNA filaments in an ATP-dependent manner, and this stabilization is correlated with activation of Rhp51 for the strand exchange reaction. Rad22 alone cannot activate the Rhp51 presynaptic filament. AMP-PNP, a nonhydrolyzable ATP analog, induces a similar stabilization of Rhp51, but this stabilization is independent of Swi5-Sfr1. However, hydrolysis of ATP is required for processive strand transfer, which results in the formation of a long heteroduplex. Our in vitro reconstitution system has revealed that the two mediators have indispensable, but distinct, roles for mediating Rhp51 loading onto RPA-precoated ssDNA, Author Summary Homologous recombination promotes genetic diversity in the next generation and serves as a driving force for evolution. It also provides efficient machinery for repairing DNA damage such as double-strand breaks. Homologous recombination involves DNA exchange between homologous chromosomes, which is mediated by evolutionarily conserved proteins called recombinases. It is thought that a recombinase binds to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to form a nucleoprotein filament called the presynaptic filament, and that this higher order structure engages in a search for homologous DNA sequences. Once a homologous duplex is found, the presynaptic filament initiates strand exchange. However, when ssDNA regions are created, they are immediately covered by replication protein A (RPA), thereby inhibiting recombinase filament formation even under conditions in which homologous recombination is appropriate. Previous studies suggested that mediator proteins help load recombinases onto ssDNA, and further studies showed that at least two mediators function together in a single recombination pathway. How these mediators coordinate recombinase loading has been unclear. We have addressed this question by reconstituting an in vitro strand exchange reaction with purified proteins including a fission yeast recombinase, Rhp51, two mediators, Rad22 and the Swi5-Sfr1 complex, and RPA. Our results indicate that Rad22 orchestrates the loading of Rhp51 onto RPA-coated ssDNA by acting as a scaffold for nucleating the recombinase filament, whereas the other mediator, Swi5-Sfr1, stabilizes and activates the filament., A test tube reconstitution of the strand exchange reaction provides further evidence that the two mediators cooperatively promote the nucleation of active recombinase-ssDNA filaments, creating a higher order structure for recombination.