Search

Baricitinib is an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor approved in Japan and the European Union for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). The aim of this study is to report pooled safety data for baricitinib in the Japanese subpopulation of the clinical development program in moderate-to-severe AD.This analysis included participant-level safety data from five double-blind, randomized clinical studies and one double-blind, randomized, long-term extension study, reported in three datasets for the Japanese subpopulation: (1) placebo-controlled, (2) baricitinib 2 mg and 4 mg extended (quot;2-mg-4-mg extendedquot;), and (3) all baricitinib doses (quot;All-bari-ADquot;). The data cutoff was 13 December 2019. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events, adverse events of special interest, and abnormal laboratory changes. Proportions of participants with events and incidence rates were calculated.Data were collected for 341 participants from Japan who received baricitinib for 371.7 participant-years (median duration 371.0 days). In the placebo-controlled dataset, the frequencies of serious infections and herpes zoster were low and similar between treatment groups, and the incidence of treatment-emergent infections, in particular herpes simplex, was higher in the baricitinib groups compared with the placebo group. No gastrointestinal perforations, tuberculosis, positively adjudicated cardiovascular events, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism were reported with exposure up to 2 years in the All-bari-AD dataset. There were no deaths in the Japanese subpopulation.This integrated safety analysis in the subpopulation of Japanese participants is consistent with the established safety profile of baricitinib in the global study population with moderate-to-severe AD.NCT02576938, NCT03334396, NCT03334422, NCT03428100, NCT03733301, and NCT03334435.

Aim: To compare nasal glucagon (NG) with intramuscular glucagon (IMG) for the treatment of insulin‐induced hypoglycaemia in Japanese patients with type 1 (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Materials and methods: This phase 3, randomized, open‐label, two‐treatment, two‐period crossover non‐inferiority study enrolled Japanese adults with T1DM or T2DM on insulin therapy, with glycated haemoglobin levels ≤86 mmol/mol (≤10%). After ≥8 hours of fasting, hypoglycaemia was induced with human regular insulin (intravenous infusion). Patients received NG 3 mg or IMG 1 mg approximately 5 minutes after insulin termination. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving treatment success [plasma glucose (PG) increase to ≥3.9 mmol/L (≥70 mg/dL) or ≥1.1 mmol/L (≥20 mg/dL) increase from the PG nadir within 30 minutes of receiving glucagon]. Non‐inferiority was declared if the upper limit of the two‐sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of the mean difference in the percentage of patients achieving treatment success (IMG minus NG) was 2 patients were rhinalgia, increased blood pressure, nausea, ear pain and vomiting in the NG group, and nausea and vomiting in the IMG group. Conclusion: Nasal glucagon was non‐inferior to IMG for successful treatment of insulin‐induced hypoglycaemia in Japanese patients with T1DM/T2DM, supporting use of NG as a rescue treatment for severe hypoglycaemia.

Background: Nasal glucagon (NG), a ready-to-use drug-device combination for treatment of severe hypoglycemia, contains 3 mg glucagon dry powder that is absorbed passively through nasal mucosa. We examined the efficacy and safety of NG compared to 1 mg injectable glucagon (IG) in reversing insulin-induced hypoglycemia in a global population of adults with T1D or T2D. Notably, this is the first analysis including pooled T2D data. Methods: Post-hoc analyses used data from 3 randomized, cross-over studies. Treatment success was defined as an increase in BG to ≥70 mg/dL or an increase of ≥20 mg/dL from nadir BG within 30 min of receiving glucagon. Tolerability was assessed using treatment-emergent adverse events and a symptom questionnaire. Results: In the T1D+T2D pooled analysis, 99.5% (213/214) of NG and 100% (214/214) of IG patients achieved treatment success in a mean time (preparation time excluded) of 13 and 11 min, respectively. All NG T2D patients (N=41) achieved treatment success. NG and IG induced similar BG changes (Figure). NG and IG had similar incidences of nausea and vomiting, with NG having a higher rate of side effects related to nasal administration [headache (13% NG, 7% IG), nasal discomfort (4% NG, 1% IG), etc.]. Separate T1D and T2D analyses showed similar results as T1D+T2D. Conclusion: NG was efficacious and well-tolerated in reversing insulin-induced hypoglycemia in adults with T1D or T2D. Disclosure E.R. Seaquist: Advisory Panel; Self; MannKind Corporation, Zucara Therapeutics Inc. Other Relationship; Self; American Board of Internal Medicine, Endocrine Society, International Hypoglycemia Study Group. K. Khunti: Advisory Panel; Self; Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Berlin-Chemie AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Menarini Group, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Napp Pharmaceuticals, Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk A/S, Roche Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier. Board Member; Self; AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi-Aventis. Consultant; Self; Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Berlin-Chemie AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Menarini Group, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Napp Pharmaceuticals, Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk A/S, Roche Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk A/S, Pfizer Inc., Sanofi-Aventis, Servier. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Berlin-Chemie AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Menarini Group, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Napp Pharmaceuticals, Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk A/S, Roche Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier. M.X. Zhang: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Q. Wang: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Y. Takita: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly Japan K.K. C.J. Child: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Y. Nagai: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly Japan K.K. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Y. Yan: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Matsuhisa: Research Support; Self; Daiichi Sankyo, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Novartis Pharma K.K., Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi, Sysmex Corporation. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi K.K., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Funding Eli Lilly and Company

Objectives To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tadalafil plus α1-blocker combination therapy in Japanese patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods The present multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period cross-over study compared the effects of tadalafil and a placebo added to ongoing α1-blocker therapy. A total of 171 Japanese patients were randomized. Results Tadalafil combined with an α1-blocker did not decrease blood pressure in the orthostatic test. The only statistically significant differences in vital signs between the combination and monotherapy groups were diastolic blood pressure and pulse (P = 0.0194 and 0.0313, respectively). However, these changes were not considered clinically meaningful. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 28.1% (47/167) and 24.2% (39/161) of patients in the combination therapy and α1-blocker monotherapy groups, respectively. Additionally, 56.7% (89/157) of patients preferred combination therapy to monotherapy, though this was not statistically significant (P = 0.0937). There was a statistically significant reduction in the International Prostate Symptom Score voiding subscore in the combination therapy group (P = 0.0442). Conclusions Concurrent treatment with tadalafil and an α1-blocker seems to be safe and well tolerated in Japanese patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Adding tadalafil to baseline α1-blocker therapy does not translate in adverse effects on the blood pressure. Patients tend to prefer combination therapy over monotherapy, and there seems to be a clinical benefit when using combination therapy.

Introduction Glucagon is the only approved medicine for severe hypoglycemia available for caregivers of people with diabetes. Nasal glucagon (NG) was recently approved in the USA as a needle-free, ready-to-use alternative to injectable glucagon. This simulated user experience study in Japan compared NG and intramuscular glucagon (IMG) administration by caregivers, and NG administration by untrained third parties. Methods This was an open-label, single-center, partially randomized crossover, simulated user experience trial conducted in Japan (October 2018 to December 2018). Caregivers who live with and care for a relative with diabetes were randomized (1:1, stratified by patient diabetes type 1 or 2) to one of two simulated administration sequences (group 1: NG then IMG; group 2: IMG then NG). Caregivers received training on each device 2 weeks before simulated administration of the device. Third parties received no training and only conducted simulated NG administration. Outcome measures included the percentage of successful administrations (based on critical step completion and dose; primary outcome), time to complete administration, and user satisfaction/preferences. Results In caregivers (N = 19), the percentage of successful administrations was greater (89.5% vs 26.3%, P

Background/Objective: Currently available glucagon products for rescue treatment of severe hypoglycemia require cumbersome multistep reconstitution and injection procedures in an emergency situation. Nasal glucagon (NG) is a nasally administered, single-use, drug-device combination containing 3 mg glucagon dry powder. We aimed to evaluate noninferiority of NG to intramuscular glucagon (IMG) for treatment of insulin-induced hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes (T1D/T2D) (NCT03421379). Methods: This was a randomized, two-period, crossover trial with NG and IMG. Hypoglycemia was induced by an intravenous insulin infusion; insulin was stopped once plasma glucose (PG) reached Results: Of the 68 evaluable patients (T1D 32, T2D 36) who received both NG and IMG, all patients achieved treatment success with a mean time of 12.0 min (NG) and 11.0 min (IMG). Noninferiority of NG to IMG was demonstrated. PG responses were similar between T1D and T2D. During the treatment period 26 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred with NG and 13 with IMG. Most TEAEs were mild in severity and none was severe. TEAEs with an incidence ≥5% were rhinalgia (NG 8.5%, IMG 0%), nausea (NG 5.6%, IMG 11.4%), and blood pressure increase (NG 5.6%, IMG 0%). With NG, very common (≥10%) symptoms from NNSQ were watery eyes and nasal congestion. Conclusion: NG was noninferior compared to IMG for the treatment of insulin-induced hypoglycemia in Japanese patients with T1D/T2D supporting the use of NG as a rescue treatment for severe hypoglycemia. Disclosure M. Matsuhisa: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Board Member; Self; Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited. Research Support; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Astellas Pharma Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Y. Takita: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. R. Nasu: None. K. Ohwaki: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. H. Nagashima: None.

BACKGROUND Inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein with evacetrapib may provide an additional treatment option for patients who do not reach their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal with statins or patients who cannot tolerate statins.Methods and Results:This multicenter, randomized, 12-week, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, outpatient, phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy of evacetrapib in reducing LDL-C in 54 Japanese patients (27 evacetrapib, 27 placebo) with primary hypercholesterolemia. Primary efficacy measure was the percent change from baseline to week 12 in LDL-C (β quantification). Treatment with evacetrapib 130 mg once daily for 12 weeks resulted in statistically significant (P

Objective: The efficacy and safety of atomoxetine was assessed in adult ADHD patients from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan in this first placebo-controlled Asian clinical study in adults of an ADHD medication. Method: Atomoxetine was compared with placebo (195 atomoxetine, 196 placebo) over 10 weeks. The change from baseline to endpoint and changes over time in the Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scale–Investigator Rated: Screening Version total score (CAARS-Inv: SV total score) were assessed along with changes in quality of life (QoL) and executive function. Results: Atomoxetine treatment resulted in a mean reduction of −14.3 (placebo, −8.8) in CAARS-Inv: SV total score and a steady increase of between-group differences from Week 2. Improvements in QoL and executive functioning were also observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation were infrequent (atomoxetine: 5.2%, placebo: 1.5%). Conclusion: Atomoxetine was tolerable and effective in improving QoL and executive function as well as ameliorating core ADHD symptoms in adult Asian patients.

Aims To examine the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg monotherapy compared with once-daily liraglutide 0.9 mg in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) for 52 weeks. Methods We conducted a phase III, randomized, 52-week (26-week primary endpoint), active- and placebo-controlled trial comparing 492 Japanese patients (dulaglutide, n = 281; liraglutide, n = 141; and placebo, n = 70). Participants and investigators were blinded to treatment assignment for dulaglutide and placebo but not for liraglutide (open-label comparator); after 26 weeks, patients randomized to placebo were switched to once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg (open-label). The present paper reports results for patients treated with dulaglutide and patients treated with liraglutide for 52 weeks. Results At week 52, dulaglutide decreased HbA1c significantly from baseline compared with liraglutide [least squares mean difference: −0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.39, −0.01; p = 0.04]. At week 52 (last observation carried forward), dulaglutide significantly decreased pre- and post-dinner blood glucose (BG) levels, the mean of seven-point self-monitored BG profiles, the mean of all postprandial BG levels and circadian variation compared with liraglutide. Body weight was generally stable in both groups through 52 weeks. The most frequently reported adverse events were nasopharyngitis, constipation, nausea and diarrhoea. Eight dulaglutide-treated (2.9%) and four liraglutide-treated (2.9%) patients reported hypoglycaemia, with no event being severe. Conclusions Monotherapy with once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg was effective and safe in Japanese patients with T2D, with better glycaemic control compared with once-daily liraglutide 0.9 mg.

Aims To examine the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide monotherapy (0.75 mg) compared with placebo and once-daily liraglutide (0.9 mg) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods This was a phase III, 52-week (26-week primary endpoint), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, open-label comparator (liraglutide) trial comparing 492 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (dulaglutide, n = 281; liraglutide, n = 141; and placebo, n = 70) who were aged ≥20 years. Patients and investigators were blinded to treatment assignment for dulaglutide and placebo but not for liraglutide. The primary objective evaluated the superiority of dulaglutide versus placebo on change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at 26 weeks. Analyses were performed on the full analysis set. Results At 26 weeks, once-weekly dulaglutide was superior to placebo and non-inferior to once-daily liraglutide for HbA1c change from baseline [least squares mean difference: dulaglutide vs placebo −1.57% (95% confidence interval −1.79 to −1.35); dulaglutide vs liraglutide −0.10% (95% confidence interval −0.27 to 0.07)]. The most frequently reported adverse events were nasopharyngitis, constipation, diarrhoea, nausea, abdominal distension and decreased appetite; only decreased appetite was different between the dulaglutide and liraglutide groups [dulaglutide, n = 2 (0.7%); liraglutide, n = 8 (5.8%); p = 0.003]. Nine (1.8%) patients experienced hypoglycaemia [dulaglutide, n = 6 (2.1%); liraglutide, n = 2 (1.5%); placebo, n = 1 (1.4%)], with no event being severe. Conclusions In Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes, once-weekly dulaglutide (0.75 mg) was superior to placebo and non-inferior to once-daily liraglutide (0.9 mg) for reduction in HbA1c at 26 weeks. Dulaglutide was safe and well tolerated.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics and safety of florbetapir (I8F) positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and cognitively normal (CN) control patients from Japan. Florbetapir (I8F) PET was obtained in 48 subjects (15 AD patients, 15 MCI patients, and 18 CNs) within a multicenter phase 2/3 study. Amyloid burden was assessed visually and classified as positive or negative for pathologic levels of amyloid aggregation, blind to diagnostic classification. Cerebral to cerebellar standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were determined from the florbetapir (I8F) PET images. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events, vital signs, clinical laboratory assessments, and electrocardiograms. Demographic variables and cognitive scales were summarized by using descriptive statistics for each group. Fisher’s exact test and one-way analysis of variance were used to compare amyloid positivity and mean SUVRs, respectively, between diagnostic groups. Florbetapir (I8F) PET was rated visually amyloid positive in 80.0 % of AD patients, 33.3 % of MCI patients, and 16.7 % of CNs. Mean SUVRs were highest in the AD group and lowest in the CN group for each brain region (P

Edivoxetine is a highly selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (NRI) that has been investigated in short-term studies as adjunctive therapy to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants (SSRIs) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who were partial responders to their SSRIs. This 52-week open-label study investigated the safety and tolerability of longer-term treatment with adjunctive edivoxetine in patients with MDD in Japan, who had completed one of two placebo-controlled acute studies of edivoxetine as adjunctive therapy to SSRIs. All patients continued on their stable dose of SSRI. Two hundred eighty-eight patients were enrolled and assessed for up to 1 year using standard safety and tolerability measures. Of these, 195 patients previously received only placebo in the parent study and, therefore, were first exposed to edivoxetine in this study. Approximately 46% of patients completed the study. The most frequently cited (>5%) reasons for discontinuation were sponsor decision (19.4%, which included patients discontinued due to early study termination), adverse event (17.4%) and subject decision (8.7%). Adverse events leading to discontinuation in more than 2 patients (>1%) were palpitations, vomiting, hepatic function abnormal, hypertension, nausea, and tachycardia. Treatment-emergent elevations in diastolic blood pressure and pulse were at least twice that reported in the literature for non-Asian patients. Twenty percent of patients had sustained elevations in pulse. Treatment-emergent changes in laboratory measures were small and not clinically meaningful. Assessment across all safety measures in this study indicated that the safety profile of edivoxetine was consistent with that expected for a selective NRI.

BACKGROUND Inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein by evacetrapib when added to atorvastatin may provide an additional treatment option for patients who do not reach their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal.Methods and Results:This multicenter, randomized, 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, outpatient, phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy of evacetrapib with atorvastatin in reducing LDL-C in 149 Japanese patients (evacetrapib/atorvastatin, n=53; ezetimibe/atorvastatin, n=50; placebo/atorvastatin, n=46) with primary hypercholesterolemia. The primary efficacy measure was percent change from baseline to week 12 in LDL-C (β quantification). Treatment with evacetrapib 130 mg daily for 12 weeks resulted in a statistically significant treatment difference of -25.70% compared with placebo in percentage decrease in LDL-C (95% CI: -34.73 to -16.68; P

Introduction This article aims to assess the efficacy and safety of atomoxetine in Korean adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods This post hoc double-blind, placebo-controlled study of atomoxetine (40–120 mg/day) over 10 weeks in adults with ADHD at 45 Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese study sites focused on patient data from Korea (atomoxetine, n = 37; placebo, n = 37). Primary efficacy outcome was change in baseline-to-endpoint Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Investigator-rated: Screening Version (CAARS-Inv:SV) Total ADHD Symptoms score. Secondary efficacy outcomes included changes in Adult ADHD Quality of Life (AAQoL) total, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version Self-Report (BRIEF-A:Self-Report), and Clinical Global Impression-ADHD-Severity (CGI-ADHD-S) scale scores. Results Atomoxetine-treated patients demonstrated a mean 18.9-point reduction in CAARS-Inv:SV total ADHD Symptoms score, compared with the 7.45-point reduction in placebo-treated patients (P ≤ 0.01). Significantly greater improvement was found for atomoxetine versus placebo in CGI-ADHD-S (P ≤ 0.01), BRIEF-A:Self-Report global executive composite (P ≤ 0.05), and metacognition index (P ≤ 0.01) executive function scores. Nausea, decreased appetite, and dry mouth were reported with significantly greater frequency by atomoxetine-treated patients, and only one placebo-treated patient discontinued because of adverse event. A 2.1-kg reduction in weight and a 7.5-beat/minute increase in pulse rate were observed in atomoxetine-treated patients. Discussion These data support a significant benefit of 80- to 120-mg once daily atomoxetine versus placebo for treatment of ADHD in adult Korean patients. A high placebo response rate was observed in this adult Korean sample; a higher discontinuation rate was also observed in atomoxetine-treated patients. These observations warrant further investigation.

INTRODUCTION The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety/tolerability of atomoxetine in Japanese adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS This 48-week, open-label extension study involved participants with ADHD who completed a 10-week randomized controlled trial of atomoxetine. Participants received atomoxetine 40 mg/day, followed by step-wise titration to a maximum of 120 mg/day. The primary outcome was safety/tolerability. Secondary outcomes were symptoms of ADHD (Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Investigator Rated: Screening Version 18-item total score), quality of life (Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Quality of Life scale), and executive function (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version: Self-report). RESULTS Of the 39.5% of participants overall who discontinued the study, 15.9% (37/233) of participants discontinued because of adverse events (AEs), primarily nausea (4.3%; 10/233). Overall, 93.6% (218/233) of participants experienced treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), most commonly nausea (56.2%; 131/233), nasopharyngitis (25.3%; 59/233), thirst (19.3%; 45/233), headache (17.2%; 40/233), and decreased appetite (16.3%; 38/233). Most TEAEs (70.8%; 165/233) were mild in intensity. Overall, 79.8% (186/233) of participants experienced ≥1 adverse drug reaction, primarily nausea (55.4%; 129/233). Five participants experienced serious AEs during the open-label extension; none was related/possibly related to treatment. There were statistically significant increases in vital signs and decreases in body weight that were not considered clinically significant. Symptoms of ADHD, quality of life, and executive function were significantly improved from baseline to endpoint (P

Objective To assess efficacy and safety of tadalafil in men aged ≥75 years with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) and additional safety in men aged ≥75 years with erectile dysfunction (ED). Patients and Methods We conducted an integrated analysis of 12 phase II–III randomized, double-blind and/or open-label extension studies to evaluate short-term (12–26 weeks) efficacy and short- and longer-term (42–52 weeks) safety in men aged

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of tabalumab, an anti-B cell activating factor (BAFF) antibody, in combination with standard of care (SoC) therapy in Japanese patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: A subgroup analysis was conducted in Japanese patients (n = 45) enrolled in ILLUMINATE-1, a phase III global trial in SLE patients (N = 1164). Patients received SoC plus tabalumab or placebo, starting with a loading dose (240 mg) at week 0, followed by 120 mg every 4 weeks (120 Q4W, n = 15), 120 mg every 2 weeks (120 Q2W, n = 15), or placebo Q2W (n = 15). The primary endpoint was proportion achieving SLE Responder Index-5 (SRI-5) improvement at week 52. Results: A numerically greater SRI-5 response rate was achieved with 120 Q2W (46.7%; p = 0.059 vs. placebo) compared with 120 Q4W (20.0%) and placebo Q2W (13.3%). The proportion of patients with severe SLE flare was lower for 120 Q2W (0%) and 120 Q4W (6.7%) than for placebo (26.7%). The rates of serious adverse events (AEs) and treatment-emergent AEs were similar across treatments. Conclusion: In Japanese SLE patients, tabalumab 120 Q2W improved SRI-5 response rate and reduced the frequency of severe flares compared with placebo. Safety profiles were similar with tabalumab and placebo.

Introduction The primary objective of this study was to assess the overall safety and tolerability of atomoxetine in Korean, Chinese, and Taiwanese adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods A total of 44 patients aged ≥18 years who met the Conners' Adult ADHD Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD were enrolled from China, Korea, and Taiwan. In this open-label, dose-escalation study, patients received atomoxetine orally once daily over a period of eight weeks, starting at 40 mg/day (one week) up to a maximum dosage of 120 mg/day. Tolerability was evaluated by rate of discontinuation due to adverse events. Safety was assessed by recording all adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, and electrocardiograms. ADHD symptoms were evaluated by the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Investigator Rated: Screening Version (CAARS-Inv:SV) for efficacy assessment. Results Thirty-four patients (77.3%) completed the study. Atomoxetine was well tolerated with a discontinuation rate of 2.3% (1/44) due to adverse events. The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea, dizziness, and somnolence. The mean change from baseline to endpoint in CAARS-Inv:SV total ADHD symptom score was −12.5 (P

To assess the safety and efficacy of 18-week olanzapine monotherapy in Japanese patients with bipolar mania, following a 6-week, placebo- and haloperidol-controlled double-blind study (acute study). For those who discontinued the acute study due to lack of efficacy, safety and efficacy was assessed with a combination therapy of olanzapine and a mood stabilizer.In this open-label, multicenter extension study, patients who completed the acute study received olanzapine (5-20 mg/day) as monotherapy, and patients who discontinued the acute study due to lack of efficacy with greater Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score than the acute study baseline, received olanzapine in combination with one of three mood stabilizers: lithium, carbamazepine, or valproate. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, weight, and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs). Efficacy measures included YMRS total score, and response and remission rates of manic symptoms.There were no deaths or serious adverse events considered potentially related to olanzapine in the monotherapy group (N = 100) or the combination-therapy group (N = 39). TEAEs occurred in 59.0% and 79.5% of patients in the monotherapy and combination-therapy groups, respectively, and their severities were mostly mild or moderate. Regarding the efficacy measures, in the monotherapy group, mean YMRS change from extension study baseline to endpoint was -3.0, and the response and remission rates at endpoint were 97.0% and 93.0%, respectively. In the combination-therapy group, mean YMRS change from extension-study baseline was -19.8; response and remission rates increased from the extension-study baseline (both 0.0%) to 64.1% and 61.5% respectively by endpoint.Olanzapine was generally well tolerated during the 18-week extension period in Japanese patients with bipolar mania. Results of both groups were also generally consistent with US and European studies. Monitoring of metabolic parameters is recommended.

Aims: The main purpose of this first atomoxetine study in Japanese adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was to investigate the tolerability of an 8-week treatment regimen. Methods: This was an open-label, dose escalation study conducted in 45 Japanese patients aged at least 18 years with DSM-IV-defined ADHD. Patients received atomoxetine orally for 8 weeks. Atomoxetine administration was started at 40 mg/day (7 days), and subsequently increased to a maximum dose of 120 mg/day. Tolerability was assessed by discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs and electrocardiograms were collected. In addition, ADHD symptoms were assessed by using the Japanese version of the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Investigator Rated: Screening Version (CAARS-Inv:SV) scores. Results: Thirty-nine patients completed the study period. Atomoxetine was well tolerated with a 6.7% (3/45) discontinuation rate due to nausea, malaise and anorexia. The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea, nasopharyngitis and headache; there were no unexpected safety concerns. No deaths or serious adverse events were reported. Mean CAARS-Inv:SV-J total ADHD symptom scores decreased in a time-dependent manner; the mean change from baseline to endpoint was −15.0 (P

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics and safety of florbetapir ((I8)F) positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and cognitively normal (CN) control patients from Japan.Florbetapir ((I8)F) PET was obtained in 48 subjects (15 AD patients, 15 MCI patients, and 18 CNs) within a multicenter phase 2/3 study. Amyloid burden was assessed visually and classified as positive or negative for pathologic levels of amyloid aggregation, blind to diagnostic classification. Cerebral to cerebellar standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were determined from the florbetapir ((I8)F) PET images. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events, vital signs, clinical laboratory assessments, and electrocardiograms. Demographic variables and cognitive scales were summarized by using descriptive statistics for each group. Fisher's exact test and one-way analysis of variance were used to compare amyloid positivity and mean SUVRs, respectively, between diagnostic groups.Florbetapir ((I8)F) PET was rated visually amyloid positive in 80.0% of AD patients, 33.3% of MCI patients, and 16.7% of CNs. Mean SUVRs were highest in the AD group and lowest in the CN group for each brain region (P0.01) and globally (P0.05). Kappa statistics showed strong inter-reader agreement (Fleiss' kappa = 0.82) and individual reader's agreement with the majority of readers (kappa ranged from 0.79 to 1.0). Seventeen of the 48 subjects (35.4%) were Apolipoprotein E genotype ε4 positive, which included 10 subjects in the AD group and 7 subjects in the MCI group. A total of 6 subjects (5 of whom were in the CN group) had at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE).These data indicate that amyloid positivity increased with diagnostic category (CNMCIAD) and are consistent with expected rates of amyloid positivity among individuals with clinical diagnoses of AD and MCI. In addition, these results were similar to those obtained in United States studies. Florbetapir ((18)F) was safe and well tolerated. The reliability of both qualitative and quantitative assessments of florbetapir ((18)F) in this study population provides support for potential use in clinical settings in Japan.

This article aims to assess the efficacy and safety of atomoxetine in Korean adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).This post hoc double-blind, placebo-controlled study of atomoxetine (40-120 mg/day) over 10 weeks in adults with ADHD at 45 Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese study sites focused on patient data from Korea (atomoxetine, n = 37; placebo, n = 37). Primary efficacy outcome was change in baseline-to-endpoint Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Investigator-rated: Screening Version (CAARS-Inv:SV) Total ADHD Symptoms score. Secondary efficacy outcomes included changes in Adult ADHD Quality of Life (AAQoL) total, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version Self-Report (BRIEF-A:Self-Report), and Clinical Global Impression-ADHD-Severity (CGI-ADHD-S) scale scores.Atomoxetine-treated patients demonstrated a mean 18.9-point reduction in CAARS-Inv:SV total ADHD Symptoms score, compared with the 7.45-point reduction in placebo-treated patients (P ≤ 0.01). Significantly greater improvement was found for atomoxetine versus placebo in CGI-ADHD-S (P ≤ 0.01), BRIEF-A:Self-Report global executive composite (P ≤ 0.05), and metacognition index (P ≤ 0.01) executive function scores. Nausea, decreased appetite, and dry mouth were reported with significantly greater frequency by atomoxetine-treated patients, and only one placebo-treated patient discontinued because of adverse event. A 2.1-kg reduction in weight and a 7.5-beat/minute increase in pulse rate were observed in atomoxetine-treated patients.These data support a significant benefit of 80- to 120-mg once daily atomoxetine versus placebo for treatment of ADHD in adult Korean patients. A high placebo response rate was observed in this adult Korean sample; a higher discontinuation rate was also observed in atomoxetine-treated patients. These observations warrant further investigation.

The efficacy and safety of atomoxetine was assessed in adult ADHD patients from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan in this first placebo-controlled Asian clinical study in adults of an ADHD medication.Atomoxetine was compared with placebo (195 atomoxetine, 196 placebo) over 10 weeks. The change from baseline to endpoint and changes over time in the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Investigator Rated: Screening Version total score (CAARS-Inv: SV total score) were assessed along with changes in quality of life (QoL) and executive function.Atomoxetine treatment resulted in a mean reduction of -14.3 (placebo, -8.8) in CAARS-Inv: SV total score and a steady increase of between-group differences from Week 2. Improvements in QoL and executive functioning were also observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation were infrequent (atomoxetine: 5.2%, placebo: 1.5%).Atomoxetine was tolerable and effective in improving QoL and executive function as well as ameliorating core ADHD symptoms in adult Asian patients.

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety/tolerability of atomoxetine in Japanese adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).This 48-week, open-label extension study involved participants with ADHD who completed a 10-week randomized controlled trial of atomoxetine. Participants received atomoxetine 40 mg/day, followed by step-wise titration to a maximum of 120 mg/day. The primary outcome was safety/tolerability. Secondary outcomes were symptoms of ADHD (Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Investigator Rated: Screening Version 18-item total score), quality of life (Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Quality of Life scale), and executive function (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version: Self-report).Of the 39.5% of participants overall who discontinued the study, 15.9% (37/233) of participants discontinued because of adverse events (AEs), primarily nausea (4.3%; 10/233). Overall, 93.6% (218/233) of participants experienced treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), most commonly nausea (56.2%; 131/233), nasopharyngitis (25.3%; 59/233), thirst (19.3%; 45/233), headache (17.2%; 40/233), and decreased appetite (16.3%; 38/233). Most TEAEs (70.8%; 165/233) were mild in intensity. Overall, 79.8% (186/233) of participants experienced ≥1 adverse drug reaction, primarily nausea (55.4%; 129/233). Five participants experienced serious AEs during the open-label extension; none was related/possibly related to treatment. There were statistically significant increases in vital signs and decreases in body weight that were not considered clinically significant. Symptoms of ADHD, quality of life, and executive function were significantly improved from baseline to endpoint (P 0.05).Despite discontinuations due to the long-term, open-label design, AE related discontinuations were modest, suggesting that atomoxetine has acceptable long-term safety and tolerability in Japanese adults with ADHD. Symptoms of ADHD improved and remained improved throughout the study.

The primary objective of this study was to assess the overall safety and tolerability of atomoxetine in Korean, Chinese, and Taiwanese adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).A total of 44 patients aged ≥18 years who met the Conners' Adult ADHD Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD were enrolled from China, Korea, and Taiwan. In this open-label, dose-escalation study, patients received atomoxetine orally once daily over a period of eight weeks, starting at 40 mg/day (one week) up to a maximum dosage of 120 mg/day. Tolerability was evaluated by rate of discontinuation due to adverse events. Safety was assessed by recording all adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, and electrocardiograms. ADHD symptoms were evaluated by the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Investigator Rated: Screening Version (CAARS-Inv:SV) for efficacy assessment.Thirty-four patients (77.3%) completed the study. Atomoxetine was well tolerated with a discontinuation rate of 2.3% (1/44) due to adverse events. The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea, dizziness, and somnolence. The mean change from baseline to endpoint in CAARS-Inv:SV total ADHD symptom score was -12.5 (P 0.001). A significant reduction in the CAARS-Inv:SV subscales (inattentive, hyperactive/impulsive, and ADHD index score, P 0.001) was observed.This is the first atomoxetine clinical trial in adult patients with ADHD in China, Korea, and Taiwan. Atomoxetine was well tolerated in doses of up to 120 mg/day with no unknown safety concerns.

The main purpose of this first atomoxetine study in Japanese adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was to investigate the tolerability of an 8-week treatment regimen.This was an open-label, dose escalation study conducted in 45 Japanese patients aged at least 18 years with DSM-IV-defined ADHD. Patients received atomoxetine orally for 8 weeks. Atomoxetine administration was started at 40 mg/day (7 days), and subsequently increased to a maximum dose of 120 mg/day. Tolerability was assessed by discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs and electrocardiograms were collected. In addition, ADHD symptoms were assessed by using the Japanese version of the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Investigator Rated: Screening Version (CAARS-Inv:SV) scores.Thirty-nine patients completed the study period. Atomoxetine was well tolerated with a 6.7% (3/45) discontinuation rate due to nausea, malaise and anorexia. The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea, nasopharyngitis and headache; there were no unexpected safety concerns. No deaths or serious adverse events were reported. Mean CAARS-Inv:SV-J total ADHD symptom scores decreased in a time-dependent manner; the mean change from baseline to endpoint was -15.0 (P0.001).This study showed that atomoxetine was well tolerated in these patients and suggested that atomoxetine at a maximum dose of 120 mg/day would be safe in Japanese ADHD patients.

Introduction Research has shown that ADHD symptoms and functional impairment often persist beyond childhood into adulthood. Thus an effective therapy that can be tolerated over long-term use in adults is needed. This is the first long term safety and tolerability study of an adult ADHD medication in Asia. Objectives Assess long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of atomoxetine (ATX) in adult Japanese ADHD patients. Aims Demonstrate the safety and tolerability of long-term ATX. Methods ATX (40-120 mg/day) was evaluated based on integrated analyses of a 10 week double-blind (DB) study and a 48 week open-label long term (LT) extension study. Long-term safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse events, discontinuation rate, and vital-signs. Efficacy measures included change from baseline in Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scale- Investigator Rated (CAARS-Inv:SV) total symptoms score, behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-A), and Adult ADHD/QoL Measure (AAQoL). Results 233 patients took ATX (LT mean final prescribed dose: 108.3 mg/day). AEs leading to discontinuations were seen in 37 (15.9%) patients, the most common being nausea in 10 (4.3%) patients. Statistically significant baseline-to-endpoint reductions in mean CAARS-Inv:SV total symptoms score during in the DB study continued throughout the LT study. Similar reductions were seen in BRIEF-A Self Report scores. These findings along with AAQoL results indicated that patients perceived improvements in both QoL and Executive Function. Conclusions Long-term ATX treatment was shown to be generally safe and tolerable in Japanese adult ADHD patients. Results also suggested ATX improved ADHD core symptoms, QoL and Executive Functions.