1. Safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine for long-term sedation in critically ill patients
- Author
-
Matsuyuki Doi, Keiji Tanaka, Yuji Fujino, Kenichi Matsuda, Misa Kawai, Junzo Takeda, Makoto Ozaki, Yasuyuki Kakihana, Masanori Takinami, Yasuhiro Shiokawa, and Shinichi Nishi
- Subjects
Male ,Bradycardia ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Critical Illness ,Sedation ,law.invention ,Heart Rate ,law ,Anesthesiology ,Heart rate ,Long term ,medicine ,Clinical endpoint ,Humans ,Hypnotics and Sedatives ,Intensive care unit ,Prospective Studies ,Dexmedetomidine ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Analgesics ,business.industry ,Middle Aged ,Intensive Care Units ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Blood pressure ,Withdrawal ,Anesthesia ,Female ,Original Article ,Hypotension ,medicine.symptom ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Purpose We evaluated the safety and efficacy of long-term administration of dexmedetomidine in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Primary endpoint was the incidence of hypotension, hypertension, and bradycardia. Secondary endpoints were withdrawal symptoms, rebound effects, the duration of sedation with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) ≤ 0 relative to the total infusion time of dexmedetomidine, and the dose of additional sedatives or analgesics. Methods Dexmedetomidine 0.2–0.7 μg/kg/h was continuously infused for maintaining RASS ≤ 0 in patients requiring sedation in the ICU. Safety and efficacy of short-term (≤24 h) and long-term (>24 h) dexmedetomidine administration were compared. Results Seventy-five surgical and medical ICU patients were administered dexmedetomidine. The incidence of hypotension, hypertension, and bradycardia that occurred after 24 h (long-term) was not significantly different from that occurring within 24 h (short-term) (P = 0.546, 0.513, and 0.486, respectively). Regarding withdrawal symptoms, one event each of hypertension and headache occurred after the end of infusion, but both were mild in severity. Increases of mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate after terminating the infusion of dexmedetomidine were not associated with the increasing duration of its infusion. The ratio of duration with RASS ≤ 0 was ≥ 85 % until day 20, except day 9 (70 %) and day 10 (75 %). There was no increase in the dose of additional sedatives or analgesics after the first 24-h treatment period. Conclusions Long-term safety of dexmedetomidine compared to its use for 24 h was confirmed. Dexmedetomidine was useful to maintain an adequate sedation level (RASS ≤ 0) during long-term infusion.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF