Search

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of removable partial dentures (RPDs) on masticatory performance (MP) of partially edentulous subjects. Materials and Methods: Electronic database and hand searches were conducted to explore clinical trials reporting the evidence of the effect of metal- and acrylic-based RPDs on mastication. The validated objective and subjective measures of assessment of mastication were included. The article selection, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias were conducted by two reviewers independently. Results: Out of 11,200 studies, 1 randomized controlled trial and 23 clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Positive impact on different parameters of masticatory function after RPD treatment was reported in 14 studies. Subjective evaluation of chewing ability (CA) displayed an improvement in 83.3% of studies, while improvement was evidenced only in 69.5% of studies upon objective evaluation. Most studies reported data on free-end saddles. Of the 13 studies associated with bilateral free-end saddle dentures, 9 studies showed a positive effect on masticatory efficiency. Various factors were found to have an impact on the MP of RPDs. Conclusions: Subjective evaluation displays higher positive impact of RPDs in MP than objective evaluation. Assessment of patients' perspectives is important in clinical decision-making. Multiple factors affect the MP with RPD treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Conventional complete dentures remain to be an important treatment for edentulous patients, especially those of low socioeconomic status. This study is a retrospective analysis that aims to elucidate influencing factors of post-insertion complications and patient satisfaction. Clinical records of 164 patients who received both maxillary and mandibular complete dentures at an Australian university teaching clinic were assessed and analysed. The parameters considered include reason for attendance, presenting clinical status, experience of operator, numbers of appointments for fabrication and adjustment, post-insertion complications and events, and patient satisfaction. The differences among selected attributes were analysed using a Mann–Whitney test, Chi-square test, or Kruskal–Wallis test where applicable, while the relationships between discrete variables were assessed by Kendall's correlation. First, the number of appointments for fabrication differed significantly between female (6.8 ± 1.8) and male patients (6.2 ± 1.3; p = 0.025) and between student (6.7 ± 1.7) and professional operators (6.0 ± 1.1; p = 0.015). The number of appointments for adjustment was significantly associated with patient age (τb = 0.167, p = 0.003) and sharply declined after the first three months. Second, post-insertion pain was the most frequent complication, and it was significantly more associated with the mandible than the maxilla (χ2 = 21.670, p = 0.000). Similarly, mandibular complete dentures were also significantly more associated with post-insertion reline than the maxillary (χ2 = 8.804, p = 0.003). Lastly, patient satisfaction was significantly associated with patient attendance with old/worn dentures (χ2 = 9.468, p = 0.002), as well as the absence of retention/stability issues (χ2 = 41.712, p = 0.000), post-insertion reline (χ2 = 29.300, p = 0.000), or denture replacement (χ2 = 13.968, p = 0.000). Dissatisfied patients had a significantly higher age (70.9 ± 11.0 vs. 66.2 ± 12.6; p = 0.023) and number of appointments for adjustment (4.9 ± 3.5 vs. 3.1 ± 2.1; p = 0.001) than satisfied patients. In summary, these findings revealed the above factors that influence the fabrication process, post-insertion complication, and patient satisfaction of conventional complete dentures. Future research may include analysis of cases completed at private practices and consideration of other potentially relevant factors such as denture usage and mental status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]