Search

MotivationIn multi-cohort machine learning studies, it is critical to differentiate between effects that are reproducible across cohorts and those that are cohort-specific. Multi-task learning (MTL) is a machine learning approach that facilitates this differentiation through the simultaneous learning of prediction tasks across cohorts. Since multi-cohort data can often not be combined into a single storage solution, there would be the substantial utility of an MTL application for geographically distributed data sources.ResultsHere, we describe the development of ‘dsMTL’, a computational framework for privacy-preserving, distributed multi-task machine learning that includes three supervised and one unsupervised algorithms. First, we derive the theoretical properties of these methods and the relevant machine learning workflows to ensure the validity of the software implementation. Second, we implement dsMTL as a library for the R programming language, building on the DataSHIELD platform that supports the federated analysis of sensitive individual-level data. Third, we demonstrate the applicability of dsMTL for comorbidity modeling in distributed data. We show that comorbidity modeling using dsMTL outperformed conventional, federated machine learning, as well as the aggregation of multiple models built on the distributed datasets individually. The application of dsMTL was computationally efficient and highly scalable when applied to moderate-size (n Availability and implementationdsMTL is freely available at https://github.com/transbioZI/dsMTLBase (server-side package) and https://github.com/transbioZI/dsMTLClient (client-side package).Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Motivation DataSHIELD is an open-source software infrastructure enabling the analysis of data distributed across multiple databases (federated data) without leaking individuals’ information (non-disclosive). It has applications in many scientific domains, ranging from biosciences to social sciences and including high-throughput genomic studies. R is the language used to interact with (and build) DataSHIELD. This creates difficulties for researchers who do not have experience writing R code or lack the time to learn how to use the DataSHIELD functions. To help new researchers use the DataSHIELD infrastructure and to improve the user-friendliness for experienced researchers, we present ShinyDataSHIELD. Implementation ShinyDataSHIELD is a web application with an R backend that serves as a graphical user interface (GUI) to the DataSHIELD infrastructure. General features The version of the application presented here includes modules to perform: (i) exploratory analysis through descriptive summary statistics and graphical representations (scatter plots, histograms, heatmaps and boxplots); (ii) statistical modelling (generalized linear fixed and mixed-effects models, survival analysis through Cox regression); (iii) genome-wide association studies (GWAS); and (iv) omic analysis (transcriptomics, epigenomics and multi-omic integration). Availability ShinyDataSHIELD is publicly hosted online [https://datashield-demo.obiba.org/], the source code and user guide are deposited on Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.6500323, freely available to non-commercial users under ‘Commons Clause’ License Condition v1.0. Docker images are also available [https://hub.docker.com/r/brgelab/shiny-data-shield].

Optimizing research on the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) involves implementing initiatives maximizing the use of the available cohort study data; achieving sufficient statistical power to support subgroup analysis; and using participant data presenting adequate follow-up and exposure heterogeneity. It also involves being able to undertake comparison, cross-validation, or replication across data sets. To answer these requirements, cohort study data need to be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR), and more particularly, it often needs to be harmonized. Harmonization is required to achieve or improve comparability of the putatively equivalent measures collected by different studies on different individuals. Although the characteristics of the research initiatives generating and using harmonized data vary extensively, all are confronted by similar issues. Having to collate, understand, process, host, and co-analyze data from individual cohort studies is particularly challenging. The scientific success and timely management of projects can be facilitated by an ensemble of factors. The current document provides an overview of the ‘life course’ of research projects requiring harmonization of existing data and highlights key elements to be considered from the inception to the end of the project.

Objectives: Existing individual-level human data cover large populations on many dimensions such as lifestyle, demography, laboratory measures, clinical parameters, etc. Recent years have seen large investments in data catalogues to FAIRify data descriptions to capitalise on this great promise, i.e. make catalogue contents more Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable. However, their valuable diversity also created heterogeneity, which poses challenges to optimally exploit their richness.Methods: In this opinion review, we analyse catalogues for human subject research ranging from cohort studies to surveillance, administrative and healthcare records.Results: We observe that while these catalogues are heterogeneous, have various scopes, and use different terminologies, still the underlying concepts seem potentially harmonizable. We propose a unified framework to enable catalogue data sharing, with catalogues of multi-center cohorts nested as a special case in catalogues of real-world data sources. Moreover, we list recommendations to create an integrated community of metadata catalogues and an open catalogue ecosystem to sustain these efforts and maximise impact.Conclusions: We propose to embrace the autonomy of motivated catalogue teams and invest in their collaboration via minimal standardisation efforts such as clear data licensing, persistent identifiers for linking same records between catalogues, minimal metadata ‘common data elements’ using shared ontologies, symmetric architectures for data sharing (push/pull) with clear provenance tracks to process updates and acknowledge original contributors. And most importantly, we encourage the creation of environments for collaboration and resource sharing between catalogue developers, building on international networks such as OpenAIRE and research data alliance, as well as domain specific ESFRIs such as BBMRI and ELIXIR. OBJECTIVES: Existing individual-level human data cover large populations on many dimensions such as lifestyle, demography, laboratory measures, clinical parameters, etc. Recent years have seen large investments in data catalogues to FAIRify data descriptions to capitalise on this great promise, i.e. make catalogue contents more Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable. However, their valuable diversity also created heterogeneity, which poses challenges to optimally exploit their richness. METHODS: In this opinion review, we analyse catalogues for human subject research ranging from cohort studies to surveillance, administrative and healthcare records. RESULTS: We observe that while these catalogues are heterogeneous, have various scopes, and use different terminologies, still the underlying concepts seem potentially harmonizable. We propose a unified framework to enable catalogue data sharing, with catalogues of multi-center cohorts nested as a special case in catalogues of real-world data sources. Moreover, we list recommendations to create an integrated community of metadata catalogues and an open catalogue ecosystem to sustain these efforts and maximise impact. CONCLUSIONS: We propose to embrace the autonomy of motivated catalogue teams and invest in their collaboration via minimal standardisation efforts such as clear data licensing, persistent identifiers for linking same records between catalogues, minimal metadata 'common data elements' using shared ontologies, symmetric architectures for data sharing (push/pull) with clear provenance tracks to process updates and acknowledge original contributors. And most importantly, we encourage the creation of environments for collaboration and resource sharing between catalogue developers, building on international networks such as OpenAIRE and research data alliance, as well as domain specific ESFRIs such as BBMRI and ELIXIR.

Multitask learning allows the simultaneous learning of multiple ‘communicating’ algorithms. It is increasingly adopted for biomedical applications, such as the modeling of disease progression. As data protection regulations limit data sharing for such analyses, an implementation of multitask learning on geographically distributed data sources would be highly desirable. Here, we describe the development of dsMTL, a computational framework for privacy-preserving, distributed multi-task machine learning that includes three supervised and one unsupervised algorithms. dsMTL is implemented as a library for the R programming language and builds on the DataSHIELD platform that supports the federated analysis of sensitive individual-level data. We provide a comparative evaluation of dsMTL for the identification of biological signatures in distributed datasets using two case studies, and evaluate the computational performance of the supervised and unsupervised algorithms. dsMTL provides an easy- to-use framework for privacy-preserving, federated analysis of geographically distributed datasets, and has several application areas, including comorbidity modeling and translational research focused on the simultaneous prediction of different outcomes across datasets. dsMTL is available at https://github.com/transbioZI/dsMTLBase (server-side package) and https://github.com/transbioZI/dsMTLClient (client-side package).

Motivation Improving the dissemination of information on existing epidemiological studies and facilitating the interoperability of study databases are essential to maximizing the use of resources and accelerating improvements in health. To address this, Maelstrom Research proposes Opal and Mica, two inter-operable open-source software packages providing out-of-the-box solutions for epidemiological data management, harmonization and dissemination. Implementation Opal and Mica are two standalone but inter-operable web applications written in Java, JavaScript and PHP. They provide web services and modern user interfaces to access them. General features Opal allows users to import, manage, annotate and harmonize study data. Mica is used to build searchable web portals disseminating study and variable metadata. When used conjointly, Mica users can securely query and retrieve summary statistics on geographically dispersed Opal servers in real-time. Integration with the DataSHIELD approach allows conducting more complex federated analyses involving statistical models. Availability Opal and Mica are open-source and freely available at [www.obiba.org] under a General Public License (GPL) version 3, and the metadata models and taxonomies that accompany them are available under a Creative Commons licence.

Gaye, Amadou Marcon, Yannick Isaeva, Julia LaFlamme, Philippe Turner, Andrew Jones, Elinor M Minion, Joel Boyd, Andrew W Newby, Christopher J Nuotio, Marja-Liisa Wilson, Rebecca Butters, Oliver Murtagh, Barnaby Demir, Ipek Doiron, Dany Giepmans, Lisette Wallace, Susan E Budin-Ljosne, Isabelle Oliver Schmidt, Carsten Boffetta, Paolo Boniol, Mathieu Bota, Maria Carter, Kim W deKlerk, Nick Dibben, Chris Francis, Richard W Hiekkalinna, Tero Hveem, Kristian Kvaloy, Kirsti Millar, Sean Perry, Ivan J Peters, Annette Phillips, Catherine M Popham, Frank Raab, Gillian Reischl, Eva Sheehan, Nuala Waldenberger, Melanie Perola, Markus van den Heuvel, Edwin Macleod, John Knoppers, Bartha M Stolk, Ronald P Fortier, Isabel Harris, Jennifer R Woffenbuttel, Bruce H R Murtagh, Madeleine J Ferretti, Vincent Burton, Paul R eng MC_UP_A540₁021/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom MR/K006525/1/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom Medical Research Council/United Kingdom Wellcome Trust/United Kingdom Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2014/09/30 06:00 Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;43(6):1929-44. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu188. Epub 2014 Sep 26.; International audience; BACKGROUND: Research in modern biomedicine and social science requires sample sizes so large that they can often only be achieved through a pooled co-analysis of data from several studies. But the pooling of information from individuals in a central database that may be queried by researchers raises important ethico-legal questions and can be controversial. In the UK this has been highlighted by recent debate and controversy relating to the UK's proposed 'care.data' initiative, and these issues reflect important societal and professional concerns about privacy, confidentiality and intellectual property. DataSHIELD provides a novel technological solution that can circumvent some of the most basic challenges in facilitating the access of researchers and other healthcare professionals to individual-level data. METHODS: Commands are sent from a central analysis computer (AC) to several data computers (DCs) storing the data to be co-analysed. The data sets are analysed simultaneously but in parallel. The separate parallelized analyses are linked by non-disclosive summary statistics and commands transmitted back and forth between the DCs and the AC. This paper describes the technical implementation of DataSHIELD using a modified R statistical environment linked to an Opal database deployed behind the computer firewall of each DC. Analysis is controlled through a standard R environment at the AC. RESULTS: Based on this Opal/R implementation, DataSHIELD is currently used by the Healthy Obese Project and the Environmental Core Project (BioSHaRE-EU) for the federated analysis of 10 data sets across eight European countries, and this illustrates the opportunities and challenges presented by the DataSHIELD approach. CONCLUSIONS: DataSHIELD facilitates important research in settings where: (i) a co-analysis of individual-level data from several studies is scientifically necessary but governance restrictions prohibit the release or sharing of some of the required data, and/or render data access unacceptably slow; (ii) a research group (e.g. in a developing nation) is particularly vulnerable to loss of intellectual property-the researchers want to fully share the information held in their data with national and international collaborators, but do not wish to hand over the physical data themselves; and (iii) a data set is to be included in an individual-level co-analysis but the physical size of the data precludes direct transfer to a new site for analysis.

Background Individual-level data pooling of large population-based studies across research centres in international research projects faces many hurdles. The BioSHaRE (Biobank Standardisation and Harmonisation for Research Excellence in the European Union) project aims to address these issues by building a collaborative group of investigators and developing tools for data harmonization, database integration and federated data analyses. Methods Eight population-based studies in six European countries were recruited to participate in the BioSHaRE project. Through workshops, teleconferences and electronic communications, participating investigators identified a set of 96 variables targeted for harmonization to answer research questions of interest. Using each study’s questionnaires, standard operating procedures, and data dictionaries, harmonization potential was assessed. Whenever harmonization was deemed possible, processing algorithms were developed and implemented in an open-source software infrastructure to transform study-specific data into the target (i.e. harmonized) format. Harmonized datasets located on server in each research centres across Europe were interconnected through a federated database system to perform statistical analysis. Results Retrospective harmonization led to the generation of common format variables for 73% of matches considered (96 targeted variables across 8 studies). Authenticated investigators can now perform complex statistical analyses of harmonized datasets stored on distributed servers without actually sharing individual-level data using the DataSHIELD method. Conclusion New Internet-based networking technologies and database management systems are providing the means to support collaborative, multi-center research in an efficient and secure manner. The results from this pilot project show that, given a strong collaborative relationship between participating studies, it is possible to seamlessly co-analyse internationally harmonized research databases while allowing each study to retain full control over individual-level data. We encourage additional collaborative research networks in epidemiology, public health, and the social sciences to make use of the open source tools presented herein. © Doiron et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.