Search

The prevalent fully-connected tensor network (FCTN) has achieved excellent success to compress data. However, the FCTN decomposition suffers from slow computational speed when facing higher-order and large-scale data. Naturally, there arises an interesting question: can a new model be proposed that decomposes the tensor into smaller ones and speeds up the computation of the algorithm? This work gives a positive answer by formulating a novel higher-order tensor decomposition model that utilizes latent matrices based on the tensor network structure, which can decompose a tensor into smaller-scale data than the FCTN decomposition, hence we named it Latent Matrices for Tensor Network Decomposition (LMTN). Furthermore, three optimization algorithms, LMTN-PAM, LMTN-SVD and LMTN-AR, have been developed and applied to the tensor-completion task. In addition, we provide proofs of theoretical convergence and complexity analysis for these algorithms. Experimental results show that our algorithm has the effectiveness in both deep learning dataset compression and higher-order tensor completion, and that our LMTN-SVD algorithm is 3-6 times faster than the FCTN-PAM algorithm and only a 1.8 points accuracy drop.

Tensor completion aimes at recovering missing data, and it is one of the popular concerns in deep learning and signal processing. Among the higher-order tensor decomposition algorithms, the recently proposed fully-connected tensor network decomposition (FCTN) algorithm is the most advanced. In this paper, by leveraging the superior expression of the fully-connected tensor network (FCTN) decomposition, we propose a new tensor completion method named the fully connected tensor network weighted optization(FCTN-WOPT). The algorithm performs a composition of the completed tensor by initialising the factors from the FCTN decomposition. We build a loss function with the weight tensor, the completed tensor and the incomplete tensor together, and then update the completed tensor using the lbfgs gradient descent algorithm to reduce the spatial memory occupation and speed up iterations. Finally we test the completion with synthetic data and real data (both image data and video data) and the results show the advanced performance of our FCTN-WOPT when it is applied to higher-order tensor completion., Comment: 12 pages

Is neural IR mostly hype? In a recent SIGIR Forum article, Lin expressed skepticism that neural ranking models were actually improving ad hoc retrieval effectiveness in limited data scenarios. He provided anecdotal evidence that authors of neural IR papers demonstrate "wins" by comparing against weak baselines. This paper provides a rigorous evaluation of those claims in two ways: First, we conducted a meta-analysis of papers that have reported experimental results on the TREC Robust04 test collection. We do not find evidence of an upward trend in effectiveness over time. In fact, the best reported results are from a decade ago and no recent neural approach comes close. Second, we applied five recent neural models to rerank the strong baselines that Lin used to make his arguments. A significant improvement was observed for one of the models, demonstrating additivity in gains. While there appears to be merit to neural IR approaches, at least some of the gains reported in the literature appear illusory., Comment: Published in the Proceedings of the 42nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2019)

Document ranking experiments should be repeatable. However, the interaction between multi-threaded indexing and score ties during retrieval may yield non-deterministic rankings, making repeatability not as trivial as one might imagine. In the context of the open-source Lucene search engine, score ties are broken by internal document ids, which are assigned at index time. Due to multi-threaded indexing, which makes experimentation with large modern document collections practical, internal document ids are not assigned consistently between different index instances of the same collection, and thus score ties are broken unpredictably. This short paper examines the effectiveness impact of such score ties, quantifying the variability that can be attributed to this phenomenon. The obvious solution to this non-determinism and to ensure repeatable document ranking is to break score ties using external collection document ids. This approach, however, comes with measurable efficiency costs due to the necessity of consulting external identifiers during query evaluation., Comment: Published in the Proceedings of the 42nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2019)