Search

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We investigated the clinical practice patterns of post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance among Korean endoscopists. METHODS: In a web-based survey conducted between September and November 2021, participants were asked about their preferred surveillance intervals and the patient age at which surveillance was discontinued. Adherence to the recent guidelines of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (USMSTF) was also analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 196 endoscopists completed the survey. The most preferred first surveillance intervals were: a 5-year interval after the removal of 1-2 tubular adenomas < 10 mm; a 3-year interval after the removal of 3-10 tubular adenomas < 10 mm, adenomas ≥ 10 mm, tubulovillous or villous adenomas, ≤ 20 hyperplastic polyps < 10 mm, 1-4 sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) < 10 mm, hyperplastic polyps or SSLs ≥ 10 mm, and traditional serrated adenomas; and a 1-year interval after the removal of adenomas with highgrade dysplasia, >10 adenomas, 5-10 SSLs, and SSLs with dysplasia. In piecemeal resections of large polyps ( > 20 mm), surveillance colonoscopy was mostly preferred after 1 year for adenomas and 6 months for SSLs. The mean USMSTF guideline adherence rate was 30.7%. The largest proportion of respondents (40.8%-55.1%) discontinued the surveillance at the patient age of 80-84 years. CONCLUSIONS: A significant discrepancy was observed between the preferred post-polypectomy surveillance intervals and recent international guidelines. Individualized measures are required to increase adherence to the guidelines.

* Context.--Although several neuroendocrine cell types constitute gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), the clinical and prognostic implications of the expression of multiple peptide hormones have not been comprehensively evaluated in rectal NETs. Objective.--To identify the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic impact of peptide hormone expression. Design.--We evaluated the expression of peptide YY (PYY), glucagon, somatostatin, serotonin, insulin, and gastrin using immunolabeling in 446 endoscopically or surgically resected rectal NETs. Results.--PYY, glucagon, serotonin, somatostatin, insulin, and gastrin were expressed in 261 of 389 (67.1%), 205 of 446 (46.0%), 36 of 446 (8.1%), 33 of 446 (7.4%), 2 of 446 (0.4%), and 1 of 446 cases (0.2%), respectively. Immunoreactivity to any peptide hormone was present in 345 of 446 cases (77.4%). Tumors expressing serotonin or somatostatin were associated with lymphovascular invasion, chromogranin A expression, and shorter disease-free survival (DFS). Rectal NETs were classified as L-cell, enterochromaffin-cell, D-cell, null-expression, or mixed-expression type based on peptide hormonal expression status. Patients with D-cell Net had the shortest DfS (10-year DFS, 54.5%), followed by those with enterochromaffin-cell NET (89.5%), null expression (97.0%), L-cell NET (99.6%), and mixed-expression NET (100%; P < .001). Multivariable analyses revealed that somatostatin expression was an independent indicator of poor prognosis with respect to DFS in rectal NETs (P = .001). Conclusions.--Somatostatin expression is a poor prognostic indicator in patients with rectal NETs. Therefore, additional peptide hormonal immunolabeling, including somatostatin, serotonin, and PYY, in rectal NETs can provide more information regarding DFS. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2023;147:797-807; doi: 10.5858/ arpa.2022-0032-OA), The incidence of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased substantially during the past few decades. They are currently the second most common digestive system tumor, after colorectal cancer. (1,2) [...]

Background and Aim: Reliable bowel preparation assessment is important in colonoscopy. However, current scoring systems are limited by laborious and time‐consuming tasks and interobserver variability. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to assess bowel cleanliness and evaluate its clinical applicability. Methods: A still image‐driven AI model to assess the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) was developed and validated using 2361 colonoscopy images. For evaluating real‐world applicability, the model was validated using 113 10‐s colonoscopy video clips and 30 full colonoscopy videos to identify "adequate (BBPS 2–3)" or "inadequate (BBPS 0–1)" preparation. The model was tested with an external dataset of 29 colonoscopy videos. The clinical applicability of the model was evaluated using 225 consecutive colonoscopies. Inter‐rater variability was analyzed between the AI model and endoscopists. Results: The AI model achieved an accuracy of 94.0% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.939 with the still images. Model testing with an external dataset showed an accuracy of 95.3%, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.976, and a sensitivity of 100% for the detection of inadequate preparations. The clinical applicability study showed an overall agreement rate of 85.3% between endoscopists and the AI model, with Fleiss' kappa of 0.686. The agreement rate was lower for the right colon compared with the transverse and left colon, with Fleiss' kappa of 0.563, 0.575, and 0.789, respectively. Conclusions: The AI model demonstrated accurate bowel preparation assessment and substantial agreement with endoscopists. Further refinement of the AI model is warranted for effective monitoring of qualified colonoscopy in large‐scale screening programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: The impact of continuing or stopping 5‐aminosalicylates (5‐ASA) after commencing anti‐tumour necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unclear. Aims: To compare the outcomes of patients with IBD who stopped or continued 5‐ASA after starting anti‐TNF therapy. Methods: We analysed data from the Korean National Health Insurance claims database between 2007 and 2020. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients who stopped or continued 5‐ASA within 90 days of anti‐TNF initiation. The primary outcome was any adverse clinical event defined as a composite of new corticosteroid use, IBD‐related hospitalisation, or intestinal surgery. Results: Among 7442 patients included for analysis (4479 [60.2%] with Crohn's disease [CD] and 2963 [39.8%] with ulcerative colitis [UC]), 1037 (13.9%) discontinued 5‐ASA within 90 days of starting anti‐TNF therapy. During a median 4.3‐year follow‐up, discontinuation of 5‐ASA was not associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical events (adjusted hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.93–1.10). The cumulative incidence of each adverse clinical event and the composite outcome were not significantly different between groups (all, p > 0.05). Additionally, separate analyses in CD and UC cohorts revealed no differences in adverse clinical outcomes between the 5‐ASA continuation and discontinuation groups. Subgroup analyses by presumed risk factors for disease relapse showed no significant differences in the risk of adverse events between groups. Conclusions: In this nationwide population‐based study, discontinuing 5‐ASA after starting anti‐TNF therapy was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events in patients with IBD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fecal calprotectin (FC) is commonly used to assess Crohn's disease (CD) activity. However, standardized cut-off values accounting for bowel resection history and disease location are lacking. In this study, we analyzed data from patients with CD who underwent magnetic resonance enterography, ileocolonoscopy, and FC measurements from January 2017 to December 2018. In 267 cases from 254 patients, the FC levels in the 'operated' patients were higher when the disease was active compared with those who were in the remission group (178 vs. 54.7 μg/g; p < 0.001), and similar findings were obtained for the 'non-operated' patients (449.5 vs. 40.95 μg/g; p < 0.001). The FC levels differed significantly according to the location of inflammation, with lower levels in the small bowel compared to those in the colon. The FC cut-off levels of 70.8 μg/g and 142.0 μg/g were considered optimal for predicting active disease for operated and non-operated patients, respectively. The corresponding FC cut-off levels of 70.8 μg/g and 65.0 μg/g were observed for patients with disease only in the small bowel. In conclusion, different FC cut-off values would be applicable to patients with CD based on their bowel resection history and disease location. Tight control with a lower FC target may benefit those with a history of bowel resection or small-bowel-only disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]