Search

The piRNA pathway protects germline genomes from selfish genetic elements (e.g. transposons) through their transcript cleavage in the cytoplasm and/or their transcriptional silencing in the nucleus. Here, we describe a mechanism by which the nuclear and cytoplasmic arms of the piRNA pathway are linked. We find that during mitosis of Drosophila spermatogonia, nuclear Piwi interacts with nuage, the compartment that mediates the cytoplasmic arm of the piRNA pathway. At the end of mitosis, Piwi leaves nuage to return to the nucleus. Dissociation of Piwi from nuage occurs at the depolymerizing microtubules of the central spindle, mediated by a microtubule-depolymerizing kinesin, Klp10A. Depletion of klp10A delays the return of Piwi to the nucleus and affects piRNA production, suggesting the role of nuclear-cytoplasmic communication in piRNA biogenesis. We propose that cell cycle-dependent communication between the nuclear and cytoplasmic arms of the piRNA pathway may play a previously unappreciated role in piRNA regulation.

rDNA loci, composed of hundreds of tandemly duplicated arrays of rRNA genes, are known to be among the most unstable genetic elements due to their repetitive nature. rDNA instability underlies aging (replicative senescence) in yeast cells, however, its contribution to the aging of multicellular organisms is poorly understood. In this study, we investigate the dynamics of rDNA loci during aging in the Drosophila male germline stem cell (GSC) lineage, and show that rDNA copy number decreases during aging. Our study further reveals that this age-dependent decrease in rDNA copy number is heritable from generation to generation, yet GSCs in young animals that inherited reduced rDNA copy number are capable of recovering normal rDNA copy number. Based on these findings, we propose that rDNA loci are dynamic genetic elements, where rDNA copy number changes dynamically yet is maintained through a recovery mechanism in the germline.

Germ cells develop as a cyst of interconnected sibling cells in a broad range of organisms in both sexes. A well-established function of intercellular connectivity is to transport cytoplasmic materials from nurse cells to oocytes, a critical process for developing functional oocytes in ovaries of many species. However, there are situations where connectivity exists without a nursing mechanism, and the biological meaning of such connectivity remains obscure. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the formation of intercellular connectivity, and discuss its meaning by visiting multiple examples of germ cell connectivity observed in evolutionarily distant species.

Two broadly known characteristics of germ cells in many organisms are their development as a cyst of interconnected cells and their high sensitivity to DNA damage. Here we provide evidence that in the Drosophila testis, connectivity serves as a mechanism that confers to spermatogonia a high sensitivity to DNA damage. We show that all spermatogonia within a cyst die synchronously even when only a subset of them exhibit detectable DNA damage. Mutants of the fusome, an organelle that is known to facilitate intracyst communication, compromise synchronous spermatogonial death and reduces overall germ cell death. Our data indicate that a death-promoting signal is shared within the cyst, leading to death of the entire cyst. Taken together, we propose that intercellular connectivity supported by the fusome uniquely increases the sensitivity of the germline to DNA damage, thereby protecting the integrity of gamete genomes that are passed on to the next generation.

Although introns are typically tens to thousands of nucleotides, there are notable exceptions. In flies as well as humans, a small number of genes contain introns that are more than 1000 times larger than typical introns, exceeding hundreds of kilobases (kb) to megabases (Mb). It remains unknown why gigantic introns exist and how cells overcome the challenges associated with their transcription and RNA processing. The Drosophila Y chromosome contains some of the largest genes identified to date: multiple genes exceed 4Mb, with introns accounting for over 99% of the gene span. Here we demonstrate that co-transcriptional splicing of these gigantic Y-linked genes is important to ensure successful transcription: perturbation of splicing led to the attenuation of transcription, leading to a failure to produce mature mRNA. Cytologically, defective splicing of the Y-linked gigantic genes resulted in disorganization of transcripts within the nucleus suggestive of entanglement of transcripts, likely resulting from unspliced long RNAs. We propose that co-transcriptional splicing maintains the length of nascent transcripts of gigantic genes under a critical threshold, preventing their entanglement and ensuring proper gene expression. Our study reveals a novel biological significance of co-transcriptional splicing. Author summary: A small number of genes in our genome are characterized by excessively large introns, sometimes exceeding megabases. It remains poorly understood why such large introns exist or how they are processed during gene expression. By examining genes on Drosophila Y chromosome that contain gigantic introns, it is shown that the transcripts of these genes are co-transcriptionally spliced, and co-transcriptional splicing of these genes is critical for proper gene expression. Perturbation of splicing led to attenuation of transcription specifically in genes with gigantic introns, but not genes with average-sized introns. Whereas transcripts of genes with gigantic introns normally form separate nuclear domains, splicing perturbation led to intermingling of these domains, leading to a proposal that co-transcriptional splicing may function to keep transcript length short to avoid entanglement of transcripts, which may stall the progression of RNA polymerase II. Taken together, these results reveal a novel function of co-transcriptional splicing that specifically impacts the expression of genes with gigantic introns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ribosomal DNA (rDNA), which encodes ribosomal RNA, is an essential but unstable genomic element due to its tandemly repeated nature. rDNA's repetitive nature causes spontaneous intrachromatid recombination, leading to copy number (CN) reduction, which must be counteracted by a mechanism that recovers CN to sustain cells' viability. Akin to telomere maintenance, rDNA maintenance is particularly important in cell types that proliferate for an extended time period, most notably in the germline that passes the genome through generations. In Drosophila, the process of rDNA CN recovery, known as 'rDNA magnification', has been studied extensively. rDNA magnification is mediated by unequal sister chromatid exchange (USCE), which generates a sister chromatid that gains the rDNA CN by stealing copies from its sister. However, much remains elusive regarding how germ cells sense rDNA CN to decide when to initiate magnification, and how germ cells balance between the need to generate DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to trigger USCE vs. avoiding harmful DSBs. Recently, we identified an rDNA-binding Zinc-finger protein Indra as a factor required for rDNA magnification, however, the underlying mechanism of action remains unknown. Here we show that Indra is a negative regulator of rDNA magnification, balancing the need of rDNA magnification and repression of dangerous DSBs. Mechanistically, we show that Indra is a repressor of RNA polymerase II (Pol II)-dependent transcription of rDNA: Under low rDNA CN conditions, Indra protein amount is downregulated, leading to Pol II-mediated transcription of rDNA. This results in the expression of rDNA-specific retrotransposon, R2, which we have shown to facilitate rDNA magnification via generation of DBSs at rDNA. We propose that differential use of Pol I and Pol II plays a critical role in regulating rDNA CN expansion only when it is necessary. Author summary: Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) exists as tandemly-repeated copies in eukaryotic genome, making it unstable due to spontaneous intrachromatid recombination that causes copy number loss. The germline, which is the sole cell type that transmits genome from generation to generation, must expand rDNA copy number to counteract spontaneous copy number loss. It has been shown that the process of rDNA copy number expansion, called rDNA magnification, involves rDNA binding protein Indra and retrotransposon R2. However, the underlying molecular mechanism of rDNA magnification and how Indra and R2 may functionally intersect remained unknown. This study shows that Indra is a transcriptional repressor of the intergenic spacer (IGS) sequence of rDNA, orchestrating R2 expression and rDNA copy number expression. Low rDNA copy number downregulates Indra, leading to expression of IGS, which in turn leads to expression of R2. It was found that IGS expression is mediated by RNA polymerase II, which is specifically recruited to nucleolus upon rDNA copy number reduction. Together, the results lead to a model how rDNA copy number reduction triggers the process of rDNA copy number expansion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) loci contain hundreds of tandemly repeated copies of ribosomal RNA genes needed to support cellular viability. This repetitiveness makes it highly susceptible to copy number (CN) loss due to intrachromatid recombination between rDNA copies, threatening multigenerational maintenance of rDNA. How this threat is counteracted to avoid extinction of the lineage has remained unclear. Here, we show that the rDNA-specific retrotransposon R2 is essential for restorative rDNA CN expansion to maintain rDNA loci in the Drosophila male germline. The depletion of R2 led to defective rDNA CN maintenance, causing a decline in fecundity over generations and eventual extinction. We find that double-stranded DNA breaks created by the R2 endonuclease, a feature of R2's rDNA-specific retrotransposition, initiate the process of rDNA CN recovery, which relies on homology-dependent repair of the DNA break at rDNA copies. This study reveals that an active retrotransposon provides an essential function for its host, contrary to transposable elements' reputation as entirely selfish. These findings suggest that benefiting host fitness can be an effective selective advantage for transposable elements to offset their threat to the host, which may contribute to retrotransposons' widespread success throughout taxa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]