1. Antiemetic Control with Palonosetron in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer Receiving a Fluoropyrimidine-Based Regimen in Addition to Either Irinotecan or Oxaliplatin: A Retrospective Study
- Author
-
Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Yahna T. Smith, Joshua Reardon, Marlo Blazer, David Efries, Kim Juergens, Jeffrey P. Rose, Lynn Weatherby, Niesha Griffith, and Gary Phillips
- Subjects
Male ,Oncology ,Quinuclidines ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Organoplatinum Compounds ,medicine.drug_class ,Nausea ,Irinotecan ,Deoxycytidine ,Internal medicine ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,parasitic diseases ,medicine ,Humans ,Antiemetic ,Gastrointestinal cancer ,Capecitabine ,Gastrointestinal Neoplasms ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Palonosetron ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Isoquinolines ,medicine.disease ,Ondansetron ,humanities ,Oxaliplatin ,Regimen ,Treatment Outcome ,Anesthesia ,Vomiting ,Antiemetics ,Camptothecin ,Female ,Fluorouracil ,medicine.symptom ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background: For moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, palonosetron (PALO) is reported to provide complete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in 69% of patients. Prior to August 2009, our gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients receiving the moderately emetogenic compounds oxaliplatin or irinotecan plus a fluoropyrimidine regimen received ondansetron and dexamethasone orally on day 1 of chemotherapy for CINV prevention. Beginning in August of 2009, ondansetron was replaced by PALO 0.25 mg (intravenous push). Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective study of GI cancer patients who received oxaliplatin or irinotecan plus a fluoropyrimidine. Failure of an antiemetic regimen was defined as grade ≥1 vomiting or grade ≥2 nausea (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3) on days 1 through 5 following chemotherapy. Patients were divided for analysis into pre-PALO and post-PALO cohorts. Fisher’s exact test compared cohort differences. Results: A total of 305 patients were included in the study, with 157 patients in the pre-PALO cohort and 148 in the post-PALO cohort. For all patients, the risk of antiemetic failure was reduced from 50.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 42.2–58.4%] to 28.4% (95% CI 21.3–36.4%) with PALO. This reduction in the relative risk of antiemetic failure was observed in all subgroups. Conclusion: The addition of PALO may provide increased control of CINV for the moderately emetogenic regimens of oxaliplatin or irinotecan plus a fluoropyrimidine in GI cancer patients.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF