Search

Objectives: Covered self-expandable metal stent (cSEMS) for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) has been developed to overcome tumor ingrowth but is prone to be associated with an increased risk of migration. Clinical impact of the novel large-bore cSEMS for malignant GOO remains unclear., Methods: A total of 117 patients undergoing endoscopic cSEMS placement for malignant GOO were enrolled in this multicenter retrospective study. Technical and clinical success, adverse events, recurrent GOO, and survival after stent placement were compared between 24 mm-cSEMS (n = 49) and 20 mm-cSEMS (n = 68)., Results: Patient characteristics were well-balanced and thus similar survival was observed between the two groups (136 days vs. 89 days, P = 0.60). Technical success rate of 100% and clinical success rate of 96% were achieved both in 24 mm-cSEMS and 20 mm-cSEMS, respectively. The median cumulative time to recurrent GOO was significantly longer in 24 mm-cSEMS than in 20 mm-cSEMS (380 days vs. 138 days, P = 0.01). The incidence of adverse events and recurrent GOO was comparable: 12% vs. 15% (P = 0.91), and 16% vs. 31% (P = 0.11); however, no stent migration was observed in 24 mm-cSEMS. In a subgroup analysis, the superiority of 24 mm-cSEMS to 20 mm-cSEMS was demonstrated in extrinsic cancers (380 days vs. 121 days, P = 0.01) but not in intrinsic cancers (151 days vs. not reached, P = 0.47)., Conclusions: The 24 mm-cSEMS may improve time to recurrent GOO with ensuring acceptable safety in patients with malignant GOO., (© 2022 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Background: In patients with unresectable hilar malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), bilateral metal stent placement is recommended. However, treatment selection between partially stent-in-stent (SIS) and side-by-side (SBS) methods is still controversial., Study: Clinical outcomes of bilateral metal stent placement by SBS and SIS methods for hilar MBO were retrospectively studied in four Japanese centers. While large-cell-type uncovered metal stents were placed above the papilla in SIS, braided-type uncovered metal stents were placed across the papilla in SBS., Results: A total of 64 patients with hilar MBO (40 SIS and 24 SBS) were included in the analysis. Technical success rate was 100% in SIS and 96% in SBS. Functional success rate was 93% in SIS and 96% in SBS. Early adverse event rates were higher in SBS (46%) than in SIS (23%), though not statistically significant (P = 0.09). Post-procedure pancreatitis was exclusively observed in SBS group (29%). Recurrent biliary obstruction rates were 48% and 43%, and the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction was 169 and 205 days in SIS and SBS, respectively., Conclusions: Other than a trend to higher adverse event rates including post-procedure pancreatitis in SBS, clinical outcomes of SIS and SBS methods were comparable in patients with unresectable hilar MBO.

BACKGROUND : Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) has been increasingly used for the management of large common bile duct (CBD) stones. Although EPLBD is often preceded by endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), EPLBD alone without EST has been increasingly reported as an alternative to EST for large CBD stones. METHODS : This multicenter randomized trial was conducted at 19 Japanese institutions to compare the efficacy and safety of EPLBD alone versus EST for the removal of large (≥ 10 mm) CBD stones. The primary end point was complete stone removal in a single session. The secondary end points included: overall complete stone removal, lithotripsy use, procedure time, adverse events, and cost. RESULTS:  171 patients with large CBD stones were included in the analysis. The rate of single-session complete stone removal was significantly higher in the EPLBD-alone group than in the EST group (90.7 % vs. 78.8 %; P  = 0.04). Lithotripsy use was significantly less frequent in the EPLBD group than in the EST group (30.2 % vs. 48.2 %; P  = 0.02). The rates of early adverse events were comparable between the two groups: rates of overall adverse events were 9.3 % vs. 9.4 % and of pancreatitis were 4.7 % vs. 5.9 % in the EPLBD and EST groups, respectively. The procedure costs were $1442 vs. $1661 in the EPLBD and EST groups, respectively ( P  = 0.12). CONCLUSION : EPLBD without EST for the endoscopic treatment of large CBD stones achieved a significantly higher rate of complete stone removal in a single session compared with EST, without increasing adverse events., Competing Interests: Century Medical Inc.,: speaker fee, research grant. Boston Scientific Corp.: speaker fee, research grant., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background and Aim: An antireflux metal stent (ARMS) for nonresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) may prevent recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) as a result of duodenobiliary reflux and prolong time to RBO (TRBO). Superiority of ARMS over conventional covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) has not been fully examined., Methods: We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial to examine whether TRBO of an ARMS with a funnel-shaped valve was longer than that of a covered SEMS in SEMS-naïve patients. We enrolled 104 patients (52 patients per arm) at 11 hospitals in Japan. Secondary outcomes included causes of RBO, adverse events, and patient survival., Results: TRBO did not differ significantly between the ARMS and covered SEMS groups (median, 251 vs 351 days, respectively; P = 0.11). RBO as a result of biliary sludge or food impaction was observed in 13% and 9.8% of patients who received an ARMS and covered SEMS, respectively (P = 0.83). ARMS was associated with a higher rate of stent migration compared with the covered SEMS (31% vs 12%, P = 0.038). Overall rates of adverse events were 20% and 18% in the ARMS and covered SEMS groups, respectively (P = 0.97). No significant between-group difference in patient survival was observed (P = 0.26)., Conclusions: The current ARMS was not associated with longer TRBO compared with the covered SEMS. Modifications including addition of an anti-migration system are required to use the current ARMS as first-line palliative treatment of distal MBO (UMIN-CTR clinical trial registration number: UMIN000014784)., (© 2019 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Background and Aim: Guidewire insertion to a pancreatic duct under wire-guided cannulation (WGC) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is associated with a high incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Pancreatic stent placement followed by WGC (PS-WGC) is considered for these cases to reduce PEP. This study was aimed to examine the effectiveness of PS-WGC compared with repeated WGC., Methods: The consecutive data of patients without history of ERCP who underwent ERCP for biliary intervention were retrospectively collected from five centers. Patients without guidewire insertion to the pancreatic duct were excluded. Pancreatic stent was immediately placed after guidewire insertion to the pancreatic duct in the PS-WGC group. The association between the method of biliary cannulation (PS-WGC or repeated WGC) and PEP was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression model., Results: A total of 590 patients (183 in the PS-WGC and 407 in the repeated WGC group) were included. PS-WGC decreased PEP (8.7% vs 19%, P = 0.001) and improved its severity (moderate and severe PEP; 2.2% vs 6.4%, P = 0.04) compared with repeated WGC. PS-WGC was associated with reduction of PEP in the multivariable model (Odds ratio 0.31, P < 0.001). The rates of difficult cannulation and overall successful biliary cannulation were not different between the two groups (66% vs 70%, P = 0.39 and 98% vs 96%, P = 0.21 in the PS-WGC and repeated WGC group, respectively)., Conclusions: Pancreatic stent placement followed by WGC reduced PEP in patients with guidewire insertion to the pancreatic duct during WGC for native papilla compared with repeated WGC., (© 2018 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background and Aim: With an aging population, an increasing number of individuals on antithrombotic agents are diagnosed with large bile duct stones. Studies have shown the effectiveness of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) for removal of large bile duct stones. EPLBD without endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) may reduce the risk of procedure-related bleeding, but the safety of this procedure for users of antithrombotic agents remains unclear., Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, we included patients who underwent EPLBD without EST for bile duct stones between March 2008 and December 2017. We compared adverse events and other clinical outcomes between users and non-users of antithrombotic agents (antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants)., Results: We analyzed a total of 144 patients (47 users and 97 non-users of antithrombotic agents). Among the users, the agents were continued in 13% and were replaced with heparin in 62% during the periprocedural period. We did not observe clinically significant bleeding and thrombotic events irrespective of the use of antithrombotic agents. Overall rate of early adverse events did not differ between users and non-users (6.4% and 7.2%, P = 0.99). Procedural outcomes did not differ between the groups (necessity for lithotripsy, 28% vs. 29%; and complete stone removal in a single session, 72% vs. 71%, for users and non-users, respectively)., Conclusions: Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation without EST may be done without a substantial increase in procedure-related bleeding for users of antithrombotic agents. A larger study is required to refine the management strategy for those agents during the periprocedural period., (© 2018 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Objective: Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency may impair the nutritional status in pancreatic cancer (PC), but the role of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) is not fully evaluated. Therefore, we conducted this multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial to evaluate the role of PERT in PC patients., Methods: Patients with unresectable PC receiving chemotherapy were randomly assigned to pancrelipase and nonpancrelipase groups. Patients in the pancrelipase group took oral pancrelipase of 48,000 lipase units per meal. N-benzoyl-tryrosyl para-aminobenzoic acid (NBT-PABA) test was performed at baseline. Our primary endpoint was change in body mass index (BMI) at 8 weeks. Secondary endpoints were change in other nutritional status at 8 weeks and overall survival., Results: A total of 88 patients were enrolled between May 2014 and May 2016. The NBT-PABA test was lower than the normal range in 90%. There were no significant differences in change in BMI at 8 weeks: 0.975 and 0.980 in the pancrelipase and the nonpancrelipase groups, respectively (P = 0.780). The other nutritional markers were also comparable. The median overall survival was 19.0 and 12.0 months (P = 0.070)., Conclusions: In this randomized controlled trial, pancrelipase failed to improve the change in BMI at 8 weeks in PC patients receiving chemotherapy.

Background and Aim: Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) is often recommended in preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) for hilar malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), but endoscopic biliary stent (EBS) is also used in the clinical practice. We conducted this large-scale multicenter study to compare ENBD and EBS in this setting., Methods: A total of 374 cases undergoing PBD including 281 ENBD and 76 EBS for hilar MBO in 29 centers were retrospectively studied., Results: Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) accounted for 69.8% and Bismuth-Corlette classification was III or more in 58.8% of the study population. Endoscopic PBD was technically successful in 94.6%, and adverse event rate was 21.9%. The rate of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis was 16.0%, and non-endoscopic sphincterotomy was the only risk factor (odds ratio [OR] 2.51). Preoperative re-intervention was performed in 61.5%: planned re-interventions in 48.4% and unplanned re-interventions in 31.0%. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was placed in 6.4% at the time of surgery. The risk factors for unplanned procedures were ECC (OR 2.64) and total bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dL (OR 2.18). In surgically resected cases, prognostic factors were ECC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.57), predraiange magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (HR 1.62) and unplanned re-interventions (HR 1.81). EBS was not associated with increased adverse events, unplanned re-interventions, or a poor prognosis., Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis did not demonstrate the advantage of ENBD over EBS as the initial PBD for resectable hilar MBO. Although the technical success rate of endoscopic PBD was high, its re-intervention rate was not negligible, and unplanned re-intervention was associated with a poor prognosis in resected hilar MBO., (© 2017 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: Endoscopic transpapillary or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided stent placement is used for nonresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with duodenal obstruction., Methods: We included consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic biliary drainage combined with a duodenal stent at 16 referral centers in four Asian countries. The primary outcome was time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO). We assessed TRBO according to the sequence of biliary and duodenal obstruction (group 1/2/3, biliary obstruction first/concurrent/duodenal obstruction first, respectively) or the location of duodenal obstruction (type I/II/III, proximal to/affecting/distal to the ampulla, respectively). We also evaluated functional success and adverse events., Results: We included 110 patients (group1/2/3, 67/29/14 patients; type I/II/III, 45/46/19 patients; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP]/EUS-guided choledocoduodenostomy/EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy, 90/10/10 patients, respectively). The median TRBO of all cases was 450 days (interquartile range, 212-666 days) and functional success was achieved in 105 cases (95%). The TRBO did not differ significantly by the timing or location of duodenal obstruction (p = .30 and .79, respectively). The TRBO of metal stents (n = 96) tended to be longer compared with plastic stents (n = 14, p = .083). Compared with ERCP, EUS-guided biliary drainage was associated with a higher rate of adverse events., Conclusion: Transpapillary or transmural endoscopic biliary drainage with a duodenal stent was effective, irrespective of the timing or location of duodenal obstruction. A prospective study is required considering the tradeoff of technical success rate, stent patency, and adverse events (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02376907).

Background and Study Aims:  Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) is a method of bile duct stone removal that has a better long-term outcome but a high risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Recent studies have suggested that 5-minute EPBD can reduce the incidence of PEP. This study aimed to examine the safety and effectiveness of longer duration EPBD compared with shorter duration EPBD (5 minutes vs. 15 seconds after disappearance of the waist of a dilation catheter)., Patients and Methods:  Patients without a history of endoscopic sphincterotomy or EPBD who underwent EPBD to remove bile duct stones were selected retrospectively from five centers. The incidence of PEP, other early adverse events, and outcomes of EPBD were compared between the groups. A multivariable analysis of risk factors for PEP was performed., Results:  A total of 607 patients (157 and 450 in the 5-minute and 15-second EPBD groups, respectively) were included. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of the incidence of PEP (8.3 % and 8.9 % in the 5-minute and 15-second EPBD groups, respectively; P  = 0.871) and the incidence of overall early adverse events ( P  = 0.999). Although 5-minute EPBD elongated the procedure time (45 vs. 37 minutes, P  < 0.001), it increased the rate of complete stone removal during a single session ( P  < 0.001) and decreased the use of lithotripsy ( P  < 0.001)., Conclusions:  Compared with 15-second EPBD, 5-minute EPBD did not reduce the incidence of PEP.

Background/aims: Endoscopic placement of self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) has emerged as a palliative treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Although covered SEMSs can prevent tumor ingrowth, frequent migration of covered SEMSs may offset their advantages in preventing tumor ingrowth., Methods: We conducted this multicenter, single-arm, retrospective study at six tertiary referral centers to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a partially covered SEMS with an uncovered large-bore flare at the proximal end as an antimigration system in 41 patients with symptomatic malignant GOO. The primary outcome was clinical success, and the secondary outcomes were technical success, stent dysfunction, adverse events, and survival after stent placement., Results: The technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 95%, respectively. Stent dysfunctions occurred in 17 patients (41%), including stent migration in nine (23%), tumor ingrowth in one (2%), and tumor overgrowth in four (10%). Two patients (5%) developed adverse events: one pancreatitis and one perforation. No procedure-related death was observed., Conclusions: A novel partially covered SEMS with a large-bore flare proximal end was safe and effective for malignant GOO but failed to prevent stent migration. Further research is warranted to develop a covered SEMS with an optimal antimigration system.

Objective This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the combination therapy of gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Methods In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, a total of 212 patients with advanced BTC receiving GS (n = 125) or GC (n = 87) between July 2006 and August 2015 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective tumor response, and safety. Results Patient characteristics were well balanced between the two groups, except for tumor size (the baseline sum of the largest diameter of the tumor: 6.3 cm in the GS group vs. 8.6 cm in the GC group, p = 0.01). Although the response rate was higher in the GS group than in the GC group (28.8% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.01), the median PFS and OS were comparable between the two groups (PFS of 5.6 vs. 7.6 months, p = 0.74; OS of 12.4 vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.20, respectively). Stomatitis and skin rash were more frequently observed in the GS group, whereas anemia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and renal toxicity were more commonly observed in the GC group. Conclusion This study demonstrates that GS and GC are similar with regard to their safety and efficacy in patients with advanced BTC. GS could serve as an alternative treatment for advanced BTC as a first-line chemotherapy.

Background/aims: In distal malignant biliary obstruction, an antireflux metal stent (ARMS) with a funnel-shaped valve is effective as a reintervention for metal stent occlusion caused by reflux. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility of this ARMS as a first-line metal stent., Methods: Patients with nonresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction were identified between April and December 2014 at three Japanese tertiary centers. We retrospectively evaluated recurrent biliary obstruction and adverse events after ARMS placement., Results: In total, 20 consecutive patients were included. The most common cause of biliary obstruction was pancreatic cancer (75%). Overall, recurrent biliary obstruction was observed in seven patients (35%), with a median time to recurrent biliary obstruction of 246 days (range, 11 to 246 days). Stent occlusion occurred in five patients (25%), the causes of which were sludge and food impaction in three and two patients, respectively. Stent migration occurred in two patients (10%). The rate of adverse events associated with ARMS was 25%: pancreatitis occurred in three patients, cholecystitis in one and liver abscess in one. No patients experienced nonocclusion cholangitis., Conclusions: The ARMS as a first-line biliary drainage procedure was feasible. Because the ARMS did not fully prevent stent dysfunction due to reflux, further investigation is warranted.

We report the case ofa 79-year-old Japanese woman diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer of the cardia with multiple lung metastases that showed complete response to trastuzumab-containing chemotherapy. First, we administered tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) and cisplatin (CDDP) concurrently to the patient. Next, we switched to trastuzumab in combination with capecitabine and CDDP because gastric cancer tissue indicated HER2-positivity. Considering the patient's age and renal function, the dose of CDDP was decreased to 50% after starting the medication. Before the 2nd course of trastuzumab-containing chemotherapy, oral mucositis (Grade 3) and hand-foot syndrome (Grade 1) were observed. Therefore, a one-step dose reduction of capecitabine was necessary. After the 4th course, the primary gastric tumor was no longer visible endoscopically. After the 7th course, computed tomography (CT) showed the disappearance of all lung metastases. Accordingly, the patient was considered to be completely responsive to the medication. After the 12th course, recurrence of the tumor was not identified and at the request of the patient, the trastuzumab-containing chemotherapy was discontinued. Regular follow-up showed no evidence of recurrence 8 months after discontinuing treatment and the patient was in good condition 21 months after her initial diagnosis.

Background and Study Aims: There are no guidelines for the timing of conversion from a single-guidewire to a double-guidewire technique to facilitate selective bile duct cannulation and reduce post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), when using wire-guided cannulation. We investigated whether early conversion to the double-guidewire method, at first unintentional insertion of a guidewire into the pancreatic duct, facilitated selective bile duct cannulation and reduced PEP compared with repeated single-guidewire attempts., Patients and Methods: A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial included 274 patients with a naive papilla, undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) using wire-guided cannulation in whom there was unintentional insertion of the guidewire into the pancreatic duct. With the guidewire still in the duct, patients were randomly assigned to undergo the double-guidewire technique or repeated single-wire cannulation. Main outcomes were success rates for selective bile duct cannulation and PEP frequency., Results: Success rates for selective bile duct cannulation within 10 attempts and 10 minutes were 75 % and 70 %, respectively, for the early double-guidewire (EDG) and repeated single-guidewire (RSG) cannulation groups (relative rate 1.07, 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 0.93 - 1.24, P = 0.42). Corresponding final selective bile duct cannulation rates were 98 % and 97 % (relative rate 1.01, 95 %CI 0.97 - 1.05, P = 1.00). PEP rates were 20 % and 17 %, respectively, for the EDG and RSG cannulation groups (relative risk 1.17, 95 %CI 0.71 - 1.94, P = 0.53). Double-guidewire cannulation was more effective in patients with malignant biliary stricture (relative rate 1.36, 95 %CI 1.05 - 1.77, P = 0.02)., Conclusions: During therapeutic ERC using wire-guided cannulation, converting to a double-guidewire technique neither facilitated selective bile duct cannulation nor decreased PEP incidence compared with repeated use of a single-wire technique., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background and Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of secondary gastroduodenal stent placement after first stent dysfunction for malignant gastric outlet obstruction., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of secondary stent-in-stent gastroduodenal stent placement., Results: Among 260 patients who had been treated with first gastroduodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction, 29 patients (11.2%) were treated with secondary gastroduodenal stent placement because of first stent dysfunction. Pancreatic cancer was the major primary cancer (55.2%). A WallFlex duodenal stent was the most frequently inserted stent both as a first stent (75.9%) and as a secondary stent (62.1%). There were 22 patients (75.9%) that received gastroduodenal stents at the bending site (supraduodenal angle or infraduodenal angle). Technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 86.2%, respectively. Median eating period was 3.0 months, and median survival time was 3.5 months. As for related complications, gastrointestinal perforation, insufficient stent expansion, tumor ingrowth, tumor overgrowth, and cholangitis were experienced in 13.8% (four cases), 6.9% (two cases), 6.9% (two cases), 3.4% (one case), and 3.4% (one case), respectively., Conclusion: Secondary gastroduodenal stent placement might be effective for managing first stent dysfunction in malignant gastric outlet obstruction. However, gastrointestinal perforation was the major complication., (© 2014 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2014 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Aim: To evaluate the differences in the treatment outcomes between the unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer patients who received chemotherapy., Methods: Patients who were treated with gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy in the previous prospective studies were divided into groups of unresectable and recurrent cases. The tumor response, time-to-progression, overall survival, toxicity, and dose intensity were compared between these two groups., Results: Response rate of the recurrent group was higher than that of the unresectable group (40.0% vs 25.5%; P = 0.34). Median time-to-progression of the recurrent and unresectable groups were 8.7 mo (95%CI), 1.2 mo, not reached) and 5.7 mo (95%CI: 4.0-7.0 mo), respectively (P = 0.14). Median overall survival of the recurrent and the unresectable groups were 16.1 mo (95%CI: 2.0 mo-not reached) and 9.6 mo (95%CI: 7.1-11.7 mo), respectively (P = 0.10). Dose intensities were significantly lower in the recurrent groups (gemcitabine: recurrent group 83.5% vs unresectable group 96.8%; P < 0.01, S-1: Recurrent group 75.9% vs unresectable group 91.8%; P < 0.01). Neutropenia occurred more frequently in recurrent group (recurrent group 90% vs unresectable group 55%; P = 0.04)., Conclusion: Not only the efficacy but also the toxicity and dose intensity were significantly different between unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer.

Background and Aim: Covered metallic stents (CMSs) were developed to overcome tumor ingrowth in uncovered metallic stents (UMSs) for malignant biliary obstruction, but superiority of CMSs over UMSs is still controversial due to the high migration rate in CMS. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective analysis to clarify risk factors for stent migration, including mechanical properties of CMSs., Methods: Patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, receiving CMS for distal malignant biliary obstruction in five tertiary care centers, were retrospectively studied. Univariate and multivariate analyses to identify prognostic factors for early (< 6 months) stent migration were performed using a proportional hazards model with death or stent occlusion without stent migration as a competing risk. Two mechanical properties were included in the analysis: axial force, the recovery force that leads to a CMS straightening, and radial force (RF), the expansion force against the stricture., Results: Among 290 patients who received CMS placement for distal malignant biliary obstruction, stent migration rate was 15.2%. CMS migrated early (< 6 months) in 10.0% and distally in 11.7%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for early stent migration were chemotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratios [SHR] 4.46, P = 0.01), CMS with low RF (SHR 2.23, P = 0.03), and duodenal invasion (SHR 2.25, P = 0.02)., Conclusion: CMS with low RF, chemotherapy, and duodenal invasion were associated with CMS migration from our study., (© 2014 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Background and Aim: Tumor involvement to the orifice of cystic duct (OCD) is a risk factor for cholecystitis after self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement, but its prevention is still difficult. We conducted this multicenter analysis to clarify a type of SEMS or a method to place SEMS which would decrease the incidence of cholecystitis after SEMS placement., Methods: The incidence of cholecystitis was studied in consecutive patients receiving SEMS for distal malignant biliary obstruction in five tertiary care centers. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors for cholecystitis., Results: A total of 376 patients who received SEMS placement for distal malignant biliary obstruction were analyzed. Tumor involvement to OCD was diagnosed in 25.3%. Overall incidence of cholecystitis was 6.9%. Cholecystitis was observed in 8.0% of 300 patients with covered SEMS, 16.8% of 95 patients with tumor involvement to OCD, 10.8% of 234 patients with SEMS of high axial force (AF), and 12.0% of 158 patients with SEMS length ≤ 60 mm. In the multivariate analysis, tumor involvement to OCD (odds ratio [OR] 5.40, P < 0.001), SEMSs with high AF (OR 5.33, P = 0.002), and SEMS length ≤ 60 mm (OR 3.19, P = 0.010) are risk factors. Among patients with tumor involvement to OCD, the incidence of cholecystitis in SEMS with high and low AF was 25.0% and 5.0%, respectively., Conclusion: This study with an expanded cohort reconfirmed tumor involvement to OCD as a risk factor for cholecystitis after SEMS placement. SEMS with low AF might decrease cholecystitis., (© 2014 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Objectives: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis is diagnosed on the basis of pancreatic pain and hyperamylasemia. However, because the diagnosis of abdominal pain is not objective, there may be some cases of painless pancreatitis among patients with post-ERCP hyperamylasemia (PEH). We reviewed the computed tomography (CT) findings of PEH cases to determine the incidence of painless pancreatitis., Methods: Between July, 2005 and December, 2011, CT was performed in 91 patients with hyperamylasemia 18 h after ERCP. We reviewed the CT findings and graded the severity of pancreatitis according to the Balthazar grading system. Grades C, D, and E were defined as pancreatitis., Results: Thirty-four patients (37%) had pancreatitis according to the CT findings. There was a significant difference in the serum amylase levels between the positive- and negative-CT finding groups (1306 ± 833 vs. 786 ± 315 IU/L, respectively; p = 0.0012). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the amylase cut-off value for discriminating between the 2 groups was 795 IU/L (6.36 times the upper normal limit)., Conclusions: Thirty-seven percent of PEH patients had painless pancreatitis. CT is useful to determine pancreatitis in patients taking analgesics, steroids, or anti-immunological drugs and those with diabetes mellitus and 18-h serum amylase levels of >6 times the normal upper limit., (Copyright © 2013 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: It has been discussed whether IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), including autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), is associated with malignancy; however, the issue has not been clarified., Methods: We analyzed 113 patients with IgG4-RD in whom malignancy was not diagnosed at the time of IgG4-RD onset and the follow-up period was longer than six months. A total of 95 patients had AIP. The mean follow-up period was 73 months. The incidence of the observed malignancies was compared with the expected incidence in an age- and sex-matched general Japanese population based on the Vital Statistics of Japan., Results: There were 15 malignancies (lung cancer in five patients, pancreatic cancer in two patients, gastric cancer in two patients, bile duct cancer in one patient, renal cancer in one patient, breast cancer in one patient, tongue cancer in one patient, malignant melanoma in one patient and acute myeloid leukemia in one patient) in 14 patients during the follow-up period. The calculated standardized incidence rate of the total malignancies was not significant, that is, 1.04 (95% CI 0.57-1.75)., Conclusion: The incidence of total malignancies in IgG4-RD patients is similar to that observed in the general population. At present, it is reasonable to conclude that IgG4-RD is not associated with an increased incidence of total malignancies.

Background: Our previous study suggested that a combination of ulinastatin and risperidone reduced post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) compared with ulinastatin alone., Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of risperidone alone for prevention of PEP., Design: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial., Setting: Two academic hospitals and 5 referral hospitals in Tokyo and Saitama, Japan., Patients: Patients undergoing therapeutic or interventional-diagnostic ERCP., Intervention: The patients were randomized to receive 2 mg of oral risperidone or oral placebo at 0.5 to 2 hours before ERCP., Main Outcome Measurements: The primary endpoint was the incidence of PEP. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of hyperenzymemia and enzyme levels (amylase, pancreatic amylase, lipase). Risk factors for PEP were evaluated., Results: We initially enrolled 500 patients in the study (250 in the risperidone group and 250 in the placebo group), but 17 (11 in the risperidone and 6 in the placebo group) were excluded after randomization. PEP developed in 24 patients (10.0%) in the risperidone group and 21 patients (8.6%) in the placebo group (P = .587). Serum amylase levels at 3 hours after ERCP were lower in the risperidone group (P = .007 in a single test of hypothesis, significance removed by Bonferroni correction for multiple testing). In multivariate analysis, a small papilla of Vater, total procedure time ≥40 minutes, and stenosis of the intrahepatic duct were significantly associated with PEP., Limitations: Multiplicity of study centers and a relatively wide time range of drug administration time., Conclusion: Risperidone did not show a benefit in prevention of PEP in this trial. (, Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT000004592.)., (Copyright © 2013 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endoscopic placement of covered self-expandable metallic stents (CSEMSs) is effective for distal malignant biliary obstruction. However, management of dysfunctional CSEMSs has not been established., Methods: Between March 1998 and July 2007, a total of 74 patients who underwent endoscopic re-interventions for CSEMS dysfunction were analyzed. Second stent insertion (CSEMS or plastic stent) or mechanical cleaning of the occluded CSEMS was performed endoscopically. The period between second stent insertion and stent dysfunction or patient death (time to dysfunction; TTD) was calculated. The cleaned initial CSEMSs were analyzed as second stents., Results: Dysfunction of the second stent occurred in 17 of 37 patients (45.9%) in the CSEMS group, 16 of 20 (80.0%) in the plastic stent group, and 13 of 17 (76.5%) in the cleaning group. The median TTD of each group was 176, 57, and 46 days, respectively. The cumulative TTD was significantly higher in the CSEMS group than in the plastic stent and cleaning groups (P = 0.08). From the multivariate analysis, sludge occlusion of the first CSEMS was identified as a significant risk factor for second stent dysfunction (HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.19-5.46), and placement of the second CSEMS significantly reduced the risk of dysfunction (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.79)., Conclusions: Insertion of a new CSEMS should be considered as the treatment of choice for the management of dysfunctional CSEMSs.

Background: Our retrospective study and phase I trial of gemcitabine and candesartan combination therapy suggested the inhibition of renin-angiotensin system potentially has a role in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. The aim of this multicenter phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine and candesartan combination therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer., Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically or cytologically proven advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on days 1, 8, and 15 and oral candesartan at a dose of 16 mg in normotensive patients, and 8 mg initially in hypertensive patients, with dose escalation to 16 mg allowed, from days 1 to 28, repeated every 4 weeks., Results: A total of 35 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Overall response rate and disease control rate were 11.4 % and 62.9 %. The median PFS and OS were 4.3 and 9.1 months with 1-year survival rate of 34.2 %. The median PFS was significantly longer in patients receiving 16 mg compared with 8 mg of candesartan (4.6 vs. 3.5 months, p=0.031). Major severe toxicities were neutropenia (23 %), leukopenia (17 %) and thrombocytopenia (11 %). Grade 2 hypotension was observed in 3 patients (9 %) and candesartan was discontinued in 2 patients due to hypotension. Conclusions In this multicenter phase 2 trial, gemcitabine and candesartan combination therapy was tolerable but failed to demonstrate activity against advanced pancreatic cancer. (UMIN CTR: UMIN000005580).

Background: A previous study suggested that ulinastatin effectively prevented post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and hyperenzymemia (PEH) in patients at average risk. In experimental models, risperidone, a selective serotonin 2A antagonist, ameliorated acute pancreatitis. We assessed the effect of risperidone combined with ulinastatin for the prevention of PEP in high-risk patients., Methods: In a multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase II trial, patients undergoing therapeutic ERCP were randomly assigned to receive ulinastatin (150000 U) with or without risperidone (1 mg). A risperidone tablet was taken orally 30-60 min before ERCP and ulinastatin was administered intravenously for 10 min immediately prior to ERCP. The primary end point was the incidence of PEP; secondary end points were PEH severity and enzyme levels (amylase, pancreatic amylase, lipase)., Results: A total of 226 patients (113 per group) were included in the study. Six patients in the risperidone + ulinastatin group and ten patients in the ulinastatin group developed pancreatitis (5.3 vs. 8.8 %, p = 0.438). The incidence of moderate/severe PEP was lower in the risperidone + ulinastatin group (1.8 %) than in the ulinastatin group (4.4 %), but this difference was not significant. Although the incidence of PEH did not differ significantly, post-ERCP levels of all pancreatic enzymes were significantly lower in the risperidone + ulinastatin group., Conclusions: Prophylactic oral risperidone administration in combination with ulinastatin did not reduce the incidence and severity of PEP in high-risk patients as compared with ulinastatin alone. However, risperidone showed an additive effect with ulinastatin, reducing serum pancreatic enzyme levels.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate risk factors for pancreatic stones and atrophy in autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP)., Methods: Seventy-one patients with AIP observed for more than 1 year were enrolled. The frequency of pancreatic stone development and atrophy on computed tomography as well as their risk factors were examined., Results: Pancreatic stones and atrophy were observed in 13 and 43 patients, respectively. Alcohol consumption of greater than 50 g/d was the only significant risk factor for pancreatic atrophy in univariate analysis. Alcohol intake of greater than 50 g/d was observed in 6 of 13 patients with stones and 10 of 58 patients without stones (46% vs 17%, P = 0.059). Alcohol intake of greater than 50 g/d was observed in 14 of 43 patients with atrophy and 2 of 28 patients without atrophy (33% vs 7.1%, P = 0.018). In multivariate analysis, alcohol consumption was a significant risk factor both for pancreatic stone formation (odds ratio [OR], 7.47; P = 0.040) and atrophy (OR 6.24; P = 0.034). Higher age at onset was another significant risk factor for pancreatic atrophy (OR 1.07 per year; P = 0.029)., Conclusions: Alcohol consumption of greater than 50 g/d increases the risk of pancreatic stone development and atrophy in patients with AIP.

Aim: To evaluate the chemotherapeutic outcomes and confirm the recent improvement of prognosis for unresectable biliary tract cancer., Methods: A total of 186 consecutive patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer, who had been treated with chemotherapy between 2000 and 2009 at five institutions in Japan, were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into three groups based on the year beginning chemotherapy: Group A (2000-2003), Group B (2004-2006), and Group C (2007-2009). The data were fixed at the end of December 2011. Overall survival and time-to-progression were analyzed and compared chronologically., Results: No patient characteristics were significantly different among the three groups. The gallbladder was involved in about half of the patients in each group, and metastatic biliary tract cancer was present in three quarters of the enrollees. In Group A, 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapies were primarily selected as first-line chemotherapy, and only 24% were treated with second-line chemotherapy. In Group B, gemcitabine or S-1 monotherapy was mainly introduced as first-line chemotherapy, and 51% of the patients who were refractory to first-line chemotherapy were treated with second-line chemotherapy mainly with monotherapy. In Group C, the combination therapy with gemcitabine and S-1 was mainly chosen as first-line chemotherapy, and 53% of the patients refractory to first-line chemotherapy were treated with second-line chemotherapy mainly with combination therapy. The median time-to-progressions were 4.4 mo, 3.5 mo and 5.9 mo in Groups A, B and C, respectively (4.4 mo vs 3.5 mo vs 5.9 mo, P < 0.01). The median overall survivals were 7.1, 7.3, and 11.7 mo in Groups A, B and C (7.1 mo vs 7.3 mo vs 11.7 mo, P = 0.03). Induction rates of all three drugs (gemcitabine, platinum analogs, and fluoropyrimidine) in Groups A, B and C were 4%, 2% and 27% (4% vs 2% vs 27%, P < 0.01)., Conclusion: The prognosis of unresectable biliary tract cancer has improved recently. Using three effective drugs (gemcitabine, platinum analogs, and fluoropyrimidine) may improve the prognosis of this cancer.

Aim: This retrospective study estimated the efficacy and safety of the WallFlex duodenal stent for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) in Japan., Methods: Forty-two consecutive patients with symptomatic malignant GOO were treated using WallFlex duodenal stents between January 2010 and October 2010., Results: The technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 83.3%, respectively.The median gastric outlet obstruction scoring system increased significantly, from 0 to 2, after stent placement (P < 0.01).The median survival time was 3.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.8-6.0 months), and the median eating period was 3.0 months (95% CI, 1.1-4.3 months). Re-intervention was required in 11 patients (26.2%). The complication rate was 26.2%. The major complication was stent occlusion (23.8%) by tumor ingrowth, which occurred in nine (21.4%) patients, and tumor overgrowth, which occurred in one (2.4%) patient. Stentmigration, perforation, and food impaction without stent occlusion were not observed.The median survival time of the patients with stent occlusion was 11.7 months (95% CI, 2.2 months - not reached), and the median stent patency of these patients was 4.0 months (95% CI, 0.8-4.7 months).These patients were successfully treated with additional stent insertion using a stent-in-stent procedure., Conclusion: Duodenal stent placement using a WallFlex duodenal stent was safe and effective for managing malignant GOO.This stent is an uncovered metallic stent, and the major problem was stent occlusion due to tumor ingrowth. However, the occluded stent could be corrected by inserting an additional duodenal stent., (© 2012 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2012 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Background: To evaluate the treatment outcome of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy as second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who were refractory to gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy were treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)) were administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, repeated every 3 weeks., Results: Sixty patients were included. The tumor response and disease control rates were 1.7 and 58.3%, respectively. The median overall survival and time to progression were 6.7 months (95% CI 4.9-8.1) and 3.5 months (95% CI 2.5-5.0), respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucopenia (20%), neutropenia (25%), anemia (23%), thrombocytopenia (17%), nausea (2%), anorexia (2%), and liver dysfunction (2%)., Conclusions: Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy showed moderate efficacy and safety as second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer that is refractory to gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objectives: We examined whether the presence of pancreatic cysts could be a risk for pancreatic cancer by comparing the incidence and characteristics of cysts found by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with and without pancreatic cancer., Methods: Half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement images and MR cholangiopancreatography were performed in 116 patients with pancreatic cancer (PC group) and 1226 with nonpancreatic disease (NP group). Incidence and characteristics of cysts were analyzed., Results: Pancreatic cysts were detected in 65 patients (56%) of the PC group and in 123 patients (10%) of the NP group. According to the multivariate analysis, cyst presence was a significant risk factor for pancreatic cancer (odds ratio [OR], 10.27; P < 0.01), especially cysts larger than 10 mm (OR, 4.718; P < 0.01). When the definition of cyst presence in the PC group was restricted to the 33 cases with cysts considered to have existed before the development of cancer, the incidence was still high (OR, 2.976; P < 0.01) and size remained significant (OR, 4.428; P < 0.01)., Conclusions: Patients with pancreatic cysts, especially larger than 10 mm, were considered to be at an increased risk of pancreatic cancer over the entire pancreas.

Our retrospective study showed inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system was associated with better outcomes in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine. The primary objective of this phase I study was to determine the recommended dose of candesartan in combination with gemcitabine in normotensive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Candesartan was given orally at an escalating dose (4, 8, 16, and 32 mg) q.d. daily, and gemcitabine was given 1000 mg/m(2) 30 min i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15, repeated every 4 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 hematological toxicities, grade 2 hypotension, abnormal creatinine or potassium, and grade 3 or 4 other non-hematological toxicities. A standard "3+3" phase I dose-escalation design was used. A total of 14 patients (candesartan 4 mg, three patients; 8 mg, three patients; 16 mg, six patients; 32 mg, two patients) were enrolled. One of six patients at 16 mg showed DLT of grade 4 neutropenia and two of two patients at 32 mg showed DLT of grade 2 hypotension. Response rate and disease control rate were 0% and 79%, respectively. Progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.6 and 22.9 months, respectively. Candesartan 16 mg is the recommended dose in combination with gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. (UMIN CTR: UMIN000002152)., (© 2012 Japanese Cancer Association.)

Objective: Glucose intolerance is often observed in autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), although its long-term prognosis after steroid treatment (ST) is still unclear., Methods: A total of 47 patients with AIP were enrolled. On the basis of the change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and the use of diabetic medication, prognosis was classified into 3 categories, namely, "improved," "aggravated," and "unchanged." The relation between the result of an initial glucagon tolerance test (ΔCPR) and the later use of insulin during maintenance ST was examined in 20 patients. The transitions of homeostasis model assessment β cell and insulin resistance (HOMA-β and HOMA-R) were analyzed in 16 patients., Results: Glucose tolerance was improved in 6 patients (13%), aggravated in 9 patients (19%), and unchanged in 32 patients (68%). All patients with ΔCPR less than 0.6 ng/mL were obliged to use insulin even after long-term observation, whereas all patients with ΔCPR more than 1.0 ng/mL were free from insulin therapy. Moreover, HOMA-β showed significant improvement after ST (43.9% → 56.0% in median, P = 0.030), and HOMA-R showed significant aggravation (1.30 → 1.78, P = 0.039)., Conclusions: Glucose tolerance that is too severely damaged may not recover fully even after ST. Thus, ST should be performed to preserve insulin secretion at the early stage of AIP.

Gemcitabine is widely used for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) as first-line chemotherapy. However, there is no standard chemotherapy for patient with advanced BTC refractory to gemcitabine. We conducted a multicenter phase II study of S-1 monotherapy as second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced BTC that were refractory to gemcitabine. S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) for 28 days, followed by 14 days of rest. This regimen was repeated every 6 weeks. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. Twenty-two patients were enrolled between March 2007 and January 2010, with 14 patients (64%) representing cases of recurrence after surgery. The overall response rate was 22.7%, and the overall disease control rate was 50.0%. The median overall survival time was 13.5 months (95% CI, 7.1-23.1 months) and the median time-to-progression was 5.4 months (95% CI, 2.6-17.2 months). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (5%) and anemia (5%). The most common non-hematological toxicities were nausea (27%), anorexia (55%), and pigmentation (32%). In conclusion, S-1 monotherapy is feasible and moderately efficacious second-line chemotherapy for advanced BTC.

Background: Endoscopic ultrasonography or real-time elastography has been applied for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging is another tissue strain imaging technology, and recent technological advances have enabled quantification of the stiffness of some tissues by measuring the shear wave velocity (SWV) during routine B-mode ultrasonography., Methods: ARFI elastography was performed in 52 healthy volunteers and 46 patients with chronic pancreatitis. SWV was measured in the head, body, and tail of the pancreas. The diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves., Results: SWV in patients with chronic pancreatitis was significantly higher than that in healthy volunteers in each part of the pancreas, although the measurement was difficult in the tail of the pancreas. The area under the ROC curve was 0.78 in the body of the pancreas, with an optimal cut-off value of 1.40 m/s, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 75, 72, 69, and 78%, respectively. In the patients with chronic pancreatitis, alcoholic etiology and decreased body mass index (BMI) were associated with high SWV., Conclusions: ARFI elastography of the pancreas showed high elasticity in chronic pancreatitis compared to findings in the normal pancreas. This modality is feasible to use for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.

Background: The current management of acute cholangitis consists of antibiotic therapy in combination with biliary drainage. However, the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy after the resolution of clinical symptoms by biliary drainage is unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether discontinuing antibiotic therapy for acute cholangitis immediately after the resolution of clinical symptoms, achieved by endoscopic biliary drainage, was safe and effective., Methods: This prospective study included patients with moderate and severe acute cholangitis. Cefmetazole sodium and meropenem hydrate were used as initial antibiotic therapy for patients with moderate and severe acute cholangitis, respectively. All patients underwent endoscopic biliary drainage within 24 h of diagnosis. When the body temperature of < 37 ° C was maintained for 24 h, administration of antibiotics was stopped. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of acute cholangitis within 3 days after the withdrawal of antibiotic therapy., Results: Eighteen patients were subjected to the final analysis. The causes of cholangitis were bile duct stone (n = 17) and bile duct cancer (n = 1). The severity of acute cholangitis was moderate in 14 patients and severe in 4. Body temperature of < 37 ° C was achieved in all patients after a median of 2 days (range 1-6) following endoscopic biliary drainage. Antibiotic therapy was administered for a median duration of 3 days (range 2-7). None of the patients developed recurrent cholangitis within 3 days after the withdrawal of antibiotics., Conclusions: Fever-based antibiotic therapy for acute cholangitis is safe and effective when resolution of fever is achieved following endoscopic biliary drainage.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy have been shown to have promising efficacy for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) as a first-line chemotherapy. However, this treatment has not been approved for clinical practice in Japan. Oral fluoropyrimidines (e.g., S-1 and capecitabine) are also promising agents that are widely used with or without gemcitabine. Unfortunately, there is no standard chemotherapy for patients refractory to gemcitabine and oral fluoropyrimidine. We conducted a feasibility study of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced BTC who are refractory to gemcitabine and S-1. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)) were administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, and this regimen was repeated every 3 weeks. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. Twenty patients with pathologically confirmed BTC were enrolled. Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy was administered as a second-line chemotherapy in thirteen patients and as a third-line chemotherapy in seven patients. Tumor response did not occur in any of the cases. Fourteen patients demonstrated stable diseases, and the disease control rate was 70%. Median overall survival and time-to-progression were 5.9 months (95% CI, 3.9-11.3 months) and 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.2-4.2 months), respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucopenia (35%), neutropenia (35%), anemia (20%), and thrombocytopenia (15%). Two patients treated for approximately 1 year developed cisplatin-related toxicities. In conclusion, gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy produces a limited tumor response in BTC, but may prolong patient's survival.

Background and Aim: Wire-guided cannulation (WGC) might increase the biliary cannulation rate and decrease the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). We assessed the learning curve for WGC in therapeutic biliary ERCP (study 1) and compared WGC and conventional contrast-assisted cannulation (CC) by a matched case-control study (study 2)., Methods: Prospectively collected data of 500 therapeutic biliary ERCP cases (250 consecutive cases of WGC and 250 matched controls of CC) were retrospectively studied. Rate and time of biliary cannulation, total procedure time, PEP, and hyperamylasemia were analyzed., Results: In study 1, biliary cannulation by WGC was successful in 96% of the first 50 cases, with a median time to cannulation of 3 min. Rates of hyperamylasemia were within 10% after 100 WGC. In study 2, there were no significant differences in the overall cannulation rate and PEP between WGC and CC, but the total procedure time was shorter in WGC (30 vs 35 min, P = 0.059). Rates of hyperamylasemia and the change in serum amylase levels was lower (9% vs 14%, P = 0.069, and + 62.8 U/L vs+ 169.5 U/L, P = 0.043) in WGC, which was more prominent in experienced endoscopists (9% vs 17%, P = 0.025, and + 68.9 U/L vs+ 229.3 U/L, P = 0.014)., Conclusions: The introduction of WGC was effective in the first 50 cases and did not increase the rate of PEP in biliary therapeutic ERCP., (© 2011 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Background: Obesity plays an important role in acute pancreatitis. Assuming that the volume of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) directly influences the severity of acute pancreatitis, we investigated the relationship between VAT and acute pancreatitis., Methods: Data were collected consecutively from 124 patients who were diagnosed with acute pancreatitis. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from the database. Computed tomography was performed in all patients, and VAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and waist circumference (WC) were measured at the level of the intervertebral disk between L2 and L3. Atlanta criteria were adopted to define severe acute pancreatitis. Clinical courses were investigated, and the Ranson and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) scores were calculated for all patients., Results: Forty-eight patients had severe acute pancreatitis (38.7%), and 76 were mild cases. BMI, VAT, SAT, and WC were correlated with the severity of acute pancreatitis in a univariate analysis, but only VAT had a strong correlation with severe acute pancreatitis in the multivariate analysis. In a trend analysis, not only severity but also the presence of pseudocysts (local complication) and prognostic factors (Ranson and APACHE II scores) were significantly related to VAT volume. In particular, the presence of a pancreatic pseudocyst was strongly related to VAT volume (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: In acute pancreatitis, peripancreatic VAT has a stronger correlation with severe acute pancreatitis than BMI or WC. VAT volume is strongly correlated with the formation of a pseudocyst and with systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients with acute pancreatitis and high VAT volume may lead to severe acute pancreatitis.

Background: Although the placement of self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) has been widely accepted as palliation for distal malignant biliary obstruction, the risk factors for their early dysfunction remain unclear., Objective: To identify risk factors for early (<3 months) SEMS dysfunction in unresectable pancreatic cancer., Design: A multicenter retrospective study., Setting: Five tertiary referral centers., Patients: Patients were included who underwent first-time SEMS placement for distal malignant biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic cancer between April 1994 and August 2010., Main Outcome Measurements: Rates and causes of early dysfunction were evaluated, and risk factors were analyzed., Results: In all, 317 eligible patients were identified. Covered SEMSs were placed in 82% of patients. Duodenal invasion was observed endoscopically in 37%. The median time to dysfunction was 170 days. The rates of all and early SEMS dysfunction were 55% and 31%, respectively. The major causes of SEMS dysfunction were food impaction and nonocclusion cholangitis (21% each) in early dysfunction and sludge (29%) in nonearly dysfunction. The rate of early dysfunction was 42% with duodenal invasion and 24% without duodenal invasion (P = .001). Early dysfunction caused by food impaction was more frequent in patients with duodenal invasion (10% and 4%, P = .053). Duodenal invasion was a risk factor (odds ratio 2.35; 95% CI, 1.43-3.90; P = .001) in a multiple logistic regression model., Limitations: A retrospective design., Conclusions: Duodenal invasion is a risk factor for early SEMS dysfunction in patients with pancreatic cancer., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the impact of age and comorbidity on clinical outcomes in advanced pancreatic cancer., Methods: Consecutive 237 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were studied. Comorbidity was scored by Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). We compared the clinical outcomes by age or comorbidity., Results: Sixty-nine patients were elderly (≥75 years), and CCI was 0 in 69 patients, 1 in 98, and ≥2 in 70. Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was administered in 183 patients and was well tolerated in both elderly group and in those with comorbidities. In a multivariate analysis, CCI, not age, was prognostic in addition to PS, distant metastasis, chemotherapy and CA19-9: the hazard ratios of CCI 1 and ≥2 were 1.25 and 1.55, compared with CCI 0 (p=0.027)., Conclusions: Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy can be an effective treatment, without significant toxicity, in elderly patients. Comorbidity, not age, was prognostic in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Prognostic factors for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer receiving chemotherapy are presently not well established. Gallbladder cancer and intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma are previously reported prognostic factors of poor prognosis; however, tumor volume has not been analyzed in these previous reports., Methods: We analyzed 56 consecutive patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who had received gemcitabine and S-1 combination chemotherapy as first-line palliative chemotherapy. Prognostic factors, including the baseline sum longest diameter (BSLD) representing tumor volume in Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor, were evaluated., Results: By multivariate analysis, age ≥70 (HR 3.01, 95% CI 1.25-7.31, P = 0.014) and larger BSLD (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18, P = 0.021) were statistically significant independent predictors of poor prognosis. Primary biliary site was not identified as a prognostic factor (P = 0.728). Median survival times of patients with BSLDs ≤ 9.0 cm and BSLDs > 9.0 cm were 18.7 and 8.8 months, respectively (P = 0.024)., Conclusions: Age and BSLD were identified as strong prognostic factors for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer receiving chemotherapy. Tumor volume might be more important than primary biliary site for the prognosis of advanced biliary tract cancer.