Search

Introduction: We sought to examine the utility of self-reported pain scale by comparing emergency department (ED) triage pain scores of self-reported but non-verifiable painful conditions with those of verifiable painful conditions using a large, nationally representative sample. Methods: We analyzed the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) 2015. Verifiable painful conditions were identified based on the final diagnoses in the five included International Classification of Diseases 9th revision codes. Non-verifiable painful conditions were identified by the five main reasons for visit. Only adults 18 years of age or older were included. The primary outcome variable was the pain scale from 0 to 10 at triage. We performed descriptive and multivariate analyses to investigate the relationships between the pain scale and whether the painful condition was verifiable, controlling for patient characteristics. Results: There were 55 million pain-related adult ED visits in 2015. The average pain scale was 6.49. For verifiable painful diagnoses, which were about 24% of the total visits, the average was 6.27, statistically significantly lower than that for non-verifiable painful conditions, 6.56. Even after controlling for the confounding of patient characteristics and comorbidities, verifiable painful diagnoses still presented less pain than those with non-verifiable painful complaints. Older age, female gender, and urban residents had significantly higher pain scores than their respective counterparts, controlling for other confounding factors. Psychiatric disorders were independently associated with higher pain scores by about a half point.  Conclusion: Self-reported pain scales obtained at ED triage likely have a larger psychological component than a physiological one. Close attention to clinical appropriateness and overall patient comfort are more likely to lead to better health outcomes and patient experiences than focusing on self-reported pain alone.

This paper studied smoking behavior in the context of the interactions among health, smoking, exercise and seeking medical care using a microeconomic model. Based on a dynamic optimal choice theory, a simultaneous equation system was used in the empirical estimation. This study found that smokers with longer smoking history tend to have extra incentives to maintain or improve their health. It was found that they tend to use more medical services and to be more active in exercise than smokers with shorter smoking history. Health status nonlinearly affects smoking decisions. Quitting incentives can be 'curative' or 'preventive', depending on one's health status. Light smokers' addiction is qualitatively and quantitatively different from heavy smokers'. Keywords: Addiction; Smoking behavior; Exercise; Medical services; Dynamic model

Abstract Background Although tobacco use in the United States has declined over the past 20 years, cigarette use among college students remains high. Additional research is thus needed to determine how university tobacco control policies and preventive education programs affect college students' smoking behaviors. Methods Approximately 13,000 undergraduate students at 12 universities or colleges in the state of Texas completed a web-based survey. College smoking policies were obtained from a survey of college administrators and from college websites. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the effects of individual smoking policies and programs on the odds of cigarette smoking. Results Of the individual programs, only having a preventive education program on campus was associated with lower odds of smoking. The existence of smoking cessation programs and designated smoking areas were associated with higher odds of smoking. Policies governing the sale and distribution of cigarettes were insignificantly associated with smoking. Conclusion Rather than focusing on policies restricting cigarette sales and use, college administrators should consider implementing or expanding tobacco prevention and education programs to further reduce student smoking rates.

Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Background: Prior research reveals that overweight patients have higher emergency department (ED) utilization rates, longer length of stay, and face increased misdiagnosis risk., Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between obesity and ED patient satisfaction., Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study. A convenience sample of inner-city ED patients completed a written survey, then rated overall satisfaction with ED care (10-point scale), and rated components of satisfaction (4-point scale; never to always). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using triage records (obesity = BMI >30)., Results: Five hundred and sixty-four patients were included in the study group (50.5%: obese, 55.4%: female, mean age: 43.2 ± 25.4 years). With respect to overall visit satisfaction (rating 8 or greater on 10-point scale), bivariate analysis revealed no differences between nonobese versus obese patients (74.6% vs. 73.9%; P = 0.85). There were no significant differences for score of 4 (always) for components of ED satisfaction: physician courtesy (87.9% vs. 90.4%; P = 0.34), nurse courtesy/respect (89.2% vs. 88.7%; P = 0.87), doctor listened (85.4% vs. 87.1%; P = 0.5), doctor explained (80.2% vs. 85.0%; P = 0.14), and recommend to friend (72.5% vs. 81.1%; P = 0.02). Within our multivariate model, obesity was not associated with overall satisfaction (scores of 8 or greater) ( P = 0.97; odds ratio = 0.99 [95% confidence interval = 0.65-1.5])., Conclusions: Despite research that suggests that overweight patients have characteristics of their ED visit that might increase dissatisfaction risk, we found no difference in satisfaction scores between nonobese and obese patients., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the costs, characteristics, and outcomes of patients brought to a Texas trauma center emergenct department after apprehension by Border Patrol (BP)/Immigration and Customs Enforcement (BP/ICE)., Materials and Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a trauma registry/financial records (1/1/11-12/31/14). Data were extracted utilizing a structured form. A multivariate ordinary least square was estimated to identify variables associated with hospital charges., Results: A total of 128 patients were enrolled as the study group; mean age was 28.6 ± 6 years, 20.3% were female, 100% were Hispanic, the most common mechanism of injury (MOI) was motor vehicle crash (75%), and mean charge was $162,152 ± $295,441. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 13.2 ± 29.8 days; 92.2% survived to discharge. Bivariate analysis revealed that MOI differed by gender ( P = 0.021). In the multivariate analysis, the only variable that associated with increased charge was LOS. Total charges for the 128 patients were $20.6M, total costs were $4.5M, and total payments were $0.99M., Conclusions: Undocumented immigrants apprehended by BP/ICE and brought to our trauma center utilized significant health-care resources., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Objectives: To quantify potential cost-savings associated with better compliance with the guidelines of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure UNC V) and to determine whether suboptimal utilization of medications is associated with higher costs for other health services., Study Design: Secondary data analysis using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) conducted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Center for Health Statistics. A complex sampling design was used to provide nationally representative estimates., Methods: From interviews with a population-based and nationally representative sample of 22 601 individuals, 1588 patients with essential hypertension without other comorbid cardiovascular conditions were selected, representing 19.6 million patients in the United States in 1996. All medical treatments for essential hypertension in 1996 were extracted from the MEPS. Using the JNC V guidelines, prescriptions used in treating essential hypertension were categorized into first-line drugs (diuretics and beta-blockers), second-line drugs (calcium-channel blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors), and third-line (nonrecommended) drugs. Nonprescription expenditures were calculated. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine whether use of the first-line drugs was associated with cost-savings., Results: Compliance rate with the JNC guidelines was low. About 36%, 67%, and 87% of patients in the nation received first-, second-, and third-line drugs, respectively, at some point during 1996. Prescription expenditure constituted more than 67% of the total expenditures for treating essential hypertension. The use of first-line drugs (vs second-line drugs) was associated with expenditures that were dollar 2.6 billion to dollar 3.2 billion lower., Conclusions: Compliance with the JNC guidelines for treating essential hypertension may reduce the costs of prescriptions and other medical services. Raising awareness of the JNC guidelines is crucial to achieve cost effectiveness in choosing treatment alternatives.