Search

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are an urgent global public health problem. CRE infections are associated with high mortality and have limited available effective treatment. Carbapenemase enzymes are encoded by genes on mobile genetic elements, such as plasmids, which are highly transmissible between organisms and increase the potential spread of resistance. The study aim was to detect carbapenemase production in Gram negative bacilli by phenotypic (CarbaNP and mCIM only or in conjunction with eCIM) and genotypic (Xpert Carba-R) methods. Material and methods: The various clinical samples were processed as per standard recommended procedures. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility test were done by using GN cards and AST N280 & AST N281 cards of Vitek 2 Compact (bioMérieux) respectively. Phenotypic (CarbaNP and mCIM only or in conjunction with eCIM) and genotypic (Xpert Carba-R) methods were used for detection of carbapenemases. Result: 144 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli isolated from various ICUs includes Klebsiella pneumoniae 52.7% (76/144) followed by Escherichia coli 18.05% (26/144) and 15.9% (23/144) Acinetobacter baumannii. Phenotypic test (CarbaNP and mCIM and or in conjunction with eCIM) showed sensitivity of 90%, 100% and 93.75% respectively. Genotypic test of 40 isolates showed predominant expression of NDM in 82.5% (33/40) isolates followed by OXA-48 in 40% (16/40). Conclusion: The study showed mCIM as the most useful diagnostic test with less economic burden to the patients. There is an urgent need for more sensitive, rapid, highly precise and accurate genotypic test which is less expensive and less labor-intensive.

Yuqiao Xu,1,2,* Weijuan Song,1,2,* Peijun Huang,1,2 Yaning Mei,1,2 Yan Zhang,1,2 Ting Xu1,2 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China; 2Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Yan Zhang; Ting Xu, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Guangzhou Street No. 300, Nanjing, 210029, People’s Republic of China, Tel +8625-6830-6287, Fax +8625- 8372-4440, Email 67658837@qq.com; xu_ting@sina.comObjective: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the performance of Xpert Carba-R for the direct detection and identification of carbapenemase genes from positive blood cultures.Methods: Pathogens which extracted from positive blood cultures and identified using MALDI-TOF MS as Enterobacterales were included in this study. Xpert Carba-R was used for the rapid detection of carbapenemase genes from positive blood cultures. NG-Test CARBA 5 and polymerase-chain reaction (PCR) sequencing were used for the detection of carbapenemases and carbapenemase genes in positive blood culture isolates, respectively. Finally, antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted using the VITEK-2 Compact system.Results: A total of 133 positive blood cultures of Enterobacterales were collected and 27 of them were detected to carry carbapenemase genes using Xpert Carba-R. In comparison with PCR sequencing results, the sensitivity and specificity of Xpert Carba-R and NG-Test CARBA 5 were calculated as 100%. Additionally, Xpert Carba-R could significantly shorten the turnaround time by directly detecting positive blood cultures comparing with NG-Test CARBA 5. For 27 carbapenem-producing strains, the resistance rates of carbapenems and aztreonam were 96.3% and 92.6%, respectively. Strains carrying the blaKPC gene were all sensitive to ceftazidime–avibactam. All strains were sensitive to tigecycline and colistin.Conclusion: Xpert Carba-R is suitable for the rapid detection of main carbapenemase genes from positive blood cultures with high sensitivity and specificity. In comparison with NG-Test CARBA 5 and PCR sequencing methods, the timely and convenient method can be a useful test to guide optimal therapy and infection control.Keywords: carbapenemase genes, positive blood culture, rapid detection, Xpert Carba-R

Objective The performance of Xpert Carba-R assay for the direct identification of carbapenemases directly from positive blood culture vials was evaluated. Materials and Methods In total, 176 positively flagged blood culture vials, yielding carbapenem-resistant GNB (CR-GNB), were enrolled for the detection and differentiation of blaKPC, blaNDM, blaVIM, blaOXA-48, and blaIMP using Xpert Carba-R. Results Klebsiella pneumoniae (76/176, 43.1%), Acinetobacter baumannii complex (67/176, 38%), and Escherichia coli (29/176,16.4%) were the predominant isolates. Overall, NDM production was the commonest (61/176, 34.6%), followed by the co-production of NDM + OXA-48 and the absence of any CR gene (44/176, 25%), followed by OXA-48 (27/176, 15.3%). In CR K. pneumoniae, the co-production of NDM + OXA-48 was most frequent (34/76, 44.7%), whereas in the A. baumannii complex, no CR gene was detected in the majority of isolates (38/67, 56.7%). bla NDM was the commonest gene in E. coli (18/29, 62%) and A. baumannii complex (26/67, 38.8%). Conclusion Xpert Carba-R can identify the molecular mechanism of CR within hours after a blood culture turns positive and, thus, has the potential for optimization of antimicrobial therapy, choosing appropriate novel β-lactam combination agents, as well as infection control interventions.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are increasingly recognized as an urgent public health concern. The rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemases could provide insights into antimicrobial therapy and infection control. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of three different methods, including the NG-test Carba 5, colloidal gold immunoassay (CGI) test, and Xpert Carba-R assay, for the rapid detection of five carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, IMP, OXA-48, and VIM). A total of 207 Gram-negative strains collected from patients and hospital sewages were tested. The presence or absence of carbapenemase genes in the whole-genome sequences was used as the gold standard for evaluating the accuracy of the above-mentioned three methods. Among the 192 strains carrying only one carbapenemase gene, the accuracies of the NG-Test Carba 5, CGI test, and Xpert Carba-R were 96.88% (95% CI, 93.01–98.72%), 96.88% (95% CI, 93.01–98.72%), and 97.92% (95% CI, 94.41–99.33%), respectively. Xpert Carba-R was able to detect all 13 types of KPC variants, including KPC-2, KPC-3, KPC-25, KPC-33, KPC-35, KPC-51, KPC-52, KPC-71, KPC-76, KPC-77, KPC-78, KPC-93, and KPC-123, with a detection sensitivity of 100.00% (95% CI, 96.50–100.00%), a specificity of 100.00% (95% CI, 92.38–100.00%), and a κ index of 1.00. For IMP, Carba 5 was superior to the other two methods, with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 71.66–100.00%), a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 97.38–100.00%), and a κ index of 1.00. For the remaining 15 strains carrying two or three kinds of carbapenemase genes, Carba 5 performed the best, which accurately identified all the target genes, followed by Xpert Carba-R (12/15, 80.00%) and the CGI test (10/15, 66.67%). Therefore, all three assays demonstrated reliable performances in carbapenemase detection, and Xpert Carba-R should be recommended for the detection of KPC variants, especially for patients at a high risk of infections caused by ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant strains. IMPORTANCE: CRE was listed as one of the top three pathogens that are in critical need of new antibiotics by the WHO. The rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemases is important for antimicrobial therapy and infection control. In recent years, new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations such as ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to cope with CRE challenges. CZA was effective against class A, class C, and some class D enzymes such as OXA-48-like. However, CZA-resistant KPC variants emerged at an alarming speed, which posed a new challenge for the accurate identification of KPC variants. In this study, we evaluated the performance of two lateral flow immunochromatographic assays, namely, NG-test Carba 5 and the CGI test, and the automated real-time quantitative PCR Xpert Carba-R in the rapid detection of carbapenemases. Notably, 13 types of KPC variants were enrolled in this study, which covered most KPC variants discovered in China. Carba-R was superior to NG-teat Carba 5 and the CGI test; it was able to detect all of the included KPC variants, including KPC-2, KPC-3, KPC-25, KPC-33, KPC-35, KPC-51, KPC-52, KPC-71, KPC-76, KPC-77, KPC-78, KPC-93, and KPC-123. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study evaluated the performance of the Xpert Carba-R assay for detecting the five common carbapenemases in carbapenemase-producing organisms in Johannesburg, South Africa between April 2021 and September 2021. The assay demonstrated 98% sensitivity and 97% specificity. It was also able to detect all the carbapenemases in double carbapenemase producers, as well as carbapenemases in non-fermenter organisms. The Xpert Carba-R assay, therefore, allows the rapid (< 1 h) and accurate identification of the common carbapenemases in pure bacterial cultures and rectal swabs. This assay can aid in the timeous institution of appropriate treatment and infection prevention and control measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study evaluated the performance of the Xpert Carba-R assay for detecting the five common carbapenemases in carbapenemase-producing organisms in Johannesburg, South Africa between April 2021 and September 2021. The assay demonstrated 98% sensitivity and 97% specificity. It was also able to detect all the carbapenemases in double carbapenemase producers, as well as carbapenemases in non-fermenter organisms. The Xpert Carba-R assay, therefore, allows the rapid ( 1 h) and accurate identification of the common carbapenemases in pure bacterial cultures and rectal swabs. This assay can aid in the timeous institution of appropriate treatment and infection prevention and control measures.

Objective The performance of Xpert Carba-R assay for the direct identification of carbapenemases directly from positive blood culture vials was evaluated. Materials and Methods In total, 176 positively flagged blood culture vials, yielding carbapenem-resistant GNB (CR-GNB), were enrolled for the detection and differentiation of blaKPC, blaNDM, blaVIM, blaOXA-48, and blaIMP using Xpert Carba-R. Results Klebsiella pneumoniae (76/176, 43.1%), Acinetobacter baumannii complex (67/176, 38%), and Escherichia coli (29/176,16.4%) were the predominant isolates. Overall, NDM production was the commonest (61/176, 34.6%), followed by the co-production of NDM + OXA-48 and the absence of any CR gene (44/176, 25%), followed by OXA-48 (27/176, 15.3%). In CR K. pneumoniae , the co-production of NDM + OXA-48 was most frequent (34/76, 44.7%), whereas in the A. baumannii complex , no CR gene was detected in the majority of isolates (38/67, 56.7%). bla NDM was the commonest gene in E. coli (18/29, 62%) and A. baumannii complex (26/67, 38.8%). Conclusion Xpert Carba-R can identify the molecular mechanism of CR within hours after a blood culture turns positive and, thus, has the potential for optimization of antimicrobial therapy, choosing appropriate novel β-lactam combination agents, as well as infection control interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Prompt and accurate identification of carbapenemase production is essential for appropriate treatment and infection control. NG-Test Carba 5 (termed herein “Carba 5”; NG Biotech, Guipry, France) is a multiplex immunochromatographic assay for the rapid phenotypic identification of five major carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48-like) from bacterial isolates. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Carba 5 and its impact on the turn-around-time in a clinical microbiology laboratory. Results Carba 5 was retrospectively evaluated using 78 carbapenemase producers and 23 non-carbapenemase producers confirmed by PCR and sequencing. The performance and time required for carbapenemase identification were prospectively evaluated using 47 carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates, and the results were compared to those obtained using Xpert Carba-R (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). For the bacterial isolates included in retrospective and prospective evaluation, the Carba 5 assay correctly identified 147 isolates except one isolate with a sensitivity of 99.13% (95% CI 95.25–99.98%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 89.42–100%). The Carba 5 assay missed one VIM-1 among 13 VIM producers. The assay showed a sensitivity of 92.31% (95% CI 63.97–99.81%) for detecting VIM and 100% for detecting KPC, NDM, OXA-48-like, and IMP. Compared to the Xpert Carba-R assay, Carba 5 exhibited 100% agreement and was more time-efficient (median time 24 min vs. 1 h 11 min). Conclusions The Carba 5 assay has potential as an alternative to molecular methods for detecting major carbapenemases from bacterial isolates in a clinical microbiology laboratory. Compared to the Xpert Carba-R, Carba 5 turns out to be more affordable and time-efficient while showing a comparable performance, and may accelerate therapeutic and infection control decisions.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are increasingly recognized as an urgent public health concern. The rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemases could provide insights into antimicrobial therapy and infection control. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of three different methods, including the NG-test Carba 5, colloidal gold immunoassay (CGI) test, and Xpert Carba-R assay, for the rapid detection of five carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, IMP, OXA-48, and VIM). A total of 207 Gram-negative strains collected from patients and hospital sewages were tested. The presence or absence of carbapenemase genes in the whole-genome sequences was used as the gold standard for evaluating the accuracy of the above-mentioned three methods. Among the 192 strains carrying only one carbapenemase gene, the accuracies of the NG-Test Carba 5, CGI test, and Xpert Carba-R were 96.88% (95% CI, 93.01–98.72%), 96.88% (95% CI, 93.01–98.72%), and 97.92% (95% CI, 94.41–99.33%), respectively. Xpert Carba-R was able to detect all 13 types of KPC variants, including KPC-2, KPC-3, KPC-25, KPC-33, KPC-35, KPC-51, KPC-52, KPC-71, KPC-76, KPC-77, KPC-78, KPC-93, and KPC-123, with a detection sensitivity of 100.00% (95% CI, 96.50–100.00%), a specificity of 100.00% (95% CI, 92.38–100.00%), and a κ index of 1.00. For IMP, Carba 5 was superior to the other two methods, with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 71.66–100.00%), a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 97.38–100.00%), and a κ index of 1.00. For the remaining 15 strains carrying two or three kinds of carbapenemase genes, Carba 5 performed the best, which accurately identified all the target genes, followed by Xpert Carba-R (12/15, 80.00%) and the CGI test (10/15, 66.67%). Therefore, all three assays demonstrated reliable performances in carbapenemase detection, and Xpert Carba-R should be recommended for the detection of KPC variants, especially for patients at a high risk of infections caused by ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant strains. IMPORTANCE: CRE was listed as one of the top three pathogens that are in critical need of new antibiotics by the WHO. The rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemases is important for antimicrobial therapy and infection control. In recent years, new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations such as ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to cope with CRE challenges. CZA was effective against class A, class C, and some class D enzymes such as OXA-48-like. However, CZA-resistant KPC variants emerged at an alarming speed, which posed a new challenge for the accurate identification of KPC variants. In this study, we evaluated the performance of two lateral flow immunochromatographic assays, namely, NG-test Carba 5 and the CGI test, and the automated real-time quantitative PCR Xpert Carba-R in the rapid detection of carbapenemases. Notably, 13 types of KPC variants were enrolled in this study, which covered most KPC variants discovered in China. Carba-R was superior to NG-teat Carba 5 and the CGI test; it was able to detect all of the included KPC variants, including KPC-2, KPC-3, KPC-25, KPC-33, KPC-35, KPC-51, KPC-52, KPC-71, KPC-76, KPC-77, KPC-78, KPC-93, and KPC-123.

ABSTRACT Decreased susceptibility to carbapenems in Enterobacterales is an emerging concern. Conventional methods with short turnaround times are crucial for therapeutic decisions and infection control. In the current study, we used the Xpert CARBA-R (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and the NG-Test CARBA 5 (NG Biotech, Guipry, France) assays for carbapenemase detection in 214 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) blood isolates. We used the modified carbapenem inactivation method, conventional PCR, and sequencing to determine the production of five common carbapenemase families and their subtypes. We performed wzc-genotyping for all CR-Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and multilocus sequence typing for all carbapenemase-producing CRE isolates to reveal their genetic relatedness. The results showed a sensitivity of 99.8% and a specificity of 100% by the Xpert assay, and a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99% by the NG-Test in detecting carbapenemases of 84 CRKP isolates with only one (VIM-1+IMP-8) failure in both tests. For CR-Escherichia coli, four carbapenemase-producing isolates were detected accurately for their subtypes. The two major clones of carbapenemase-producing CRKP isolates in Taiwan were ST11-K47 producing KPC-2 (n = 47) and ST11-K64 producing OXA-48-like (n = 9). Our results support the use of either test in routine laboratories for the rapid detection of common carbapenemases. Caution should be taken using the Xpert assay in areas with a high prevalence of CRE carrying blaIMP-8. IMPORTANCE Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are emerging worldwide, causing nosocomial outbreaks and even community-acquired infections since their appearance 2 decades ago. Our previous national surveillance of CPE isolates in Taiwan identified five carbapenemase families (KPC, OXA, NDM, VIM, and IMP) with the KPC-2 and OXA-48-like types predominant. Timely detection and classification of carbapenemases in CPE may be a useful test to guide optimal therapy and infection control. Genetic detection methods using the Xpert CARBA-R assay and the immunochromatographic assay using the NG-Test CARBA 5 have been validated with the advantage of short turnaround time. Our study demonstrated that the NG and Xpert assays are convenient methods to accurately identify carbapenemases in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli blood isolates. Detecting IMP variants remains challenging, and the results of Xpert CARBA-R assay should be carefully interpreted.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of CHROMagar™ KPC compared with Xpert® Carba-R assay for the detection of carbapenem-resistant bacterial isolates from rectal swabs. Methods: Rectal swabs were obtained from patients admitted to Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates) over a period of 7 months and were screened for carbapenem resistance by either culture on CHROMagar KPC or carbapenemase production using the Xpert Carba-R molecular method. Further testing for carbapenem susceptibility of isolates recovered from CHROMagar KPC was performed using VITEK®2. Results: A total of 1813 rectal swabs were screened, of which 61 (3.4%) were positive for carbapenem resistance by either one or both methods. Both methods were equally efficient in detecting carbapenem resistance in 37/61 swabs (60.7%), mostly positive for Klebsiella pneumoniae (22 isolates), of which 40.9% (9/22) carried blaOXA-48-like and blaNDM. Xpert Carba-R assay detected 12 additional swabs with negative CHROMagar KPC culture and revealed additional carbapenemase-producing organisms carrying blaOXA-48-like and/or blaNDM. CHROMagar KPC recovered organisms in nine swabs not detected by the genotypic method, 44.4% of which were K. pneumoniae. Three swabs yielded false-positive results (carbapenem-susceptible organisms) by both methods. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 75.4% and 99.8% for CHROMagar KPC and 80% and 99.8% for Xpert Carba-R. Conclusion: This comparative study of CHROMagar KPC versus Xpert Carba-R in rectal swabs showed a slightly higher sensitivity for the PCR-based method. Whilst CHROMagar KPC provides a less expensive screening method, Xpert Carba-R may be more accurate and faster.

Background: Prompt and accurate identification of carbapenemase production is essential for appropriate treatment and infection control. NG-Test Carba 5 (termed herein "Carba 5"; NG Biotech, Guipry, France) is a multiplex immunochromatographic assay for the rapid phenotypic identification of five major carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48-like) from bacterial isolates. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Carba 5 and its impact on the turn-around-time in a clinical microbiology laboratory. Results: Carba 5 was retrospectively evaluated using 78 carbapenemase producers and 23 non-carbapenemase producers confirmed by PCR and sequencing. The performance and time required for carbapenemase identification were prospectively evaluated using 47 carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates, and the results were compared to those obtained using Xpert Carba-R (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). For the bacterial isolates included in retrospective and prospective evaluation, the Carba 5 assay correctly identified 147 isolates except one isolate with a sensitivity of 99.13% (95% CI 95.25–99.98%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 89.42–100%). The Carba 5 assay missed one VIM-1 among 13 VIM producers. The assay showed a sensitivity of 92.31% (95% CI 63.97–99.81%) for detecting VIM and 100% for detecting KPC, NDM, OXA-48-like, and IMP. Compared to the Xpert Carba-R assay, Carba 5 exhibited 100% agreement and was more time-efficient (median time 24 min vs. 1 h 11 min). Conclusions: The Carba 5 assay has potential as an alternative to molecular methods for detecting major carbapenemases from bacterial isolates in a clinical microbiology laboratory. Compared to the Xpert Carba-R, Carba 5 turns out to be more affordable and time-efficient while showing a comparable performance, and may accelerate therapeutic and infection control decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The real-time PCR assay Xpert Carba-R and the lateral flow immunoassay NG-Test CARBA5 were developed to detect 5 types of carbapenemase genes (bla IMP , bla KPC , bla VIM , bla OXA-48 , and bla NDM). We compared the diagnostic performance, turn-around time, and cost of these assays. Carbapenemase genes were defined using the Carba NP test, modified Carbapenem Inactivation Methods (mCIM), multiplex PCR, and whole-genome sequencing. We included clinical Enterobacterales isolates (n = 36) and nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli isolates (n = 17) collected from 16 acute-care hospitals in the Kinki region of Japan. Twenty-six of these 53 isolates were positive according to both of the Carba NP test and mCIM and, contained the following carbapenemase genes: bla IMP-1 (n = 3), bla IMP-6 (n = 1), bla IMP-19 (n = 12), bla IMP-26 (n = 1), bla IMP-41 (n = 2), bla IMP-66 (n = 2), bla NDM-1 (n = 3), and bla VIM-2 (n = 2). All of the remaining 27 isolates were negative according to the Carba NP test, mCIM, and multiplex PCR. The specificities of both assays were 100%. The sensitivity of the Xpert Carba-R assay was as low as 53.8% and that of the NG-Test CARBA5 was 92.3% because the former failed to detect all isolates with bla IMP-19 (n = 12) and the latter failed to detect isolates with bla IMP-66 (n = 2). Both assays can easily be performed in less than 5 min. The NG-Test CARBA5 assay was superior with regard to assay time and cost per sample. We propose the use of the NG-Test CARBA5 assay in clinical laboratories where IMP-type carbapenemases are endemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

NG-Test CARBA 5 (NG-Biotech) is a rapid in vitro multiplex immunoassay for the phenotypic detection and differentiation of the "big five" carbapenemase families (KPC, OXA-48-like, VIM, IMP, and NDM). Version 2 of this assay was evaluated alongside the Xpert Carba-R assay (Cepheid, Inc.), the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), and the CIMTris assay, with a collection of carbapenem-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli comprising 138 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 97 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used as the reference standard. For P. aeruginosa , NG-Test CARBA 5 produced an overall percentage agreement (OPA) with WGS of 97.1%, compared with 92.8% forXpert Carba-R and 90.6% for mCIM. For A. baumannii , as OXA-type carbapenemases (non-OXA-48) are not included, both the NG-Test CARBA 5 and Xpert Carba-R only had an OPA of 6.2%, while the CIMTris performed well with an OPA of 99.0%. The majority of A. baumannii isolates (95.9%) tested falsely positive for IMP on NG-Test CARBA 5; no IMP genes were found on WGS. No clear cause was found for this phenomenon; a cross-reacting protein antigen unique to A. baumannii is a possible culprit. NG-Test CARBA 5 performed well for carbapenemase detection in P. aeruginosa . However, results from A. baumannii isolates should be interpreted with caution., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

We compared the performance of 2 automated systems for detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae , BD MAX Check-Points CPO (CPO assay) and Xpert Carba-R assay, with culture confirmed by polymerase chain reaction as the reference method. Using 867 samples from 627 patients, the overall sensitivity, specificity, total positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the CPO assay were 95.7%, 96.5%, 60.8% and 99.8% and for the Xpert assay were 97.9%, 99.8%, 95.8%, and 99.9%, respectively. The cycle threshold values (Ct value) of the false-positive CPO assay results were significantly higher than those of true-positive cases (P < 0.001). By applying a modified cut-off Ct value of 37.3 for klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC), the positive predictive value for KPC was improved from 52.9% to 89.5%. The CPO assay will be useful when handling many specimens, as tests are conducted in batches. However, positive cases showing high Ct values should be confirmed by another assay to rule out false positivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Decreased susceptibility to carbapenems in Enterobacterales is an emerging concern. Conventional methods with short turnaround times are crucial for therapeutic decisions and infection control. In the current study, we used the Xpert CARBA-R (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and the NG-Test CARBA 5 (NG Biotech, Guipry, France) assays for carbapenemase detection in 214 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) blood isolates. We used the modified carbapenem inactivation method, conventional PCR, and sequencing to determine the production of five common carbapenemase families and their subtypes. We performed wzc -genotyping for all CR-Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and multilocus sequence typing for all carbapenemase-producing CRE isolates to reveal their genetic relatedness. The results showed a sensitivity of 99.8% and a specificity of 100% by the Xpert assay, and a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99% by the NG-Test in detecting carbapenemases of 84 CRKP isolates with only one (VIM-1+IMP-8) failure in both tests. For CR-Escherichia coli, four carbapenemase-producing isolates were detected accurately for their subtypes. The two major clones of carbapenemase-producing CRKP isolates in Taiwan were ST11-K47 producing KPC-2 ( n  = 47) and ST11-K64 producing OXA-48-like ( n  = 9). Our results support the use of either test in routine laboratories for the rapid detection of common carbapenemases. Caution should be taken using the Xpert assay in areas with a high prevalence of CRE carrying bla IMP-8 . IMPORTANCE (CPE) are emerging worldwide, causing nosocomial outbreaks and even community-acquired infections since their appearance 2 decades ago. Our previous national surveillance of CPE isolates in Taiwan identified five carbapenemase families (KPC, OXA, NDM, VIM, and IMP) with the KPC-2 and OXA-48-like types predominant. Timely detection and classification of carbapenemases in CPE may be a useful test to guide optimal therapy and infection control. Genetic detection methods using the Xpert CARBA-R assay and the immunochromatographic assay using the NG-Test CARBA 5 have been validated with the advantage of short turnaround time. Our study demonstrated that the NG and Xpert assays are convenient methods to accurately identify carbapenemases in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli blood isolates. Detecting IMP variants remains challenging, and the results of Xpert CARBA-R assay should be carefully interpreted.Enterobacterales (CPE) are emerging worldwide, causing nosocomial outbreaks and even community-acquired infections since their appearance 2 decades ago. Our previous national surveillance of CPE isolates in Taiwan identified five carbapenemase families (KPC, OXA, NDM, VIM, and IMP) with the KPC-2 and OXA-48-like types predominant. Timely detection and classification of carbapenemases in CPE may be a useful test to guide optimal therapy and infection control. Genetic detection methods using the Xpert CARBA-R assay and the immunochromatographic assay using the NG-Test CARBA 5 have been validated with the advantage of short turnaround time. Our study demonstrated that the NG and Xpert assays are convenient methods to accurately identify carbapenemases in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli blood isolates. Detecting IMP variants remains challenging, and the results of Xpert CARBA-R assay should be carefully interpreted.

• Novel DNA extraction method using FTA card can be applied for rectal swab specimens. • LAMP assay for detecting five (KPC, NDM, OXA, IMP, VIM) carbapenemase genes. • Combination of novel DNA extraction method and LAMP will be useful in POCT setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

NG-Test Carba 5 is a rapid in vitro multiplex immunoassay for the phenotypic detection and differentiation of five common carbapenemase families (KPC, OXA-48-like, VIM, IMP, and NDM) directly from bacterial colonies. The assay is simple to perform and has recently received U.S. Food and Drug Administration clearance. A method comparison study was performed at geographically diverse medical centers ( n  = 3) in the United States, where 309 Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were evaluated by NG-Test Carba 5 (NG Biotech, Guipry, France), the Xpert Carba-R assay (Cepheid, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA), the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), the EDTA-modified carbapenem inactivation method, and disk diffusion with carbapenems. Colonies from tryptic soy agar with 5% sheep blood (blood agar) and MacConkey agar were tested, and the results were compared to those obtained by a composite reference method. Additionally, a fourth medical center performed a medium comparison study by evaluating the performance characteristics of NG-Test Carba 5 from blood, MacConkey, and Mueller-Hinton agars with 110 isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa These results were compared to the expected genotypic and mCIM results. For the multicenter method comparison study, the overall positive percent agreement (PPA) and the overall negative percent agreement (NPA) of NG-Test Carba 5 with the composite reference method were 100% for both blood and MacConkey agars. The medium comparison study at the fourth site showed that the PPA ranged from 98.9% to 100% and that the NPA ranged from 95.2% to 100% for blood, MacConkey, and Mueller-Hinton agars. NG-Test Carba 5 accurately detected and differentiated five common carbapenemase families from Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa colonies on commonly used agar media. The results of this test will support a streamlined laboratory work flow and will expedite therapeutic and infection control decisions., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.)

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of CHROMagar™ KPC compared with Xpert® Carba-R assay for the detection of carbapenem-resistant bacterial isolates from rectal swabs., Methods: Rectal swabs were obtained from patients admitted to Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates) over a period of 7 months and were screened for carbapenem resistance by either culture on CHROMagar KPC or carbapenemase production using the Xpert Carba-R molecular method. Further testing for carbapenem susceptibility of isolates recovered from CHROMagar KPC was performed using VITEK®2., Results: A total of 1813 rectal swabs were screened, of which 61 (3.4%) were positive for carbapenem resistance by either one or both methods. Both methods were equally efficient in detecting carbapenem resistance in 37/61 swabs (60.7%), mostly positive for Klebsiella pneumoniae (22 isolates), of which 40.9% (9/22) carried bla OXA-48-like and bla NDM . Xpert Carba-R assay detected 12 additional swabs with negative CHROMagar KPC culture and revealed additional carbapenemase-producing organisms carrying bla OXA-48-like and/or bla NDM . CHROMagar KPC recovered organisms in nine swabs not detected by the genotypic method, 44.4% of which were K. pneumoniae. Three swabs yielded false-positive results (carbapenem-susceptible organisms) by both methods. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 75.4% and 99.8% for CHROMagar KPC and 80% and 99.8% for Xpert Carba-R., Conclusion: This comparative study of CHROMagar KPC versus Xpert Carba-R in rectal swabs showed a slightly higher sensitivity for the PCR-based method. Whilst CHROMagar KPC provides a less expensive screening method, Xpert Carba-R may be more accurate and faster., (Copyright © 2019 International Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) are rapidly disseminating worldwide, and their presence in tertiary care hospitals poses a significant threat to the management of nosocomial infections. There is a need to control CPO, especially in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, because these organisms are resistant to most β-lactam antibiotics and are easily transmitted. At present, the identification of CPO is time-consuming; hence, this study focused on the use of the Xpert CARBA-R assay (Cepheid, USA) to determine intestinal colonization rates of CPO in patients admitted to the ICU of a tertiary care hospital in Korea. Forty clinical stool samples were collected and inoculated both in a CARBA-R cartridge and in conventional culture plates. The CARBA-R assay required only ~one hour to screen CPO, while the time required for conventional culture was over three days. We also found that the prevalences of intestinal colonization by carbapenem-resistant organisms and Enterobacteriaceae were 17.5% (7 out of 40) and 7.5% (3 out of 40), respectively. Among the colonizing strains, three that contained carbapenemase, including Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemase (KPC), and imipenem (IMP) and Verona integron-mediated metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) were found. With its convenience, the Xpert CARBA-R assay can be included in CPO surveillance strategies.