Search

Abstract This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combining radiomic and genomic models in predicting the long-term prognosis of patients with lung cancer and to contribute to the further exploration of radiomics. This study retrieved comprehensive literature from multiple databases, including radiomics and genomics, to study the prognosis of lung cancer. The model construction consisted of the radiomic and genomic methods. A comprehensive bias assessment was conducted, including risk assessment and model performance indicators. Ten studies between 2016 and 2023 were analyzed. Studies were mostly retrospective. Patient cohorts varied in size and characteristics, with the number of patients ranging from 79 to 315. The construction of the model involves various radiomic and genotic datasets, and most models show promising prediction performance with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.64 to 0.94 and the concordance index (C-index) values from 0.28 to 0.80. The combination model typically outperforms the single method model, indicating higher prediction accuracy and the highest AUC was 0.99. Combining radiomics and genomics in the prognostic model of lung cancer may improve the predictive performance. However, further research on standardized data and larger cohorts is needed to validate and integrate these findings into clinical practice. Critical relevance statement The combination of radiomics and genomics in the prognostic model of lung cancer improved prediction accuracy in most included studies. Key Points The combination of radiomics and genomics can improve model performance in most studies. The results of establishing prognosis models by different methods are discussed. The combination of radiomics and genomics may be helpful to provide better treatment for patients. Graphical Abstract

Abstract Background and purpose The persistent progression of pneumonia is a critical determinant of adverse outcomes in patients afflicted with COVID-19. This study aimed to predict personalized COVID-19 pneumonia progression between the duration of two weeks and 1 month after admission by integrating radiological and clinical features. Methods A retrospective analysis, approved by the Institutional Review Board, encompassed patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia between December 2022 and February 2023. The cohort was divided into training and validation groups in a 7:3 ratio. A trained multi-task U-Net network was deployed to segment COVID-19 pneumonia and lung regions in CT images, from which quantitative features were extracted. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm was employed to construct a radiological model. A clinical model was constructed by LASSO method and stepwise regression analysis, followed by the subsequent construction of the combined model. Model performance was assessed using ROC and decision curve analysis (DCA), while Shapley’s Additive interpretation (SHAP) illustrated the importance of CT features. Results A total of 214 patients were recruited in our study. Four clinical characteristics and four CT features were identified as pivotal components for constructing the clinical and radiological models. The final four clinical characteristics were incorporated as well as the RS_radiological model to construct the combined prediction model. SHAP analysis revealed that CT score difference exerted the most significant influence on the predictive performance of the radiological model. The training group’s radiological, clinical, and combined models exhibited AUC values of 0.89, 0.72, and 0.92, respectively. Correspondingly, in the validation group, these values were observed to be 0.75, 0.72, and 0.81. The DCA curve showed that the combined model exhibited greater clinical utility than the clinical or radiological models. Conclusion Our novel combined model, fusing quantitative CT features with clinical characteristics, demonstrated effective prediction of COVID-19 pneumonia progression from 2 weeks to 1 month after admission. This comprehensive model can potentially serve as a valuable tool for clinicians to develop personalized treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Abstract Background The application of radiomics in thoracic lymph node metastasis (LNM) of lung adenocarcinoma is increasing, but diagnostic performance of radiomics from primary tumor to predict LNM has not been systematically reviewed. Therefore, this study sought to provide a general overview regarding the methodological quality and diagnostic performance of using radiomic approaches to predict the likelihood of LNM in lung adenocarcinoma. Methods Studies were gathered from literature databases such as PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane library. The Radiomic Quality Score (RQS) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) were both used to assess the quality of each study. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the best radiomics models in the training and validation cohorts were calculated. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also conducted. Results Seventeen studies with 159 to 1202 patients each were enrolled between the years of 2018 to 2022, of which ten studies had sufficient data for the quantitative evaluation. The percentage of RQS was between 11.1% and 44.4% and most of the studies were considered to have a low risk of bias and few applicability concerns in QUADAS-2. Pyradiomics and logistic regression analysis were the most commonly used software and methods for radiomics feature extraction and selection, respectively. In addition, the best prediction models in seventeen studies were mainly based on radiomics features combined with non-radiomics features (semantic features and/or clinical features). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the training cohorts were 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.73–0.91]), 0.88 (95% CI [0.81–0.93]), and 0.93(95% CI [0.90–0.95]), respectively. For the validation cohorts, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.89 (95% CI [0.82–0.94]), 0.86 (95% CI [0.74–0.93]) and 0.94 (95% CI [0.91–0.96]), respectively. Conclusions Radiomic features based on the primary tumor have the potential to predict preoperative LNM of lung adenocarcinoma. However, radiomics workflow needs to be standardized to better promote the applicability of radiomics. Trial registration CRD42022375712.