Rechargeable nonaqueous lithium–oxygen batteries with a high theoretical capacity of 3.86×10 Ahkg¢1 and energy density of 1.14×10 Whkg¢1 have been regarded as one of the most promising power sources for next-generation electric vehicles and portable devices. However, the system is complex and certain issues need to be addressed before this technology can be brought into practical use. The system suffers from many problems such as low practical capacity, low energy efficiency, and short cycle life, all of which are highly dependent on the surface and structural properties of the cathode. Efforts have been made to optimize catalysts toward the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and the design of porous electrodes that can enhance the transport of oxygen, lithium ions, and electrons. For conventional lithium–oxygen batteries, carbon materials have been applied widely as catalysts or supports in air cathodes because of their comparably simple preparation method, large specific surface area, appropriate pore size and volume, good reaction activities, and economic merits. With these benefits, carbon materials exhibit a good discharge performance in nonaqueous lithium–oxygen batteries. For example, hierarchical micron-sized mesoporous/macroporous graphene has been used as a cathode material in nonaqueous lithium–oxygen batteries and delivered an excellent specific discharge capacity of 13700 mAhg¢1.[5] In addition, many other carbon-based materials have been used for cathodes, which include carbon powder, carbon nanotubes, and ordered carbons. However, recent detailed studies of nonaqueous lithium–oxygen batteries suggested the serious instability issue of carbon-based materials: carbon can react with the discharge product Li2O2, [9] promote electrolyte decomposition during discharge–charge cycles, and even decompose at charge voltages higher than 3.5 V. This instability will lead to the formation of the irreversible product lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) on the electrode surface. This product is an insulator and will increase the electron transport resistance to lead to a deterioration of the round-trip efficiency and a shorter cycle life. Therefore, carbon materials are assessed to be unfavorable for long-term operation in nonaqueous lithium–oxygen batteries. In contrast, noncarbon materials can fundamentally avoid the formation of Li2CO3 on the product–electrode interface. As a result, the exploration of a suitable alternative non-carbon cathode is important to develop a lithium–oxygen battery with a long cycle life. Recent research has reported on numerous non-carbon cathodes for nonaqueous lithium–oxygen batteries. For example, Ni-supported cathodes were developed with directly grown hierarchical porous Co3O4 films, [13] vertically grown Co3O4 nanowire (NW) arrays, [14] tunable nanoarchitectures of Co3O4, [15] and porous noble metals. The application of these cathodes was reported to reduce overvoltage and improve stability caused by the suppression of the decomposition caused by carbon electrodes. In addition, other kinds of metal oxides and metal carbides have also been used to fabricate non-carbon cathodes. Conventional non-carbon electrodes are typically formed by coating catalyst materials onto a substrate/current collector, which decreases the practical gravimetric specific capacity caused by the added weight of substrate/current collecThe development of non-carbon electrodes for nonaqueous lithium–oxygen batteries has become a recent focus as carbon electrodes were found to be unstable. Conventional non-carbon electrodes are typically formed with a substrate/ current collector, which will decrease the practical capacity. Here, we propose an integrated porous electrode made of LaNiO3 that does not require a substrate/current collector. The porous structure allows the formation of nanosized pores on the walls of microsized pores, which facilitates the transport of both oxygen and lithium ions. Importantly, all the surfaces of the porous structure are catalytically active for electrochemical reactions. Experimental results show that the adoption of the electrode in the battery enables a capacity of 1.064 mAhcm¢2 at a current density of 0.05 mAcm¢2. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the battery can be cycled for at least 25 cycles at a fixed capacity of 0.3 mAhcm¢2, and the electrode shows no degradation after the cycles.