Search

Total body irradiation (TBI) at a dose of 12 Gy combined with cyclophosphamide (CyTBI12Gy) is one of the standard myeloablative regimens for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). In clinical practice, cyclophosphamide may be substituted with fludarabine (FluTBI12Gy) to reduce toxicity. We retrospectively compared outcomes of CyTBI12Gy with FluTBI12Gy for patients with AML treated in complete remission (CR) with allo-HCT from either a matched sibling or unrelated donor. Of 1684 adults who met inclusion criteria, 109 patients in each group were included in a matched-pair analysis. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 25% in the FluTBI12Gy compared to 28% in the CyTBI12Gy group (p =.44) while non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 17% versus 19%, (p =.89) respectively. The rates of leukemia-free survival and overall survival were 65% versus 54% (p =.28) and 70% versus 60.5% (p =.17). Cumulative incidence of grade 2–4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was significantly lower for FluTBI12Gy than CyTBI12Gy (16% vs. 34%, p =.005), while the incidences of grade 3–4 acute GVHD and chronic GVHD did not differ significantly. The probability of GVHD and relapse-free survival was 49% in the FluTBI12Gy and 41% in the CyTBI12Gy group (p =.17). We conclude that for patients with AML treated with allo-HCT in CR, cyclophosphamide may be substituted with fludarabine in a regimen based on TBI at a dose of 12 Gy without negative impact on the efficacy. FluTBI12Gy is associated with reduced risk of grade 2–4 acute GVHD and encouraging survival rates.

Relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) still represents a major concern with poor outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) versus blinatumomab alone in this setting. This is a multicenter retrospective study from centers of SFGM-TC. All transplanted patients who received blinatumomab salvage therapy were included. Patients who received DLI from 1 month before to 100 days after the starting of blinatumomab were included in the blina-DLI group. Seventy-two patients were included. Medium follow-up was 38 months. Fifty received blinatumomab alone and 22 the association blinatumomab-DLI. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 31% in the blinatumomab group and 43% in the blinatumomab-DLI group (p=0.31). Studying DLI as a time dependent variable, PFS did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (HR:0.7, 95%CI:0.4-1.5). In multivariate analysis, DLI was not a prognostic factor for OS, progression-free survival and progression/relapse incidence. Adverse events and graft-versus-disease rates were comparable in the 2 groups. In conclusion, adding DLI between 1 month before and 100 days after start of blinatumomab is safe and does not seem to improve outcomes in B-ALL patients who relapsed after allo-HCT.

Frontline arsenic trioxide (ATO)–based treatment regimens achieve high rates of long-term relapse-free survival in treating acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and form the current standard of care. Refining prognostic estimates for newly diagnosed patients treated with ATO-containing regimens remains important in continuing to improve outcomes and identify patients who achieve suboptimal outcomes. We performed a pooled analysis of exclusively ATO-treated patients at a single academic institution and from the ALLG APML4 and Alliance C9710 studies to determine the prognostic importance of additional cytogenetic abnormalities and/or complex karyotype. We demonstrated inferior event-free survival for patients harboring complex karyotype (hazard ratio [HR], 3.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63-8.56; P = .002), but not for patients harboring additional cytogenetic abnormalities (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 0.78-5.82; P = .142). These data support a role for full karyotypic analysis of all patients with APL and indicate a need for novel treatment strategies to overcome the adverse effect of APL harboring complex karyotype.

Contains fulltext : 251601.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH; hemophagocytic syndrome) is a rare syndrome of potentially fatal, uncontrolled hyperinflammation. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is indicated in primary, recurrent or progressive HLH, but information about its outcomes in the adult population is limited. We obtained data about 87 adult (≥18 years of age) patients retrospectively reported to the EBMT. The median survival time was 13.9 months. The three and five-year overall survival (OS) was 44% (95% CI 33-54%). Among 39 patients with a follow-up longer than 15 months, only three died. Relapse rate was 21% (95% CI 13-30%), while NRM reached 36% (95% CI 25-46%). Younger patients (

Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the best curative option for high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Unfortunately, it is still associated with a significant risk of relapse due to mechanisms of escape from the control of alloreactive T cells. Repetitive adjuvant donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI), termed prophylactic DLI (proDLI), as an effective strategy in preventing relapse is still debated. Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy of proDLI in allografted AML and MDS. We identified 56 patients treated with proDLI (DLI planned in full chimeras without any sign of disease relapse) and matched them to 167 patients in control group, (DLI performed for mixed chimerism or positive minimal residual disease) based on similar age, initial disease, cytogenetic prognosis, and conditioning intensity. Results: In univariate analysis, the incidence of severe aGVHD at 100 days and incidence of all grades of chronic GVHD 1 year after allo-HSCT were similar in the two groups. We also observed a trend of higher 3-year RI (52.61% [95% confidence interval 25.99-79.23]) in the proDLI group versus the control group (29.31% [20.28-38.34], p=0.067). However, 3-year overall survival (p=0.892), progression-free survival (p=0.239), and non-relapse mortality (p=0.343) were similar between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, the only factor influencing overall and progression-free survival was anti-thymocyte globulin administration during the conditioning regimen. Discussion/Conclusion: The proDLI strategy had an acceptable toxicity profile but did not improve patient outcomes compared to the pre-emptive strategy.

Background: Despite therapeutic progress, 10 to 30% of adult patients with primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL) are primary refractory or experience early relapse (R/R). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) thus remains a potentially curative option in this setting. Material and Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, the outcomes of 33 French and Belgian adult patients allo-transplanted for R/R PMBCL between January 1999 and December 2018, were examined. Results: At allo-HSCT time, patients had received a median of 3 treatment lines, 50% of them were in complete response, 40% in partial response and 10% had a progressive disease. Forty-two percent of the donors were siblings and 39% matched related. The median follow-up for alive patients was 78 months (3.5-157). Considering the whole cohort, 2-year overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and graft-versus-host disease-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 48% (95%CI: 33-70), 47% (95%CI: 33-68) and 38.5% (95%CI: 25-60) respectively. Cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality rates were respectively 34% (95%CI: 18-50) and 18% (95%CI: 7-34). Disease status at transplant was the only factor predicting survivals, patients with progressive disease showing significant lower 2-year PFS (HR: 6.12, 95%CI: 1.32-28.31, p = 0.02) and OS (HR: 7.04, 95%CI: 1.52-32.75, p = 0.013). A plateau was observed for OS and PFS after 4 years with 10 patients alive after this date, suggesting that almost one third of the patients effectively salvaged and undergoing allo-SCT could be cured. Conclusion: This study indicates that allo-HSCT is a valid therapeutic option for R/R PMBCL, providing durable remissions.

Background In autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT)-eligible myeloma patients, prolonged induction does not necessarily improve the depth of response. Method We analysed 1,222 ASCT patients who were classified based on (1) the interval between induction and stem cell collection, (2) the type of induction regimen: BID (Bortezomib, IMiDs and Dexamethasone), Bortezomib-based, or CTD (Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone), and (3) the time to best response (Early i.e. best response within 4 or 5 months, depending on the regimen vs Late; Good i.e. VGPR or better vs Poor) RESULTS: The length of induction treatment required to achieve a Good response did not affect PFS (p=0.65) or OS (p=0.61) post-ASCT. The three types of regimen resulted in similar outcomes: median PFS 31, 27.7 and 30.8 months (p=0.31), and median OS 81.7, 92.7, and 77.4 months, respectively (p=0.83). On multivariate analysis, neither the type nor the duration of the induction regimen affected OS and PFS, except for Early Good Responders who had a better PFS compared to Early Poor Responders (HR = 1.21, p value = 0.02). However, achieving a Good response at induction was associated with a better response (≥ VGPR) post-transplant CONCLUSION: The kinetics of response did not affect outcomes.

Contains fulltext : 245127.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is a complex, potentially fatal therapy featuring a myriad of complications. Triggering event(s) of such complications vary significantly, but often a so-called "multi-organ failure" (MOF) is reported as the leading cause of death. The identification of the exact trigger of MOF is critical towards early and disease-specific intervention to improve outcome. We examined data from 202 alloHCT patients reported to have died of MOF from the EBMT registry aiming to determine their exact cause of death focusing on veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) due to its life-threatening, often difficult to capture yet preventable nature. We identified a total of 70 patients (35%) for whom VOD/SOS could be considered as trigger for MOF and leading cause of death, among which 48 (69%) were previously undiagnosed. Multivariate analysis highlighted history of hepatic comorbidity or gentuzumab use and disease status beyond CR1 as the only significant factors predictive of VOD/SOS incidence (OR = 6.6; p = 0.001 and OR = 3.3; p = 0.004 respectively). VOD/SOS-related MOF was widely under-reported, accounting for 27% of deaths attributed to MOF of unknown origin without a previous VOD/SOS diagnosis. Our results suggest most missed cases developed late VOD/SOS beyond 21 days post-alloHCT, highlighting the importance of the newly revised EBMT criteria.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of second autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT2) for patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after a first transplantation (ASCT1). Outcomes for 56 patients receiving an ASCT2 registered in the EBMT database were analyzed. The 4-year cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality and disease relapse/progression were 5% and 67%, respectively. The 4-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 62% and 28%. In univariate analysis, relapse of HL within 12 months of ASCT1 was associated with a worse OS (35% versus 76%

BackgroundIn patients with acute leukemia, lymphoma and chronic malignancies, donor and/or recipient Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) seropositive status increases the risk of development of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after allo-hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), while it has no influence on other transplant outcomes. No data are available on the impact of EBV serostatus on transplant outcomes in patients with nonmalignant hematological disorders.ObjectiveWe analyzed the influence of the recipient's (R) and donor's (D) EBV serostatus on transplant outcomes (overall survival (OS); relapse-free survival (RFS); relapse incidence (RI); nonrelapse mortality (NRM); acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD); cGVHD) in patients with nonmalignant hematological disorders undergoing allo-HCT.Patients and MethodsA total of 2,355 allo-HCTs performed between 1997 and 2016 for acquired bone marrow failure or hemoglobinopathies were included in this retrospective Registry megafile Infectious Diseases Working Party of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (IDWP-EBMT) study.ResultsDemographics: The median age of recipient was 17.7 years (range: 0–77), and 50.8% were children. 79.0% of recipients and 75.4% of donors were EBV-seropositive. 67.8% had HCT from a matched family donor, 4.6% from a mismatched family donor, and 27.6% from an unrelated donor (UD). T-cell depletion was performed in vivo and ex vivo in 82.2% and 6.6% of patients, respectively. Conditioning regimen was myeloablative in 63.7% and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in 36.3% of patients. The median follow-up was 4.7 years. Transplant outcomes: EBV-seropositive recipients in comparison with EBV-seronegative recipients had lower OS (85.4% vs. 88.4%, p = 0.035) and higher NRM (10.0% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.018). No other significant differences were found for: RI, RFS, and aGVHD or cGVHD with respect to EBV pretransplant serostatus donor and/or recipient. Multivariate analysis: A trend toward higher risk of development of cGVHD (HR = 1.31; p = 0.081) and better survival (HR = 0.78; p = 0.087) in allo-HCT from EBV-seropositive donors was found. Allo-HCT in EBV-seropositive recipients had a trend toward lower risk of development of cGVHD (HR = 0.75; p = 0.065). When four subgroups (R−/D−, R−/D+, R+/D−, R+/D+ EBV serology) were analyzed, the EBV serostatus had no significant impact on OS, RFS, RI, NRM and development of aGVHD or cGVHD.ConclusionsAllo-HCT from EBV-seropositive versus EBV-seronegative donors are at 31% higher risk of cGVHD in patients with nonmalignant hematological disorders undergoing allo-HCT; however this difference is nonsignificant in multivariate analysis.

Recently a new three-group clinical classification was reported by an International Consortium to stratify CMML patients with regard to prognosis. The groups were defined as follows: (1) Myelodysplastic (MD)-CMML: WBC ≤ 10 × 109/l, circulating immature myeloid cells (IMC) = 0, no splenomegaly; (2) MD/MP (overlap)–CMML: WBC 10–20 × 109/l or WBC ≤ 10 × 109/l but IMC > 0 and/or splenomegaly; (3) Myeloproliferative (MP)-CMML: WBC > 20 × 109/l. By analysing EBMT Registry patients who underwent allo-HCT for CMML between 1997 and 2016, we aimed to determine the impact of this classification on transplantation outcome and to make a comparison with the conventional WHO classification (CMML-0/CMML-1/CMML-2). Patient grouping was based on the data registered at time of transplantation, with IMC replaced by peripheral blasts. Among 151 patients included in the analysis, 38% were classified as MD-CMML, 42% as MD/MP-CMML and 20% as MP-CMML. With a median survival of 17 months in the whole series, MD-CMML patients were distinguished as a low-risk group with higher CR rate at transplant and a longer post-transplant 2-year progression-free survival in comparison to others (44.5% vs 33.5%, respectively), whereas the WHO classification was superior in identifying high-risk patients (CMML-2) with inferior survival outcomes.

Introduction: Cellular composition of grafts is believed to be one of the significant determinants of outcomes of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). However, inconsistent results of the influence of CD34+ cells dose on the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), disease control and survival have been reported in studies published thus far. Allo-HCT remains the only potentially curative treatment modality for eligible patients with myelofibrosis (MF). As patients with this diagnosis were underrepresented or not included in the above mentioned analyses, this EBMT registry study aimed to determine impact of CD34+ cell counts on allo-HCT results in this population. Methods: Six hundred and fifty seven patients with primary or secondary MF transplanted with use of peripheral blood (PB) as a source of stem cells after RIC regimen (Fludarabine/Melphalan, N=536 (82%); Fludarabine/Busulphan, N=121 (18%)) between 2000 and 2016 were included. Stem cell donor type was HLA-identical sibling (MSD; N=249, 38%) or unrelated (UD; N=408, 62%). Use of ex vivo T-cell depletion and post-transplant cyclophosphamide to prevent GVHD were the exclusion criteria. Median patient age was 58 (range, 22-76) years. In-vivo T-cell depletion was used in 526 (80%) of cases. Median transplanted CD34+ dose was 6.6 (2-29) x 10^6 per kg of recipient body weight. Median follow-up was 46 (2-194) months. Patient and transplant characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Results: We did not observe any impact of CD34+ cells dose on outcome variables in the whole study group. However, in an analysis adjusted for donor type, among patients transplanted from a MSD, the 2yr overall survival (OS) probability was 77% for those transplanted with higher doses of CD34+ cells (defined as >7.0 x 10^6/kg) compared to 60% for lower CD34+ counts (below 7.0 x 10^6/kg), P=0.007 (Figure 1). The corresponding probabilities of 2yr non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 16% and 29% (P=0.04), respectively (Figure 2). In multivariate analysis, for patients transplanted from a MSD, higher CD34+ dose was an independent predictor for better survival (HR 0.56; P=0.01) and lower risk of NRM (HR 0.54; P=0.02). We did not find any association between CD34+ counts with probability of engraftment, the incidence of acute (aGVHD) and chronic (cGVHD) nor disease relapse. The effect of cell dose was not seen in the UD cohort. Factors associated independently with an unfavorable outcome in the whole study group were: older patient age and transplantation from CMV seronegative donors to seropositive recipients for OS and NRM and use of an UD and female donor for NRM. Allo-HCT from UD was also an independent predictor for higher incidence of aGVHD and lower probability of engraftment. Use of in vivo T-cell depletion was a protective factor for aGVHD. It was in turn associated with higher risk of relapse. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests a potential survival benefit for MF patients treated with RIC PB-allo-HCT from MSD with higher doses of CD34+ cells (threshold > 7.0 x 10^6/kg). We suggest that this factor should be taken into consideration when planning and performing hematopoietic cell apheresis. Disclosures Kröger: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; DKMS: Research Funding; JAZZ: Honoraria; Medac: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Riemser: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding. Robin:Novartis Neovii: Research Funding. Chevallier:Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mielke:Bellicum: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel (via institution); EBMT/EHA: Other: Travel support; Miltenyi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and speakers fee (via institution), Speakers Bureau; IACH: Other: Travel support; Jazz Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; ISCT: Other: Travel support; GILEAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel (via institution), Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support (via institution), Speakers Bureau; DGHO: Other: Travel support; Kiadis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support (via institution), Speakers Bureau. Snowden:Janssen: Honoraria; Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; IDMC: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Blaise:Sanofi: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre medicaments: Honoraria; Molmed: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Hernandez Boluda:Incyte: Other: Travel expenses paid. McLornan:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines offered great hope in controlling the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic. At present, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have shown excellent efficacy to prevent COVID-19 but immunocompromised patients were left-off most vaccine clinical trials albeit their extreme vulnerability. Indeed, immunosuppression is associated with a higher risk of developing severe COVID-19 with mortality rates over 30% reported in patients with hematologic malignancies (HM). [...]

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) may be performed in multiple myeloma (MM) patients relapsing after a previous auto-HCT. For those without an adequate dose of stored stem cells, remobilization is necessary. This retrospective study included patients who, following disease relapse after the first auto-HCT(s), underwent stem cell remobilization and auto-HCT performed using these cells. There were 305 patients, 68% male, median age at salvage auto-HCT was 59 years. The median time to relapse after the first-line penultimate auto-HCT(s) was 30.6 months, the median follow-up after salvage auto-HCT 31 months. The 2- and 4-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) after the salvage auto-HCT was 5 and 9%, the relapse incidence 56 and 76%, respectively. Overall survival (OS) after 2 and 4 years was 76 and 52%, progression-free survival (PFS) 39 and 15%. In multivariable analysis an increasing interval between the penultimate auto-HCT and relapse was associated with better OS and PFS, later calendar year of salvage auto-HCT with better OS. In conclusion, salvage auto-HCT performed with cells remobilized after a previous auto-HCT was associated with acceptable NRM. The leading cause of failure was disease progression of MM, which correlated with a shorter interval from the penultimate auto-HCT to the first relapse.

Maribavir is a benzimidazole riboside with activity against cytomegalovirus (CMV). The safety and efficacy of maribavir for preemptive treatment of CMV infection in transplant recipients is not known.In a phase 2, open-label, maribavir dose-blinded trial, recipients of hematopoietic-cell or solid-organ transplants (≥18 years of age, with CMV reactivation [1000 to 100,000 DNA copies per milliliter]) were randomly assigned to receive maribavir at a dose of 400, 800, or 1200 mg twice daily or the standard dose of valganciclovir for no more than 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with a response to treatment, defined as confirmed undetectable CMV DNA in plasma, within 3 weeks and 6 weeks after the start of treatment. The primary safety end point was the incidence of adverse events that occurred or worsened during treatment.Of the 161 patients who underwent randomization, 159 received treatment, and 156 had postbaseline data available - 117 in the maribavir group and 39 in the valganciclovir group. The percentage of patients with postbaseline data available who had a response to treatment within 3 weeks was 62% among those who received maribavir and 56% among those who received valganciclovir. Within 6 weeks, 79% and 67% of patients, respectively, had a response (risk ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.51). The percentages of patients with a response to treatment were similar among the maribavir dose groups. Two patients who had a response to treatment had a recurrence of CMV infection within 6 weeks after starting maribavir at a dose of 800 mg twice daily; T409M resistance mutations in CMV UL97 protein kinase developed in both patients. The incidence of serious adverse events that occurred or worsened during treatment was higher in the maribavir group than in the valganciclovir group (52 of 119 patients [44%] vs. 13 of 40 [32%]). A greater percentage of patients in the maribavir group discontinued the trial medication because of an adverse event (27 of 119 [23%] vs. 5 of 40 [12%]). A higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was reported with maribavir, and a higher incidence of neutropenia was reported with valganciclovir.Maribavir at a dose of at least 400 mg twice daily had efficacy similar to that of valganciclovir for clearing CMV viremia among recipients of hematopoietic-cell or solid-organ transplants. A higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events - notably dysgeusia - and a lower incidence of neutropenia were found in the maribavir group. (Funded by ViroPharma/Shire Development; EudraCT number, 2010-024247-32.).

International audience; Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission (CR1) with isolated NPM1 mutation (iNPM1m) is considered a good prognosis genotype, although up to one-third relapse. To evaluate the best transplant strategy, we retrospectively compared autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT), related (MSD), and fully matched unrelated (MUD) allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We identified 256 adult patients including 125 auto-SCT, 72 MSD, and 59 MUD. The 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 62% in auto-SCT, 69% in MUD, and 81% in MSD (P = .02 for MSD vs others). The 2-year overall survival (OS) was not different among auto-SCT, MUD, and MSD, reaching 83% (P = .88). The 2-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 2.5% in auto-SCT and 7.5% in allo-SCT (P = .04). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) was higher after auto-SCT (30%) than after MUD (22%) and MSD (12%, P = .01). In multivariate analysis, MSD versus auto-SCT but not MUD versus auto-SCT was associated with lower RI (P

The use of antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin in the setting of transplantation from an HLA-matched related donor is still much debated. Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease are the main causes of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin in a large cohort of patients with myelofibrosis (n=287). The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease among patients who were or were not given antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin were 26% and 41%, respectively. The corresponding incidences of chronic graft-versus-host disease were 52% and 55%, respectively. Non-adjusted overall survival, disease-free survival and non-relapse mortality rates were 55% versus 53%, 49% versus 45%, and 32% versus 31%, respectively, among the patients who were or were not given antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin. An adjusted model confirmed that the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease was lower following antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin (hazard ratio, 0.54; P=0.010) while it did not decrease the risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease. The hazard ratios for overall survival and non-relapse mortality were 0.66 and 0.64, with P-values of 0.05 and 0.09, respectively. Antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin did not influence disease-free survival, graft-versus-host disease, relapse-free survival or relapse risk. In conclusion, in the setting of matched related transplantation in myelofibrosis patients, this study demonstrates that antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin decreases the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease without increasing the risk of relapse. ispartof: HAEMATOLOGICA vol:104 issue:6 pages:1230-1236 ispartof: location:Italy status: published

Après allogreffe de cellules souches hématopoïétiques (allo-CSH), la rechute de la maladie initiale et le dysfonctionnement du greffon restent aujourd’hui parmi les causes majeures d’échec de cette thérapeutique tant pour les hémopathies malignes que non malignes. Une seconde allo-CSH est une option pour pallier ces situations. Dans le cadre des 8e ateliers d’harmonisation des pratiques de greffe de la Société francophone de greffe de moelle et de thérapie cellulaire (SFGM-TC), le groupe de travail s’est basé sur les données de la littérature, afin d’élaborer des recommandations concernant la faisabilité, les indications, le choix du donneur et le conditionnement de la seconde allo-CSH. En cas de rechute de la maladie, une seconde allogreffe avec conditionnement à intensité réduite ou non myéloablatif est une option raisonnable, en particulier chez les patients en bon état général (Karnofsky/Lansky > 80 %), avec un faible score de comorbidités (score EBMT ≤ 3), ayant une longue rémission après la première greffe (> 6 mois) et une faible masse tumorale au moment de seconde allogreffe. Un donneur géno-identique tend à donner une meilleure survie globale. En cas de dysfonctionnement du greffon (rejet primaire et secondaire), un conditionnement immunoablatif est recommandé. Un changement de donneur reste une option valide, en particulier, en l’absence de maladie du greffon contre l'hôte après la première allo-CSH. [Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant: Guidelines from the francophone Society of bone marrow transplantation and cellular therapy (SFGM-TC)]. Disease recurrence and graft dysfunction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) currently remain among the major causes of treatment failure in malignant and non-malignant hematological diseases. A second allo-HSCT is a valuable therapeutic option to salvage those situations. During the 8th annual harmonization workshops of the french Society of bone marrow transplantation and cellular therapy (SFGM-TC), a designated working group reviewed the literature in order to elaborate unified guidelines on feasibility, indications, donor choice and conditioning in the case of a second allo-HSCT. In case of relapse, a second allo-HSCT with reduced intensity or non-myeloablative conditioning is a reasonable option, particularly in patients with a good performance status (Karnofsky/Lansky>80%), low co-morbidity score (EBMT score≤3), a longer remission duration after the first allo-HSCT (>6 months), and who present low disease burden at the time of second allo-HSCT. Matched related donors tend to be associated with better outcomes. In the presence of graft dysfunction (primary and secondary graft rejection), an immunoablative conditioning regimen is recommended. A donor change remains a valid option, especially in the absence of graft-versus-host disease after the first allo-HSCT.

International audience; Therapeutic management of patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis (MF) who experience relapse or graft failure following allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains heterogeneous. We retrospectively analyzed 216 patients undergoing a second allo-HCT for either relapse (56%) or graft failure (31%) between 2010 and 2017. Median age was 57.3 years (range 51–63). The same donor as for the first allo-HCT was chosen in 66 patients (31%) of whom 19 received an HLA-identical sibling donor, whereas a different donor was chosen for 116 patients (54%). Median follow-up was 40 months. Three-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 42% and 39%, respectively. Three-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse rates were 36% and 25%, respectively. Grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD occurred in 25% and 11% of patients, respectively, and the 3-year incidence of chronic GVHD was 33% including 14% for extensive grade. Graft-failure incidence at 1 year was 14%. In conclusion, our data suggest that a second allo-HCT is a potential option for patients failing first allo-HCT for MF albeit careful patient assessment is fundamental to identify individual patients who could benefit from this approach.

BACKGROUND Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment option in advanced-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary syndrome (SS). This study presents an updated analysis of the initial experience of the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) describing the outcomes after allo-HSCT for MF and SS, with special emphasis on the impact of the use of unrelated donors (URD). METHODS AND PATIENTS Eligible for this study were patients with advanced-stage MF or SS who underwent a first allo-HSCT from matched HLA-identical related or URD between January/1997 and December/2011. Sixty patients have been previously reported. RESULTS 113 patients were included [77 MF (68%)]; 61 (54%) were in complete or partial remission, 86 (76%) received reduced-intensity protocols and 44 (39%) an URD allo-HSCT. With a median follow up for surviving patients of 73 months, allo-HSCT resulted in an estimated overall survival (OS) of 38% at 5 years, and a progression-free survival (PFS) of 26% at 5 years. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that advanced-phase disease (complete remission/partial remission >3, primary refractory or relapse/progression in patients that had received 3 or more lines of systemic treatment prior to transplant or the number of treatment lines was not known), a short interval between diagnosis and transplant (

International audience

In order to identify cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive patients who are at risk of developing CMV infection following first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), we built up a scoring system based on patient/donor characteristics and transplantation modalities. To this end, 3690 consecutive patients were chronologically divided into a derivation cohort (2010-2012, n = 2180) and a validation cohort (2013-2014, n = 1490). Haploidentical donors were excluded. The incidence of first clinically significant CMV infection (CMV disease or CMV viremia leading to preemptive treatment) at 1, 3, and 6 months in the derivation cohort was 13.8%, 38.5%, and 39.6%, respectively. CMV-seropositive donor, unrelated donor (HLA matched 10/10 or HLA mismatched 9/10), myeloablative conditioning, total body irradiation, antithymocyte globulin, and mycophenolate mofetil significantly and independently affected the incidence of 3-month infection. These six factors were selected to build up the prognostic model. Four risk groups were defined: low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high-risk categories, with a 3-month predicted incidence of first clinically significant CMV infection in the derivation cohort of 22.2%, 31.1%, 45.4%, and 56.9%, respectively. This score represents a framework for the evaluation of patients who are at risk of developing clinically significant CMV infection following allo-HCT. Prospective studies using this score may be of benefit in assessing the value of anti-CMV prophylaxis in well-defined patient cohorts.

We analyzed newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with del(17p) and/or t(4;14) undergoing either upfront single autologous (auto), tandem autologous (auto-auto) or tandem autologous/reduced-intensity allogeneic (auto-allo) stem cell transplantation. 623 patients underwent either auto (n = 446), auto-auto (n = 105), or auto-allo (n = 72) between 2000 and 2015. 46% of patients had t(4;14), 45% had del(17p) while 9% were reported having both abnormalities. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45-58%) for single auto, 60% (95% CI, 49-72%) for auto-auto, and 67% (95% CI, 53-80%) for auto-allo (p = 0.187). Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 17% (95% CI, 12-22%), 33% (95% CI, 22-43%), and 34% (95% CI, 21-38%; p = 0.048). Five-year relapse rate was 82, 63, and 56%, while non-relapse mortality was 1, 4, and 10%. In multivariable analysis, in t(4;14) with single auto as reference, auto-auto (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; p = 0.007) and auto-allo (HR, 0.45; p = 0.018) were associated with better PFS. In terms of t(4;14) and OS, auto-auto appeared to improve outcome compared with single auto (HR, 0.49; p = 0.096). In del(17p), outcome in PFS was similar between single auto and auto-auto, while auto-allo appeared to improve PFS (HR, 0.65; p = 0.097). No significant difference in OS was identified between the groups in patients with del(17p).

Deletion 5q or monosomy 5 (-5/5q-) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a common high-risk feature that is referred to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, -5/5q- is frequently associated with other high-risk cytogenetic aberrations such as complex karyotype, monosomal karyotype, monosomy 7 (-7), or 17p abnormalities (abn (17p)), the significance of which is unknown. In order to address this question, we studied adult patients with AML harboring -5/5q- having their first allogeneic transplantation between 2000 and 2015. Five hundred and one patients with -5/5q- have been analyzed. Three hundred and thirty-eight patients (67%) were in first remission and 142 (28%) had an active disease at time of allogeneic transplantation. The 2-year probabilities of overall survival and leukemia-free survival were 27% and 20%, respectively. The 2-year probability of treatment-related mortality was 20%. We identified four different cytogenetic groups according to additional abnormalities with prognostic impact: -5/5q- without complex karyotype, monosomal karyotype or abn(17p), -5/5q- within a complex karyotype, -5/5q- within a monosomal karyotype and the combination of -5/5q- with abn(17p). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with worse overall survival and leukemia-free survival across the four groups were active disease, age, monosomal karyotype, and abn(17p). The presence of -5/5q- without monosomal karyotype or abn(17p) was associated with a significantly better survival rate while -5/5q- in conjunction with monosomal karyotype or abn(17p) translated into a worse outcome. The patients harboring the combination of -5/5q- with abn(17p) showed very limited benefit from allogeneic transplantation. ispartof: HAEMATOLOGICA vol:105 issue:2 pages:414-423 ispartof: location:Italy status: published

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) is the standard of care for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who relapse/progress after first line chemoimmunotherapy. Long-term outcome of those who relapse after transplant is poor. We present the results of a retrospective study of 256 adult patients reported to the EBMT registry with DLBCL who relapsed after auto-HSCT performed between 2003 and 2013, and who received active salvage strategies. One hundred and fifty-four (60%) were male; median age was 53 years. Median time to relapse was 7 months, 65% relapsed during the first year. Overall response rate after salvage therapy was 46%. Median follow-up after first salvage therapy was 40 months (IQR 23-63 months). Overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 27% (95% CI 22-33). OS at 3 years of patients relapsing longer than 1 year after auto-HSCT was 41% (95% CI 31-53) compared with 20% (95% CI 14-24) in those who relapsed in less than 1 year. Eighty-two patients (32%) had a second HSCT, an allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) in 69 cases, at a median time of 6.5 months after relapse. OS at 3 years after allo-HSCT was 36% (95% CI 25-51). In conclusion, the prognosis of patients with DLBCL that relapse after auto-HSCT is dismal. Patients who relapse in less than 1 year remain an unmet need, and should be considered for CAR T cell therapy or clinical trials. Patients who relapse after 1 year can be rescued with salvage therapies and a second HSCT. These results provide a benchmark to compare data of new prospective studies.

Introduction. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has typically an indolent course but can undergo transformation into a more aggressive lymphoma so called Richter's syndrome. While the advent of novel targeted therapies is transforming the management of patients with CLL, these drugs failed to prevent the risk of RS. RS is associated with a very poor outcome and is thus becoming the main obstacle to long term CLL control. Autologous (auto-) and allogeneic (allo-) hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (-SCT) have been recommended as the treatment of choice in eligible patients with clonally related RS (Rossi Blood 2018) but previous experience is still limited to less than 50 cases. We here aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of both auto- and allo-SCT for patients with RS in a large cohort in a period overlapping the advent of novel agents. Methods. We report on a retrospective study of consecutive adult patients with RS who underwent auto- or allo-SCT between 2008 and 2018 in EBMT centers. Results. A total of 197 patients (M/F= 133/64) were included in the present study; 125 patients received allo-SCT and 72 auto-SCT. The main difference between these 2 cohorts was the median age at transplant that was lower in the allo- than in the auto-SCT group (median age 57 [18-71] vs 61 [39-74] years, p = 0.006). Regarding the allo-SCT cohort, median time from RS diagnosis to SCT was 10 months [1.1-322.8] and 54.2% had received >2 therapeutic lines for RS. At allo-SCT, 60 (48.4%) were in CR and 53 (42.7%) in PR or SD. Most patients received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen (n= 90, 72.6%) and peripheral blood (89.6%) as stem cell source. Donors were related (matched, n=40 (33%) or mismatched, n=4 (3%)) or unrelated (matched, n= 76 (61%) and mismatched, n=4 (3%). A total of 41 patients (33.6%) received total body irradiation (TBI). With a median follow-up of 48 months, 2-year OS was 46% (36-55%) and 2-year PFS 38% (28-48%). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 31% (22-40%) as was the 2-year NRM (Figure 1). Two-year CIR was significantly reduced in patients with ≤2 therapeutic lines for RS (12% (1-22%) vs 41% (26-55%); p=0.005). Performance status affected 2-y PFS (24% (7-42%) if Karnofsky index Regarding the auto-HSCT cohort, median time from RS diagnosis to HSCT was 7.8 months [2.6-102.7] and 66.7% had received >2 lines for RS. At auto-SCT, 36 (52.2%) were in CR and 36 (37.7%) in PR or SD. With a median follow-up of 18 months, 2-year OS was 69 % (56-82%) and 2-year PFS 47% (33-62%). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 46% (32-60%) and 2-year NRM was 7% (0-13%) (Figure 2). CR patients presented better PFS (69% (50-88%) vs 29% (9-50%); p=0.002) and OS (82% (66-97%) vs 56% (35-78%) ; p=0.03). Performance status affected 2-y PFS (25% (2-48%) if Karnofsky index 90%, p = 0.005) and 2-y OS (55% (29-82%) if Karnofsky index 90%, p = 0.04). Disclosures Guièze: Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Byrne:Ariad/Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Finke:Riemser: Honoraria, Other: research support, Speakers Bureau; Neovii: Honoraria, Other: research support, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Honoraria, Other: research support, Speakers Bureau. Chevallier:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria.

Reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation (RIST) is usually reserved for patients with mantle cell lymphoma who relapse after an autoSCT. However, the long-term efficacy of RIST and its curative potential have not been clearly demonstrated. We studied the long-term outcome of patients receiving a RIST for MCL as reported to the EBMT. A total of 324 patients, median age 57 years (range 31-70), underwent a RIST between 2000 and 2008; 43% of the patients had received >3 lines of prior therapy, including an autoSCT in 46%. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 10% at 100 days and 24% at 1 year and was lower for patients receiving anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)/ALG (RR 0.59, p = 0.046). After a median follow-up of 72 months (range 3-159), 118 patients relapsed at a median of 8 months post RIST (range 1-117). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 25% and 40% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, and was associated with chemorefractory disease (HR 0.49, p = 0.01) and the use of CAMPATH (HR 2.59, p = 0.0002). The 4-year progression-free survival rate and overall survival rate was 31 and 40%, respectively. RIST results in long-term disease-free survival in about 30% of the patients, including those patients relapsing after a prior autoSCT.

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative therapy in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis. Ruxolitinib, a JAK-inhibitor, has been approved in myelofibrosis patients and is effective to alleviate symptoms of the disease in a substantial proportion of patients. In a French phase 2 study, the use of ruxolitinib as a bridge to HSCT was followed by a high transplantation rate, with one third of patients presenting clinical improvement before HSCT (partial response or spleen size reduction) (BMT 2021, Robin et al). The aim of the current study is to compare post-transplantation outcomes between patients who received ruxolitinib before HSCT and those who did not. Methods: This retrospective study includes patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis registered in the SFGM-TC registry including patients from France, Belgium and Switzerland. Patients who received HSCT between July 2010 and December 2019 with available information regarding ruxolitinib treatment were included. The impact of ruxolitinib was analyzed by multivariable Cox regression and a propensity score. Results: 305 patients could be included, of whom 143 received ruxolitinib prior to HSCT (RuxoG). All patient characteristics are given in RuxoG followed by no ruxolitinib group (noRuxo). The diagnosis before HSCT was primary myelofibrosis (83% vs 75%), secondary myelofibrosis (13% vs 19%) or transformed into AML (4% vs 6%). Karnofsky score at transplant was < 70% in 9% and 11%. In RuxoG. median age was older (60.29 vs. 58.75, p=0.069) and delay from diagnosis longer (20.42 vs 13.26 months, p=0.040). RuxoG patients had less frequently anemia < 10 g/dl (84% vs 98%, p=0.027) or thrombocytopenia < 50 G/L (22% vs 32%, p=0.066) and presented more frequently splenomegaly or pre-graft splenectomy (83% vs 63%, p=0.0007). DIPSS score was well balanced in both groups, being high or intermediate-2 in 100 patients (79% vs 86%, p=0.23), from the 235 patients with available data. Myeloablative conditioning regimen was used in 16% vs 26% (p=0.049), and conditioning regimen consisted of on fludarabine-busulfan in 33% vs 61%, fludarabine-melphalan in 47% vs 22% or other in 20% vs 16% (p Conclusion: Patients who received ruxolitinib before HSCT were at higher risk of acute GVHD and post-transplant mortality, but this was not observed in patients responding to ruxolitinib and it does not translate into higher risk of chronic GVHD. Main hypotheses to explain these finding could be: 1) specific disease, patient or transplant characteristics in RuxoG; 2) the longer delay to transplantation or 3) a specific effect of ruxolitinib. This study suggests that myelofibrosis patients responding to ruxolitinib should have the transplant without waiting disease progression. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Forcade: Novartis: Other: travel grant. Loschi: AbbVie: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; CELGENE/BMS: Honoraria; Gilead: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Novartis: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Servier: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Duléry: Takeda Gilead Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Robin: NEOVII MEDAC NOVARTIS: Research Funding.

INTRODUCTION: Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) is a heterogenous disease which is almost incurable without an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Within the revised international scoring system (R-IPSS), MDS with poor and very poor cytogenetics have a much worse outcome after allo-HCT. The very poor cytogenetic subgroup refers to patients harboring more than 3 abnormalities and is therefore a highly heterogenous group. We have shown in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that beyond complex karyotype, specific adverse cytogenetic features such as 7q abnormalities (abn7q), 5q abnormalities (abn5q), 17p abnormalities (abn17p) and monosomal karyotype (MK) worsen the outcomes after allo-HCT. We have therefore retrospectively reviewed MDS with very poor cytogenetics and studied the impact of adverse cytogenetic features on outcomes after transplant. METHODS: We selected MDS patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2001 and 2018 from a matched related or unrelated donor, for whom a full cytogenetic report was available in the EBMT registry. We then stratified them according to the presence of abn7q, abn5q, abn17p, MK and the number of abnormalities (≤5, 6-9 and ≥10). Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and relapse-free survival (GRFS) was defined as survival without grade II-IV acute GvHD, extensive chronic GvHD or relapse. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were identified in the registry. One hundred twenty-three patients (81%) had MDS with excess of blasts and 4 (3%) had secondary AML. Median age was 59 years (interquartile range (IQR), 51-64) and the median follow-up was 38 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 34-60). The time from diagnosis to allo-HCT was a median of 6 months (IQR, 4-8). Two thirds of patients received a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (N = 103, 67%) and 87 patients had a matched unrelated donor (57%). Almost all patients were in first complete remission at time of transplant (N= 149, 97%). Regarding specific cytogenetic features, 87 patients had abn7q (57%), 99 abn5q (64%), 59 abn17p (38%) and 120 MK (78%) with considerable overlap between groups. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 34% (95% CI 26-42%) and 24% (95% CI 17-31%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 59% (95% CI 51-67%) and 18% (95% CI 12-24%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GvHD and chronic GvHD was 33% (95% CI 25-40%) and 44% (95% CI 36-53%) by day 100 and 2 years respectively. The 2-year GRFS was 12% (95% CI 6-17%). The presence of abn5q was associated with a significantly decreased PFS of 17% (95% CI 9-25%) versus 36% (95% CI 23-49%); p=0.05) and GRFS (6% (95% CI 1-11%) versus 23% (95% CI 11-34%); p=0.04). The presence of abn7q was associated with significantly increased NRM (25% (15-34%) versus 9% (2-16%); p=0.02) which did not translate into OS. There were no specific cytogenetic features that had an independent impact on the cumulative incidence of relapse, but age over 55 years did increase the relapse risk (65: 66% (95% CI 50-83%); p=0.03). A continuous effect was also observed (per decade increase: HR=1.24, 95%CI 1.02-1.52; p=0.03). Patients with an interval of more than 6 months from diagnosis to allo-HCT had almost double the OS (45% (95% CI 32-58%)) compared to patients with an interval less than 6 months (27% (95% CI 17-37%); p=0.04), however a continuous effect was not observed. CONCLUSION: MDS with very poor cytogenetics according to R-IPSS is a very bad group with dismal outcomes after allo-HCT. Within this high-risk group, specific adverse cytogenetic features such as the number of abnormalities, abn7q, abn5q, abn17p or MK did not stratify outcomes further, except for abn5q which was associated with a decreased PFS. Our results might be explained in part by the low number patients and by the over-representation of adverse features within this cohort. Despite that, advancing age was associated with increased relapse. Whilst allo-HCT remains the best therapeutic option for this very high-risk patient group, efforts should focus on post-transplant preemptive intervention strategies to prevent relapse. Disclosures Byrne: Incyte: Honoraria. Schroeder: Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Blaise: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Hayden: Jansen, Takeda: Other: Travel, Accomodation, Expenses; Amgen: Honoraria. Scheid: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yakoub-Agha: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.

Rational: The significant increase in haplo-identical allogeneic cell transplantation (Allo-HCT) has led to the more frequent use of cyclophosphamide (Cy) after transplantation for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (PT-Cy). This strategy has subsequently been used in related and unrelated allogeneic HCT settings as well with some controversial results. Patients and Methods: We analyzed all consecutive Allo-HCTs from matched related (MR) and unrelated donors (HLA matched and mismatched: MUD and MMUD) reported to the SFGM-TC registry from January 2014 to December 2019 and who have received PT-Cy alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive molecules (IS). We therefore performed a pair-matched analysis (1/2) with transplantations using classic GVHD prophylaxis with (w) or without (wo) anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG). The primary objective was to evaluate the incidence and severity of acute and chronic GVHD in PT-Cy compared to other strategies. Secondary objectives included: modalities of PT-Cy and IS, cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), non-relapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS), GVHD and relapse free-survival (GRFS), infection rates. Results: We analyzed a total of 1190 patients (pts), 386 (32%) received PT-Cy and matched with 804 (68%) pts who received classic GVHD prophylaxis (no PT-Cy). Among PT-Cy patients, 59% were males with a median age of 55.3 years (3.4-75.5), 49% were AML, 14% ALL, 20% MDS and MPS, 12.5% NHL and HL, and 4.5% Multiple Myeloma. Before transplantation, 61% of pts were in complete remission (CR), 34% not in CR, 2% in stable disease and 3% were not treated. Conditioning regimen was myeloablative in 35% of patients, 86% received peripheral blood stem cells, 31% were CMV negative pairs, 58% were sex-matched and 51% were ABO compatible. There was no significant difference between the PT-Cy and no PT-Cy groups regarding all the variables. We identified four groups: group 1: PT-Cy + IS (n=259), group 2: PT-Cy + ATG + IS (n=120), group 3: ATG w or wo IS (n=651) and group 4: other IS (n=160). We observed significant differences between the 4 groups for age (p The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD grades II, III/IV, chronic GVHD, relapse and NRM, the probability of OS and GRFS are shown in Table 1. The results of multivariate analysis (Table 2) showed a significant lower incidence of acute GVHD gr II, III, IV and chronic GVHD after PT-Cy + IS and a significant higher TRM after ATG ± IS. In addition, other well-known parameters were found to have a significant impact as age on OS and GRFS, use of unrelated donor on OS and CIR and PBSC on chronic GVHD. Regarding severe infections after HCT, there was no difference between PT-cy and pair-matched patients except for pneumonia (12.5% vs. 8% respectively, p=0.08) and septicemia (12% vs. 1.7% respectively, p In conclusion, there was a significant lower incidence and severity of acute and chronic GVHD in the PT-Cy group after related, HLA matched and mismatched unrelated Allo-HCT compared to matched patients with other GVHD prophylaxis with a higher NRM when patients received ATG. We did not observe significant translation into GRFS improvement probably due to the higher toxicity of PT-Cy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Yakoub-Agha: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Forcade: Novartis: Other: travel grant. Chalandon: Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Gilead, Amgen, Jazz, Astra Zenec: Other: Travel EXpenses, Accomodation; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Amgen: Other: Advisory Board. Huynh: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Dulery: Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy; Gilead: Other: Travel support and registration fees for scientific meetings .

Introduction: Primary mediastinal B cells lymphoma (PMBCL) is a rare subtype of aggressive non Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Despite therapeutic progresses, 10 to 30% of PMBCL patients are primary refractory or experience early relapses (R/R). Despite Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) after bridging therapy or new therapies such as PD-1 inhibitors or CAR-T cells, R/R PMBL patients have a very poor outcome. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is thus a potentially curative treatment for patients who relapsed after salvage therapies. Only limited data have been published about allo-SCT in R/R PMBCL (Herrera A. F, BBMT 2019). In the present study conducted on behalf the Société Francophone de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC) and the lymphoma study association (LYSA) group, we investigated the outcomes of allo-transplanted adult R/R PMBCL. Methods This multicenter retrospective study included all adult R/R PMBCL patients reported to the SFGM-TC and who underwent an allo-HCT between 1999 and 2018. Data have been obtained through ProMISe (internet-based system shared by all European transplantation centers) and completed by consulting the medical files of the LYSA group centers. All patients have given signed informed consent. Results Thirty-three patients with R/R PMBCL from 19 French (n=29) and 3 Belgium (n=4) centers were included. The median age at transplant was 33 y (18-61), with a predominance of female patients (58%). Majority of patients had a low HCT-CI score [0 = 9/17 (53%), data missing in 16 patients]. Seventy-six percent of patients had an IPI score between 1 and 2 and Ann Harbor score was ≥ 3 in 56.6% at diagnosis. Median number of treatment lines before allo-HCT was 3 (1-6). All patients received poly-chemotherapies with anthracyclines and anti-CD20 as first-line therapy. Most sixty-one percent of patients had previously undergone auto-HCT and one patient received CAR-T before allo-HCT. Forty one percent of patients were primary refractory. At time of transplant, 50% of patients were in complete response, 40% in partial response, and 10% had a progressive disease. Conditioning regimen was reduced intensity regimen in 63%. Stem cell source was PBSC in 88%. Donors were sibling in 42% or matched related donor in 39%. An alternative donor was chosen in 18%. GVHD prophylaxis included antithymocyte globulin in 61%, and calcineurin inhibitor in 97%. Median follow up was 78 months (3.5-157). Considering the whole cohort, 2y OS, DFS, NRM, and cumulative incidence of relapse were 48% (95%CI: 33-70), 60% (95%CI: 44-82), 18% (95%CI: 7-34), and 34% (95%CI: 18-50) respectively. Cumulative incidences of day 100 grade I-II and III-IV acute GVHD 36% and 0%, respectively. Cumulative incidence was 32% among whom 33% had an extensive cGVHD. Patients with progressive disease at transplantation had worst 2y PFS and OS (PFS: HR: 6.12, 95%CI: 1.32-28.31, p=0.02 and OS: HR: 7.04, 95%CI: 1.52-32.75, p=0.013). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the largest published study evaluating outcomes of allo-HCT for R/R PMBCL. Although this is a retrospective study with a limited number of patients, the outcomes suggest that allo-HCT is a therapeutic option providing durable remissions for patients with R/R PMBCL. Introduction: Primary mediastinal B cells lymphoma (PMBCL) is a rare subtype of aggressive non Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Despite therapeutic progresses, 10 to 30% of PMBCL patients are primary refractory or experience early relapses (R/R). Despite Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) after bridging therapy or new therapies such as PD-1 inhibitors or CAR-T cells, R/R PMBL patients have a very poor outcome. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is thus a potentially curative treatment for patients who relapsed after salvage therapies. Only limited data have been published about allo-SCT in R/R PMBCL (Herrera A. F, BBMT 2019). In the present study conducted on behalf the Société Francophone de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC) and the lymphoma study association (LYSA) group, we investigated the outcomes of allo-transplanted adult R/R PMBCL. Methods This multicenter retrospective study included all adult R/R PMBCL patients reported to the SFGM-TC and who underwent an allo-HCT between 1999 and 2018. Data have been obtained through ProMISe (internet-based system shared by all European transplantation centers) and completed by consulting the medical files of the LYSA group centers. All patients have given signed informed consent. Results Thirty-three patients with R/R PMBCL from 19 French (n=29) and 3 Belgium (n=4) centers were included. The median age at transplant was 33 y (18-61), with a predominance of female patients (58%). Majority of patients had a low HCT-CI score [0 = 9/17 (53%), data missing in 16 patients]. Seventy-six percent of patients had an IPI score between 1 and 2 and Ann Harbor score was ≥ 3 in 56.6% at diagnosis. Median number of treatment lines before allo-HCT was 3 (1-6). All patients received poly-chemotherapies with anthracyclines and anti-CD20 as first-line therapy. Most sixty-one percent of patients had previously undergone auto-HCT and one patient received CAR-T before allo-HCT. Forty one percent of patients were primary refractory. At time of transplant, 50% of patients were in complete response, 40% in partial response, and 10% had a progressive disease. Conditioning regimen was reduced intensity regimen in 63%. Stem cell source was PBSC in 88%. Donors were sibling in 42% or matched related donor in 39%. An alternative donor was chosen in 18%. GVHD prophylaxis included antithymocyte globulin in 61%, and calcineurin inhibitor in 97%. Median follow up was 78 months (3.5-157). Considering the whole cohort, 2y OS, DFS, NRM, and cumulative incidence of relapse were 48% (95%CI: 33-70), 60% (95%CI: 44-82), 18% (95%CI: 7-34), and 34% (95%CI: 18-50) respectively. Cumulative incidences of day 100 grade I-II and III-IV acute GVHD 36% and 0%, respectively. Cumulative incidence was 32% among whom 33% had an extensive cGVHD. Patients with progressive disease at transplantation had worst 2y PFS and OS (PFS: HR: 6.12, 95%CI: 1.32-28.31, p=0.02 and OS: HR: 7.04, 95%CI: 1.52-32.75, p=0.013). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the largest published study evaluating outcomes of allo-HCT for R/R PMBCL. Although this is a retrospective study with a limited number of patients, the outcomes suggest that allo-HCT is a therapeutic option providing durable remissions for patients with R/R PMBCL. Disclosures Sibon: Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; iQone: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Loschi: AbbVie: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; CELGENE/BMS: Honoraria; Gilead: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Novartis: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Servier: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Dulery: Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy; Gilead: Other: Travel support and registration fees for scientific meetings .

Introduction: Cytogenetics remains one of the most important prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, even for outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Complex karyotype (CK) constitutes a cytogenetic category with a very adverse prognosis in this setting. However, CK is a heterogenous and loosely defined category which comprises a high diversity of cytogenetic subtypes, which is highly enriched with specific cytogenetic subtypes characterized by losses of chromosomal material at critical regions known to confer a poor prognosis per se, such as monosomal karyotype, del(7q)/-7, del(5q)/-5 or abnormalities leading to 17p region loss. On the contrary, rare AML cases characterized with only multiple numerical abnormalities known as pure hyperdiploid karyotype (HDK), have a controversial prognosis. We hypothesized that pure complex HDK AML has a distinct and much better prognosis after allo-HCT compared to non-HDK, CK AML. Methods: We selected from the EBMT registry adult patients with AML and a full cytogenetic report. HDK was defined by the presence of 49 chromosomes or more. Patients were then stratified by pure HDK (pHDK) and HDK with other cytogenetic abnormalities (HDK+), characterized by HDK and the presence of a prognostic-defining cytogenetic abnormality such as del(5q)/-5, del(7q)/-7, del(17p)/-17/i(17q), inv(3q21-26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26) or t(9;22). We included only first allo-HCT from a sibling or unrelated donor (UD) performed between 2000 and 2018. Results: A total of 236 patients were identified as having HDK. There were 95 pHDK and 141 HDK+. Median age at transplantation was 53 years (range, 18-74) and median follow-up was 43 months (range, 35-56). A diagnosis of secondary AML was reported in 48 patients (20%). At the time of allo-HCT, 180 patients (76%) were in first remission (CR1), and 56 were beyond CR1 (24%). Eighty-five (39%) patients received an allo-HCT from a sibling donor, with more matched unrelated donors (MUD) in HDK+ patients (p=0.02). Most patients (70%) had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score of more than 90% at the time of transplantation. A myeloablative conditioning regimen was administered in 46% of the patients. In vivo T-cell depletion was part of the regimen in 66% of the patients. The most frequent trisomies were trisomy 8, 21, 13, and 22. The 2-year probability of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 26% for the entire cohort. The 2-year probability of LFS was 50% for pHDK and 31% for HDK+ (p=0.003). The 2-year probability of overall survival (OS) was 57% for pHDK and 36% for HDK+ (p=0.007). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) was 22% for pHDK and 44% for HDK+ (p=0.001) (Figure 1). The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and chronic GvHD was 34% and 33%, respectively, for the entire cohort. Finally, the 2-year probability of GvHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 36% for pHDK and 21% for HDK+ (p=0.01). On multivariate analysis, pHDK remained associated with significantly better LFS, OS and GRFS and higher RI (all p-values Conclusions: AML with pHDK has a better outcome after allo-HCT in terms of RI, LFS, OS and GRFS. pHDK AML constitutes probably a distinct cytogenetic entity from HDK+ or other non-hyperdiploid CK AML. CK remains a strong indication for allo-HCT, but the type of abnormalities included in CK significantly influences the outcome and should guide how to manage patients after allo-HCT in terms of immunosuppression withdrawal or prophylactic/preemptive post-transplant interventions such as use of hypomethylating agents or donor lymphocyte infusions. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Labopin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Ganser: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Socie: Alexion: Research Funding. Forcade: Novartis: Other: travel grant. Chalandon: Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Gilead, Amgen, Jazz, Astra Zenec: Other: Travel EXpenses, Accomodation; Incyte, BMS, Pfizer, Abbie, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Yakoub-Agha: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Kröger: Novartis: Research Funding; Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AOP Pharma: Honoraria. Esteve: Jazz: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Mohty: Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria.