Search

Introduction:Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) real-world incidence has been investigated in a limited number of European countries such as Sweden, Denmark and a few others. These prospective population-based analyses give a more precise idea of AML as a health problem than registry data from cooperative groups or other sources, that usually include selected cases as part of research studies and/or therapy trials. In October 2016, the Autonomous Government of Catalonia funded a project (PERIS SLT002/16/00433) to prospectively collect all AML cases from our territory. Objective:To investigate the incidence, characteristics and treatment decisions in all consecutive AML patients diagnosed in Catalonia between January 2017 and December 2019. Methods:Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of AML according the WHO 2016 criteria, both primary and secondary (APL excluded) with an age >18 years. The project was disseminated to all hospitals from Catalonia regardless of their size, having at least one hematologist. A specific informatics tool was implemented for remote reporting of the cases. All data were anonymized. In parallel, a circuit for centralized bio banking of patients' samples was designed. The database included the main clinical, laboratory data as well as the initial therapeutic approach. Cases included in our CETLAM group cooperative studies were automatically linked to the trial database for collecting detailed information. Statistical analyses were performed with R packages. Results:Assuming an incidence of AML of 4 cases per 100,000 inhabitants (based on previous reported data from others), we expected 912 cases during three years in the 7,6 million population of Catalonia. Our prospective registry included 750 consecutive AML patients, 82% of the expected cases. The remaining 18% could be explained by the exclusion of APL, age below 18 years, or underreporting. Seventy percent of patients (n=527) were diagnosed and treated in the 5 large University Hospitals from Barcelona and the two adjacent cities (Badalona and Hospitalet). Table 1 shows the main characteristics of the patients. Among the 390 patients up to 70 years, 272 (70%) were enrolled in the CETLAM AML-12 protocol that included intensive chemotherapy (ICT) and risk adapted hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Forty-one additional patients (11%) in this age group received other ICT in different clinical trials. A remaining 73 patients (20%) were treated with other intensive or non-intensive approaches outside trials. In the group of 360 patients older than 70 years only a 33% (n= 119) were treated under the risk-adapted CETLAM AML-16 protocol for elderly AML patients. This trial included ICT as in the CETLAM-12 in case of favorable genetic features; this was received by 13 of the 119 patients (11%) enrolled. The remaining patients of CETLAM-16 were treated with low-intensity chemotherapy (oral fludarabine, subcutaneous (SC) cytarabine and G-CSF or azacytidine) and 97 additional elderly patients were included in other clinical trials mostly with targeted and hypomethylating agents (27%). Other active therapies outside trials (usually low-intensity) were administered in 50 additional patients (14%) whereas the remaining 94 patients (26%) only received supportive measures (transfusions, hydroxyurea, antibiotics, palliation, or no treatment), because of one or more of the following: advanced age, poor AML features or severe clinical condition. Overall survival (OS) of the whole series at 2 years was 31±2% (CI: 27-35). Patients younger than 70 years had a 2-year OS of 47±3% (CI: 41-53) compared to 11±3% (CI: 7-17) for those above 70 years (p Conclusions:This prospective study is highly representative of the diagnosis and treatment of AML in Catalonia. The median age at diagnosis was 70 years. Of note, 81% of patients up to 70 years were enrolled in ICT trials. The proportion of patients in trials in the elderly group was lower although still remarkable (60%). In this advanced age group, a 26% of patients were treated with supportive measures only. Despite the high inclusion rate in clinical trials, only one third of newly diagnosed AML patients have the probability to survive at 2 years, with a dismal outcome in those above 70 years. Therefore, the investigation of novel and more effective treatments remains mandatory. This series will be detailed and updated during the meeting. Disclosures Salamero: Pfizer:Consultancy;Jazz Pharmaceuticals:Consultancy, Honoraria;Daichii Sankyo:Honoraria;Novartis:Consultancy, Honoraria;Celgene:Consultancy, Honoraria.Olivera:BAYER:Consultancy;Pfizer:Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Daiichi Sankyo:Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Boehringer Ingelheim:Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.Sureda Balari:Celgene:Consultancy, Honoraria;Merck Sharpe and Dohme:Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Sanofi:Consultancy, Honoraria;Novartis:Consultancy, Honoraria;Gilead/Kite:Consultancy, Honoraria;Janssen:Consultancy, Honoraria;Incyte:Consultancy;Roche:Honoraria;BMS:Speakers Bureau;Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb:Consultancy, Honoraria;Takeda:Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.Ribera:Pfizer, Amgen:Research Funding;Pfizer, Amgen, Ariad, Novartis:Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.Sierra:Jazz Pharmaceuticals:Research Funding;Pfizer:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Daiichi Sankyo:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Abbvie:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Novartis:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Astellas:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Roche:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Gilead-Kite:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

BACKGROUND: The progress in the understanding of pathophysiology of AML has allowed the identification of genetic and immune abnormalities with prognostic impact on outcome and suitable as therapeutic targets. The genetic abnormalities are essential for risk allocation and risk-adapted treatment included the indication of hematopoietic cell transplantation. In the last decade, several studies have shown that persistence of measurable residual disease (MRD) after chemotherapy increases relapse incidence and the probability of leukemia recurrence and survival. Therefore, MRD has been progressively incorporated in prognosis estimation. In the last 25 years the CETLAM cooperative group has promoted 4 consecutive trials for AML patients fit for intensive chemotherapy and eventually HCT. Post-remission treatment was based on genetics of the disease and more recently on MRD. The aim of this study has been to investigate if the survival of patients has improved and, if so, to identify the factors that have influenced on the better outcome. METHODS: We included all patients with primary AML up to the age of 60 years enrolled in 4 consecutive Spanish CETLAM group trials. In brief, induction chemotherapy included idarubicin, cytarabine and etoposide in AML-94, AML-99 and AML-03 protocols and without etoposide in the AML-12. G-CSF priming was allowed in the two more recent trials. Post remission therapy included 1 to 3 consolidations including intermediate or high dose cytarabine. Hematopoietic transplantation indication was based on availability of an HLA-compatible donor, genetic findings and more recently MRD. Follow-up was extended to June 2020. The survival and relapse incidence analyses were censored at 5 years. Informed consent was obtained in all cases and the institutional review boards approved the protocols. RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2019, 1755 primary AML patients between 18 and 60 years-old fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The main characteristics of patients appear in table 1. Median age of the whole group was 46 years old. Overall survival (OS) in the whole group was 45% at 5 years, being significantly better in AML-03 and AML-12 than in AML-94 and AML-99 (image 1). Event free survival (EFS) in the whole group was 37% at 5 years, with also significant differences between trials. Also, the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 39% in the whole group with less relapses in the two more recent trials (image 2). To understand these findings, we analyzed first the CR rate over time that was higher in the AML-03 and AML-12 protocols (table 2). The results were different depending on genetics of AML with highest CR rate in patients with CBF AML and in those with intermediate-risk cytogenetics and favorable molecular findings; in contrast, patients with adverse cytogenetics had the lowest CR rate mainly because frequent refractoriness to therapy. According to outcomes in each MRC cytogenetic group 5y-OS was: 69±3% (63-76) in favorable group, 46±2% (43-49) in intermediate and 21±3% (16-27) in adverse group (p Referent to feasibility of allogeneic HCT, there was an increased access to the procedure over the years. A higher proportion of patients allografted in AML-03 and AML-12, 32% and 41% of patients in CR, respectively, compared to 16% in AML-94 and 19% in AML-99. A shortening of the interval between CR and transplantation has been observed in recent years; 3.9 months (mo) in AML-94, 2.7 mo in AML-99, 2.9 mo in AML-03 and 2.2 mo in AML-12. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with primary AML and age up to 60 years-old have improved over the last 25 years. During this period, the CETLAM group has refined the biological characterization of AML patients and tailored the post-remission therapy based on genetic markers with prognostic impact. The increased feasibility of allogeneic HCT may also justify the better results in more recent trials. Even though, there is substantial room for improvement, particularly in patients with AML and adverse genetic features. Disclosures Salamero: Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daichii Sankyo: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Moraleda:Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Sandoz: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Tormo:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ribera:Pfizer, Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer, Amgen, Ariad, Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Sureda Balari:Roche: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck Sharpe and Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sierra:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead-Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

BACKGROUND: AML risk classification is based on genetics (cytogenetics and molecular features) and more recently also on minimal residual disease (MRD) after chemotherapy. These two aspects allow predicting relapse and supporting or not the most anti-leukemia treatment that remains allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We prospectively investigated the combined use of the two predictive markers to allocate post-remission therapy with or without HCT. Objectives of the study were testing: a) if this approach was feasible in a multicenter setting; b) the proportion of patients who were allocated to an allogeneic HCT and finally received the procedure; c) the final distribution into the risk categories and their outcome; d) to analyze the outcome of patients with favorable or intermediate genetics moved to the high risk category because of positive MRD. METHODS: Adult patients with primary AML treated at 15 academic hospitals were included between February 2012 and December 2018. Induction chemotherapy consisted of idarubicin 12 mg/m2 days 1-2-3 and cytarabine 200 mg/m2 days 1 to 7. Consolidation courses were high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m2 or 1.5 g/m2 if ≥60 y/o). The number of consolidation courses was based on genetic risk: 3 in favorable genetics category (FGC) (CBF, NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwild or ratio0.1%) and/or quantitative PCR of the specific transcripts (RUNX1/RUNX1T1, CBFβ/MYH11 and NPM1). RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-five patients (median age: 55, range18-70 y/o, 51% male) were enrolled. Cytogenetics according the revised MRC classification in 707 informative cases was: CBF AML 12%, intermediate 65% (75% of them normal karyotype), and adverse 23%. FLT3-ITD was detected in 28% of patients with intermediate risk cytogenetics and NPM1 mutation in the same group was present in the 48%. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 81% (n=603) of patients, 82% and 80% in patients up to and above 60 yrs, respectively. Induction death occurred in 9% of patients, 7% and 11% the two age groups, and 10% of patients had refractory leukemia; 542 (90%) of the 603 CR patients completed the consolidation phase and were risk allocated taking into account genetics and MRD. The remaining CR patients were not allocated because of early relapse (n=22), death in CR (n=5), severe toxicity (n=22) or others (n=12). After risk allocation, 208 (38%) patients were in the genetics-MRD combined favorable group (CFG), 103 (19%) in combined intermediate group (CIG) and 231 (43%) in the combined adverse group (CAG). In the latter, 185 (80%) of patients received an allogeneic HCT in first CR. Fifty-seven patients (11%) moved from the genetically FGC or IGC to the CAG because of high MRD at the end of consolidations. Median follow-up in survivors was 25 months. Overall 4-years survival (OS) of the whole series is 48±2%; event-free survival (EFS) is 77+3% in the CFG group, 45+6% in the CIG and 34+4% in the CAG (p CONCLUSION Risk adapted therapy for primary AML based on genetics and MRD is feasible in a cooperative group setting. The proportion of CR was high (>80%) even in patients older than 60 y/o. MRD assessment at the end of consolidation moved 57 patients with favorable or intermediate genetics to the CAG. Avoiding HCT in first CR in the FGC patients associated to EFS above 75% at 4 years. Allogeneic transplantation feasibility was 80% when this was the intended treatment because of adverse genetics and/or MRD positivity. Risk assessment based on genetics and MRD continues separating three groups of patients with different outcomes. Since relapses remain frequent when adverse AML features are present, further approaches after transplantation, such as targeted agents and immune therapies deserve investigation. Disclosures Sierra: Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Salamero:Daichii Sankyo: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Esteve:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy.

The reported frequency of D alloimmunization in D- recipients after transfusion of D+ platelets varies. This study was designed to determine the frequency of D alloimmunization, previously reported to be an average of 5%±2%. A primary anti-D immune response was defined as the detection of anti-D ≥28 days following the first D+ platelet transfusion. Data were collected on 485 D- recipients of D+ platelets in 11 centres between 2010-2012. Their median age was 60 (range 2-100) years. Diagnoses included: haematological (203/485, 42%), oncological (64/485, 13%) and other diseases (218/485, 45%). Only 7/485 (1.44%; 95%CI 0.58-2.97%) recipients had a primary anti-D response after a median serological follow-up of 77 days (range: 28-2111). There were no statistically significant differences between the primary anti-D formers and the other patients, in terms of gender, age, receipt of immunosuppressive therapy, proportion of patients with haematological/oncological diseases, transfusion of whole blood-derived or apheresis platelets or both, and total number of transfused platelet products. This is the largest study with the longest follow-up of D alloimmunization following D+ platelet transfusion. The low frequency of D alloimmunization should be considered when deciding whether to administer Rh Immune Globulin to D- males and D- females without childbearing potential after transfusion of D+ platelets.

Background and objective: The prognosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is poor in older adults and elderly patients, and subtype-oriented prospective trials are scarce in these patients. We present the results of three prospective parallel subtype-oriented protocols in fit patients older than 55 years. Patients and methods: In 2008, three prospective phase II trials in patients older than 55 years were activated: ALLOLD07 for Philadephia (Ph) chromosome-negative ALL, ALLOPHO7 for Ph-positive ALL, and BURKIMABO8 for mature B-ALL. Early death (ED), complete remission (CR), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were analyzed. Results: 56, 53 and 21 patients from the ALLOLD07, ALLOPHO7 and BURKIMABO8 trials, respectively, were evaluable. CR was 74%, 87% and 70%, with an ED rate of 13%, 11% and 15%, respectively. The medians of DFS were 8 and 38 months for ALLOLD07 and ALLOPHO7 protocols, not being achieved in the BURKIMABO8 trial (p = 0.001), and the median OS was 12, 37 and 25 months, respectively (p = 0.030). Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and infections were less frequent in the ALLOPHO7 trial vs. ALLOLD07 and BURKIMAB trials, and renal toxicity and mucositis were more frequent in the BURKIMABO8 trial vs. the ALLOLD07 and ALLOPHO7 trials. ECOG score and WBC count had prognostic significance for OS in ALLOPHO7 and BURKIMABO8 trials, whereas no prognostic factors were identified in ALLOLD07 protocol. Conclusion: Subtype-oriented treatment had an impact in the outcome of older adults with ALL. The poorest outcome was observed in Ph-negative non-Mature B-cell ALL patients, for whom improvements in therapy are clearly needed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND: Rh antigens are not present on the platelet surface. However, platelet concentrates may contain enough RBCs to elicit an anti-D response. Thus, D status must be considered in platelet transfusion. In immunosuppressed patients, frequencies of D alloimmunization of up to 19 percent have been previously reported. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Here a prospective study is reported in which 22 D– patients with hematologic disease received D+ platelet transfusions. Platelet concentrates were prepared from whole-blood donations according to the buffy coat method and were pooled before administration. The antibody screen test to detect anti-D was performed by LISS- IAT using the gel test. RESULTS: Our series comprises 22 immunosuppressed D+ patients with a median age of 56 years (range, 23–79). The patients received 121 D-incompatible pooled platelet transfusions. The mean ± SD of RBC content was 4.17 ± 1.74 mL. None of the 22 patients developed detectable anti-D after a median follow-up of 8 weeks (range, 1–37). CONCLUSION: The risk of D alloimmunization is low in patients with hematologic disease after D-incompatible platelet transfusions using platelet concentrates prepared by the buffy coat method.

The management of patients on vitamin K antagonist therapy who require an invasive procedure is problematic. A randomised, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of bemiparin, a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), with unfractionated heparin (UFH) as bridging therapy: the BERTA (BEmiparin Randomised Trial on bridging Anticoagulants) study. Two hundred and six patients on long-term oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) requiring an invasive procedure were randomized to receive bridging therapy with bemiparin + matching placebo or UFH. OAT was resumed on day 1. The study medication was continued for 5-6 days after the procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the combined incidence of arterial and venous thromboembolic events. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major bleeding within 10 days after the invasive procedure. There were no thromboembolic events in the bemiparin group, but two events (2.2 %) occurred in the UFH group. No major bleeding occurred in either group, but minor bleeding occurred in four patients (4.3 %) and six patients (6.1 %) in the bemiparin and UHF groups, respectively. No deaths and no cases of severe thrombocytopenia occurred during the whole study period. Despite its small size, the BERTA study is the first randomised, double-blind clinical trial comparing UFH with a fixed high-risk thromboprophylactic dose of an LMWH as bridging therapy. There were no thromboembolic events and fewer bleeding episodes in the bemiparin group than in the UFH group, hence we suggest that bemiparin is at least as safe as UFH as bridging therapy.

Hodgkin’s disease is, in general, a lymph node-based disease. It usually starts in an area within the lymphatic system and spreads, in an orderly manner, along the lymph­atic chain to contiguous lymph node areas. There have been sporadic case reports of acute liver failure caused by hematological malignancies. Generally, liver failure is a feature of stage IV end-stage disease, when it occurs in lymphoma. Thus, hepatic involvement usually occurs late in the course of Hodgkin’s disease or with advanced-stage disease, and primary presentation in the liver with acute liver failure is extremely rare. In most cases, the diagnosis was made at aut­opsy. We describe a patient with Hodgkin’s disease presenting with acute liver failure. This is a very unusual Hodgkin’s disease form of presentation, because the acute liver failure was the presenting feature of the disease. Furthermore, the lymphoma occurred as a very late relapse, twenty years after the first diagnosis. To the best of our knowledge, such a case has not been described to date.

The antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory properties of thalidomide have led to its use and evaluation in refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). 1,2 However, thalidomide use is associated with several side effects, although deep vein thrombosis and peripheral neuropathy are the most serious. 3 The incidence of thrombosis after treatment with thalidomide ranges from 2% to 23%, but is higher among patients who also receive chemotherapy. 3,4 Thromboembolic episodes are usually venous and may cause pulmonary embolism or even myocardial infarction and cerebral venous thrombosis. 3,4 Arterial occlusion is rare, and the association between arterial thrombotic events and thalidomide is infrequent with only a few patients reported who developed arterial strokes on thalidomide. 3,5 We describe a case of nonfatal thrombotic stroke occurring in a patient with relapsed MM treated with thalidomide.

We evaluated the capacity of oral iron with or without oral folic acid administration to improve the accomplishment of our scheduled preoperative autologous blood collection program in patients with baseline hemoglobin115 g/l.Patients were enrolled in a randomized trial. The control group received no vitamin supplements. The iron group received 105 mg of elemental iron daily p.o. The and iron+folate group received 105 mg of elemental iron daily and 5 mg of folic acid daily p.o.Eighty-six percent of patients in the control group, 86% of patients in the iron group and 87% of patients in the iron+folate group accomplished our preoperative autologous blood collection program.In our study, neither oral iron nor folic acid supplements enhanced the accomplishment of our preoperative autologous blood collection program in patients with baseline hemoglobin115 g/l.

BACKGROUND: Our reference adsorption procedure is to autoadsorb serum with ZZAP-pretreated patients’ red cells (RBCs), although it is time-consuming. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) for performing autologous adsorption procedures without pretreatment of patients’ RBCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Equal volumes of patient's plasma, patient's RBCs, and PEG were mixed. This mixture was incubated for 15 minutes at 37°C, and the adsorbed plasma-PEG mixture was immediately harvested to proceed to the antiglobulin test with anti-immunoglobulin G. The ZZAP-adsorption procedure was performed in our reference laboratory. RESULTS: Thirty-one samples were detected with warm autoantibodies in pretransfusion testing. A total number of 58 autologous adsorption procedures were performed with PEG in 870 minutes (mean, 28 min) and alloantibodies were detected in 4 (13%) cases (anti-E in 2 cases and anti-E + K in 2 cases). Our reference laboratory performed a total number of 61 adsorption procedures with ZZAP in 3660 minutes (mean, 118 min) and detected the same alloantibodies specificities. CONCLUSION: The PEG autologous adsorption procedure is an efficient method of enhancing autoantibody adsorption and alloantibody detection and decreasing the labor-intensive testing required by the presence of serum warm autoantibodies in pretransfusion samples.

Fundamento y objetivo Evaluar la capacidad del hierro oral con administracion de acido folico oral o sin ella para mejorar el cumplimiento de un programa de recogida de sangre autologa con predeposito (PRSAP) en pacientes con cifras basales de hemoglobina superior a 115 g/l. Pacientes y metodo Los pacientes incluidos en el estudio fueron aleatorizados en 3 grupos: el grupo control no recibio suplementos vitaminicos; el grupo con hierro recibio 105 mg de hierro elemental diario por via oral y el grupo hierro + folico recibio 105 mg de hierro elemental diario y 5 mg de acido folico diario por via oral. Resultados El 86% de los pacientes del grupo control, el 86% del grupo con hierro y el 87% del grupo hierro + folico consiguieron cumplir nuestro PRSAP. Conclusion En nuestro estudio, los suplementos de hierro oral, con o sin acido folico oral, no mejoran el cumplimiento de nuestro PRSAP en pacientes con cifras basales de hemoglobina superiores a 115 g/l.

Background and aim Only 20-30% of elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are enrolled in clinical trials because of co-morbid disorders or poor performance status. We present the results of treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) ALL patients over 55 yr treated in the PETHEMA ALL-96 trial. Patients and methods From 1996 to 2006, 33 patients > or = 55 yr with Ph- ALL were included. Induction therapy was vincristine, daunorubicin, prednisone, asparaginase, and cyclophosphamide over 5 weeks. Central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis involved triple intrathecal (IT) therapy, 14 doses over the first year. Consolidation-1 included mercaptopurine, methotrexate, teniposide and cytarabine, followed by one consolidation-2 cycle similar to the induction cycle. Maintenance consisted of mercaptopurine and methotrexate up to 2 yr in complete remission (CR) with monthly reinduction cycles (vincristine, prednisone and asparaginase) during the first year. Results Median (range) age was 65 yr (56-77). Phenotype (30 patients): early-pre-B 7, common/pre-B 18, T 5. Cytogenetics (28 patients): normal 12, complex 10, t(4;11) 2 and other 4. CR was achieved in 19/33 (57.6%) patients, early death occurred in 12 (36.4%) and 2 (6%) were resistant. Overall survival and disease-free survival probabilities (2 yr, 95% CI) were 39% (21%-57%) and 46% (22%-70%), respectively (median follow up of 24 months). Removal of asparaginase and cyclophosphamide from the induction decreased induction death (OR 0.119, CI 95% 0.022-0.637, P = 0.013) and increased survival (20% vs. 52%, P = 0.05). Conclusions The prognosis of elderly Ph- ALL patients is poor. In this study, less intensive induction decreased toxic death, allowing delivery of planned consolidation therapy and increased survival probability.

A 68-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with an uncategorized, Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative disorder associated with leukocytosis, anemia and thrombocytopenia. His WBC count on admission was 290,000 per mm 3 , and oral hydroxyurea was started on Day 2 in hospital, when the WBC count was 392,000 per mm 3 . On Day 3, the WBC count was 323,000 per mm 3 , and the patient became confused and eventually stuporous. A cerebral CT scan demonstrated multiple hyper-dense nodules surrounded by edema. Therapeutic leukapheresis was initiated on Day 4; no sedimenting agent or other drugs were used. Two procedures were performed, on Days 4 and 5. The patient's WBC count fell from 316,000 per mm 3 prior to the first apheresis to 69,000 per mm 3 on Day 6. The hemoglobin level went from 8.9 g per dL percent to 6.6 g per dL, and the platelet count from 71,700 per mm 3 to 37,700 per mm 3 . Despite the intervention, the patient became comatose on Day 7, and died on Day 10. An autopsy was not performed. Leukostasis occurs in patients with high blast counts due to aggregates of leukemic cells in vessels, especially in the lung and brain. In patients with very high WBC counts (> 300,000/mm 3 ), these leukemic cells can destroy vessel walls and invade white matter to form nodules, often surrounded by hemorrhage. Because hydroxyurea takes at least 24 h for an effect, early cytoreduction by leukapheresis may be useful for the symptomatic patient. However, leukapheresis may not be able to reverse the more advanced pathology of intracerebral leukemic nodules, which could have contributed to the death of our patient.

To evaluate the current use of the DAT in our hospital, we reviewed the charts of all patients who had a DAT performed in our laboratory. The collected data included DAT results and a previously completed laboratory evaluation of suspected hemolytic anemia. Four hundred sixty-three DATs were performed in our laboratory from April 1999 to October 2001.The DAT was negative in 434 (93.7%) cases and positive in 29 (6.3%) cases. A complete laboratory evaluation of suspected hemolytic anemia was seen in 179 (38.7%) cases. The incidence of a positive DAT was higher in the group of patients with > 2 signs of hemolysis (4/34 cases; 11.8%) than in the group of patients with ≤ 2 signs of hemolysis (5/145 cases;3.4%) (RR = 0.029;95% CI:0.08–1.03;p = 0.06). When a patient with anemia is being investigated, a complete laboratory evaluation for suspected hemolytic anemia should be done before performing a DAT. Immunohematology 2003:19:16–18.