Search

Background: The impact of preoperative glycemic control on the survival outcomes of patients undergoing a radical hysterectomy (RH) for cervical cancer has not been investigated. Patients and Methods: We reviewed patients who underwent a type III RH for cervical cancer between January 2004 and June 2011 in our institution. Results: A total of 431 patients were included and 83 (19.3%) were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM). Poorly controlled DM (preoperative hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] ≥7.0%) was observed in 49 (59.0%) diabetic patients. Compared to patients without DM and diabetic patients with good glycemic control (preoperative HbA1c <7.0%), diabetic patients with poor glycemic control had significantly higher risks of tumor recurrence, cervical cancer-specific death, and overall death. In multivariate analysis, DM with poor glycemic control independently predicted recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). We excluded patients without DM and performed a sensitivity analysis. When HbA1c levels were treated as a dichotomous variable, preoperative HbA1c ≥7.0% was independently associated with RFS, CSS, and OS. When HbA1c level was treated as a continuous variable, it remained an independent predictor of RFS, CSS, and OS. Conclusion: DM with poor glycemic control prior to RH was significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrence and mortality in cervical cancer patients. These results underscore the importance of intensive glycemic control and close follow-up for diabetic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel combined with a fixed dose of cisplatin (75 mg/m²) delivered as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with ovarian cancer., Methods: In this phase I trial, a time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval design was used. Docetaxel was given at a starting dose of 60 mg/m² and was increased in 5 mg/m² increments until the MTD was determined or the maximum dose level of 75 mg/m² was reached. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate was set at 25%, with a total sample size of 30 patients. HIPEC was delivered immediately following debulking surgery at a target temperature of 43°C for 90 minutes., Results: From August 2022 to November 2022, 30 patients were enrolled. Among the patients who received a dose of docetaxel ≤65 mg/m², no DLT was reported. DLTs were observed in one patient who received 70 mg/m² docetaxel (grade 3 anaemia) and in three patients who received 75 mg/m² docetaxel (one case of grade 3 anaemia, one case of grade 3 hepatic impairment and one case of grade 4 thrombocytopenia). Patients treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m² in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m² had an estimated DLT rate of 25%, which was the closest to the target DLT rate and was therefore chosen as the MTD., Conclusion: Docetaxel, in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin (75 mg/m²), can be used safely at intraperitoneal doses of 75 mg/m² in ovarian cancer patients who received HIPEC (43°C, 90 minutes) following debulking surgery., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05410483., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (© 2024. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Objective: To investigate whether the combination of neoadjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NHIPEC) plus intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy (IV NACT) has superior efficacy to IV NACT alone., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Two tertiary referral university hospitals., Population: Patients with ovarian cancer who received NACT-interval debulking surgery (IDS) between 2012 and 2020., Methods: The tumour response to NACT was evaluated with the chemotherapy response score (CRS) system. Survival outcomes were compared., Main Outcome Measures: CRS 3, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: In total, 127 patients were included, and 46 received NHIPEC plus IV NACT. The addition of NHIPEC was independently associated with an increased likelihood of CRS 3 (p = 0.033). Patients who received NHIPEC + IV NACT had significantly improved PFS compared with those who received IV NACT alone (median PFS: 22 versus 16 months, p < 0.001). The use of NHIPEC was identified as an independent predictor of PFS (p < 0.0001). OS did not differ significantly between treatment groups (p = 0.062), although a trend favouring NHIPEC was noted. Incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events and the surgical complexity score of IDS were similar between the two groups., Conclusions: Compared with IV NACT alone, the combination of NHIPEC and IV NACT resulted in improved tumour response and longer PFS. The addition of NHIPEC did not increase the risk of adverse effects or affect the complexity of IDS., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

For many malignant diseases, specialized care has been reported to be associated with better outcomes. The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of gynecologic oncologists on treatment outcomes for cervical cancer patients treated by radical hysterectomy. Records of patients who received radical hysterectomy between January 2005 and June 2010 were reviewed. Perioperative morbidity, recurrence-free survival, and cancer-specific survival were assessed. Cox regression model was used to evaluate gynecologic oncologists as an independent predictor of survival. A total of 839 patients were included. Of these patients, 553 were treated by gynecologic oncologists, while 286 were treated by other subspecialties. With regard to operative outcomes, significant differences in favor of operation by gynecologic oncologists were found in number of patients receiving para-aortic node sampling and dissection (P=0.038), compliance with surgical guidelines (P=0.003), operative time (P<0.0001), estimated blood loss (P<0.0001), transfusion rate (P=0.046), number of removed nodes (P=0.033), and incidences of ureteric injury (P=0.027), cystotomy (P=0.038), and fistula formation (P=0.002). Patients who were operated on by gynecologic oncologists had longer recurrence-free survival (P=0.001; hazard ratio [HR] =0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.48, 0.84]) and cancer-specific survival (P=0.005; HR=0.64; 95% CI [0.47, 0.87]), and this association remained significant in patients with locally advanced disease. Care by gynecologic oncologists was an independent predictor for improved recurrence-free survival (P<0.0001; HR=0.57; 95% CI [0.42, 0.76]) and cancer-specific survival (P=0.001; HR=0.58; 95% CI [0.42, 0.81]), which was still significant among patients with locally advanced cancer. Given the results, we believe for cervical cancer patients receiving radical hysterectomy, operation by gynecologic oncologists results in significantly improved surgical and survival outcomes. The importance of the subspecialty of a gynecologist for cervical cancer patients should be addressed in clinical practice, especially for those in developing countries.