Search

SUMMARY: Lateral organ boundaries domain (LBD) proteins are plant‐specific transcription factors. Class‐I LBD genes have been widely demonstrated to play pivotal roles in organ development; however, knowledge on class‐II genes remains limited. Here, we report that ZmLBD5, a class‐II LBD gene, is involved in the regulation of maize (Zea mays) growth and the drought response by affecting gibberellin (GA) and abscisic acid (ABA) synthesis. ZmLBD5 is mainly involved in regulation of the TPS‐KS‐GA2ox gene module, which is comprised of key enzyme‐encoding genes involved in GA and ABA biosynthesis. ABA insufficiency increases stomatal density and aperture in overexpression plants and causes a drought‐sensitive phenotype by promoting water transpiration. Increased GA1 levels promotes seedling growth in overexpression plants. Accordingly, CRISPR/Cas9 knockout lbd5 seedlings are dwarf but drought‐tolerant. Moreover, lbd5 has a higher grain yield under drought stress conditions and shows no penalty in well‐watered conditions compared to the wild type. On the whole, ZmLBD5 is a negative regulator of maize drought tolerance, and it is a potentially useful target for drought resistance breeding. Significance Statement: Maize (Zea mays) ZmLBD5 is mainly associated with abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellin (GA) synthesis by regulating the TPS‐KS‐GA2ox gene module, which is comprised of key enzyme‐encoding genes involved in GA and ABA biosynthesis. ZmLBD5 negatively regulates drought tolerance by repressing ABA synthesis and promoting stomatal development and opening; however, lbd5 mutants have higher grain yield under drought stress conditions and show no penalty in well‐watered conditions compared to the wild type. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Root architecture remodelling is critical for forage moisture in water‐limited soil. DEEPER ROOTING 1 (DRO1) in Oryza, Arabidopsis, and Prunus has been reported to improve drought avoidance by promoting roots to grow downward and acquire water from deeper soil. In the present study, we found that ZmDRO1 responded more strongly to abscisic acid (ABA)/drought induction in Zea mays ssp. mexicana, an ancestral species of cultivated maize, than in B73. It was proposed that this is one of the reasons why Zea mays ssp. mexicana has a more noticeable change in the downward direction angle of the root and fewer biomass penalties under water‐deficient conditions. Thus, a robust, synthetic ABA/drought‐inducible promoter was used to control the expression of ZmDRO1B73 in Arabidopsis and cultivated maize for drought‐resistant breeding. Interestingly, ABA‐inducible ZmDRO1 promoted a larger downward root angle and improved grain yield by more than 40% under water‐limited conditions. Collectively, these results revealed that different responses to ABA/drought induction of ZmDRO1 confer different drought avoidance abilities, and we demonstrated the application of ZmDRO1 via an ABA‐inducible strategy to alter the root architecture of modern maize to improve drought adaptation in the field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Teosinte, an ancestor to modern maize, displays an excellent performance regarding resistance to stress, but its yield potential has rarely been reported. To evaluate the potential contribution of teosinte to maize improvement, two maize–teosinte backcrossed recombination inbred line (RIL) populations and their corresponding test‐cross hybrids were planted for trait assessment. In RN and ZP RIL populations, the average coefficients of variation of 31 agronomic traits were 9.14% (Range, 0.38%‒25.21%) and 6.85% (Range, 0.55%‒27.73%), respectively. The correlation coefficients of 13 common shared traits between RIL populations and test‐cross hybrid populations ranged from 0.10 to 0.60 and from 0.06 to 0.72, respectively. A total of 39 and 3 recombined inbred lines, and 29 and 47 test‐cross hybrids exhibited higher yields than their checks (RP125, Zheng58, CD189 and ZD958) with the BLUP data, respectively. Furthermore, four test‐cross hybrids including RN034/SCML1950, ZP068/Chang7‐2, ZP079/Chang7‐2 and ZP122/Chang7‐2 showed a more stable yield performance, with yield gains of +7.07%, +3.64%, +5.83% and +3.82% over checks, respectively. In conclusion, teosinte could serve as an alien germplasm for maize breeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pseudocapacitance is mainly contributed by fast surface‐controlled reactions. However, the effect of nanostructures on the capacitive behaviour has not been systematically studied yet. In this work, we synthesize different Co3O4 nanostructures with the same crystal structure and exposed clean crystal planes that include 1D nanowire, 2D nanosheet, 3D rambutan‐like and hierarchical structures, ranging from low to high dimensions. It is discovered the specific capacitance of Co3O4 materials follows the order of 1D nanowire > hierarchical structure > 2D nanosheet > 3D rambutan‐like structure while the electron transfer resistance is 1D nanowire < 2D nanosheet < hierarchical structure < 3D rambutan‐like structure. Under the same electrochemistry, results suggest the pseudocapacitance is not simply dependent on the surface area offered by the nanostructure, but relies on the conductivity, accessibility, diffusion rate and reactivity of the electrode. 1D nanostructure can render the highest reactant accessibility, fastest electron transfer and largest diffusion rate, thus achieving the highest specific pseudocapacitance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) have been widely used in maize genetics and breeding, because they are co-dominant, easy to score, and highly abundant. In this study, we used whole-genome sequences from 16 maize inbreds and 1 wild relative to determine SSR abundance and to develop a set of high-density polymorphic SSR markers. A total of 264 658 SSRs were identified across the 17 genomes, with an average of 135 693 SSRs per genome. Marker density was one SSR every of 15.48 kb. (C/G)n, (AT)n, (CAG/CTG)n, and (AAAT/ATTT)n were the most frequent motifs for mono, di-, tri-, and tetra-nucleotide SSRs, respectively. SSRs were most abundant in intergenic region and least frequent in untranslated regions, as revealed by comparing SSR distributions of three representative resequenced genomes. Comparing SSR sequences and e-polymerase chain reaction analysis among the 17 tested genomes created a new database, including 111 887 SSRs, that could be develop as polymorphic markers in silico. Among these markers, 58.00, 26.09, 7.20, 3.00, 3.93, and 1.78% of them had mono, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotide motifs, respectively. Polymorphic information content for 35 573 polymorphic SSRs out of 111 887 loci varied from 0.05 to 0.83, with an average of 0.31 in the 17 tested genomes. Experimental validation of polymorphic SSR markers showed that over 70% of the primer pairs could generate the target bands with length polymorphism, and these markers would be very powerful when they are used for genetic populations derived from various types of maize germplasms that were sampled for this study. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Abiotic and biotic stresses globally constrain plant growth and impede the optimization of crop productivity. The phytohormone auxin is involved in nearly every aspect of plant development. Auxin acts as a chemical messenger that influences gene expression through a short nuclear pathway, mediated by a family of specific DNA-binding transcription factors known as Auxin Response Factors (ARFs). ARFs thus act as effectors of auxin response and translate chemical signals into the regulation of auxin responsive genes. Since the initial discovery of the first ARF in Arabidopsis, advancements in genetics, biochemistry, genomics, and structural biology have facilitated the development of models elucidating ARF action and their contributions to generating specific auxin responses. Yet, significant gaps persist in our understanding of ARF transcription factors despite these endeavors. Unraveling the functional roles of ARFs in regulating stress response, alongside elucidating their genetic and molecular mechanisms, is still in its nascent phase. Here, we review recent research outcomes on ARFs, detailing their involvement in regulating leaf, flower, and root organogenesis and development, as well as stress responses and their corresponding regulatory mechanisms: including gene expression patterns, functional characterization, transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post- translational regulation across diverse stress conditions. Furthermore, we delineate unresolved questions and forthcoming challenges in ARF research., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Liu, Yahaya, Li and Wu.)