Search

Mesophyll protoplasts from Brassica oleracea, B. napus, Nicotiana tobaccum and Solanum tuberosum were isolated and subjected to ultracentrifugation at 65000g for 30 min in percoll solutions containing various strengths of salt and osmotic stabilizing agents. After centrifugation, the self-generated per-coll gradients were evaluated for their effectiveness in protoplast evacuolation and enucleation. The vacuoles, cell debris, evacuolated protoplasts and enucleated protoplasts were separated. Factors that affected evacuolation and enucleation in the percoll gradients were described. Mesophyll protoplasts produced by epidermis peeling and short enzyme incubation periods were more easily evacuolated and enucleated than those produced by leaf-slicing and long incubation periods. Lower centrifugal force at 25000g for 80 min was also successful in evacuolating and enucleating the mesophyll protoplasts. A green band that contained nearly pure evacuolated protoplasts, of which 45% were enucleated protoplasts, was obtained from the self-generated percoll gradient. Rhodamine 123 staining of mitochondria indicated that the evacuolated protoplasts were metabolically active and were capable of regenerating the vacuole and cell wall. Cell divisions were also observed when the evacuolated protoplasts were cultured. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: KRAS mutations are detected in 25% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no targeted therapies are approved for this subset population. Trametinib, a selective allosteric inhibitor of MEK1/MEK2, demonstrated preclinical and clinical activity in KRAS-mutant NSCLC. We report a phase II trial comparing trametinib with docetaxel in patients with advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC. Patients and methods: Eligible patients with histologically confirmed KRAS-mutant NSCLC previously treated with one prior platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned in a ratio of 2 : 1 to trametinib (2 mg orally once daily) or docetaxel (75 mg/m² i.v. every 3 weeks). Crossover to the other arm after disease progression was allowed. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The study was prematurely terminated after the interim analysis of 92 PFS events, which showed the comparison of trametinib versus docetaxel for PFS crossed the futility boundary. Results: One hundred and twenty-nine patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC were randomized; of which, 86 patients received trametinib and 43 received docetaxel. Median PFS was 12 weeks in the trametinib arm and 11 weeks in the docetaxel arm (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14; 95% CI 0.75--1.75; P = 0.5197). Median overall survival, while the data are immature, was 8 months in the trametinib arm and was not reached in the docetaxel arm (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.52--1.83; P = 0.934). There were 10 (12%) partial responses (PRs) in the trametinib arm and 5 (12%) PRs in the docetaxel arm (P=1.0000). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) in ≥20% of trametinib patients were rash, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. The most frequent grade 3 treatment-related AEs in the trametinib arm were hypertension, rash, diarrhea, and asthenia. Conclusion: Trametinib showed similar PFS and a response rate as docetaxel in patients with previously treated KRASmutant- positive NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report the first quality-of-life assessment of a MEK inhibitor in metastatic melanoma from a phase III study. Trametinib prolonged progression-free survival and improved overall survival versus chemotherapy in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma. Less functional impairment, smaller declines in health status, and less exacerbation of symptoms were observed with trametinib.Background In a randomized phase III study, trametinib prolonged progression-free survival and improved overall survival versus chemotherapy in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma. Patients and methods Patients' quality of life (QOL) was assessed at baseline and follow-up visits using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core QOL questionnaire. Results In the primary efficacy population (BRAF V600E+, no brain metastases) from baseline to weeks 6 and 12, patients' global health status scores worsened by 4–5 points with chemotherapy but improved by 2–3 points with trametinib. Rapid and substantive reductions in QOL functionality (e.g. role functioning, 8–11 points at weeks 6 and 12) and symptom exacerbation (e.g. fatigue, 4–8 points; nausea and vomiting, 5 points, both at weeks 6 and 12) were observed in chemotherapy-treated patients. In contrast, trametinib-treated patients reported small improvements or slight worsening from baseline at week 12, depending on the functional dimension and symptom. The mean symptom-scale scores for chemotherapy-treated patients increased from baseline (symptoms worsened) for seven of eight symptoms at week 6 (except insomnia) and six of eight symptoms at week 12 (except dyspnea and insomnia). In contrast, at weeks 6 and 12, the mean symptom-scale scores for trametinib decreased from baseline (symptoms improved) for pain (11–12 points), insomnia (10–12 points), and appetite loss (1–5 points), whereas those for diarrhea worsened (15–16 points). Mixed-model repeated-measures analyses showed significant (P < 0.05) and/or clinically meaningful improvements (small to moderate) from baseline in favor of trametinib for global health; physical, role, and social functioning; fatigue; pain; insomnia; nausea and vomiting; constipation; dyspnea; and appetite at weeks 6 and/or 12. QOL results for the intent-to-treat population were consistent. Conclusions This first QOL assessment for a MEK inhibitor in metastatic melanoma demonstrated that trametinib was associated with less functional impairment, smaller declines in health status, and less exacerbation of symptoms versus chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]