Search

Your search keyword '"Wright, Lauren B."' showing total 15 results
Start Over Author "Wright, Lauren B."
15 results on '"Wright, Lauren B."'

2. Data from The Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaboration: A Pooling Project of Studies Participating in the National Cancer Institute Cohort Consortium

Author

Nichols, Hazel B., primary, Schoemaker, Minouk J., primary, Wright, Lauren B., primary, McGowan, Craig, primary, Brook, Mark N., primary, McClain, Kathleen M., primary, Jones, Michael E., primary, Adami, Hans-Olov, primary, Agnoli, Claudia, primary, Baglietto, Laura, primary, Bernstein, Leslie, primary, Bertrand, Kimberly A., primary, Blot, William J., primary, Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine, primary, Butler, Lesley, primary, Chen, Yu, primary, Doody, Michele M., primary, Dossus, Laure, primary, Eliassen, A. Heather, primary, Giles, Graham G., primary, Gram, Inger T., primary, Hankinson, Susan E., primary, Hoffman-Bolton, Judy, primary, Kaaks, Rudolf, primary, Key, Timothy J., primary, Kirsh, Victoria A., primary, Kitahara, Cari M., primary, Koh, Woon-Puay, primary, Larsson, Susanna C., primary, Lund, Eiliv, primary, Ma, Huiyan, primary, Merritt, Melissa A., primary, Milne, Roger L., primary, Navarro, Carmen, primary, Overvad, Kim, primary, Ozasa, Kotaro, primary, Palmer, Julie R., primary, Peeters, Petra H., primary, Riboli, Elio, primary, Rohan, Thomas E., primary, Sadakane, Atsuko, primary, Sund, Malin, primary, Tamimi, Rulla M., primary, Trichopoulou, Antonia, primary, Vatten, Lars, primary, Visvanathan, Kala, primary, Weiderpass, Elisabete, primary, Willett, Walter C., primary, Wolk, Alicja, primary, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne, primary, Zheng, Wei, primary, Sandler, Dale P., primary, and Swerdlow, Anthony J., primary

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Table S1 from The Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaboration: A Pooling Project of Studies Participating in the National Cancer Institute Cohort Consortium

Author

Nichols, Hazel B., primary, Schoemaker, Minouk J., primary, Wright, Lauren B., primary, McGowan, Craig, primary, Brook, Mark N., primary, McClain, Kathleen M., primary, Jones, Michael E., primary, Adami, Hans-Olov, primary, Agnoli, Claudia, primary, Baglietto, Laura, primary, Bernstein, Leslie, primary, Bertrand, Kimberly A., primary, Blot, William J., primary, Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine, primary, Butler, Lesley, primary, Chen, Yu, primary, Doody, Michele M., primary, Dossus, Laure, primary, Eliassen, A. Heather, primary, Giles, Graham G., primary, Gram, Inger T., primary, Hankinson, Susan E., primary, Hoffman-Bolton, Judy, primary, Kaaks, Rudolf, primary, Key, Timothy J., primary, Kirsh, Victoria A., primary, Kitahara, Cari M., primary, Koh, Woon-Puay, primary, Larsson, Susanna C., primary, Lund, Eiliv, primary, Ma, Huiyan, primary, Merritt, Melissa A., primary, Milne, Roger L., primary, Navarro, Carmen, primary, Overvad, Kim, primary, Ozasa, Kotaro, primary, Palmer, Julie R., primary, Peeters, Petra H., primary, Riboli, Elio, primary, Rohan, Thomas E., primary, Sadakane, Atsuko, primary, Sund, Malin, primary, Tamimi, Rulla M., primary, Trichopoulou, Antonia, primary, Vatten, Lars, primary, Visvanathan, Kala, primary, Weiderpass, Elisabete, primary, Willett, Walter C., primary, Wolk, Alicja, primary, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne, primary, Zheng, Wei, primary, Sandler, Dale P., primary, and Swerdlow, Anthony J., primary

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Gestational diabetes and risk of breast cancer before age 55 years

Author

Bertrand, Kimberly A, primary, O’Brien, Katie M, additional, Wright, Lauren B, additional, Palmer, Julie R, additional, Blot, William J, additional, Eliassen, A Heather, additional, Rosenberg, Lynn, additional, Sandin, Sven, additional, Tobias, Deirdre, additional, Weiderpass, Elisabete, additional, Zheng, Wei, additional, Swerdlow, Anthony J, additional, Schoemaker, Minouk J, additional, Nichols, Hazel B, additional, and Sandler, Dale P, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Breast cancer risk in relation to history of preeclampsia and hyperemesis gravidarum: Prospective analysis in the Generations Study

Author

Wright, Lauren B., Schoemaker, Minouk J., Jones, Michael E., Ashworth, Alan, and Swerdlow, Anthony J.

Subjects
Adult, Receptor, ErbB-2, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, United Kingdom, preeclampsia, Postmenopause, breast cancer, Pre-Eclampsia, Premenopause, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Hyperemesis Gravidarum, cohort study, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Prospective Studies, Breast Carcinoma In Situ, skin and connective tissue diseases, Cancer Epidemiology, Follow-Up Studies, Proportional Hazards Models
Abstract

Preeclampsia and hyperemesis gravidarum are pregnancy complications associated with altered sex hormone levels. Previous studies suggest preeclampsia may be associated with a decreased risk of subsequent breast cancer and hyperemesis with an increased risk, but the evidence remains unclear. We used data from the Generations Study, a large prospective study of women in the United Kingdom, to estimate relative risks of breast cancer in relation to a history of preeclampsia and hyperemesis using Cox regression adjusting for known breast cancer risk factors. During 7.5 years average follow‐up of 82,053 parous women, 1,969 were diagnosed with invasive or in situ breast cancer. Women who had experienced preeclampsia during pregnancy had a significantly decreased risk of premenopausal breast cancer (hazard ratio (HR) =0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49–0.90) and of HER2‐enriched tumours (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12–0.91), but there was no association with overall (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.80–1.02) or postmenopausal (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.85–1.12) breast cancer risk. Risk reductions among premenopausal women were strongest within 20 years since the last pregnancy with preeclampsia. Hyperemesis was associated with a significantly increased risk of HER2‐enriched tumours (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.07–2.87), but not with other intrinsic subtypes or breast cancer risk overall. These results provide evidence that preeclampsia is associated with a decreased risk of premenopausal and HER2‐enriched breast cancer and that hyperemesis, although not associated with breast cancer risk overall, may be associated with raised risk of HER2‐enriched tumours., What's new? Although the link of preeclampsia and hyperemesis gravidarum with altered sex hormone levels is well established, relatively little is known about the association of these pregnancy complications with breast cancer risk. Here, the authors found that a history of preeclampsia decreased the risk of premenopausal breast cancer and tumors enriched for the receptor tyrosine‐protein kinase HER2. In contrast, hyperemesis gravidarum increased the risk to develop HER2‐enriched tumors, pointing to nuanced differences of sex hormone alterations during pregnancy with respect to breast cancer subtypes and menopausal status.

Published
2018

8. Adult weight change and premenopausal breast cancer risk: A prospective pooled analysis of data from 628,463 women

Author

Schoemaker, Minouk J., primary, Nichols, Hazel B., additional, Wright, Lauren B., additional, Brook, Mark N., additional, Jones, Michael E., additional, O'Brien, Katie M., additional, Adami, Hans‐Olov, additional, Baglietto, Laura, additional, Bernstein, Leslie, additional, Bertrand, Kimberly A., additional, Boutron‐Ruault, Marie‐Christine, additional, Chen, Yu, additional, Connor, Avonne E., additional, Dossus, Laure, additional, Eliassen, A. Heather, additional, Giles, Graham G., additional, Gram, Inger T., additional, Hankinson, Susan E., additional, Kaaks, Rudolf, additional, Key, Timothy J., additional, Kirsh, Victoria A., additional, Kitahara, Cari M., additional, Larsson, Susanna C., additional, Linet, Martha, additional, Ma, Huiyan, additional, Milne, Roger L., additional, Ozasa, Kotaro, additional, Palmer, Julie R., additional, Riboli, Elio, additional, Rohan, Thomas E., additional, Sacerdote, Carlotta, additional, Sadakane, Atsuko, additional, Sund, Malin, additional, Tamimi, Rulla M., additional, Trichopoulou, Antonia, additional, Ursin, Giske, additional, Visvanathan, Kala, additional, Weiderpass, Elisabete, additional, Willett, Walter C., additional, Wolk, Alicja, additional, Zeleniuch‐Jacquotte, Anne, additional, Sandler, Dale P., additional, and Swerdlow, Anthony J., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. Breast Cancer Risk After Recent Childbirth

Author

Nichols, Hazel B., primary, Schoemaker, Minouk J., additional, Cai, Jianwen, additional, Xu, Jiawei, additional, Wright, Lauren B., additional, Brook, Mark N., additional, Jones, Michael E., additional, Adami, Hans-Olov, additional, Baglietto, Laura, additional, Bertrand, Kimberly A., additional, Blot, William J., additional, Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine, additional, Dorronsoro, Miren, additional, Dossus, Laure, additional, Eliassen, A. Heather, additional, Giles, Graham G., additional, Gram, Inger T., additional, Hankinson, Susan E., additional, Hoffman-Bolton, Judy, additional, Kaaks, Rudolf, additional, Key, Timothy J., additional, Kitahara, Cari M., additional, Larsson, Susanna C., additional, Linet, Martha, additional, Merritt, Melissa A., additional, Milne, Roger L., additional, Pala, Valeria, additional, Palmer, Julie R., additional, Peeters, Petra H., additional, Riboli, Elio, additional, Sund, Malin, additional, Tamimi, Rulla M., additional, Tjønneland, Anne, additional, Trichopoulou, Antonia, additional, Ursin, Giske, additional, Vatten, Lars, additional, Visvanathan, Kala, additional, Weiderpass, Elisabete, additional, Wolk, Alicja, additional, Zheng, Wei, additional, Weinberg, Clarice R., additional, Swerdlow, Anthony J., additional, and Sandler, Dale P., additional

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

11. The Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaboration: A Pooling Project of Studies Participating in the National Cancer Institute Cohort Consortium

Author

Nichols, Hazel B., primary, Schoemaker, Minouk J., additional, Wright, Lauren B., additional, McGowan, Craig, additional, Brook, Mark N., additional, McClain, Kathleen M., additional, Jones, Michael E., additional, Adami, Hans-Olov, additional, Agnoli, Claudia, additional, Baglietto, Laura, additional, Bernstein, Leslie, additional, Bertrand, Kimberly A., additional, Blot, William J., additional, Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine, additional, Butler, Lesley, additional, Chen, Yu, additional, Doody, Michele M., additional, Dossus, Laure, additional, Eliassen, A. Heather, additional, Giles, Graham G., additional, Gram, Inger T., additional, Hankinson, Susan E., additional, Hoffman-Bolton, Judy, additional, Kaaks, Rudolf, additional, Key, Timothy J., additional, Kirsh, Victoria A., additional, Kitahara, Cari M., additional, Koh, Woon-Puay, additional, Larsson, Susanna C., additional, Lund, Eiliv, additional, Ma, Huiyan, additional, Merritt, Melissa A., additional, Milne, Roger L., additional, Navarro, Carmen, additional, Overvad, Kim, additional, Ozasa, Kotaro, additional, Palmer, Julie R., additional, Peeters, Petra H., additional, Riboli, Elio, additional, Rohan, Thomas E., additional, Sadakane, Atsuko, additional, Sund, Malin, additional, Tamimi, Rulla M., additional, Trichopoulou, Antonia, additional, Vatten, Lars, additional, Visvanathan, Kala, additional, Weiderpass, Elisabete, additional, Willett, Walter C., additional, Wolk, Alicja, additional, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne, additional, Zheng, Wei, additional, Sandler, Dale P., additional, and Swerdlow, Anthony J., additional

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Breast Cancer Risk After Recent Childbirth: A Pooled Analysis of 15 Prospective Studies.

Author

Nichols, Hazel B., Schoemaker, Minouk J., Cai, Jianwen, Xu, Jiawei, Wright, Lauren B., Brook, Mark N., Jones, Michael E., Adami, Hans-Olov, Baglietto, Laura, Bertrand, Kimberly A., Blot, William J., Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine, Dorronsoro, Miren, Dossus, Laure, Eliassen, A. Heather, Giles, Graham G., Gram, Inger T., Hankinson, Susan E., Hoffman-Bolton, Judy, and Kaaks, Rudolf

Subjects
CHILDBIRTH, BREAST cancer, BREASTFEEDING, PROPORTIONAL hazards models, EPIDERMAL growth factor receptors, BREAST tumor diagnosis, PROTEIN analysis, BREAST tumors, COMPARATIVE studies, DISEASE susceptibility, LABOR (Obstetrics), LONGITUDINAL method, MATERNAL age, RESEARCH methodology, MEDICAL cooperation, RESEARCH, RESEARCH funding, PERIMENOPAUSE, EVALUATION research, PARITY (Obstetrics)
Abstract

Background: Parity is widely recognized as protective for breast cancer, but breast cancer risk may be increased shortly after childbirth. Whether this risk varies with breastfeeding, family history of breast cancer, or specific tumor subtype has rarely been evaluated.Objective: To characterize breast cancer risk in relation to recent childbirth.Design: Pooled analysis of individual-level data from 15 prospective cohort studies.Setting: The international Premenopausal Breast Cancer Collaborative Group.Participants: Women younger than 55 years.Measurements: During 9.6 million person-years of follow-up, 18 826 incident cases of breast cancer were diagnosed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for breast cancer were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression.Results: Compared with nulliparous women, parous women had an HR for breast cancer that peaked about 5 years after birth (HR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.63 to 1.99]) before decreasing to 0.77 (CI, 0.67 to 0.88) after 34 years. The association crossed over from positive to negative about 24 years after birth. The overall pattern was driven by estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer; no crossover was seen for ER-negative cancer. Increases in breast cancer risk after childbirth were pronounced when combined with a family history of breast cancer and were greater for women who were older at first birth or who had more births. Breastfeeding did not modify overall risk patterns.Limitations: Breast cancer diagnoses during pregnancy were not uniformly distinguishable from early postpartum diagnoses. Data on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) oncogene overexpression were limited.Conclusion: Compared with nulliparous women, parous women have an increased risk for breast cancer for more than 20 years after childbirth. Health care providers should consider recent childbirth a risk factor for breast cancer in young women.Primary Funding Source: The Avon Foundation, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Breast Cancer Now and the UK National Health Service, and the Institute of Cancer Research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

14. Association of Body Mass Index and Age With Subsequent Breast Cancer Risk in Premenopausal Women.

Author

Schoemaker, Minouk J., Nichols, Hazel B., Wright, Lauren B., Brook, Mark N., Jones, Michael E., O'Brien, Katie M., Adami, Hans-Olov, Baglietto, Laura, Bernstein, Leslie, Bertrand, Kimberly A., Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine, Braaten, Tonje, Chen, Yu, Connor, Avonne E., Dorronsoro, Miren, Dossus, Laure, Eliassen, A. Heather, Giles, Graham G., Hankinson, Susan E., and Kaaks, Rudolf

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

15. Gestational diabetes and risk of breast cancer before age 55 years.

Author

Bertrand KA, O'Brien KM, Wright LB, Palmer JR, Blot WJ, Eliassen AH, Rosenberg L, Sandin S, Tobias D, Weiderpass E, Zheng W, Swerdlow AJ, Schoemaker MJ, Nichols HB, and Sandler DP

Subjects
Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Parity, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Receptors, Estrogen, Risk Factors, Breast Neoplasms epidemiology, Diabetes, Gestational epidemiology
Abstract

Background: The history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has been associated with breast cancer risk in some studies, particularly in young women, but results of cohort studies are conflicting., Methods: We pooled data from 257 290 young (age <55 years) women from five cohorts. We used multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between GDM history and risk of breast cancer, overall and by oestrogen receptor (ER) status, before age 55 years, adjusted for established breast cancer risk factors., Results: Five percent of women reported a history of GDM and 6842 women reported an incident breast-cancer diagnosis (median follow-up = 16 years; maximum = 24 years). Compared with parous women without GDM, women with a history of GDM were not at increased risk of young-onset breast cancer overall (HR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.78, 1.03) or by ER status (HR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.16 for ER-positive; HR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.78, 1.47 for ER-negative). Compared with nulliparous women, parous women with a history of GDM had a lower risk of breast cancer overall (HR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.91) and of ER-positive (HR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.02) but not ER-negative (HR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.76, 1.54) invasive breast cancer. These results were consistent with the HRs comparing parous women without GDM to nulliparous women., Conclusions: Results of this analysis do not support the hypothesis that GDM is a risk factor for breast cancer in young women. Our findings suggest that the well-established protective effect of parity on risk of ER-positive breast cancer persists even for pregnancies complicated by GDM., (© The Author(s) 2021; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.)

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results