Search

Background: Scholarly productivity and research output vary among different subspecialties. The h-index was developed as a more wholesome metric that measures an author's contribution to literature. Objective: Through a web-based cross-sectional analysis, we investigated the differences in scholarly impact and influence of both fellowship and nonfellowship-trained academic otolaryngologists in the United States. A secondary objective was to further understand the output among the larger fellowship fields. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed for active faculty otolaryngologists. A total of 1704 otolaryngologists were identified as faculty in residency training programs across the United States. Their h-index and publication data were gathered using the Scopus database. The data were obtained in August 2019 and analysis occurred in January 2020. Results: Head and neck surgical faculty (25.5%) had the highest representation with fellowship experience. Among all faculty, there was no statistical difference in the overall average h-index scores when comparing faculty that had fellowship training with those who did not (12.6 and 12.1, respectively, P =.498). Rhinologists had the highest publication output per year at 3.90. Among fellowship-trained faculty, the highest average h-index and total publications were seen in head & neck surgery, while facial plastics had the lowest averages (P <.001). Conclusions: In this study, fellowship-trained faculty had a greater but not significant scholarly impact than nonfellowship faculty. Furthermore, there were significant variations in output among the various subspecialties of otolaryngology. Growing fields, as academic rhinology, are continuing to flourish in robust research productivity and output. This study further demonstrates the potential, growing influence of fellowship training on research involvement and academic advancement within the otolaryngology subspecialties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore the sinopulmonary outcomes of aspirin desensitization through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources: Embase and OVID Medline databases. Review Methods: A systematic review of published articles on outcomes following aspirin desensitization in any language for relevant articles was performed in February 2019. Outcomes included sinonasal quality-of-life assessment, sense-of-smell scores, FEV-1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second), and medication/steroid use. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria out of 6055 articles screened. Aspirin desensitization resulted in significant improvement in FEV-1 and reduction in asthma medication/steroid use (P <.05). There was no significant improvement in the sinonasal quality of life of patients who underwent aspirin desensitization (P =.098). Conclusion: Aspirin desensitization appears to be effective in improving pulmonary outcomes and should be considered in the treatment of patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. However, good-quality studies are still needed to determine the ideal protocol tailored to individual patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To our knowledge, no national studies have investigated the epidemiology of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) in the United States since the incorporation of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10 CM). Objective: Our objective is to analyze the epidemiology of HHT from 2013 to 2017 and to determine the relationships between epistaxis and other associated complications of this rare disease. Methods: We analyzed the epidemiology of HHT between 2013 and 2017 by accessing data of 87 709 738 patients from the Clinformatics Data Mart using ICD-9 CM and ICD-10 CM codes. Variables analyzed included age, gender, region, clinical setting of diagnosis, hospitalizations, and complications. Bivariate analyses using generalized linear models were conducted to determine the likelihood of HHT patients with epistaxis enduring associated life-threatening complications such as cerebral hemorrhage, thrombosis, and pulmonary hemorrhage compared to HHT patients without epistaxis during the study period. Results: The prevalence of HHT increased from 6.1 to 12.1 per 100 000 persons, with patients of ages 18 to 29 years and those older than 60 years seeing the greatest percent increase. The prevalence of HHT in the Southern United States saw a 147% increase. Compared to HHT patients without epistaxis, HHT patients with epistaxis were 3.4 times more likely to experience pulmonary hemorrhage, 3.3 times more likely to have pulmonary emboli, 2.8 times more likely to experience cerebral hemorrhage, and 2.0 times more likely to have thrombosis during the study period. Conclusion: Our national study has provided the first incidence and prevalence rates of HHT in the United States since the incorporation of the ICD-10 CM. HHT patients with epistaxis require prompt multidisciplinary treatment of their condition due to their increased risk of life-threatening complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]