Search

Large inter-individual variation in platelet response to endogenous agonists and pharmacological agents, including resistance to antiplatelet therapy, prompts a search for novel platelet inhibitors and development new antithrombotic strategies. The present in vitro study evaluates the beneficial effects of three adenosine receptor (AR) agonists (regadenoson, LUF 5835 and NECA), different in terms of their selectivity for platelet adenosine receptors, when used alone and in combination with P2Y12 inhibitors, such as cangrelor or prasugrel metabolite. The anti-platelet effects of AR agonists were evaluated in healthy subjects (in the whole group and after stratification of individuals into high- and low-responders to P2Y12 inhibitors), using whole blood techniques, under flow (thrombus formation) and static conditions (study of platelet activation and aggregation). Compared to P2Y12 antagonists, AR agonists were much less or not effective under static conditions, but demonstrated similar antiplatelet activity in flow. In most cases, AR agonists significantly enhanced the anti-platelet effect of P2Y12 antagonists, despite possessing different selectivity profiles and antiplatelet activities. Importantly, their inhibitory effects in combination with P2Y12 antagonists were similar in high- and low-responders to P2Y12 inhibitors. In conclusion, a combination of anti-platelet agents acting via the P1 and P2 purinergic receptors represents a promising alternative to existing antithrombotic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

\nIntroduction: Serologic characterization of antihuman platelet antigen (HPA) alloantibodies is crucial in fetal neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. The gold standard MAIPA assay requires fresh platelets from HPA-genotyped donors, which is challenging for some laboratories. Megakaryocytes express HPA epitopes and offer an alternative source for detecting anti-HPA antibodies. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of a novel assay called monoclonal antibody immobilization of megakaryocyte antigens (MAIMA) for detecting anti-HPA antibodies. Methods: CD34+ cells from buffy coats were differentiated into megakaryocytes in vitro. The performance of the MAIMA assay was evaluated using WHO reference reagents for HPA-1a, HPA-3a, and HPA-5b, along with sera samples from patients who had well-characterized anti-HPA antibodies. Results: The WHO anti-HPA-1a reference reagent showed similar binding to megakaryocytes and platelets in MAIMA and MAIPA, respectively. On the other hand, optical density (OD) values for the WHO anti-HPA-3a reference reagent were lower in MAIMA than in MAIPA. Anti-HPA-5b antibodies were not detectable in MAIMA. Patients’ sera containing anti-HPA-1a antibodies were successfully detected in MAIMA in all clinical samples. Moreover, OD values in MAIPA and MAIMA showed high correlation (r = 0.96, p < 0.001). MAIMA was reactive for samples with anti-HPA-3a as well as anti-HPA-3b; however, OD values were lower compared to MAIPA. Interestingly, all patient samples with anti-HPA-5b antibodies were tested negative in MAIMA. Conclusion: In vitro generated megakaryocytes can be used to detect anti-HPA-1a alloantibodies. However, despite this potential, they may be less suitable for the detection of alloantibodies against other HPAs such as HPA-5b. The identification of antibodies to human platelet antigens (HPA) is crucial. The standard test (MAIPA assay) is difficult because it requires fresh platelets from specific donors. This study investigated a new method, monoclonal antibody immobilization of megakaryocyte antigens (MAIMA), using in vitro generated megakaryocytes from CD34+ cells. The assay was tested against WHO reference reagents and patient samples with known anti-HPA antibodies. Results showed that MAIMA successfully detected anti-HPA-1a antibodies and correlated well with MAIPA. However, MAIMA had lower sensitivity for anti-HPA-3a and anti-HPA-5b antibodies. Notably, anti-HPA-5b antibodies were not detectable by MAIMA. In conclusion, in vitro generated megakaryocytes can effectively detect anti-HPA-1a antibodies. However, MAIMA may be less suitable for antibodies against other HPAs, such as HPA-5b. This study highlights the potential of MAIMA as an alternative assay and provides insight into its strengths and limitations in detecting specific anti-HPA antibodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Microbial infections and mucosal dysbiosis influence morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In the oral cavity, periodontal bacteria and subgingival plaque dysbiosis provide persistent inflammatory stimuli at the mucosal surface. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether exposure to periodontal bacteria influences disease parameters in SLE patients., Methods: Circulating antibodies to specific periodontal bacteria have been used as surrogate markers to determine an ongoing bacterial burden, or as indicators of past exposure to the bacteria. Banked serum samples from SLE patients in the Oklahoma Lupus Cohort were used to measure antibody titres against periodontal pathogens (Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Treponema denticola) and commensals (Capnocytophaga ochracea, and Streptococcus gordonii) by ELISA. Correlations between anti-bacterial antibodies and different clinicalparameters of SLE including, autoantibodies (anti-dsDNA, anti-SmRNP, anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La), complement, and disease activity (SLEDAI and BILAG) were studied., Results: SLE patients had varying amounts of antibodies to different oral bacteria. The antibody titres against A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and C. ochracea were higher in patients positive for anti-dsDNA antibodies, and they showed significant correlations with anti-dsDNA titres and reduced levels of complement. Among the periodontal pathogens, only antibodies to A. actinomycetemcomitans were associated with higher disease activity., Conclusions: Our results suggest that exposure to specific pathogenic periodontal bacteria influences disease activity in SLE patients. These findings provide a rationale for assessing and improving periodontal health in SLE patients, as an adjunct to lupus therapies.