Search

A randomized, sequential, bioreplication study was performed with 24 healthy volunteers to assess the pharmacokinetic variability of oral and intravenous administrations of valspodar, a multidrug resistance modulator for use as a chemotherapy adjunct. Subjects received 200 mg as a 2-hour intravenous infusion and 400 mg orally as microemulsion soft gelatin capsules each given on two separate occasions. Following replicate intravenous administrations, reproducibility in peak concentration and area-under-the-curve was demonstrated by interoccasion equivalence testing. Low to moderate inter- and intra-subject pharmacokinetic variability were observed with coefficients of variation ranged from 9% to 19%. Absolute bioavailability from the microemulsion formulation was 60%. Replicate oral administrations demonstrated uniform and repeatable absorption with interoccasion equivalence in peak concentration, time to reach the peak concentration, and area-under-the-curve. Coefficients of inter- and intra-subject variation for these parameters ranged from 10% to 20% indicating low to moderate pharmacokinetic variability. When variabilities were compared between the two routes of administration, the absence of differences indicated that the rate and extent of drug absorption from the microemulsion formulation was as uniform and repeatable as by intravenous infusion.

The pharmacokinetic dose proportionality and relative bioavailability of cyclosporine from a microemulsion formulation (Sandimmune Neoral) were compared to those of the commercial formulation (Sandimmune) over the dosage range 200 to 800 mg. Single oral administrations were given as soft gelatin capsules in an open randomized study with 48 healthy volunteers. Whole-blood cyclosporine concentrations were determined by a specific monoclonal radioimmunoassay. In comparison to Sandimmune, the absorption rate (maximum concentration) and systemic availability (area under the curve) of cyclosporine were greater for Sandimmune Neoral at all dose levels investigated. The area under the curve for Sandimmune increased in a less than proportional manner with respect to dose, whereas that for Sandimmune Neoral was consistent with linear pharmacokinetics. Because of this difference, no global assessment of relative bioavailability could be performed. The relative bioavailability of cyclosporine from Sandimmune Neoral ranged from 174 to 239% compared to Sandimmune, depending on the dose level. The improvements in oral bioavailability and dose linearity of cyclosporine exposure after administration as Sandimmune Neoral should facilitate more accurate dosage titration in the clinical setting.

The inter- and intraindividual variability of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics from a microemulsion formulation were compared with the currently marketed formulation in a sequential bioreplication study. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers were randomized to receive each formulation on two separate occasions; the reference treatment was a single oral dose of 300 mg of Sandimmune and the test treatment was a single oral dose of 180 mg of Sandimmune Neoral, both given as soft gelatin capsules. Serial venous blood samples were obtained over a period of 48 h after each administration, and cyclosporine concentrations were measured in whole blood by a specific monoclonal RIA method. Between- and within-subject variabilities were quantified from the appropriate sums of squares from analysis of variance and statistically compared between formulations. Both inter- and intraindividual variation for the peak concentration, time to reach the peak, area under the curve, and terminal half-life of the test formulation were significantly reduced (p0.05) with two exceptions. For area under the curve between subjects (p0.2) and peak concentration within subjects (p0.1), trends toward reduced variability for the test formulation were evident. These results were further reflected in the inter- and intraindividual coefficients of variation of the pharmacokinetic parameters that ranged from 3 to 22% for the test formulation compared with 19 to 41% for the reference formulation. In comparison with the currently marketed formulation, reduced variability in the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine following oral administration of Sandimmune Neoral provides a more predictable and consistent concentration-time profile.

Objective: To investigate the effects of tibolone on carbohydrate metabolism, and to compare these effects with those of a sequential regimen of conjugated equine estrogens and medrogestone. Methods: This was an open-label, multicentre, comparative study. Seventy-two postmenopausal women were randomized to receive either tibolone 2.5 mg/day or conjugated equine estrogens 0.6 mg plus sequential medrogestone 5 mg (CEE/M) for six 28-day cycles. Carbohydrate metabolism was evaluated at baseline and after three and six cycles of treatment by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). A blood sample was taken at 30, 60, 90 and 120 mm after glucose 75 mg dosing for determination of plasma glucose, insulin and connecting peptide (C-peptide) levels. Results: The changes from baseline of glucose, insulin and C-peptide area-under-the-curve (AUC) values were not statistically significant after 3 and 6 months of tibolone or CEE/M treatment. There was a small transitory decrease in HbA 1C after three cycles of treatment with tibolone. Conclusion: The effects of tibolone and CEE/M on carbohydrate metabolism were considered to have no clinical significance.

Human drug interaction studies in vivo are conducted when in vitro and/or animal interactions suggest clinical relevance. Studies in vitro have indicated that the new, entirely synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor fluvastatin affects the metabolism of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac and the oral hypoglycemic tolbutamide. Diclofenac and tolbutamide are both model substrates of the CYP2C isozymes, suggesting that this enzyme could be involved in the underlying mechanism of interaction. The concomitant use of lipid-lowering drugs with oral hypoglycemic agents has been recommended in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Therefore, 2 studies were initiated to explore potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between fluvastatin, simvastatin, or placebo and the oral hypoglycemic agents tolbutamide (study I) and glyburide (study II), each in 16 healthy subjects. These compounds were selected because of a demonstrated in vitro interaction with tolbutamide and widespread clinical use of glyburide. A further study (study III) was conducted to investigate the potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between fluvastatin and glyburide under therapeutic conditions in 32 patients with NIDDM. Single and multiple coadministration of fluvastatin 40 mg or simvastatin 20 mg increased the mean maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve of glyburide by about 20%. The pharmacokinetics of tolbutamide were influenced to only a minor extent. Fluvastatin concentration-time profiles were unaffected by tolbutamide or glyburide coadministration. However, the pharmacokinetic interactions between fluvastatin or simvastatin and tolbutamide and glyburide were not associated with clinically relevant changes in blood glucose and insulin concentrations and, therefore, are not considered to be relevant in therapeutic practice.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)