Search

Platelet abnormalities and secondary thrombocytosis are clinical features of ulcerative colitis (UC) and seem to play a relevant role in pathogenesis. This work analyzed the adsorption characteristics of the adsorber Immunopure.A prospective study was performed to investigate the module in vitro with blood from healthy donors in a down-scaled recirculation model and in vivo in six patients suffering from UC. Furthermore, adsorber beads were investigated by immunofluorescence analyses. Apheresis was performed over 5 weeks at weekly intervals.In vitro as well as in vivo, the module showed a strong adsorption of platelets, monocytes, CD14Immunopure treatments improved the course of the disease and were well tolerated. The module strongly adsorbs platelets and platelet-aggregates.

During 2012-2020, 89 German apheresis centers collected retrospective and prospective observational data of 2028 patients undergoing regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) for the German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (GLAR). More than 47 500 LA sessions are documented in GLAR. In 2020, all patients treated with LA showed a high immediate median reduction rate of LDL-C (68.2%, n = 1055) and Lp(a) (72.4%, n = 994). Patient data were analyzed for the incidence rate of major coronary events (MACE) 1 and 2 years before the beginning of LA treatment (y-2 and y-1) and prospectively up to 7 years on LA (y + 1 to y + 7). During the first 2 years of LA (y + 1 and y + 2), a MACE reduction of 78% was observed. Current analysis of GLAR data shows very low incidence rates of cardiovascular events in patients with high LDL-C and/or high Lp(a) levels, progressive ASCVD, and maximally tolerated lipid lowering medication regular by LA results.

Background Lipidapheresis was introduced for intractable hyperlipidemia as a more selective therapy than plasma exchange aiming to enhance efficacy and limit side-effects. Although this therapy is regarded safe, multicenter data from routine application are limited. We investigated direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) and lipofiltration (MONET) regarding the short and the long-term safety aspects. Methods This multicenter observational study prospectively evaluated 2154 DALI and 1297 MONET sessions of 122 patients during a period of 2 years. Safety parameters included clinical side-effects (adverse device effects, ADEs), technical complications, blood pressure and pulse rate. Also routinely performed laboratory parameters were documented. Analysis of laboratory parameters was not corrected for blood dilution. Results Overall 0.4% DALI and 0.5% MONET treatments were affected by ADE. Technical complications occurred in 2.1% and in 0.8% DALI and MONET sessions, respectively. The most frequent ADE was hypotension, and the majority of technical problems were related to vascular access. Both types of treatments led to a drop of thrombocytes in the range of 7–8%. Hematocrit and erythrocytes decreased only during the DALI treatments by about 6%. Leucocytes decreased during the DALI therapy (∼15%), whereas they increased during the MONET application (∼11%). MONET treatment was associated with a higher reduction of proteins (fibrinogen: 58% vs. 23%, albumin: 12% vs. 7%, CRP: 33% vs. 19% for MONET and DALI, respectively). Apart from severe thrombocytopenia in two DALI patients, changes of other parameters were typically transient. Conclusions Under routine use the frequency of side-effects was low. Still, monitoring of blood count and proteins in chronic apheresis patients is recommended.

Background and Aims In active ulcerative colitis [UC] refractory to mesalazine, escalation to either steroids or immunosuppression is common practice. The efficacy and safety of alternative escalation therapy with a novel leukocyte apheresis device were studied. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, controlled multicentre pilot study comparing leukocyte apheresis with prednisolone in refractory UC (disease activity index [DAI] ≥ 4 and ≤8). Group A received weekly apheresis over five consecutive weeks. Group P received oral prednisolone 40 mg/day tapered to 0 mg at week 6. The primary end point was steroid-free clinical remission [DAI ≤ 2] at week 12. Clinical response was also analysed. Results Twenty-four patients were enrolled, 13 of whom were randomized into group A and 11 into group P. Clinical remission off steroids at week 12 was achieved in 3/12 patients [25.0%] with apheresis and 2/10 [20.0%] with prednisolone [p = 1.0]. The response rate after 12 weeks was 75.0% in group A and 50.0% in group P. Mean DAI scores improved in both treatment groups [p = 0.008]. C-reactive protein decreased from 6.0 ± 5.3 to 3.8 ± 3.7 mg/L at 12 weeks in group A and increased from 5.2 ± 6.0 to 6.3 ± 7.9 mg/mL in group P. Both treatments were well tolerated. No unexpected serious adverse events were seen in group A. In group P one symptomatic infection with Clostridium difficile occurred. Conclusions In patients with active UC refractory to mesalazine a novel leukocyte apheresis showed promising results. A comparison with prednisolone revealed similar therapeutic effectivity and excellent safety, providing the chance to escalate without systemic steroids.

Aim To evaluate the effect of alirocumab on frequency of standard apheresis treatments [weekly or every 2 weeks (Q2W)] in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH). Methods and results ODYSSEY ESCAPE ([NCT02326220][1]) was a double-blind study in 62 HeFH patients undergoing regular weekly or Q2W lipoprotein apheresis. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1, respectively) to receive alirocumab 150 mg ( n = 41) or placebo ( n = 21) Q2W subcutaneously for 18 weeks. From day 1 to week 6, apheresis rate was fixed according to the patient’s established schedule; from weeks 7 to 18, apheresis rate was adjusted based on the patient’s low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) response in a blinded fashion. Apheresis was not performed when the LDL-C value was ≥30% lower than the baseline (pre-apheresis) value. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of apheresis treatments over 12 weeks (weeks 7–18), standardized to number of planned treatments. In the alirocumab group the least square (LS) mean ± SE (95% confidence interval [CI]) per cent change in pre-apheresis LDL-C from baseline at week 6 was − 53.7 ± 2.3 (−58.2 to − 49.2) compared with 1.6 ± 3.1 (–4.7 to 7.9) in the placebo group. The primary efficacy endpoint showed statistically significant benefit in favour of alirocumab (Hodges–Lehmann median estimate of treatment difference: 0.75; 95% CI 0.67–0.83; P < 0.0001). Therefore, alirocumab-treated patients had a 0.75 (75%) additional reduction in the standardized rate of apheresis treatments vs. placebo-treated patients. During this period, 63.4% of patients on alirocumab avoided all and 92.7% avoided at least half of the apheresis treatments. Adverse event rates were similar (75.6% of patients on alirocumab vs. 76.2% on placebo). Conclusions Lipoprotein apheresis was discontinued in 63.4% of patients on alirocumab who were previously undergoing regular apheresis, and the rate was at least halved in 92.7% of patients. Alirocumab was generally safe and well tolerated. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT02326220&atom=%2Fehj%2Fearly%2F2016%2F09%2F08%2Feurheartj.ehw388.atom

Background Many patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) fail to reach optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels with available lipid-lowering medications, including statins, and require treatment using alternative methods such as lipoprotein apheresis. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of alirocumab 150 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) compared with placebo in reducing the frequency of lipoprotein apheresis treatments in patients with HeFH. Methods ODYSSEY ESCAPE is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 18-week, phase 3 study being conducted in the United States and Germany. ODYSSEY ESCAPE will evaluate the efficacy and safety of alirocumab in approximately 63 adults with HeFH undergoing regular weekly (QW; for ≥4 weeks) or Q2W (for ≥8 weeks) lipoprotein apheresis. Patients will be randomly assigned (2:1, respectively) to receive alirocumab 150 mg subcutaneously Q2W or placebo subcutaneously Q2W (both in 1-mL injections) for 18 weeks. From day 1 to week 6, the apheresis frequency will be fixed to the individual patient's established schedule (QW or Q2W); thereafter, apheresis will be performed according to the LDL-C value at that visit: apheresis will not be performed when the LDL-C value is ≥30% lower than the baseline pre-apheresis LDL-C value. The primary end point is the frequency of apheresis treatments over a 12-week period starting at week 7. Discussion The ODYSSEY ESCAPE trial will determine whether alirocumab reduces the frequency of lipoprotein apheresis in patients with HeFH.

International audience; Objectives Current options for patients with steroid-dependent, chronic-active ulcerative colitis (UC) with insufficient response/intolerance to immunosuppressants (ISs) and/or biologics are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of granulocyte/monocyte adsorptive (GMA) apheresis (Adacolumn®) in this population. Materials and methods Ninety five adults with steroid-dependent active UC and insufficient response/intolerance to IS and/or TNF inhibitors received 5–8 aphereses in a single induction series of ≤10 weeks. Endpoints included rates of remission (clinical activity index [CAI] ≤ 4) at weeks 24 and 48. Results Of 94 patients (ITT population), remission and response rates were 34.0% and 44.7% at week 24, and 33.0% and 39.4% at week 48. Among 30 patients with prior failure of IS and biologics, 33.3% and 20.0% were in remission at weeks 24 and 48. At both weeks, 19.2% of patients achieved steroid-free remission. Sustained remission or response occurred in 27.7% of patients at 48 weeks. The cumulative colectomy rate at week 96 was 23.4%. Safety was consistent with previous findings. Conclusions This study confirms findings of the 12-week interim analysis and demonstrates that GMA apheresis provides a safe and beneficial long-term outcome for patients with chronic active UC resistant/intolerant to IS and/or TNF inhibitors. © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group.

Iron deficiency (ID) and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) are common findings in patients undergoing lipoprotein apheresis (LA). Different intravenous (iv) formulations are used to treat ID in LA patients, however guidelines and data on ID/IDA management in LA patients are lacking. We therefore performed a prospective observational multi-center cohort study of ID/IDA in LA patients, comparing two approved i.v. iron formulations, ferric gluconate (FG) and ferric carboxymaltose (FCM).Inclusion criteria were a) serum ferritin100 μg/L or b) serum ferritin300 μg/L and transferrin saturation20%. Patients received either FG (62.5 mg weekly) or FCM (500 mg once in ID or up to 1000 mg if IDA was present) i.v. until iron deficiency was resolved. Efficacy and safety were determined by repeated laboratory and clinical assessment. Iron parameters pre and post apheresis were measured to better understand the pathogenesis of ID/IDA in LA patients.80% of LA patients treated at the three participating centers presented with ID/IDA; 129 patients were included in the study. Serum ferritin and transferrin levels were reduced following apheresis (by 18% (p0.0001) and by 13% (p0.0001) respectively). Both FG and FCM were effective and well tolerated in the treatment of ID/IDA in LA patients. FCM led to a quicker repletion of iron stores (p0.05), while improvement of ID/IDA symptoms was not different. Number and severity of adverse events did not differ between FG and FCM, no severe adverse events occurred.Our results suggest that FG and FCM are equally safe, well-tolerated and effective in treating ID/IDA in LA patients. These data form the basis for follow-up randomized controlled trials to establish clinical guidelines.

Objective In recent years the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), a paramount decision-making body of the German health care system challenged the approval of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for regular reimbursement, including lipoprotein apheresis therapy. Years before an interdisciplinary German apheresis working group, established by members of both German Societies of Nephrology (Verband Deutsche Nierenzentren (VDN), Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Nephrologie (DGfN)), initiated a revision of the indication of lipoprotein apheresis therapy according to current guidelines and recommendations for the treatment of lipid disorders. This working group was convinced, that data derived from a registry would support lipoprotein apheresis as a therapy for severe hyperlipidemic patients suffering from progressive cardiovascular diseases. Methods and results In 2009 the working group established the indication for lipoprotein apheresis with respect to current cardiovascular guidelines and scientific knowledge for the registry, which are in line with the reimbursement guidelines. In 2011 financing by sponsors was secured and an internet-based registry was created. A pilot project with 5 apheresis centers finished in 2012 – since then the registry is available to all German apheresis centers. Conclusions There has been consensus between the medical societies and health care carriers regarding the need for a German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (GLAR). The launch of this registry complies with requirements of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). Complementing the Pro(a)LiFe-Study, first data from GLAR support the safety of the different apheresis treatment procedures. In addition these first data suggest, with respect to the results of Pro(a)LiFe-Study, effectiveness in preventing cardiovascular progression as well. Here, further data are needed to statistically substantiate these early findings.

The objective of this study was a standardized comparison of the safety and effectiveness of the Kaneka (Kaneka Corporation, Osaka, Japan) whole blood (Liposorber DL-100) and plasma (Liposorber LA-15) lipoprotein apheresis (LA) system to optimize the individual therapy of patients with cardiovascular disease and severe dyslipidemia.Six chronic LA patients with a pre-treatment LDL-C 6 mmol/l in steady state received a total of three treatments with the LA-15 device, followed by three treatments with the DL-100 device or vice versa. To achieve a standardized comparison the treated blood volume for any patient was kept identical for both procedures. Sampling points for total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, Lp(a), triglyceride, blood count, and bradykinin measurements were adjusted for both techniques.Total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, Lp(a), and triglycerides were reduced by 59.2 ± 6.5%, 79.3 ± 6.9%, 7.1 ± 3.9%, 87.3 ± 3.1%, 22.5 ± 24.2% using the DL-100 system and by 51.4 ± 5.2%, 65.2 ± 3.7%, 2.2 ± 4.9%, 72.7 ± 2.2%, 46.5 ± 9.4% using the LA-15 system, showing that the DL-100 adsorber was significantly more effective for lowering total cholesterol (p = 0.044), LDL-C (p = 0.001), Lp(a) (p = 0.029), while triglycerides were reduced to a higher extent by the plasma system (p = 0.046) in this patient group. The regenerable LA-15 adsorber columns showed a higher removal capacity considering the difference between inflow and outflow concentrations. Bradykinin levels significantly increased up to 145 fold in the outflow lines using the plasma system (p = 0.028), but not systemically. There was no significant bradykinin generation using the whole blood adsorber.In conclusion, the whole blood system was faster and more effective in this LA patient group with pre apheresis LDL-C6 mmol/l. Whether the regenerable plasma system is more effective in patients with higher LDL-C content should be evaluated in future standardized comparisons.

Background Lipidapheresis techniques are increasingly used to treat drug-resistant hyperlipidemia but few efficacy studies under routine application are available. In this multicenter observational study we investigated direct adsorption of lipoproteins (DALI) and lipoprotein filtration (MONET) for the short and the long-term effects on lipid-lowering effects. Methods Data of 122 apheresis patients from 11 centers (DALI: n = 78, MONET: n = 44) were prospectively collected for a period of 2 years. Routine lipid measurements were evaluated (2154 DALI and 1297 MONET sessions). It was investigated whether the relative reduction of LDL-C during apheresis session achieves at least 60%. Also relative reduction of total cholesterol, HDL, triglyceride, and Lp(a) were analyzed. Results The relative reduction of LDL-C was at least 60%: DALI: 70.62%, 95% CI = [69.34; 71.90] and MONET: 64.12%, 95% CI = [60.79; 67.46]. Also triglycerides were reduced with both systems: DALI 38.63%, 95% CI = [33.95; 43.30] vs. MONET 57.68%, 95% CI = [51.91; 63.45]. Relative reductions of total cholesterol were in the range of 50% (DALI 95% CI = [46.49; 49.65] MONET 95% CI = [48.93; 55.26]) and of Lp(a) in the range of 65% (DALI 95% CI = [61.92; 65.83] MONET 95% CI = [63.71; 70.30]. HDL reduction was: DALI 15.01%, 95% CI = [13.22; 16.79] and MONET 22.59%, 95% CI = [19.33; 25.84]. For both devices treated patient plasma/blood volume and in case of DALI the use of the larger adsorber configurations (DALI 1000 and DALI 1250) were independent positive predictors of the relative reduction of LDL-C and of Lp(a). Conclusions Both systems effectively improved lipid profile and reduced atherogenic lipids. The results point to the importance of the individualized application of these valuable therapies to achieve clinical targets.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, technical performance and clinical efficacy of a novel adsorptive-type cytapheresis module in patients with active ulcerative colitis. Ten patients with ulcerative colitis (clinical activity index 6-10) were recruited. The new adsorber (Nikkiso, Tokyo, Japan) was specifically designed to remove platelets, granulocytes and monocytes from peripheral blood using an extracorporeal circulation. Cytapheresis treatments were performed weekly for five consecutive weeks (each with a 60-min duration). Safety and tolerability were evaluated by investigating vital parameters, routine laboratory tests, adverse event reporting and a questionnaire. Disease activity was evaluated by assessing the clinical activity index as well as the endoscopic index, according to Rachmilewitz. Technical performance and biocompatibility were investigated by repeated measurements of cellular blood count, complement factor C3a and cell surface markers before, during and after the apheresis treatments. The cytapheresis treatments were "well" to "very well" tolerated by the patients. All measured safety parameters remained essentially unchanged. Performance data showed that platelets, monocytes and neutrophil granulocytes were effectively reduced during the cytapheresis treatments. Apheresis treatment was associated with high remission rates (80% at week 10). Clinical remission was accompanied by the reduction of the endoscopic index in four out of the nine eligible patients. Levels of C3a did not significantly increase during cytapheresis treatments. The novel device has been shown to be safe, well tolerated and clinically efficient. It offered a very good biocompatibility and platelet elimination capacity.

Albumin dialysis with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) or single pass albumin dialysis (SPAD) uses human serum albumin (HSA) as an addendum of the dialysate fluid. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the impact of the dialysate albumin concentration on removal efficacy. Heparinized human plasma (3 L/test) was spiked with creatinine (1000 mg/L), unconjugated bilirubin (100 mg/L), chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) (100 mg/L), and diazepam (3 mg/L). The MARS albumin circuit was primed with different amounts of HSA (150, 100, 60, and 40 g). The plasma, albumin, and dialysate flow rates were 200, 200, and 40 mL/min, respectively. Clearances were calculated based on repeated sampling during the experiments, which lasted 480 min. The effective HSA concentrations in the dialysate were 175, 115, 77, and 46 g/L, respectively. They decreased over treatment time to 147, 99, 63, and 41 g/L, respectively, due to surface adsorption. The plasma-HSA concentration remained unchanged over time in all experiments (average 39 g/L). The creatinine clearance was not impacted by dialysate HSA concentration. For the albumin-bound markers a clear correlation between HSA-concentration and clearance was demonstrated with the highest clearances for the 100 and 150 g HSA experiments. The 100 g HSA setup appeared to be the one with best cost-benefit ratio, resulting in clearances (after 1 h of treatment) of 31 mL/min creatinine, 0.3 mL/min unconjugated bilirubin, 11 mL/min CDCA, and 35 mL/min diazepam. Low albumin concentrations, such as in SPAD, result in low clearance rates for albumin-bound substances. The optimal clearances in these experiments were reached with a priming dose of 100 g HSA.

We investigated in a longitudinal, multicenter, cohort study whether combined lipid apheresis and lipid-lowering medication can reduce extremely high levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) and thus prevent major adverse coronary events (MACE) more efficaciously than lipid-lowering medication alone.Eligible patients had coronary artery disease and Lp(a) levelsor =2.14 micromol/l (95th percentile). All patients received lipid-lowering medications alone until maximally tolerated doses were no longer effective, followed by combined lipid apheresis and lipid-lowering medication. The rates of the primary outcome, MACE, were recorded for both periods.A total of 120 patients were included. The mean duration of lipid-lowering therapy alone was 5.6+/-5.8 years, and that of apheresis was 5.0+/-3.6 years. Median Lp(a) concentration was reduced from 4.00 micromol/l to 1.07 micromol/l with apheresis treatment (P0.0001); the corresponding mean annual MACE rate per patient was 1.056 versus 0.144 (P0.0001).Lowering of Lp(a) levels by apheresis was efficacious and safe, and we recommend this therapy for patients in whom maximally tolerated doses of medication alone have failed to control coronary artery disease-associated events.

The influence of the granulocyte/monocyte apheresis (GMCAP) on cell populations participating in mechanisms of tolerance, e.g. dendritic cells (DCs), is still not very clear. In a first step, we aimed to investigate changes in the DC population of patients suffering from ulcerative colitis (UC) (n = 13) compared to healthy subjects (n = 9). In a second step, we studied the changes in peripheral DCs in a small group of patients with active UC before and after Adacolumn apheresis (n = 7). For this purpose, plasmacytoid and myeloid DCs and their maturation markers CD40, CD80, and CD86 were measured using four-color flow cytometry in the peripheral blood. After apheresis, and in acute flare-ups, we identified a significantly lower number of lymphocytes, plasmacytoid, and myeloid DCs. In conclusion, the additional removal of peripheral DCs by GMCAP, which otherwise would contribute to the inflammatory process in the gut, may lead to a higher tolerogeneic status towards luminal antigens.

Recent studies suggest that leukocytapheresis with Cellsorba is a valuable therapy for ulcerative colitis after failure of conventional treatment. In this study the potential of leukocytapheresis to induce remission in refractory chronic colitis under the conditions of European treatment guidelines was investigated. The therapeutic benefit of leukocytapheresis in the maintenance of remission was additionally elucidated. Twenty patients were treated weekly for 5 weeks. A significant decrease in the activity index was observed. Fourteen patients achieved clinical remission, and mucosal healing was observed endoscopically in six patients. After randomization these 14 patients in remission entered a second period of either monthly leukocytapheresis or no further treatment. In both groups steroids were tapered down. After 6 months, only one patient in the control group remained in remission, in contrast to five of eight patients in the leukocytapheresis group. In conclusion, leukocytapheresis may offer a therapeutic option in the induction and the maintenance of remission in chronic active ulcerative colitis.

The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical effects of cytapheresis using the Adacolumn system (selective removal of circulating monocytes and granulocytes by means of an extracorporeal type column) in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). An open uncontrolled multicenter pilot study was conducted in 18 SLE patients who were showing a SLEDAI score of 8 or more under conventional medication. Patients with lupus nephritis (>class 1, WHO classification) were excluded. Extracorporeal cytapheresis with the Adacolumn system was administered once a week for five consecutive weeks. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated using the SLEDAI for 10 weeks after the first cytapheresis session. The median SLEDAI decreased from 16 at baseline to six at week 11 (10 weeks after the first apheresis) (p

The success of apheresis treatment is often measured as a decrease in the detected antibodies and an improvement in different disease-related scores. Sometimes, however, the seriousness of the disease does not correlate with the antibody level. During a period of 8 years, 15 patients (3 myasthenia gravis, 1 multiple sclerosis, 2 systemic lupus erythematosus, 3 alloimmunized kidney transplant, 6 rheumatoid arthritis) were treated by protein A immunoadsorption. Lymphocyte subpopulations (activated T cells, cytolytic T cells, B cells, natural killer cells) and inflammatory proteins (ferritin, C-reactive protein, alpha1-antitrypsin, alpha2-macroglobulin) were analyzed. After observing clinical outcomes, the patients could be divided into 2 groups, respectively: Group 1, responding patients with remission of disease; and Group 2, delayed-responding patients, who required chronic treatment. Group 1 patients characteristically showed a greater increase in activated T and cytolytic T cells which correlated with a greater decrease of B cells. It might be possible that protein A immunoadsorption induced immunomodulation. Further immunological investigation is required to verify these findings.

The elimination of fibrinogen from plasma improves plasma viscosity and whole blood viscosity. For extracorporeal adsorption of fibrinogen the pentapeptide gly-pro-arg-pro-lys was coupled to sepharose CL-4B. Columns containing 100 ml of coupled sepharose CL-4B were used to eliminate fibrinogen from the plasma of 8 healthy male subjects (mean age 27.4 +/- 4.3 years, height 180.9 +/- 8.3 cm, weight 85.1 +/- 13.6 kg). Four treatments were performed in each proband (days 1, 2, 4 and 7). Plasma fibrinogen concentration was lowered from 221.1 +/- 39.0 to 123.5 +/- 21.7 mg/dl (2275 +/- 477 ml plasma treated) by the first treatment, from 172.8 +/- 42.3 to 105.6 +/- 16.5 mg/dl (1609 +/- 761 ml) by the second, from 140.5 +/- 13.8 to 98.8 +/- 8.6 mg/dl (1224 +/- 118 ml) by the third and from 160.2 +/- 23.6 to 106.4 +/- 9.7 mg/dl (1513 +/- 521) by the fourth. Plasma viscosity was improved from 1.40 +/- 0.18 mPa s before the first treatment to 1.23 +/- 0.06 mPa s after fourth treatment, whole blood viscosity from 4.49 +/- 0.36 mPa s to 3.83 +/- 0.27 mPa s (P0.01). No clinical side effects and no clinically relevant change of laboratory parameters including in vitro tests on thrombocyte function were observed. Seven men and three women (48-75 years old, 9 patients suffered from diabetes mellitus, one patient from peripheral arterial occlusive disease, 5 patients were on regular hemodialysis) were treated by fibrinogen adsorption. Each column contained 135 ml of coupled sepharose CL-4B. Treatments were scheduled on day 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25 and 28. 144 treatments with fibrinogen adsorption were performed. No clinical side effects due to the fibrinogen-adsorption procedure were observed. In these 10 patients the fibrinogen concentration before the first treatment was 473.7 +/- 183.7 mg/dl. In the first treatment session it was lowered to 241.4 +/- 125.8 mg/dl by treating 4270 +/- 1180 ml of plasma. In the following 134 treatments the pre-treatment concentration of fibrinogen was 262.6 +/- 83.4 mg/dl, the post-treatment concentration was 120.6 +/- 37.2 mg/dl. The mean volume of plasma treated was 3737 +/- 1643 ml, the mean duration of a treatment session (except the first treatment) was 143.7 +/- 63.1 min. In 7 patients a mean post-treatment fibrinogen concentration ofor = 123 mg/dl was obtained, in the other patients 133, 177 and 184 mg/dl. Yet, the decrease of fibrinogen concentration was also pronounced in these 3 patients: -82%, -67%, and -73%, respectively. Accelerated wound healing was observed in 9 of the 10 patients. In conclusion, affinity chromatography using the pentapeptide gly-pro-arg-pro-lys is an effective, selective and safe procedure to lower fibrinogen concentration in plasma thereby improving blood viscosity. It could be a therapeutic option in severe blood vessel disease where drug therapy is not sufficient and invasive procedures like bypass or angioplasty cannot be applied.

Release of microparticles into the blood during extracorporeal circulation must be kept low because of possibly serious acute and chronic adverse effects. Concentration and size distribution of microparticles were measured during simulated treatments (n = 7) on original equipment for 2 standard low-density lipoprotein (LDL) elimination procedures (DALI 750, Fresenius AG, St. Wendel, Germany and Liposorber, Kaneka Corporation, Osaka, Japan) and compared to hemofiltration solutions. For both systems as well as in hemofiltration solutions, the mean particle concentrations in 500 ml portions gathered from the efferent blood line stayed below 10% of pharmacopoeia standards for infusion solutions (United States Pharmacopoeia, European Pharmacopoeia) in all measured size classes. Although particle concentrations were comparable in all systems, the mean total number of particles > or =2 microm released per session was lowest in the DALI (167,000) compared to the Liposorber (465,000) and hemofiltration solutions (2,240,000). This was mainly due to different total processed blood volumes necessary to achieve the required LDL reduction.

Six years ago 4 patients suffering from myasthenia gravis (MG) types C and E according to Compston with failed drug therapy were initially treated 3 times (1 patient, a total of 11 times) by protein A immunoadsorption (Immunosorba, Excorim AB, Lund, Sweden). No further immunoadsorption treatments have been carried out. In addition, 3 patients were given a thymectomy. The present status of the patients was checked. We could see a beneficial effect in all MG patients. The patients are fit for work; each has an improved Besinger index. The patients were used as their own controls. A higher anti-AChRAb level 6 years after protein A immunoadsorption than at the beginning was seen in all patients, combined with less serious MG. In addition, their immunomodulation could be induced as seen in lymphocyte and inflammatory protein changes during the first 36 days after beginning immunoadsorption treatment. A larger population has to be investigated to verify these results.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, technical performance and clinical efficacy of a novel adsorptive-type cytapheresis module in patients with active ulcerative colitis. Ten patients with ulcerative colitis (clinical activity index 6-10) were recruited. The new adsorber (Nikkiso, Tokyo, Japan) was specifically designed to remove platelets, granulocytes and monocytes from peripheral blood using an extracorporeal circulation. Cytapheresis treatments were performed weekly for five consecutive weeks (each with a 60-min duration). Safety and tolerability were evaluated by investigating vital parameters, routine laboratory tests, adverse event reporting and a questionnaire. Disease activity was evaluated by assessing the clinical activity index as well as the endoscopic index, according to Rachmilewitz. Technical performance and biocompatibility were investigated by repeated measurements of cellular blood count, complement factor C3a and cell surface markers before, during and after the apheresis treatments. The cytapheresis treatments were "well" to "very well" tolerated by the patients. All measured safety parameters remained essentially unchanged. Performance data showed that platelets, monocytes and neutrophil granulocytes were effectively reduced during the cytapheresis treatments. Apheresis treatment was associated with high remission rates (80% at week 10). Clinical remission was accompanied by the reduction of the endoscopic index in four out of the nine eligible patients. Levels of C3a did not significantly increase during cytapheresis treatments. The novel device has been shown to be safe, well tolerated and clinically efficient. It offered a very good biocompatibility and platelet elimination capacity.

Due to inadequate scientific evidence there are almost no established guidelines for the application of immune apheresis therapy in a specific disease condition. Relatively high costs and the require

Adacolumn is a medical device for adsorptive cytapheresis. It has been developed for selective adsorption of granulocytes and monocytes from peripheral blood of patients with immune disorders, such as autoimmune diseases and chronic inflammatory diseases. A double blind sham-controlled crossover study design was used in order to evaluate in vivo biological responses of leukocytes as well as biocompatibility during and after Adacolumn cytapheresis in healthy volunteers. In addition, experiments were undertaken to further evaluate leukocyte reactions to Adacolumn carrier (G-1: cellulose diacetate) beads in vitro. Six healthy volunteers, 4 males and 2 females, with a mean age of 26.7 years were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment arms in a crossover fashion. Three subjects received a single Adacolumn treatment, followed by a single sham treatment at an interval of 7 days. The other three subjects received the two treatments in reverse order. All subjects were followed up 7 days after the last treatment. Additionally, in vitro investigations were carried out using blood from the healthy donors to examine the effect of G-1 beads on granulocyte functions. In vitro exposure of human peripheral blood to G-1 beads caused downregulation of L-selectin expression and upregulation of Mac-1 expression on granulocytes, leading to a marked reduction of adhesive capacity of granulocytes to endothelial cells. The exposure also led to decreased granulocyte chemotactic activity to IL-8. The number of granulocytes and monocytes clearly decreased during Adacolumn cytapheresis. Granulocytes showed marked phenotypic changes of L-selectin(Low) and Mac-1(Hi) after passing through Adacolumn in vivo. Expression of TNF-alpha and chemokine receptors was downregulated. In addition, TNF-alpha and IL-1beta producing capacity of peripheral blood leukocytes was decreased after Adacolumn cytapheresis and these changes lasted even one week after the cytapheresis. The level of complement fragments, C3a and C5a, increased, while bradykinin concentration did not change during Adacolumn cytapheresis. Exposure of human peripheral blood to G-1 beads, both in vitro and in vivo, caused a significant reduction of adhesive capacity and proinflammatory cytokine producing capacity of peripheral blood leukocytes. Such changes were not observed after sham apheresis. Despite complement activation, tolerability of Adacolum cytapheresis was not influenced. These findings may at least partly explain the beneficial effect of Adacolumn cytapheresis in the treatment of autoimmune diseases.

Membrane differential filtration is an accepted procedure for the extracorporeal removal of low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Reduction rates largely depend on the nature of the membranes and are ideally evaluated in a crossover study design. Four patients who had been treated by LDL apheresis for at least 6 months were included. Six consecutive weekly sessions (40 ml plasma/kg body weight) were scheduled per system (Plasmacure PS06/Evaflux Eval 5A [Kuraray] versus Plasmaflo OP05W/Cascadeflo AC1770 [Asahi]). Laboratory measurements indicated reductions of plasma concentrations for fibrinogen (37% [Kuraray] versus 44% [Asahi]), IgG (15% versus 20%), IgA (24% versus 28%), IgM (63% versus 53%), and total protein (11% versus 16%). Total cholesterol was eliminated by 52% versus 49%, LDL by 67% versus 66%, triglycerides by 56% versus 41%, and high-density lipoprotein by 10% versus 20%. Three therapies employing the Asahi filter combination were terminated prematurely due to saturation of the plasma fractionator. In conclusion, despite similar physical properties, the membranes differ significantly concerning selectivity and sensitivity to saturation.

Online hemodiafiltration (online HDF) and acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) are 2 innovative renal replacement therapies. Convincing evidence has shown that both techniques are superior to conventional hemodialysis in many aspects. The aim of the present investigation was to compare online HDF and AFB in 12 stable maintenance hemodialysis patients in a prospective, randomized crossover trial. Twelve stable dialysis patients, age 49.7 +/- 11.3 years and on dialysis for 83.5 +/- 76.7 months, were treated prospectively and randomly by either AFB, predilution HDF (pre-HDF), or postdilution HDF (post-HDF) for a total of 36 weeks using exclusively F60S high-flux dialyzers. Routine blood biochemical tests, bone metabolism parameters, and clearance for both small and larger molecular weight substances were measured at defined intervals. During the trial period inter- and intradialysis symptoms, e.g., hypotensive episodes and intradialysis arterial blood gas analyses, were recorded. Both online HDF and AFB were well accepted by the overwhelming majority of patients and also by the dialysis staff. Pretreatment sodium, total and ionized calcium, chloride, bicarbonate, and urea did not differ within or between the 3 treatment groups. Potassium increased slightly in HDF patients while phosphate and beta2-microglobulin (beta2-M) decreased in all groups. After dialysis, AFB patients exhibited a significantly higher bicarbonate concentration and lower potassium level when identical potassium concentrations in dialysate were used. Patients receiving AFB manifested less intradialysis partial pressure of oxygen drop and partial pressure of carbon dioxide rise than those on HDF treatments. HDF treatments could afford higher single-pool and double-pool Kt/V, higher effective urea and beta2M clearance, and lower total interdialysis symptom scores than the AFB treatment method. While bone metabolism parameters did not differ between the 3 dialysis modalities, some parameters such as deoxypyridinoline in HDF and osteocalcin, pyridinoline, and deoxypyridinoline in AFB deteriorated at the end of the crossover study. Aluminum concentration decreased progressively to about one-third of prestudy values at the end of the study with all 3 treatments. AFB was associated with a lower predialysis mean arterial pressure (MAP), a smaller drop in MAP during treatment, and similar hypotension episodes compared with the 2 HDF treatments. Albumin concentration showed a trend to decrease during the first 2 months of the trial period followed by a slight increase thereafter but still significantly lower than initial value at the end of crossover. Both online HDF and AFB share most of the features of optimal renal replacement therapy. Online HDF is superior to AFB in such aspects as increased delivered dialysis dose both for small and larger molecular weight toxins and less interdialysis symptoms. On the other hand, AFB is associated with a smaller effect on arterial blood gas values and improved intradialysis hemodynamic tolerance. Some dialysis-related symptoms and complications in the case of our AFB practice could be attributable, at least in part, to low dialysate calcium level.

The principle of a patient-specific immunoadsorber (PsIA) is demonstrated. Studies with model systems (HSA/anti-HSA) on immobilization, stability, and leakage form the basis for the presented fast-performance liquid chromatography (FPLC) and batch experiments, which were conducted using two different protein A adsorbers and autologous and heterologous PsIA systems. Experiments to determine the binding capacity of protein A adsorbers and PsIAs are described. In all experiments, the adsorption of plasma IgG, total protein, and C1q and C3d circulating immune complexes were measured. Plasma of patients with autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus) was investigated. Analysis was performed in both the initial plasma and the flow-through or supernatant. Results of the investigations using FPLC and batch experiments were compared. Autologous PsIA systems are suitable for the selective removal of elevated levels of circulating immune complexes in the plasma.

Particle contamination of blood always takes place in extracorporeal systems and few studies have been conducted to evaluate potential risks. Particle concentration was measured in the efferent blood line on original equipment for two established LDL elimination procedures (DALI) ( Fresenius ) and Liposorber ( Kaneka ). Acquired data were compared with standards for infusion solutions from European (EP) and American (USP) Pharmacopoeia. All values were well below the given limits. Even in extreme situations (>20 pump stops) particle concentration did not exceed the standards. Considering an average treated blood volume of 7.3 l for the DALI-System and 17.0 l for Liposorber (long term clinical studies) the absolute amount of particles infused per treatment was 167 000 (DALI) and 465 000 (Liposorber) particles ⩾2 μm.

Wegener's granulomatosis is a vasculitic disease predominantly affecting the upper respiratory tract, lungs, and kidneys. Three patients with Wegener's granulomatosis and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis were treated with an intensified regimen of immunoadsorption (IA) (Excorim or Therasorb) in addition to cyclophosphamide (CYC) and methylprednisolone (PRE). Patient A had been in remission under oral CYC/PRE. The first exacerbation was treated successfully with 4 IA treatments without changing medication. Patient B experienced 3 flares within 1 year, which were treated with 28 IA (3-7 IAs/course), intravenous CYC after each course, and PRE. A fall of creatinine levels from 120 to 190 micromol/L to 100 micromol/L was noted after IA and before administration of CYC. Patient C presented in uremia. Autoantibodies were eliminated by 11 IA treatments parallel to CYC/PRE therapy. They remained within a normal range for >1 year's follow-up; however, kidney function did not return. In conclusion, the observations in Patients A and B suggest a beneficial therapeutic effect of early IA in WG.

Intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry were used to investigate whether immunoadsorption (IA) of immunoglobulins alters intracytoplasmic cytokine production in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from the blood of patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis (n = 7), membrane proliferative glomerulonephritis (n = 1), and Goodpasture's syndrome (n = 1). Four patients (Group 1) showed severely depressed production of TNF-alpha, IL-2, IFN-gamma, and IL-4 by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and responded to 3 IA sessions with significant increases in CD4+TNF-alpha+, CD4+IL-2+, and CD8+IL-2+ T cells. Also, a tendency toward increased percentage levels of CD4+ T cells producing IFN-gamma or IL-4 and of CD8+ T cells producing either TNF-alpha or IFN-gamma was seen, but due to the small number of patients investigated, these differences did not attain statistic significance. Group 2 (n = 5) showed unimpaired intracellular cytokine levels and responded to IA with a heterogeneous pattern of changes in TNF-alpha, IL-2, IFN-gamma, and IL-4 production, but these alterations were smaller than those in Group 1. The present findings indicate that the extracorporeal removal of immunoglobulins by anti-IgG or protein A adsorber columns has an impact on T cell immunity and suggest that modulating effects on cellular immune system function are involved in the mode of action of IA.

Elimination of IgG can be achieved by extracorporeal immunoadsorption (IA) based on specific binding to either staphylococcal protein A (Excorim) or sheep polyclonal antibodies directed against human IgG (Therasorb). In 602 analyzed sessions of IA, elimination of IgG was 60% through 80% depending on the treated plasma volume, with no significant difference between the mentioned systems. However, the decrease of IgM and IgA was approximately 50% in the anti-IgG compared to 20-40% in the protein A system. Plasma albumin concentration decreased by 20% in the anti-IgG system compared to 15% in the protein A system, and hemoglobin values increased by 2% in the anti-IgG system and decreased by 6% in the protein A system. In conclusion, a clinical relevance for these findings cannot be ruled out, and the individual choice might depend on the clinical situation and laboratory findings.