Search

Background: There is currently a lack of understanding regarding the link between ABO blood types with outcomes of traumatically injured patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the association of ABO blood types with outcomes in traumatically injured patients separated by injury type., Methods: This retrospective study evaluated trauma patients at an urban, Level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2017. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant or <16 years old. Recorded outcomes included: ABO blood group, mortality, Injury Severity Score (ISS), race, injury type, mechanism of injury, and complications. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics including Chi-squared, Kruskal-Wallis, and F -test calculations., Results: A total of 3779 patients were included in this study. No significant differences were present in mean age or ISS between blood types. In patients with penetrating injuries, blood type O was associated with a significant increase in mortality ( P = 0.017), red blood cell transfusion ( P = 0.027), and massive transfusion protocol (MTP) ( P = 0.026) compared to non-O blood types. In patients with blunt injuries, blood type AB was associated with a significant increase in mortality rate compared to non-AB blood types ( P = 0.03)., Conclusion: ABO blood type is connected with an underlying process which affects trauma outcomes, including mortality. Blood type O is associated with increased blood transfusion, MTP, and mortality during the initial hospitalization following a traumatic penetrating injury, while blood type AB is associated with increased mortality during the initial hospitalization following a blunt traumatic injury., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2021 International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science.)

Context: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) occurs in 1%-2% of all blunt trauma patients. Computed tomographic angiography of the neck (CTAn) is commonly used for the diagnosis and grading of BCVIs. Grade of injury dictates treatment, and there remains a lack in understanding the inter-reader reliability of these interpretations., Aims: The aim of this study is to determine the extent of variability in BCVIs among specialized neuroradiologist interpretation of CTAn., Settings and Design: Retrospective review of trauma patients admitted to a level one trauma center with a BCVI from January 2012 to December 2017. Patients were randomly assigned for CTAn re-evaluation by two of three blinded, neuroradiologists., Statistical Analysis Used: The variability in BCVI grades was measured using the coefficient of unalikeability (u), and inter-reader reliability was calculated using weighted Cohen's kappa (k)., Results: Two hundred and twenty-eight BCVIs were analyzed with initial grades of 71 (31%) grade one, 74 (32%) grade two, 26 (11%) grade three, 57 (25%) grade four, and 0 grade five. Variability was present in 93 (41%) of all BCVIs. Grade one injuries had the lowest occurrence of total agreement (31%) followed by grade three (61%), grade two (63%), and grade four (92%). Total variability of grade interpretations (u = 100) occurred most frequently with grade three BCVIs (21%). Weighted Cohen's k calculations had a mean of 0.07, indicating poor reader agreement., Conclusions: This novel study demonstrated the BCVI variability of radiological grade interpretation occurs in more than a third of patients. The reliability of CTAn interpretation of BCVI grades is not uniform, potentially leading to undertreatment and overtreatment., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2020 International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science.)

Objective: The importance of maintaining mean arterial pressure (MAP) > 85 mm Hg for patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is well documented, because systemic hypotension greatly increases the risk of secondary SCI. Current literature focuses on the ICU setting; however, there is a paucity of data describing the changes in MAP in the operating room (OR). In the present study, the authors investigated the incidence of intraoperative hypotension for patients with acute traumatic SCI as well as any associated factors that may have impacted these findings., Methods: This retrospective study was performed at a level 1 trauma center from 2015 to 2016. All patients with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score A-D acute traumatic SCIs from C1 to L1 were identified. Those included underwent spinal instrumentation and/or laminectomy decompression. Associated factors investigated include the following: age, body mass index, trauma mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, level of SCI, ASIA score, hospital day of surgery, total OR time, need for laminectomy decompression, use of spinal fixation, surgical positioning, blood loss, use of blood products, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and discharge disposition. Intraoperative minute-by-minute MAP recordings were used to determine time spent in various MAP ranges., Results: Thirty-two patients underwent a total of 33 operations. Relative to the total OR time, patients spent an average of 51.9% of their cumulative time with an MAP < 85 mm Hg. Furthermore, 100% of the study population recorded at least one MAP measurement < 85 mm Hg. These hypotensive episodes lasted a mean of 103 cumulative minutes per operative case. Analysis of associated factors demonstrated that fall mechanisms of injury led to a statistically significant increase in intraoperative hypotension compared to motor vehicle collisions/motorcycle collisions (p = 0.033). There were no significant differences in MAP recordings when analyzed according to all other associated factors studied., Conclusions: This is the first study reporting the incidence of intraoperative hypotension for patients with acute traumatic SCIs, and the results demonstrated higher proportions of relative hypotension than previously reported in the ICU setting. Furthermore, the authors identified that every patient experienced at least one MAP below the target value, which was much greater than the initial hypothesis of 50%. Given the findings of this study, adherence to the MAP protocol intraoperatively needs to be improved to minimize the risk of secondary SCI and associated deleterious neurological outcomes.