Search

Background and Objectives: In 2016, a randomized controlled trial demonstrated the clinical efficacy of trans-sternal thymectomy for patients with non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis (MG). Whether large-scale changes occurred in clinical practice after this trial is unknown., Methods: We performed a retrospective longitudinal cross-sectional analysis using National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from 2012 to 2019. Our study included hospitalized adults at least 18 years of age diagnosed with MG without an associated thymoma. We used joinpoint regression to analyze annual trends in thymectomy volume and surgical approach (minimally invasive vs trans-sternal) from 2012 to 2019. Using logistic regression models, we examined patient and hospital-level factors that may have influenced whether thymectomy was performed, such as age, sex, race, insurance payor, hospital size and teaching status, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Sampling weights were applied to account for the complex survey design of NIS., Results: The total number of thymectomy procedures increased by 69.8% per year (95% CI 40.1-105.8) between 2012 and 2019. Trans-sternal thymectomies increased by 62.8% per year (95% CI 35.8-95.2) and minimally invasive thymectomies by 83.7% per year (95% CI 38.1-144.3). Thymectomies were significantly more likely to occur in 2017-2019 compared with 2012-2016 (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.62-2.31). In a multivariable regression model, several factors decreased the odds of patients with MG having a thymectomy: older age, Black race (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.77), female (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.86), and higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Patients in medium (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.30-2.55) or large (OR 2.81, 95% CI 2.07-3.82) size and urban teaching hospitals (OR 6.09, 95% CI 2.65-13.97) were more likely to undergo thymectomy., Discussion: Thymectomy is being performed more frequently for non-thymomatous MG, especially after 2016 after publication of a positive phase III clinical trial. There are several disparities in thymectomy utilization that warrant further attention., Competing Interests: The authors report no relevant disclosures. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp., (© 2024 American Academy of Neurology.)

Introduction: This study used network meta-analysis (NMA) to inform and compare the number needed to treat (NNT), number needed to harm (NNH), and cost per improved outcome (CPIO) associated with more recently approved treatments for anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (anti-AChR Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG)., Methods: Clinical trials of neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors, efgartigimod intravenous (IV) and rozanolixizumab, and complement inhibitors, ravulizumab and zilucoplan, versus placebo (with background conventional treatment) were included in the primary NMA to compare efficacy and safety outcomes. The outputs from the NMAs were used to estimate NNT and NNH of each treatment versus placebo. CPIO (2024 USD) was estimated for a ≥ 3- or ≥ 5-point reduction from baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) and Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores. Sensitivity analyses were performed adding efgartigimod PH20 subcutaneous (SC) and eculizumab to the NMA., Results: Efgartigimod IV had the lowest NNT versus placebo for achieving a ≥ 3- and ≥ 5-point reduction in QMG, as well as a ≥ 5-point reduction in MG-ADL, whereas rozanolixizumab had the lowest NNT for a ≥ 3-point reduction in MG-ADL. The NNH versus placebo was similar across comparator treatments. Efgartigimod IV had the lowest CPIO among all treatments for all assessed efficacy outcomes. Sensitivity analyses yielded results consistent with primary analysis and indicated that efgartigimod PH20 SC had comparable NNT and CPIO values to efgartigimod IV, whereas eculizumab had comparable NNT and higher CPIO values compared to other complement inhibitors., Conclusions: FcRn inhibitors and complement inhibitors assessed in this study all demonstrated clinical benefit in terms of NNT as well as an acceptable safety profile in terms of NNH. Within the limitations of this meta-analysis, efgartigimod was associated with a favorable benefit-risk profile as well as a better economic value compared to ravulizumab, rozanolixizumab, and zilucoplan as treatments for anti-AChR Ab+ gMG., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL) is an 8-item outcome measure to assess symptoms and functional limitations in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. The MG-ADL score is an equally weighted level sum score that is used as primary outcome measures in clinical trials, in clinical practice, and as an end-point in health economic evaluation. This data analysis aims to obtain detailed knowledge of measurement properties of MG-ADL items and the MG-ADL score., Methods: Cross-sectional data from a real-world prospective study (MRW) were combined with longitudinal data from the ADAPT trial. Outcome measures included were MG-ADL, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG), MG 15-item Quality of Life (MG-QOL15r) and EQ-5D-5L. Patients were categorized by their Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification. The following measurement properties were assessed: distributional characteristics, inter-item correlation, convergent, known groups and construct validity and internal factor structure., Results: Correlations of items within MG-ADL dimensions were moderate, while MG-ADL correlations between comparable MG-QOL15r and QMG items were mixed. Known groups validity for the MG-ADL score was demonstrated for MGFA class. Mean MG-ADL item level scores by MGFA class demonstrated construct validity. PCA, including all four outcome measures, resulted in a nine factor solution., Discussion: Psychometric properties of individual MG-ADL items were moderate to good. This study showed that the MG-ADL adequately captures the multidimensional heterogeneous nature of MG. This is, however, accompanied by mixed psychometric performance of the MG-ADL score, which may complicate health economic modelling., Registration: MyRealWorld-MG was registered on November 25, 2019, with registration numberNCT04176211. The ADAPT randomized clinical trial is registered atClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03669588)., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the effect of nerve decompression on pain in patients with lower extremity painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN)., Background: Currently, no treatment provides lasting relief for patients with DPN. The benefits of nerve decompression remain inconclusive., Methods: This double-blinded, observation and same-patient sham surgery-controlled randomized trial enrolled patients aged 18 to 80 years with lower extremity painful DPN who failed 1 year of medical treatment. Patients were randomized to nerve decompression or observation group (2:1). Decompression-group patients were further randomized and blinded to nerve decompression in either the right or left leg and sham surgery in the opposite leg. Pain (11-point Likert score) was compared between decompression and observation groups and between decompressed versus sham legs at 12 and 56 months., Results: Of 2987 screened patients, 78 were randomized. At 12 months, compared with controls (n=37), both the right-decompression group (n=22) and left-decompression group (n=18) reported lower pain (mean difference for both: -4.46; 95% CI: -6.34 to -2.58 and -6.48 to -2.45, respectively; P < 0.0001). Decompressed and sham legs equally improved. At 56 months, compared with controls (n=m 14), pain was lower in both the right-decompression group (n=20; mean difference: -7.65; 95% CI: -9.87 to -5.44; P < 0.0001) and left-decompression group (n=16; mean difference: -7.26; 95% CI: -9.60 to -4.91; P < 0.0001). The mean pain score was lower in decompressed versus sham legs (mean difference: 1.57 95% CI: 0.46 to 2.67; P =0.0002)., Conclusions: Although nerve decompression was associated with reduced pain, the benefit of surgical decompression needs further investigation as a placebo effect may be responsible for part or all of these effects., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The role of immunosenescence, particularly the natural process of thymic involution during aging, is increasingly acknowledged as a factor contributing to the development of autoimmune diseases and cancer. Recently, a concern has been raised about deleterious consequences of the surgical removal of thymic tissue, including for patients who undergo thymectomy for myasthenia gravis (MG) or resection of a thymoma. This review adopts a multidisciplinary approach to scrutinize the evidence concerning the long-term risks of cancer and autoimmunity postthymectomy. We conclude that for patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive MG and those diagnosed with thymoma, the removal of the thymus offers prominent benefits that well outweigh the potential risks. However, incidental removal of thymic tissue during other thoracic surgeries should be minimized whenever feasible.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare neuromuscular junction disorder that is characterized by fatigable weakness of muscles. People with MG experience various clinical manifestations based on the muscles involved. MG can be autoimmune, paraneoplastic, congenital, medication-related, or transient in the neonatal period due to the passive placental transfer of antibodies from mothers with MG. Acetylcholine receptor antibodies are seen in the majority of patients with MG. However, other antibodies have been discovered in the last 20 years, including muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) and lipoprotein-related peptide 4 (LRP4), and are now available through commercial testing. More recently, a handful of other antibodies have been associated with MG; however, they are not presently available for routine testing. A disease classification system has been developed by the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) and is commonly used worldwide. A number of objective and subjective outcome measures have been developed and validated over the years and have been proven useful for both clinical and research purposes, serving as primary and secondary outcome measures in most clinical trials. A growing number of therapies are available for both acute and chronic management of MG, with several new mechanistic approaches under investigation. An international consensus guidance for the management of MG was first published in 2016 and updated in 2020., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Objective: High-dose prednisone use, lasting several months or longer, is the primary initial therapy for myasthenia gravis (MG). Upwards of a third of patients do not respond to treatment. Currently no biomarkers can predict clinical responsiveness to corticosteroid treatment. We conducted a discovery-based study to identify treatment responsive biomarkers in MG using sera obtained at study entry to the thymectomy clinical trial (MGTX), an NIH-sponsored randomized, controlled study of thymectomy plus prednisone versus prednisone alone., Methods: We applied ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electro-spray quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry to obtain comparative serum metabolomic and lipidomic profiles at study entry to correlate with treatment response at 6 months. Treatment response was assessed using validated outcome measures of minimal manifestation status (MMS), MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative MG (QMG) score, or a strictly defined composite measure of response., Results: Increased serum levels of phospholipids were associated with treatment response as assessed by QMG, MMS, and the Responders classification, but all measures showed limited overlap in metabolomic profiles, in particular the MG-ADL. A panel including histidine, free fatty acid (13:0), γ-cholestenol and guanosine was highly predictive of the strictly defined treatment response measure. The AUC in Responders' prediction for these markers was 0.90 irrespective of gender, age, thymectomy or baseline prednisone use. Pathway analysis suggests that xenobiotic metabolism could play a major role in treatment resistance. There was no association with outcome and gender, age, thymectomy or baseline prednisone use., Interpretation: We have defined a metabolomic and lipidomic profile that can now undergo validation as a treatment predictive marker for MG patients undergoing corticosteroid therapy. Metabolomic profiles of outcome measures had limited overlap consistent with their assessing distinct aspects of treatment response and supporting unique biological underpinning for each outcome measure. Interindividual variation in prednisone metabolism may be a determinate of how well patients respond to treatment., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Gil Wolfe is a consultant for: Grifols, Alexion, ArgenX, Takeda, BPL, UCB. Speaker’s Bureau for: Grifols, Alexion. Grant/Research support from: ArgenX, Ra/UCB, Immunovant, Roche, Alexion, Sanofi Henry J. Kaminski is a consultant for Roche, Cabeletta Bio, Lincoln Therapeutics, Takeda and UCB Pharmaceuticals; and is CEO and CMO of ARC Biotechnology, LLC based on US Patent 8,961,98. He is principal investigator of the Rare Disease Network for Myasthenia Gravis (MGNet) National Institute of Neurological Disorders & Stroke, U54 NS115054 and Targeted Therapy for Myasthenia Gravis. R41NS110331-01 to ARC Biotechnology. Inmaculada Aban: all research grants going through UAB OSP. Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA). Ra/UCB Pharmaceutical through MGFA. Alexion through MGFA. Argenx through MGFA. Catalyst through MGFA. Verona Pharmaceutical. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2023 Sikorski et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objectives: To evaluate patient attitudes and beliefs toward thymectomy for myasthenia gravis (MG)., Methods: The Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America administered a questionnaire to the MG Patient Registry, an ongoing longitudinal survey of adult MG patients. Questions assessed reasons for or against thymectomy and how hypothetical scenarios would have affected their decision., Results: Of 621 respondents, 190 (31%) reported a history of thymectomy. Of those who underwent thymectomy for nonthymomatous MG, 97 (51.6%) ranked symptom improvement as most important and 100 (53.2%) ranked reducing medication as least important. Among 431 nonthymectomy patients, the most frequent reason for not undergoing thymectomy was that their doctor did not discuss it (152 of 431 = 35.2%) and 235 (56.8%) said that they would have considered it more strongly if their doctor spent more time discussing it., Conclusions: Thymectomies are motivated more by symptoms than by medication, and a lack of neurologist discussion is the most common barrier to thymectomy., Competing Interests: The Myasthenia Gravis Patient Registry is established and maintained by the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Data on maintenance therapy with subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) in myasthenia gravis (MG) are limited. We report on transitioning acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive (Ab+) MG patients on stable intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) regimens as part of routine clinical care to SCIg 1:1.2., Methods: This multicenter North American open-label prospective investigator-initiated study had two components: the IVIg Stabilization Period (ISP) enrolling patients already on IVIg as part of routine clinical care (Weeks -10 to -1), followed by transition of stable MG subjects to SCIg in the Experimental Treatment Period (ETP; Weeks 0 to 12). We hypothesized that >65% of patients entering the ETP would have a stable Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score from Week 0 to Week 12. Secondary outcome measures included other efficacy measures, safety, tolerability, IgG levels, and treatment satisfaction., Results: We recruited 23 patients in the ISP, and 22 entered the ETP. A total of 12 subjects (54.5%) were female, and 18 (81.8%) were White, with mean age 51.4 ± 17 years. We obtained Week 12 ETP QMG data on 19 of 22; one subject withdrew from ETP owing to clinical deterioration, and two subjects withdrew due to dislike of needles. On primary analysis, 19 of 22 participants (86.4%, 95% confidence interval = 0.72-1.00) were treatment successes using last observation carried forward (p = 0.018). Secondary efficacy measures supported MG stability. SCIg was safe and well tolerated, and IgG levels were stable. Treatment satisfaction was comparable between ISP and ETP., Conclusions: MG patients on IVIg as part of their routine clinical care remained stable on monthly IVIg dosage, and most maintained similar disease stability on SCIg., (© 2023 European Academy of Neurology.)

Objective: To determine whether rituximab is safe and potentially beneficial, warranting further investigation in an efficacy trial for acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized MG (AChR-Ab+ gMG)., Methods: The B-Cell Targeted Treatment in MG (BeatMG) study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase-2 trial that utilized a futility design. Individuals 21-90 years of age, with AChR-Ab+ gMG (MG Foundation of America Class II-IV) and receiving prednisone ≥15 mg/day were eligible. The primary outcome was a measure of steroid-sparing effect, defined as the proportion achieving ≥75% reduction in mean daily prednisone dose in the 4-weeks prior to week 52 and with clinical improvement or no significant worsening as compared to the 4-week period prior to randomization. The co-primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes included MG-specific clinical assessments. Fifty-two individuals were randomized (1:1) to either a two-cycle rituximab/placebo regimen, with follow-up through 52-weeks., Results: Of the 52 participants included, mean (±SD) age at enrollment was 55.1 (±17.1) years; 23 (44.2%) were female, and 31 (59.6%) were MGFA Class II. The mean (±SD) baseline prednisone dose was 22.1 (±9.7) mg/day. The primary steroid-sparing outcome was achieved in 60% of those on rituximab vs. 56% on placebo. The study reached its futility endpoint (p=0.03) suggesting that the pre-defined clinically meaningful improvement of 30% due to rituximab over placebo was unlikely to be achieved in a subsequent, larger trial. No safety issues identified., Conclusions: While rituximab was safe and well-tolerated, these results suggest that there is a low probability of observing the defined clinically meaningful steroid-sparing effect over a 12-month period in a phase-3 trial of mild-moderately symptomatic AChR-Ab+ gMG., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that for mild-to-moderate AChR-Ab+ gMG, compared with placebo, rituximab is safe but unlikely to reduce steroid use by an absolute difference of at least 30% at 1 year., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02110706., (© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.)

The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) is an MHC class I-like molecule that is widely distributed in mammalian organs, tissues, and cells. FcRn is critical to maintaining immunoglobulin G (IgG) and albumin levels through rescuing these molecules from lysosomal degradation. IgG autoantibodies are associated with many autoimmune diseases, including myasthenia gravis (MG), a rare neuromuscular autoimmune disease that causes debilitating and, in its generalized form (gMG), potentially life-threatening muscle weakness. IgG autoantibodies are directly pathogenic in MG and target neuromuscular junction proteins, causing neuromuscular transmission failure. Treatment approaches that reduce autoantibody levels, such as therapeutic plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin, have been shown to be effective for gMG patients but are not indicated as ongoing maintenance therapies and can be associated with burdensome side effects. Agents that block FcRn-mediated recycling of IgG represent a rational and promising approach for the treatment of gMG. Blocking FcRn allows targeted reduction of all IgG subtypes without decreasing concentrations of other Ig isotypes; therefore, FcRn blocking could be a safe and effective treatment strategy for a broad population of gMG patients. Several FcRn-blocking antibodies and one antibody Fc fragment have been developed and are currently in various stages of clinical development. This article describes the mechanism of FcRn blockade as a novel approach for IgG-mediated disease therapy and reviews promising clinical data using such FcRn blockers for the treatment of gMG., (Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to achieve the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the MG-QOL15R questionnaire into Spanish and the analysis of its psychometric properties., Materials and Methods: We recruited patients with MG, ≥18 years old, whose mother tongue was Spanish. After the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the MG-QOL15-R, the following tests were performed: internal consistency using the Cronbach-α coefficient and corrected item-total correlations; reproducibility with a test-retest analysis using intraclass correlation coefficients; and concurrent validity using Spearman's correlation coefficient of the Spanish language MG-QOL15R-S, Myasthenia Gravis Activity of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores. As an approximation to construct validity, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was performed between MG-QOL15R-S scores according to the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America classification., Results: A total of 83 MG patients were enrolled, mean age 48.19 ± 17.25 years; 58 (69.9%) were women. The mean MG-QOL15R-S score was 11.3 ± 7.1. Cronbach-α coefficient was 0.92. Item-total correlation ranged between 0.43 and 0.75. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.80. The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.637 (p-value < .001) for MG-ADL and 0.487 (p-value < .001) for QMG. Mann-Whitney U tests of the mean MG-QOL15R-S scores were significantly different according to the clinical severity (p-value < .001)., Conclusions: The Spanish version of the MG-QOL15R is a valid and reliable instrument and potentially useful for measuring health-related quality of life in Spanish-speaking MG patients., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Abstract: This update covers recommendations for myasthenia gravis (MG) in patients with coronavirus 2019 disease as well as reports of the clinical features of patients with MG and coronavirus 2019. Updated advisory committee recommendations for the use of thymectomy in generalized MG are also provided. Other MG topics include lipoprotein receptor-4 and agrin antibody associations, factors influencing conversion of ocular to generalized MG, the use of rituximab for more recent onset disease, immunoglobulins for maintenance therapy, and fatigue and depression., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate whether eculizumab helps patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor-positive (AChR+) refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) achieve the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) post-intervention status of minimal manifestations (MM), we assessed patients' status throughout REGAIN (Safety and Efficacy of Eculizumab in AChR+ Refractory Generalized Myasthenia Gravis) and its open-label extension., Methods: Patients who completed the REGAIN randomized controlled trial and continued into the open-label extension were included in this tertiary endpoint analysis. Patients were assessed for the MGFA post-intervention status of improved, unchanged, worse, MM, and pharmacologic remission at defined time points during REGAIN and through week 130 of the open-label study., Results: A total of 117 patients completed REGAIN and continued into the open-label study (eculizumab/eculizumab: 56; placebo/eculizumab: 61). At week 26 of REGAIN, more eculizumab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients achieved a status of improved (60.7% vs 41.7%) or MM (25.0% vs 13.3%; common OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1-4.5). After 130 weeks of eculizumab treatment, 88.0% of patients achieved improved status and 57.3% of patients achieved MM status. The safety profile of eculizumab was consistent with its known profile and no new safety signals were detected., Conclusion: Eculizumab led to rapid and sustained achievement of MM in patients with AChR+ refractory gMG. These findings support the use of eculizumab in this previously difficult-to-treat patient population., Clinicaltrialsgov Identifier: REGAIN, NCT01997229; REGAIN open-label extension, NCT02301624., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that, after 26 weeks of eculizumab treatment, 25.0% of adults with AChR+ refractory gMG achieved MM, compared with 13.3% who received placebo., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Introduction: Controversy persists on the best treatment to control ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) and reduce conversion to generalized myasthenia gravis (GMG). We hypothesized that low dose prednisone could accomplish both in a cohort of OMG patients followed after three years., Methods: We reviewed the records of 168 patients who presented with OMG. Our study included 103 of the OMG patients who met inclusion criteria, requiring follow up for a minimum of 3 years without disease generalization. Low dose prednisone was defined as ≤7.5 mg per day. The main outcome was having single vision without ptosis blocking vision, measured by binocular single vision (BSV) and upper lid position. We also analyzed late progression to GMG., Results: Of 87 patients treated with prednisone, chronic low dose prednisone alone restored BSV in 47 patients (46% of all patients) without GMG. Pyridostigmine monotherapy restored BSV in 11/14 patients (11% of all patients). Other immunomodulatory therapy (OIT) was needed in 38 patients (37%). Medical therapy maintained BSV at last evaluation (mean follow up 8.2 ± 5.0 years) in 93 patients (90%). GMG developed in 10 patients (10%) during the follow-up period., Conclusion: In OMG patients who do not generalize before 3 years, chronic long term prednisone at lower doses is moderately effective in maintaining optimum BSV. However, OIT are commonly required in these patients. In these OMG patients receiving prednisone and/or OIT, conversion to GMG after three years of disease is uncommon., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives: To approximate the rate of familial myasthenia gravis and the coexistence of other autoimmune disorders in the patients and their families., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Clinics across North America., Participants: The study included 1032 patients diagnosed with acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR)-positive myasthenia gravis., Methods: Phenotype information of 1032 patients diagnosed with AChR-positive myasthenia gravis was obtained from clinics at 14 centres across North America between January 2010 and January 2011. A critical review of the epidemiological literature on the familial rate of myasthenia gravis was also performed., Results: Among 1032 patients, 58 (5.6%) reported a family history of myasthenia gravis. A history of autoimmune diseases was present in 26.6% of patients and in 28.4% of their family members., Discussion: The familial rate of myasthenia gravis was higher than would be expected for a sporadic disease. Furthermore, a high proportion of patients had a personal or family history of autoimmune disease. Taken together, these findings suggest a genetic contribution to the pathogenesis of myasthenia gravis., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RJB served as a consultant for NuFactor and Momenta Pharmaceutical and receives research support from PTC Therapeutics, Ra Pharma, Orphazyme, Sanofi Genzyme, FDA OOPD, NIH and PCORI. MB reports grant support from Muscular Dystrophy Association, ALS Association, ALS Recovery Fund, Kimmelman Estate, Target ALS, Eli Lilly & Company and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) during the conduct of the study. He also reports grant support from FDA, CDC and DOD; research support from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, UCB, Cytokinetics, Neuraltus, Biogen and Orphazyme A/S; and personal fees from NMD Pharma, Ra Pharmaceuticals, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Avexis, UCB and Denali outside the submitted work. VC served as a consultant for review and expert testimony for the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Justice under the Vaccine Injury and Compensation Program. Dr Chaudhry has received royalty for total neuropathy score (TNS) patented (through Johns Hopkins University) for license of TNS use from AstraZeneca, Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Calithera Biosciences, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Levicept, and Acetylon Pharmaceuticals. MMD serves or recently served as a consultant for ArgenX, Catalyst, CSL-Behring, Kezar, Momenta, NuFactor, RMS Medical, Sanofi Genzyme, Shire Takeda, and Spark Therapeutics. Dr Dimachkie received grants from Alexion, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Amicus, Biomarin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Catalyst, CSL-Behring, FDA/OOPD, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Grifols, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MDA, NIH, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Octapharma, Orphazyme, Sarepta Therapeutics, Shire Takeda, Spark, UCB Biopharma, Viromed & TMA. AE was a member of the advisory board for Alexion, a scientific award jury member for Grifols and safety data monitor for UCB. MF has received honoraria for serving on advisory boards for ARGNX pharma, Alexion. MF also has research support from Catalyst, Ra pharma, Amicus, Orphazyme, Alexion, Momenta and Alnylam. JFH reports research support and grants from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, argenx BVBA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Muscular Dystrophy Association, NIH (including the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Disease), PCORI (Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute) and Ra Pharmaceuticals; and nonfinancial support from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, argenx BVBA, Ra Pharmaceuticals and Toleranzia. HJK is funded by the Muscular Dystrophy Association (508240) and by NIH grant U54NS115054; is a consultant for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Ra Pharmaceuticals, and UCB Pharmaceuticals; and is CEO of ARC Biotechnology, LLC, which receives support from the NIH (R41NS110331). He serves on the Editorial Board of Experimental Neurology. MMe has received honoraria as a speaker and/or moderator from Alnylam, Akcea, Pfizer and CSL Behring. She has served on Advisory Boards for Pfizer, Alnylam and Akcea. She serves as an investigator for clinical trials with Alnylam and Biogen. SM has served on advisory board meetings for Alexion and argenx. MP served on advisory board for CSL Behring, Alexion pharmaceuticals, Argenx Pharmaceuticals and has been consultant for Momenta Pharmaceuticals. DPR receives research funding from a Sponsored Research Agreement from Cabaletta Bioscience. BJT holds an American and European Union patent on the clinical testing and therapeutic intervention for the hexanucleotide repeat expansion of C9orf72, and has received research grants from The Myasthenia Gravis Foundation, the Robert Packard Center for ALS Research, the ALS Association (ALSA), the Italian Football Federation (FIGC), the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA), Merck and Microsoft Research. BJT receives funding through the Intramural Research Program at the National Institutes of Health., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To examine whether sustained minimal manifestation status (MMS) with complete withdrawal of prednisone is better achieved in thymectomized patients with myasthenia gravis (MG)., Methods: This study is a post hoc analysis of data from a randomized trial of thymectomy in MG (Thymectomy Trial in Non-Thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis Patients Receiving Prednisone Therapy [MGTX]). MGTX was a multicenter, randomized, rater-blinded 3-year trial that was followed by a voluntary 2-year extension for patients with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive MG without thymoma. Patients were randomized 1:1 to thymectomy plus prednisone vs prednisone alone. Participants were age 18-65 years at enrollment with disease duration less than 5 years. All patients received oral prednisone titrated up to 100 mg on alternate days until they achieved MMS, which prompted a standardized prednisone taper as long as MMS was maintained. The achievement rate of sustained MMS (no symptoms of MG for 6 months) with complete withdrawal of prednisone was compared between the thymectomy plus prednisone and prednisone alone groups., Results: Patients with MG in the thymectomy plus prednisone group achieved sustained MMS with complete withdrawal of prednisone more frequently (64% vs 38%) and quickly compared to the prednisone alone group (median time 30 months vs no median time achieved, p < 0.001) over the 5-year study period. Prednisone-associated adverse symptoms were more frequent in the prednisone alone group and distress level increased with higher doses of prednisone., Conclusions: Thymectomy benefits patients with MG by increasing the likelihood of achieving sustained MMS with complete withdrawal of prednisone., Clinicaltrialsgov Identifier: NCT00294658., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with generalized MG with AChR antibody, those receiving thymectomy plus prednisone are more likely to attain sustained MMS and complete prednisone withdrawal than those on prednisone alone., (© 2020 American Academy of Neurology.)

Introduction: Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scales were compared using the data from the Thymectomy Trial in Non-Thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis Patients Receiving Prednisone Therapy (MGTX) study., Methods: Correlation between QMG and MG-ADL raw and change-from-baseline scores was calculated every 3 months for 60 months based on treatment groups and minimal manifestation status (MMS)., Results: QMG and MG-ADL change-from-baseline scores correlated significantly, with increasing strength of correlation over time, in both treatment groups. QMG and MG-ADL raw scores correlated significantly in both treatment groups, with increasing correlation only in the prednisone-alone group. Correlation between raw scores was weaker in patients who were in MMS, demonstrating a "floor effect" on the MG-ADL scale. Raw QMG scores could be modeled assuming a normal distribution, whereas raw MG-ADL scores could not be modeled this way., Discussion: The floor effect and skewed distribution of the MG-ADL measure should be taken into account in the design of myasthenia gravis clinical trials., (© 2020 The Authors. Muscle & Nerve published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Importance: One major advantage of developing large, federally funded networks for clinical research in neurology is the ability to have a trial-ready network that can efficiently conduct scientifically rigorous projects to improve the health of people with neurologic disorders., Observations: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Network for Excellence in Neuroscience Clinical Trials (NeuroNEXT) was established in 2011 and renewed in 2018 with the goal of being an efficient network to test between 5 and 7 promising new agents in phase II clinical trials. A clinical coordinating center, data coordinating center, and 25 sites were competitively chosen. Common infrastructure was developed to accelerate timelines for clinical trials, including central institutional review board (a first for the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke), master clinical trial agreements, the use of common data elements, and experienced research sites and coordination centers. During the first 7 years, the network exceeded the goal of conducting 5 to 7 studies, with 9 funded. High interest was evident by receipt of 148 initial applications for potential studies in various neurologic disorders. Across the first 8 studies (the ninth study was funded at end of initial funding period), the central institutional review board approved the initial protocol in a mean (SD) of 59 (21) days, and additional sites were added a mean (SD) of 22 (18) days after submission. The median time from central institutional review board approval to first site activation was 47.5 days (mean, 102.1; range, 1-282) and from first site activation to first participant consent was 27 days (mean, 37.5; range, 0-96). The median time for database readiness was 3.5 months (mean, 4.0; range, 0-8) from funding receipt. In the 4 completed studies, enrollment met or exceeded expectations with 96% overall data accuracy across all sites. Nine peer-reviewed manuscripts were published, and 22 oral presentations or posters and 9 invited presentations were given at regional, national, and international meetings., Conclusions and Relevance: NeuroNEXT initiated 8 studies, successfully enrolled participants at or ahead of schedule, collected high-quality data, published primary results in high-impact journals, and provided mentorship, expert statistical, and trial management support to several new investigators. Partnerships were successfully created between government, academia, industry, foundations, and patient advocacy groups. Clinical trial consortia can efficiently and successfully address a range of important neurologic research and therapeutic questions.

Importance: Many patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) have substantial clinical disability, persistent disease burden, and adverse effects attributable to chronic immunosuppression. Therefore, there is a significant need for targeted, well-tolerated therapies with the potential to improve disease control and enhance quality of life., Objective: To evaluate the clinical effects of zilucoplan, a subcutaneously (SC) self-administered macrocyclic peptide inhibitor of complement component 5, in a broad population of patients with moderate to severe gMG., Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial at 25 study sites across North America recruited participants between December 2017 and August 2018. Fifty-seven patients were screened, of whom 12 did not meet inclusion criteria and 1 was lost to follow-up after randomization but before receiving study drug, resulting in a total of 44 acetylcholine receptor autoantibody (AChR-Ab)-positive patients with gMG with baseline Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores of at least 12, regardless of treatment history., Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to a daily SC self-injection of placebo, 0.1-mg/kg zilucoplan, or 0.3-mg/kg zilucoplan for 12 weeks., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary and key secondary end points were the change from baseline to week 12 in QMG and MG Activities of Daily Living scores, respectively. Significance testing was prespecified at a 1-sided α of .10. Safety and tolerability were also assessed., Results: The study of 44 patients was well balanced across the 3 treatment arms with respect to key demographic and disease-specific variables. The mean age of patients across all 3 treatment groups ranged from 45.5 to 54.6 years and most patients were white (average proportions across 3 treatment groups: 78.6%-86.7%). Clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in primary and key secondary efficacy end points were observed. Zilucoplan at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg SC daily resulted in a mean reduction from baseline of 6.0 points in the QMG score (placebo-corrected change, -2.8; P = .05) and 3.4 points in the MG Activities of Daily Living score (placebo-corrected change, -2.3; P = .04). Clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements were also observed in other secondary end points, the MG Composite and MG Quality-of-Life scores. Outcomes for the 0.1-mg/kg SC daily dose were also statistically significant but slower in onset and less pronounced than with the 0.3-mg/kg dose. Rescue therapy (intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange) was required in 3 of 15, 1 of 15, and 0 of 14 participants in the placebo, 0.1-mg/kg zilucoplan, and 0.3-mg/kg zilucoplan arms, respectively. Zilucoplan was observed to have a favorable safety and tolerability profile., Conclusions and Relevance: Zilucoplan yielded rapid, meaningful, and sustained improvements over 12 weeks in a broad population of patients with moderate to severe AChR-Ab-positive gMG. Near-complete complement inhibition appeared superior to submaximal inhibition. The observed safety and tolerability profile of zilucoplan was favorable., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03315130.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired neurological disorder characterized clinically by weakness and impaired sensory function evolving over 2 months or more, loss or significant decrease in deep tendon reflexes, and by electrophysiological evidence of peripheral nerve demyelination. Expeditious diagnosis and treatment of CIDP early in the disease course is critical such that irreversible disability can be avoided. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is one first-line and maintenance therapy option for CIDP. The US Food & Drug Administration's (FDA's) approval of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) in 2018 provides patients with CIDP more treatment options for maintenance therapy. The different options for administration of IG treatment create the need for information to assist clinicians and patients in choosing the optimal therapeutic approach. Considerations for pharmacokinetics, administration procedures, adverse events, patient variables, and cost will all be discussed in this article., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The first randomized blinded study of thymectomy in nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis was designed to answer 3 questions: does the combination of prednisone and removal of the thymus gland via extended transsternal thymectomy after 3 years compared with an identical dosing protocol of prednisone alone (1) lead to better disease status for generalized MG patients with antiacetylcholine receptor antibodies, (2) reduce their prednisone requirements, and/or (3) reduce the side-effect burden from medications used to treat the disease? The study demonstrated that thymectomy confers these benefits for patients and sets the stage for inquiries into the benefits of less-invasive approaches to thymic resection., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Thymectomy Trial in Non-Thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis Patients Receiving Prednisone (MGTX) showed that thymectomy combined with prednisone was superior to prednisone alone in improving clinical status as measured by the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score in patients with generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis at 3 years. We investigated the long-term effects of thymectomy up to 5 years on clinical status, medication requirements, and adverse events., Methods: We did a rater-blinded 2-year extension study at 36 centres in 15 countries for all patients who completed the randomised controlled MGTX and were willing to participate. MGTX patients were aged 18 to 65 years at enrolment, had generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis of less than 5 years' duration, had acetylcholine receptor antibody titres of 1·00 nmol/L or higher (or concentrations of 0·50-0·99 nmol/L if diagnosis was confirmed by positive edrophonium or abnormal repetitive nerve stimulation, or abnormal single fibre electromyography), had Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Clinical Classification Class II-IV disease, and were on optimal anticholinesterase therapy with or without oral corticosteroids. In MGTX, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either thymectomy plus prednisone or prednisone alone. All patients in both groups received oral prednisone at doses titrated up to 100 mg on alternate days until they achieved minimal manifestation status. The primary endpoints of the extension phase were the time-weighted means of the QMG score and alternate-day prednisone dose from month 0 to month 60. Analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00294658. It is closed to new participants, with follow-up completed., Findings: Of the 111 patients who completed the 3-year MGTX, 68 (61%) entered the extension study between Sept 1, 2009, and Aug 26, 2015 (33 in the prednisone alone group and 35 in the prednisone plus thymectomy group). 50 (74%) patients completed the 60-month assessment, 24 in the prednisone alone group and 26 in the prednisone plus thymectomy group. At 5 years, patients in the thymectomy plus prednisone group had significantly lower time-weighted mean QMG scores (5·47 [SD 3·87] vs 9·34 [5·08]; p=0·0007) and mean alternate-day prednisone doses (24 mg [SD 21] vs 48 mg [29]; p=0·0002) than did those in the prednisone alone group. 14 (42%) of 33 patients in the prednisone group, and 12 (34%) of 35 in the thymectomy plus prednisone group, had at least one adverse event by month 60. No treatment-related deaths were reported during the extension phase., Interpretation: At 5 years, thymectomy plus prednisone continues to confer benefits in patients with generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis compared with prednisone alone. Although caution is appropriate when generalising our findings because of the small sample size of our study, they nevertheless provide further support for the benefits of thymectomy in patients with generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis., Funding: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: This project is an effort to understand how orders for IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) are documented and prescribed by physicians, and subsequently, how they are reviewed by insurance companies for the treatment of immune neuropathies., Methods: A panel of neuromuscular specialists reviewed case records from 248 IVIg-naive patients whose in-home IVIg infusion treatment was submitted to insurance for authorization. After reviewing a case record, 1 panelist was asked to make a diagnosis and to answer several questions about the treatment. A second panelist reviewed the original record and follow-up records that were obtained for reauthorization of additional treatments and was asked to determine whether the patient had responded to the treatment., Results: Our specialists believed that only 32.2% of 248 patients had an immune neuropathy and were appropriate candidates for IVIg therapy, whereas 46.4% had neuropathies that were not immune mediated. Only 15.3% of cases met electrodiagnostic criteria for a demyelinating neuropathy. Our specialists believed that 36.7% of 128 cases with follow-up records had responded to therapy. In cases in which the initial reviewer had predicted that there would be a response to IVIg, the second reviewer found that 54% had responded. This is compared with a 27% response rate when the first reviewer predicted that there would be no response ( p = 0.019)., Conclusions: Our expert review finds that the diagnosis of immune neuropathies made by providers, and subsequently approved for IVIg therapy by payers, is incorrect in a large percentage of cases. If payers include an expert in their review process, it would improve patient selection, appropriate use, and continuation of treatment with this expensive therapeutic agent.

The thymectomy specimens from the "thymectomy trial in non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis patients receiving prednisone therapy" (MGTX) underwent rigid and comprehensive work-up, which permits analysis of the spatial distribution of histological and immunohistological features. This analysis revealed strong intra- and inter-case variability. While many histological features (e.g. median percent fat content among different specimens) can easily be correlated with clinical parameters, intra-case spatial variability of histological features has yet defied quantification and statistical evaluation. To overcome this gap in digital pathology, we here propose intra-case entropy of measured histological features in all available slides of a given thymectomy specimen as a quantitative marker of spatial histological heterogeneity. Calculation of entropy led to one value per specimen and histological feature. Through these 'entropy values' the so far neglected degree of spatial histological heterogeneity could be fed into statistical analyses, extending the scope of clinico-pathological correlations., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Objective: We studied the performance of a 15-item, health-related quality-of-life polyneuropathy scale in the clinic setting in patients with diabetic distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN)., Methods: Patients with DSPN from 11 academic sites completed a total of 231 Chronic Acquired Polyneuropathy Patient-Reported Index (CAPPRI) scales during their clinic visits. Conventional and modern psychometric analyses were performed on the completed forms., Results: Conventional and modern analyses generally indicated excellent psychometric properties of the CAPPRI in patients with DSPN. For example, the CAPPRI demonstrated unidimensionality and performed like an interval-level scale., Conclusion: Attributes of the CAPPRI for DSPN include ease of use and interpretation; unidimensionality, allowing scores to be summed; adequate coverage of disease severity; and the scale's ability to address relevant life domains. Furthermore, the CAPPRI is free and in the public domain. The CAPPRI may assist the clinician and patient with DSPN in estimating disease-specific quality of life, especially in terms of pain, sleep, psychological well-being, and everyday function. The CAPPRI may be most useful in the everyday clinical setting but merits further study in this setting, as well as the clinical trial setting., (© 2018 American Academy of Neurology.)

A task force of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America recently published a formal consensus statement intended to be a treatment guide for clinicians caring for myasthenia gravis (MG) patients worldwide. Its development was stimulated by the fact that there is generally no accepted standard of care for MG, and no one treatment is best for all MG patients. Also, there are few randomized trials of treatments in current use, and the generalizability of the few trials that have been successful may be difficult. Fifteen international experts in MG participated in the consensus process, which used a simple consensus to develop preliminary definitions and the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to quantify agreement on treatment guidance statements for seven topics: symptomatic and immunosuppressive treatment, intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange, impending and manifest myasthenic crisis, thymectomy, juvenile MG, MG with muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies, and MG in pregnancy. The executive summary of the guidance statement was published with open access to facilitate access by patients and healthcare professionals, and the full statement, with extensive background information, is available online. The guidance statement is a living document that will require updates as new treatments and new information on current treatments become available., (© 2018 New York Academy of Sciences.)

Recently competed clinical trials of therapeutics for myasthenia gravis have varied widely in design, but also perhaps in less explicit ways. We explore ways in which these design characteristics may have influenced recruitment and results, as well as the implications for forthcoming studies. Trial eligibility criteria may inadvertently select for incident versus prevalent cases or patients with relatively mild versus more severe disease. Trial enrichment with patients who have relatively mild disease may limit the sensitivity of the trial to detect a therapeutic effect. Enrichment for patients with more severe disease may introduce confounds caused by regression toward the mean. Overly narrow eligibility may limit the generalizability of results. An exclusive focus on incident cases may hamper recruitment, as may many other factors, such as access to the experimental therapeutic treatment outside of the trial or following completion of the double-blind treatment period. We illustrate how other design characteristics (e.g., treatment duration, strategy for steroid tapering, selection of the primary outcome, and principal analytic approach) may affect the sensitivity of a trial to demonstrate therapeutic effects. Finally, we consider the importance of placebo effects, being careful to differentiate these from therapeutic effects observed in the placebo group, and discuss how the use of combined outcome measures may minimize placebo effects., (© 2017 New York Academy of Sciences.)

In this edition of this column, we review new studies concerning the pathophysiology, treatment, and outcomes of patients with necrotizing myopathy, genetic testing in congenital myopathies, and limb girdle muscular dystrophies, and the incidence of polyneuropathy in the myotonic dystrophies. Various studies in myasthenia gravis, including those concerning antibody testing, clinical features, and quality of life are also reviewed as are recent findings in congenital myasthenic syndromes. Finally, 2 studies concerning polyneuropathy are discussed, including one on the association of polyneuropathy in patients with the metabolic syndrome and one on laboratory testing in patients with otherwise idiopathic small fiber polyneuropathy.

Objectives: Many advances have been made in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of myasthenia gravis (MG) and most patients will eventually progress to experience minimal manifestations (MM) of the disease or remission. However, there is a paucity of literature on medication dosing needed to achieve such a favorable clinical status in the long term. The objective of this article was to (1) study the course of MG and identify clinical predictors of maintenance of eventual disease remission or minimal manifestations and (2) determine if patients on low-dose medications have comparable MG Foundation of America (MGFA) scores and postintervention statuses (PIS) with those on conventional therapeutic dosing., Methods: This is a retrospective longitudinal chart review of 74 patients with MG. A subset of 28 of 74 patients diagnosed with MG after 2000 who were followed for at least 3 consecutive years from the year of diagnosis were also analyzed. An annual MGFA score, PIS, medication doses, and thymectomy status were obtained. Remission or MM of disease was defined as MGFA clinical classification <2 that persisted over the past 2 follow-up visits., Results: Thirty-four of 74 patients were on low-dose medications at last follow-up. There was no statistical difference between medication dosages and MGFA scores. In a subset of 28 patients, 23 (88.5%) with eventual disease remission or MM at last follow-up had an MGFA class <2 at their third year of diagnosis. In contrast, only 3 of 9 subjects with more symptomatic disease had similar results (P = 0.005). In terms of PIS at last follow-up, most patients were either in complete stable remission, pharmacologic remission, or MM status. Most patients (78.3%) had an MGFA class of 0 or 1 at last follow-up; 45% were on low-dose medications., Conclusions: Most patients with MG will realize disease stability characterized by either remission or MM status. A significant number of such patients were able to be maintained on low doses of medications to treat MG. The MGFA class at year 3 of diagnosis is a clinical predictor of long-term disease prognosis. There was no statistical difference between medication doses and MGFA scores at last follow-up.

In this edition, we focus on neuromuscular junction disorders and myopathy. The newly published international consensus guidelines for the management of myasthenia gravis are reviewed. In addition, various emerging treatment options for myasthenia, including the use of methotrexate, rituximab, subcutaneous immunoglobulin, and thymectomy, are discussed. Recent studies examining the clinical and genetic features of several forms of congenital myasthenia gravis are also highlighted. The clinical features and treatment of late-onset Pompe disease are reviewed, as are studies in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, and calpainopathy.

Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Objective: To develop formal consensus-based guidance for the management of myasthenia gravis (MG)., Methods: In October 2013, the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America appointed a Task Force to develop treatment guidance for MG, and a panel of 15 international experts was convened. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology was used to develop consensus guidance statements. Definitions were developed for goals of treatment, minimal manifestations, remission, ocular MG, impending crisis, crisis, and refractory MG. An in-person panel meeting then determined 7 treatment topics to be addressed. Initial guidance statements were developed from literature summaries. Three rounds of anonymous e-mail votes were used to attain consensus on guidance statements modified on the basis of panel input., Results: Guidance statements were developed for symptomatic and immunosuppressive treatments, IV immunoglobulin and plasma exchange, management of impending and manifest myasthenic crisis, thymectomy, juvenile MG, MG associated with antibodies to muscle-specific tyrosine kinase, and MG in pregnancy., Conclusion: This is an international formal consensus of MG experts intended to be a guide for clinicians caring for patients with MG worldwide., (© 2016 American Academy of Neurology.)

Introduction: In this study we evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of prednisone in patients with ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) concurrently treated with pyridostigmine., Methods: This investigation was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants whose symptoms failed to remit on pyridostigmine were randomized to receive placebo or prednisone, initiated at 10 mg every other day, and titrated to a maximum of 40 mg/day over 16 weeks. The primary outcome measure was treatment failure., Results: Fewer subjects were randomized than the 88 planned. Of the 11 randomized, 9 completed 16 weeks of double-blind therapy. Treatment failure incidence was 100% (95% CI 48%-100%) in the placebo group (n = 5) vs. 17% (95% CI 0%-64%) in the prednisone group, P = 0.02 (n = 6). Median time to sustained minimal manifestation status (MMS) was 14 weeks, requiring an average prednisone dose of 15 mg/day. Adverse events were infrequent and generally mild in both groups., Conclusions: A strategy of low-dose prednisone with gradual escalation appears to be safe, well-tolerated, and effective in treating OMG., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)