Search

Background: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a chronic inflammatory condition associated with a significantly increased risk of various cardiovascular and thromboembolic events. Existing studies suggest an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in GCA, but results vary. This meta-analysis aims to quantify the association between GCA and the risk of various cardiovascular outcomes, providing a comprehensive evaluation of the cardiovascular burden in patients with GCA., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was carried out using several databases. Studies were included based on predefined eligibility criteria. Using random effect models, Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals were produced to report the overall effect size. Funnel plots, Egger regression tests, and Begg-Mazumdar's rank correlation test were used to assess publication bias. The endpoint included any cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery disease (CAD), aortic aneurysm/dissection, peripheral artery disease (PAD), stroke, and venous thromboembolism., Results: The meta-analysis included 14 studies with a combined sample size of 609,954 patients, where the mean age was 73.8 years and 72.2% were female. Patients with GCA had significantly higher odds of experiencing any cardiovascular event (OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.55 to 2.15), acute myocardial infarction (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.34 to 1.97), coronary artery disease (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.09 to 2.08), aortic aneurysm/dissection (OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.55 to 2.46), peripheral artery disease (OR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.69 to 2.41), stroke (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.25 to 1.84), venous thromboembolism (OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.73 to 2.12), deep vein thrombosis (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.50 to 2.91) and pulmonary embolism (OR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.38 to 4.36). The heterogeneity of the outcomes ranged from low to high across different analyses. No publication bias was evident in the analysis., Conclusion: The meta-analysis highlights the critical need for vigilant cardiovascular monitoring and proactive management strategies in GCA patients. Further research is needed to identify specific factors that contribute to cardiovascular complications in these patients., (Copyright © 2024 Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Publishing services by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Key Clinical Message: Early recognition and management of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are crucial, especially in patients with extensive xanthomas and premature coronary artery disease. Prompt diagnosis and aggressive lipid-lowering therapy can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality rates. Careful clinical assessment in resource-limited settings is essential for optimal outcomes., Abstract: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder that causes chronically elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Based on LDL levels, FH can be heterozygous or homozygous, further established through clinical features, laboratory findings, and genetic analysis. Elevated cholesterol levels cause atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and sudden death. Xanthomas are a clinical manifestation of FH that reveal the underlying systemic genetic disease. We present the case of a 47-year-old male with triple vessel coronary artery disease and widespread xanthomas, diagnosed with homozygous FH based on "The Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Diagnostic Criteria for Familial Hypercholesterolemia." Lifelong therapy with lipid-lowering medications and lifestyle changes is necessary in such cases., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Prostate cancer, constituting a substantial portion of global cancer incidence and mortality, prompts a critical examination of potential modifiers, notably ejaculation frequency. This narrative review explores the complex relationship between ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer risk, addressing the paucity of consensus and the intricate interplay of factors. The evidence drawn from eleven studies with diverse methodologies reveals a complex understanding of this association. While some studies suggest an inverse correlation between ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer risk, signifying a potential protective effect, others present conflicting findings, necessitating a comprehensive exploration. Evidence synthesis underscores the importance of considering age, urinary health, and lifestyle factors in elucidating the ejaculation frequency-prostate cancer relationship. Notably, technological advancements, including machine learning models and genetic markers, enhance the precision of patient counselling and individualized care. In a clinical context, the findings emphasize the clinical relevance of incorporating sexual behavior into preventive strategies. Public health campaigns emerge as influential tools, breaking taboos, raising awareness, and empowering men to prioritize their well-being. The paradigm shift in prostate cancer understanding, fueled by technology and personalized medicine, holds promise for more accurate risk assessments. Liquid biopsies, multiparametric MRI, and considerations of the gut microbiome present avenues for tailored preventive strategies. However, methodological challenges and study variations necessitate further research, emphasizing consistency, exploring underlying mechanisms, and a life course perspective., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)