Search

Background: Simultaneous involvement of multiple distinct brain regions occurs in 2-5% of all high-grade gliomas (HGG) and is associated with poor prognosis. Whereas radiotherapy (RT) is an important and well-established treatment for high-grade glioma, the role of dose-escalated radiotherapy has yet to be established. In this case series, we report upon the dosimetry, adverse effects, and response in patients with multiple un-methylated high-grade gliomas receiving dose-escalated radiation. Materials and methods: We reviewed charts of patients with multifocal high grade glioma treated at our institution since January 2022. All patients had stereotactic biopsies after an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast-enhanced with T1, T2, FLAIR sequences and were discussed in a multidisciplinary oncology team. MGMT-positive patients received either TMZ alone or RT with TMZ and were excluded from this analysis. Un-methylated patients received dose-escalated RT without temezolamide (TMZ). Following computed tomography (CT) and MR simulation, the gros tumor volume (GTV) was delineated and prescribed 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions within the standard 40.05 Gy planning treatment volume (PTV). Treatment planning was volumetric modulated arc therapy. Results: A total of 20 patients with multiple un-methylated MGMT glioblastoma multiforme were treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy between January 2022 and June 2023. All patients completed dose escalated radiotherapy without acute adverse effects. Progression-free survival at six months was 85%, as defined by the RANO criteria. Conclusion: In this case series, we showed that un-methylated multiple high-grade glioma could be safely treated with dose escalation. Results of progression-free survival should be validated in a larger prospective clinical trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and Objectives: To review a series of patients with brain metastases from ovarian cancer at a single institution. To describe treatment modalities, their outcomes and to determine prognostic factors.Patients and Methods: Between January 1995 and December 2014, 25 patients with ovarian cancer brain metastases were treated at The Sheba Medical Center. The medical records were retrospectively reviewed to collect demographic, clinical, and imaging data as well as the information on the treatment modalities used and their outcomes.Results: Mean patient age at the time of brain metastasis diagnosis was 62.7 years. The median interval between the diagnosis of primary cancer and brain metastasis was 42.3 months. Neurologic deficits, headache, and seizure were the most common symptoms. The brain was the only site of metastasis in 20% of the patients. Active ovarian cancer at the time of diagnosis of brain metastasis was observed in half of the patients with systemic disease. Multiple brain metastases were observed in 25% of the patients. We treated 11 patients with surgery plus radiation therapy protocols in various orders: surgery followed by complementary whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), surgery followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and surgery followed by WBRT and then by adjuvant SRS. Five patients underwent surgery alone and nine patients were treated with radiation alone (WBRT, SRS, or both). Univariate analysis for predictors of survival demonstrated that age above 62.7 years at the time of central nervous system involvement was a significant risk factor and leptomeningeal disease was a poor prognostic factor in reference to supra-tentorial lesions. Multivariate analysis for predictors of survival, however, showed that multiple brain lesions (>4) were a poor prognostic factor, and multivariate analysis of the time to progression revealed that combined treatments of surgery and radiation resulted in longer median periods of progression-free survival than each modality alone.Conclusion: We conclude that the only significant predictors of survival or progression-free survival in our cohort were the number of brain metastases and the treatment modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]