Search

Improving professional attitudes and behaviors requires critical self reflection. Research on reflection is necessary to understand professionalism among medical students. The aims of this prospective validation study at the Mayo Medical School and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine were: (1) to develop and validate a new instrument for measuring reflection on professionalism, and (2) determine whether learner variables are associated with reflection on the gross anatomy experience. An instrument for assessing reflections on gross anatomy, which was comprised of 12 items structured on five-point scales, was developed. Factor analysis revealed a three-dimensional model including low reflection (four items), moderate reflection (five items), and high reflection (three items). Item mean scores ranged from 3.05 to 4.50. The overall mean for all 12 items was 3.91 (SD = 0.52). Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was satisfactory for individual factors and overall (Factor 1 alpha = 0.78; Factor 2 alpha = 0.69; Factor 3 alpha = 0.70; Overall alpha= 0.75). Simple linear regression analysis indicated that reflection scores were negatively associated with teamwork peer scores ("P" = 0.018). The authors report the first validated measurement of medical student reflection on professionalism in gross anatomy. Critical reflection is a recognized component of professionalism and may be important for behavior change. This instrument may be used in future research on professionalism among medical students. (Contains 3 tables. )

Introduction: Engaging learners in continuing medical education (CME) is challenging. Recently, CME courses have transitioned to livestreamed CME, with learners viewing live, in‐person courses online. The authors aimed to (1) compare learner engagement and teaching effectiveness in livestreamed with in‐person CME and (2) determine how livestream engagement and teaching effectiveness is associated with (A) interactivity metrics, (B) presentation characteristics and (C) medical knowledge. Methods: A 3‐year, non‐randomised study of in‐person and livestream CME was performed. The course was in‐person for 2018 but transitioned to livestream for 2020 and 2021. Learners completed the Learner Engagement Inventory and Teaching Effectiveness Instrument after each presentation. Both instruments were supported by content, internal structure and relations to other variables' validity evidence. Interactivity metrics included learner use of audience response, questions asked by learners and presentation views. Presentation characteristics included presentations using audience response, using pre/post‐test format, time of day and words per slide. Medical knowledge was assessed by audience response. A repeated measures analysis of variance (anova) was used for comparisons and a mixed model approach for correlations. Results: A total of 159 learners (response rate 27%) completed questionnaires. Engagement did not significantly differ between in‐person or livestream CME. (4.56 versus 4.53, p = 0.64, maximum 5 = highly engaged). However, teacher effectiveness scores were higher for in‐person compared with livestream (4.77 versus 4.71 p = 0.01, maximum 5 = highly effective). For livestreamed courses, learner engagement was associated with presentation characteristics, including presentation using of audience response (yes = 4.57, no = 4.45, p <.0001), use of a pre/post‐test (yes = 4.62, no = 4.54, p <.0001) and time of presentation (morning = 4.58, afternoon = 4.53, p =.0002). Significant associations were not seen for interactivity metrics or medical knowledge. Discussion: Livestreaming may be as engaging as in‐person CME. Although teaching effectiveness in livestreaming was lower, this difference was small. CME course planners should consider offering livestream CME while exploring strategies to enhance teaching effectiveness in livestreamed settings. Stephenson et al. report that even if livestreaming education effectiveness is rated as somewhat lower than in‐person teaching, livestreaming may be as engaging as in‐person CME. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An 82-year-old man with a medical history remarkable for chronic heart failure, diabetes mellitus, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and degenerative joint disease presented to the outpatient clinic with bilateral lower [...]

A 38-year-old woman presented to the emergency department because of increasing fatigue and shortness of breath, worsening during the past 2 months. At the time of presentation, even minimal exertion [...]

On completion of this article, you should be able to (1) describe the general method for musculoskeletal joint injection; (2) describe the clinical presentation, indications, technique, and supporting evidence for [...]